Video & Transcript Research : 'data assessment'

Page 1 of 500
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • regulations and parameters for the data those assessments must collect and the bars those assessments
  • So we do have, I believe, some data about the relationship between the current Read by Grade 3 assessment
  • We do have, I believe, some data about the relationship between the current Read by Grade 3 assessment
  • This just changes the Read by Grade 3 assessment from one assessment to another.
  • pre-assessment, plus a midpoint assessment.
Bills: AB386
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Data from assessments of this kind, while on their own cannot drive the change we want to see, do provide
  • Instead, it aims to provide a single assessment system that provides actionable, standards-aligned data
  • Prior to using standard-referenced assessments and criterion-referenced assessments, states across the
  • change the assessments.
  • A data and accountability nerd.
Bills: HB8
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, TIA has a data component, and I think you can plug multiple data streams into that, right?
  • year assessments is normed, but their summative assessment is their state summative assessment that
  • Same, but are the data? And I'll share this data because we know—I'd love to see it.
  • of assessment systems.
  • assessments.
Bills: HB8
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, HB 8 improves the end-of-year assessment by developing a new shorter standards-based assessment
  • Data from assessment accountability systems on their own cannot drive the change we want to see,” “but
  • Instead, it aims to provide a single assessment system that provides actionable, standards-aligned data
  • In particular, it makes sure that all assessments, including the alternative assessments that districts
  • Prior to using standard-referenced—” “assessments and criterion-referenced assessments, states across
Bills: HB8
Summary: The House Committee on Public Education met to hear House Bill 8, which would replace STAAR with a new assessment and accountability system beginning in the 2027-28 school year. The chair described the bill as reducing testing time, limiting benchmark tests, adding beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year assessments, requiring faster score turnaround, involving Texas teachers in test development, and tightening accountability timelines and transparency rules. Members also discussed provisions on A-F ratings, cut scores, CCMR, local accountability plans, and TEA reporting requirements. Committee members and invited witnesses split sharply on the bill’s approach. Supporters, including the chair, TEA Commissioner Mike Morath, and Ed Trust’s Nicholas Munyon Penny, argued the bill would reduce high-stakes pressure, provide quicker and more actionable data, limit over-testing, and better align assessments to Texas standards while preserving criterion-referenced accountability. They said the new system would help teachers and parents intervene sooner and would improve transparency, including parent access to student responses and automatic rescoring in some writing cases. Opponents, including Rep. Hinojosa and student witness Ella Moran, argued the bill still increases testing and replaces one high-stakes test with multiple TEA-created tests. Moran testified that STAAR creates anxiety, disrupts instruction, and does not reflect real learning, while Hinojosa said the House had previously passed a better bill based on a nationally norm-referenced model and criticized the new proposal as a concession to the Senate. Questions also focused on AI scoring of writing, rescoring rates, and whether the bill’s new accountability rules would be reliable and fair. The committee did not take a final vote during the portion provided, but the chair said a vote on HB 8 would be called after public testimony later in the day.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This addresses gaps in the collection of data regarding post-secondary effectiveness and workforce outcomes
  • reporting and regional labor demand assessments.
  • This data is used to produce a regional labor demand assessment.
  • A biennial assessment of regional labor market data will help inform regional workforce planning.
  • You see the data points listed in this bill?
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • These evaluations assess agencies on student retention, graduation rates, achievement rates, and graduation
  • I'm not exactly sure the exact data points you're referencing.
  • Your offices with some data, but we are really proud of the work that the legislature has done to increase
  • We were not able to get the data available before this hearing for PCAs, but that would also contribute
  • Three data points I also wanted to make sure y'all knew is that after last session and the changes that
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I spent the last couple of days scraping CAFR data, which is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports
  • What I did is I collected historical data related to rates, values, levies, and population.
  • Overall, what the data suggests is that levies are way up, population is relatively stagnant, rates are
  • I just had a note, which I know enough about data to know this is not conclusive, but all three of the
  • Okay, well, that's a subject for another day, but an interesting data point.
Bills: SB9, SB 9
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/11/2026 - Senate Education

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • The SBE must ensure that local education agencies receive test scores and assessment data from the third
  • grade reading portion of the statewide assessment by May 15th and scores and data from all other portions
  • The SBE must ensure that local education agencies receive test scores and assessment data from the third
  • grade reading portion of the statewide assessment by May 15th and scores and data from all other portions
  • Lastly, the bill delays the date by which LEAs must receive statewide assessment test scores and data
Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from February 18 and March 4, 2026, then took up HCR 2003, the Protect Girls in Sports in Arizona Act. Supporters, including Superintendent Tom Horne and several athletes and coaches, argued the measure would protect fairness, safety, and privacy in girls’ sports and locker rooms by requiring sports to be designated male, female, or co-ed and by limiting access to certain private spaces. Opponents, including the ACLU and Arizona Education Association, argued the resolution was discriminatory, would function as a bathroom ban, and could create enforcement and privacy problems. The committee passed HCR 2003 on a 4-3 vote, giving it a due pass recommendation. The committee then heard HB 2020, which would make certain threats or disruptions at educational institutions by minors a class 1 misdemeanor instead of a class 6 felony, and passed it 4-3. HB 2032, which shifts the statewide testing window later in the school year and changes related score deadlines, drew support from school leaders who said it would better reflect full-year learning; it passed 6-1. HB 2033, allowing school districts and charter schools to choose paper-and-pencil statewide testing by governing board vote, also passed 6-0 with one member not voting. HB 2318, establishing term limits for school district governing board members, was amended to clarify the limit applies only after two consecutive four-year terms beginning after a specified date; it passed 4-3 despite opposition from the Arizona School Board Association over impacts on rural districts. The committee next approved HB 2378, which changes eligibility rules for School Facilities Oversight Board members so certain architect and engineer members may not have school-construction business interests, passing 4-3. HB 2313, which prohibits teacher strikes or organized work stoppages and reduces school funding if a strike occurs, passed 4-3 after testimony from educators who said it was punitive and could worsen staffing shortages. Finally, the committee considered HB 2249, which expands the Parents’ Bill of Rights to require written parental consent and notification regarding school facilitation of social transitioning and creates significant civil penalties for violations. Opponents warned it was vague, punitive, and likely to chill ordinary school interactions, while supporters said it was needed to stop schools from hiding information from parents. After adopting a six-page amendment, the committee passed HB 2249 on a 4-3 vote.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 2/26/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, of the few dozen cases that data.
  • sensitive data under the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act.
  • The primary effect of classifying data as sensitive data is that it changes that data from being data
  • The primary effect of classifying data as sensitive data is that it changes that data from being data
  • about data practices and data privacy. about data practices and data privacy.
Bills: HF3642, HF2700, HF3615
Summary: The Commerce Finance and Policy Committee met on House File 3642, which would prohibit virtual currency kiosks in Minnesota. The bill was laid over, and the committee adopted a DE1 author’s amendment. Chair Kaggel and Representative Perryman described the measure as a response to widespread scams using crypto kiosks, especially against older adults and other vulnerable people, and said they would continue working with the Department of Commerce and other stakeholders. Testimony from law enforcement and advocates strongly supported the ban. A St. Cloud police sergeant and a Woodbury detective described cases in which victims lost large sums, said the current safeguards and refund rules are being bypassed, and argued that the kiosks are difficult to investigate because funds move quickly and often overseas. An AARP Minnesota volunteer also supported the bill, saying kiosks are a preferred tool for scammers and that existing protections have not kept pace with the problem. The Department of Commerce said it strongly supports the bill and reported that it has received 120 complaints over three years involving nearly $1 million in reported losses, with 2025 the worst year so far. The main opposition came from CoinFlip’s general counsel, who argued that the problem is fraud generally, not kiosks themselves, and said Minnesota already has consumer protections, including refunds for eligible victims. He urged stronger regulation rather than a ban, citing blockchain analytics, hold periods, and 24-hour customer service as alternatives. Committee members then asked questions about how long kiosks have operated in Minnesota, how many there are, who owns them, and the scale of losses; Commerce said there are hundreds statewide, operated by a variety of companies, and that reported losses are likely undercounts.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 2/26/26

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Right now, the data at issue is protected by the Data Practices Act, which assessing offices know how
  • Assessing offices are not equipped to isolate data points in this way, nor should they.
  • Right now, the data at issue is protected by the Data Practices Act, which assessing offices know how
  • Right now, the data at issue is protected by the Data Practices Act, which assessing offices know how
  • The data at issue is protected by the Data Practices Act, which assessing offices know how to apply uniformly
Bills: HF3676, HF2959, HF3233
MN
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We had data for the rest of the state, but we don't.
  • The data will be presented today.
  • To let you a little bit, let you know the department currently provides TCIC data.
  • One, to your point, Andy, about us not having the data.
  • Crime Stoppers actually has... data.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/5/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Last year we moved to a new model called an assessment model.
  • And so what I'm assessment model.
  • reinsurance assessments also remain. reinsurance assessments also remain.
  • So, I assessment model in the MCHA. So, I appreciate<01:13:24.000> that.
  • refund on that assessment.
Bills: HF3388, HF400
Summary: The committee approved the minutes from the prior day and then heard House File 400, a bill described as a defrayal measure for health insurance mandates. Representative Perryman said the bill would not block future mandates, but would require the state to pay the added costs of any new mandated benefits so those costs would not be shifted to premium payers. She and supporters framed the bill as a way to protect affordability for Minnesota employers, workers, and families, especially in the fully insured market. Testimony in support came from the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the Minnesota Council of Health Plans. They argued that Minnesota has a high number of mandated benefits, that each new mandate adds cost to premiums, and that businesses—especially small and midsize employers—are already struggling with rising health insurance costs. The health plans representative said the bill would use the existing Commerce defrayal process to reimburse plans for eligible mandate-related claims, allowing those costs to be removed from premium rates. Several members echoed support, saying the bill would improve transparency by showing the fiscal impact of proposed mandates and help prevent people from being priced out of coverage. Members also explored how mandates apply in the market and how premiums are set. Deputy Commissioner Julia Dryer explained that, unless otherwise specified, mandates generally apply to the individual, small group, and fully insured large group markets, while self-insured ERISA plans and other markets are generally outside that scope. Representative Elkins noted that the affected market is relatively small and said small businesses are increasingly moving to self-insured plans because of cost. He and others raised concerns about affordability, while Representative Smith argued that mandates often ensure needed care and that the bill shifts costs to taxpayers rather than insurers. Representative Bacham added a personal example from tribal self-insurance, saying preventive physicals had saved lives and asking whether other factors besides mandates are driving insurer costs. No amendments were offered, and the bill was laid over for possible future consideration.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Commerce Committee Meeting - 2026-04-07

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • a complicated nexus with personal data. a complicated nexus with personal data.
  • data so that consumers may be aware of who is buying and selling their personal data.
  • purchasing that data purchasing that data from<00:09:33.880> realtors.
  • the sale of data, not the sharing<00:10:04.640> of<00:10:04.760> data.
  • sharing of data. sharing of data. Thank<00:10:06.880> you.
Bills: HF4456, HF4544, HF3698