Video & Transcript Research : 'dispensing fee'

Page 1 of 446
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on Juvenile Justice Apr 7th, 2025

S/C on Juvenile Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thompson Appreciate the bill the question I have is on section 2 prohibiting the use of chemical dispensing
  • , volunteer, intern, or service provider working in a juvenile facility. may not use a chemical dispensing
  • Section 51.26 which seeks to prohibit the use of chemical dispensing devices such as pepper spray in
Bills: HB31, HB3360
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Health Committee Meeting - 2026-04-13

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • On the cost issue, so you're saying that the grocery store charges a small fee to the person picking
  • it up, or no, no, no, it's a service meaning no fee there is no intention to charge any fees.
  • to the person charges us small fee to the person picking<01:04:13.880> it<01:04:13.960> up
  • there is no intention to charge no fee there is no intention to charge any<01:04:19.600> fees.
  • any fees. Okay, thank you. any fees. Okay, thank you.
Summary: The committee met at 1:00 p.m., confirmed a quorum, and approved the April 8, 2026 minutes. The first bill heard was House File 4712, which was laid over after the committee adopted a DE2 amendment. Representative Schultz said the bill would create a narrow additional exception to public pool limitations so highly certified swimming instructors could use certain pools for specialized infant, youth, and developmental-disability swim instruction. The only testifier, Tessa Seppelt, described ISR instruction as water-safety and drowning-prevention training for very young children and children with developmental delays, and said access to appropriate facilities is the main barrier. Members raised questions about emergency egress, public safety, and insurance coverage, and the author said he would follow up on those concerns. The committee then took up House File 4801, a bill by Representative Nadeau aimed at health care program integrity. He said it would align commercial and Medicaid partners to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse by changing prior authorization and retrospective review processes, improving data sharing on suspected fraud, addressing conflicting or duplicative services, allowing managed care organizations to verify provider credentials, and making risk corridors in MCO contracts permanent. The Minnesota Council of Health Plans supported the bill, saying it would help detect fraud and improve coordination, while the Minnesota chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics opposed it, arguing that expanded prior authorization would delay care, increase physician burden, and harm children with chronic conditions. Members debated patient safety, fraud detection, and whether the bill would undermine recent prior-authorization reforms. The bill was laid over. House File 3756, a technical update to the insulin safety net program, was also laid over. Representative Backer said the bill clarifies that a hospital-use intravenous insulin product is not part of the program because it is sold only to health care institutions and infused by practitioners, not dispensed to patients for self-use. The Board of Pharmacy testified that the language was drafted to avoid affecting future legitimate uses, and members asked whether the definition could limit new uses if treatments change. The committee then began House File 4860, but the transcript cuts off before the bill’s presentation is completed.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Feb 5th, 2026 at 04:07 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • It updates certain agriculture fees every so often.
  • This gives a list of the fees, a list of where we're at, all the different things.
  • These will, in case you don't know, these fees will go through a board.
  • And so we never have the wherewithal to raise fees.
  • There's a lot of fees in here.
Bills: SB145, SB143
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Public Safety REVISED Apr 21st, 2026 at 09:00 am

Public Safety

Transcript Highlights:
  • Agencies, first responder agencies, from charging a fee to respond.
  • Responding that they also shouldn't charge a fee for what basically is their mission, which is to be
  • And one of the ideas that came up was to charge an accident response fee when fire departments go out
  • Those fees will only be charged to insured drivers.
  • Accident fees can be $710 to $1,800 per accident.
Bills: HB3045
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Jan 21st, 2026

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We also have an increase in taxes and fees to support the state road fund.
  • This increases the heavy vehicle weight distance tax by 35% and increase vehicle registration fees by
  • So they're not gonna get any less money based on the new vehicle registration fee increases that are
  • There's no additional fee today. You got to tell her what the question is.
  • We share with them the vehicle registration fees. They have the ability to do this.
Bills: SB2
TX
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 14th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, since 2009, when the fee structure for the Construction Industries Board, the fee structures
  • Construction Industries Board has presented a fair and responsible assessment that we adjust their fee
  • be a barrier for people to be able to even get into the trades due to the large increase of these fees
  • I don't believe I would say that, thinking through the fee structure that they've asked for.
  • That they didn't ask for any fees that I would consider absorbitant.
Bills: SB1239, SB1732
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 16th, 2026 at 11:18 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first item on the agenda is Senate Bill 38: fees on registered pet food. ...registered pet food.
  • food brand, and then that goes into the fee and is distributed.
  • So there's a fee on—pardon me, Madam Chair, Representative—there's a fee on registering the pet food.
  • Is there an actual tax on anything over this, or is it just the fee to register the food?
  • Madam Chair, Madam Chair, and Representative, yes, it's just the fee.
Bills: SB38, SB17, SB41, SB264
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Finance Jan 21st, 2026 at 02:04 pm

Senate Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • We also have an increase in taxes and fees to support the state. Road Fund.
  • The surcharge is additional to the registration fees. Thank you for your time, Madam.
  • How are we stacking up now with our neighboring states in terms of fees?
  • There's no additional fee today. You got to tell her what the question is, I don't know.
  • They have the bill we give them; we share with them the vehicle registration fees.
Bills: SB2
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Health Committee Meeting - 2025-04-07

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This resulted in higher profits through Unnecessary facility fees but not improved outcomes.
  • Up to the Medicare fee schedule amount.
  • from us, and then for each event you're going to get a $40 fee from MDH.
  • I just was the testifier said they have to pay the $40,000. dollar fee.
  • I thought it was an annual fee, but then they have to pay it repeatedly.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Health Finance and Policy Committee 4/7/25

Health Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • fees, but not improved outcomes. fees, but not improved outcomes.
  • And they pay a $20 fee to our thing.
  • you're going to get $40 fee from MDH.
  • They're getting charged not only our $20 fee for the license fee where we actually go out and inspect
  • you're going to get $40 fee from MDH.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Human Services Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • They would be able to look at the fee schedule; the number would be there, and that would be the rate
  • The other side of the question is that when we do this, this would impact fee-for-service.
  • <00:53:01.640> and at least 100% of the Medicare fee and at least 100% of the Medicare fee
  • What's not included: adult day treatment, EI, EIDBI, hospital, dental, pharmacy dispensing fees, EMS,
  • Pharmacy dispensing fees EMS sud under Pharmacy dispensing fees EMS sud under 245b<01:22:57.800>
Bills: HF1005
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Jan 27th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, again, that's how the fees are collected. It's done...
  • It's a $100 fee, as I understand it.
  • Basically, it's a registration fee charged to manufacturers.
  • The animal feed annual fee that companies have to pay, that's the basic fee for whatever product that
  • The animal feed annual fee that companies have to pay, that's the basic fee for whatever product that
Bills: SB38, SB46, SB18
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 2/10/25 - Part 2

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • This is getting rid of the delivery fee.
  • the fee also administering the fee the fee also creates<00:31:43.880> some<00:31:44.120> confusion
  • No one wants fees increased.
  • No one wants fees increased.
  • No one wants fees increased.
Bills: HF5
Summary: The Transportation Committee resumed consideration of House File 5, which would reduce transportation-related revenues while also providing tax relief, including a subtraction for Social Security income, elimination of the delivery fee, and a cap on automatic gas tax indexing. The committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, which added the phrase “using existing resources,” and then proceeded to public testimony. Representative Joy described the bill as making Minnesota more affordable, while several members and testifiers raised concerns about the impact on transportation funding and road maintenance. MnDOT Commissioner Nancy Doppenberg testified that reductions in planned transportation investments would worsen pavement, bridge, and roadway conditions, reduce construction projects and jobs, and add to an already large funding gap. Committee discussion focused on the estimated revenue losses from the bill, including about $45 million in fiscal year 2026 and $55 million annually from repealing the delivery fee, plus additional losses from capping gas tax indexing, for a combined transportation revenue reduction of about $131 million in the 2026-27 biennium. Members also asked about bridge aesthetics, paint, transit impacts, and whether other mandates and cost increases should be considered alongside revenue reductions. Supporters of the delivery fee repeal, including the Minnesota Grocers Association and Minnesota Retailers Association, argued the fee is costly to administer, confusing to consumers, and disproportionately burdens small businesses and lower-income or disabled consumers who rely on delivery. The Minnesota Association of Townships and the Minnesota Transportation Alliance emphasized that rural and local governments face major road and bridge funding needs and warned that reducing revenue would shift costs to property taxpayers or leave projects unfunded. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion of the meeting provided; the committee continued with testimony and member questions.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 2/10/25 - Part 1

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the aircraft registration taxes or fees, uh, those would be paid for by airlines.
  • The no-fee transaction payment to service providers.
  • for transactions that currently do not have a fee.
  • for transactions that currently do not have a fee.
  • That currently do not have a fee associated with it.
Bills: HF5
Summary: The committee began with member and staff introductions, then heard an overview of the governor’s transportation budget recommendations from fiscal staff Andy Lee. He explained that the spreadsheet showed only proposed changes, not base spending, and highlighted General Fund and trunk highway adjustments for MnDOT and the Department of Public Safety, including operating changes, extensions of prior appropriations, increased state road construction and Blatnik Bridge authority tied to anticipated federal funds, State Patrol hiring and a metro headquarters item, aeronautics changes, and revenue adjustments in the Driver and Vehicle Services special revenue account. The main testimony came from Metropolitan Council Chair Charlie Zelle, who outlined three budget-related items: advancing funds to MnDOT to help coordinate a highway reconstruction with a transitway project, making Metro Mobility riders eligible for free fixed-route transit, and reducing the Metro Transit general fund appropriation by $32.454 million annually. He said the advance would speed delivery and reduce disruption, the free-fare pilot had been successful and could save money if even a small share of Metro Mobility trips shifted to fixed-route service, and the general fund reduction was manageable in the near term because of new revenue streams but could constrain future expansion and capital maintenance. Members questioned the long-term effects of the proposed reduction, possible impacts on safety, service expansion, and capital maintenance, and whether federal funding uncertainty could affect operations and bus procurement. Zelle said the cuts would not affect immediate operations but could limit future BRT, microtransit, and transitway expansion, while also noting that capital maintenance needs include platform rebuilds, track work, rolling stock, and station repairs. He also said the 2023 funding package had accelerated projects and that the council was opening three transit lines this year. No votes or formal actions were taken in the portion provided.