Video & Transcript Research : 'criminal code cleanup'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 20th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • word in criminal appeals; that's still the province of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
  • law, criminal procedure, rights in a criminal context, would questions like that ever be before the
  • However, when the Court of Criminal Appeals, in deciding a criminal appeal, has to interpret a constitutional
  • But what you still have is the Court of Criminal Appeals, the experts in criminal law within the Texas
  • over all criminal cases.
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met and heard several bills related to legislative process and court jurisdiction. Senate Bill 1386, by Senator Huffman, would change compelled legislative testimony from blanket transactional immunity to testimonial immunity, allowing compelled statements or documents to be used against a witness in criminal prosecution only if not derived from the compelled testimony, while preserving protection against perjury and false statements and retaining the right to counsel. No public witnesses testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1470, by Chairman Hughes, which would require DPS to share existing data on cross-state driver’s license cancellations with the Secretary of State for voter-roll maintenance. Hughes said the bill does not create new data collection and is intended to improve list maintenance. A DPS resource witness was present, there was no substantive opposition, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1210, also by Hughes, would address conflicts between the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals on constitutional questions by making the Supreme Court the final arbiter in limited circumstances. Chris Hilton supported the bill, but Allen Place, Jack Rohde, and Philip Furlow opposed it, arguing it was unconstitutional, unnecessary, and could create practical problems in criminal post-conviction litigation. The bill was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 311, which would conform the Government Code to the Texas Constitution by clarifying the Supreme Court’s original writ authority against lower courts and officials other than the governor. Justice Evan Young and Chris Hilton supported the bill as a clarification of existing authority, while no one testified against it; the bill was left pending. The committee then recessed to allow the chamber to rearrange for the Senate session.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We already have a process for confirming residency in the code.
  • Suddenly, a bill that is supposed to criminalize foreign interference in Texas elections is criminalizing
  • Okay, you enter your access code here, you put your paper in right there.
  • Texas election code 122.001 clearly states that voting must be private.
  • All are understanding section 122.001 in the voting code.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • word in criminal appeals.
  • law, criminal procedure, rights in a criminal context.
  • Court of Criminal Appeals?
  • over all criminal cases.
  • on the criminal justice system.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • …and ensure the Public Utility Commission of Texas can access federal criminal history records as needed
  • Does that mean some sort of proprietary coding, or are we talking about an oven with a timer on it?
  • Both groups conduct criminal investigations, enforce state law, and Require a Texas Commission on Law
  • separate section of the insurance code, creating its own code regarding this.
  • These criminals post on social media, as mentioned already, in search of their accomplices.
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Healthcare Committee Jan 21st, 2026

Healthcare

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have so many definitions of rural in our code. What is considered rural for the hospitals?
  • 32.800> our have so many definitions of rural in our have so many definitions of rural in our code
  • 34.000> considered<00:08:34.399> rural<00:08:35.039> for<00:08:35.279> the code
  • What is considered rural for the code. What is considered rural for the hospitals?
Bills: SB9, SB90, SB82, SB84, SB9, SB90, SB82, SB84
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • codes. for real property theft and real property fraud.
  • The court dismisses criminal charges related to the act.
  • We have the criminal and we have the civil.
  • I'm glad that our criminal law protected you in this case.
  • They had no idea he had a criminal history involving children.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • They know that a criminal...
  • Cooperate with criminal investigations and participate in criminal prosecutions.
  • However, this changed the Code of Criminal Procedures.
  • 18 and younger, mirroring the code of criminal procedure you have updated over the last few sessions.
  • The bill is designed to address the increasing criminal caseload in Bell County by establishing criminal
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence May 20th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence will come to order.
  • Penal Code Section 2503 already has.
  • And it's even in the family code.
  • Smith, the member is under Section 30.04 of the Penal Code, the criminal penalty for burglary. of a vehicle
  • It's not a constitutional matter; this is code of criminal procedure, and it's simply a notice provision
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence will come back to order. And the clerk will call the roll.
  • In 2013, the Texas Legislature enacted Article 11.073 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, commonly referred
  • affects criminal appellate procedures in capital punishment cases.
  • This bill would allow this finding to be entered under any Penal Code offense.
  • If proven, an affirmative finding on any offense in the Penal Code.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 29th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • However, the Code of Criminal Procedure does not currently address this issue. require the trial court
  • The Code of Criminal Procedure sets out no limitations on a court's authority to grant or declare a mistrial
  • I think it may be necessary to be said that criminal justice, criminal procedure, and criminal cases
  • Is it in the code?
  • House Bill 3206 amends Article 35.23 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to modify jury sequestration practices
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Jurisprudence May 13th, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senate Bill 955 enhances a criminal penalty for...
  • Senate Bill 614 updates the Code of Criminal Procedure to allow the FSC to refer not only active but
  • Meanwhile, in the Code of Criminal Procedure Article 39.14, in relation to discovery, a pro se defendant
  • I'm a criminal defense lawyer.
  • Um, Chapter 8 of the Penal Code.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Criminal Justice Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you. criminal enterprise affecting businesses across the state of Texas, cartels and other criminal
  • If the juvenile has committed a pending criminal case, has a pending criminal case while at TJJD. that
  • Offenses listed in Article 42. 0.054 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which include very serious penal
  • A sexually violent... violent offense as defined in Article 62 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and
  • I'm the criminal district attorney for Coma County.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice convened to address pressing issues surrounding oil field crime and safety on Texas highways. The meeting was initiated by Chair Flores, who emphasized the need for improved tools to combat repeat offenders having committed intoxicated driving, alongside tackling oil field theft that has escalated due to organized criminal activities. The committee heard public testimonies and engaged with various stakeholders, including law enforcement and industry representatives, who highlighted the complexities and dangers associated with these crimes. Notably, a significant focus was placed on Senate Bill 1320, which aims to establish a dedicated unit within the Department of Public Safety to investigate and address thefts specific to the oil and gas industry. This initiative seeks to strengthen coordination among various law enforcement agencies and improve training for local officers to combat these sophisticated theft operations more effectively.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • of Criminal Procedure, which include very serious Penal Code offenses including murder, capital murder
  • A sexually violent offense as defined in Article 62 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and a felony community
  • of Criminal Procedure, which include very serious Penal Code offenses including murder, capital murder
  • A sexually violent offense as defined in Article 62 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and a felony community
  • I'm the Criminal District Attorney for Coma County.
Summary: The committee heard and advanced several criminal justice bills, with most of the discussion focused on oilfield theft, DWI enforcement, juvenile justice, reentry licensing, jail transparency, and court/judicial standards. SB 1320 would create a DPS oilfield theft unit headquartered in the Permian Basin; supporters from industry, law enforcement, and a district attorney described increasingly sophisticated, organized theft tied to cartels and multi-jurisdictional criminal networks, while DPS said it currently has only two officers working the issue. The committee voted SB 1320 out unanimously and placed it on the local and uncontested calendar. SB 826, which would enhance DWI committed in a school zone to a state jail felony, also passed unanimously after brief explanation and no testimony. SB 1171, adding juvenile justice OIG peace officers to Schedule C salary, was reported favorably on a committee substitute, and SB 1080, which would allow incarcerated people to obtain occupational licenses effective upon release, also passed on a committee substitute after testimony from formerly incarcerated advocates and reentry supporters. The committee also considered several bills aimed at tougher DWI penalties. SB 476 would increase intoxication manslaughter penalties when the offender violates an ignition interlock restriction; the bill was supported by the author, victims’ family members, Galveston officials, and law enforcement, but opposed by the Texas Civil Rights Project, which argued treatment and prevention would be more effective. After discussion about possible amendments, the bill was left pending. SB 745 would create a new first-degree felony option for intoxication manslaughter involving multiple deaths, and it was reported favorably after testimony from a prosecutor supporting the need for a stronger sentencing option. SB 2320 would broadly increase penalties for DWI offenses, including first-time DWI, DWI with an open container, high-BAC DWI, and repeat offenses; it was supported by a grieving family member and a sheriff, and the committee voted it out favorably. On juvenile justice, SB 1727 would expand tools to address assaults on staff at Texas Juvenile Justice Department facilities by lowering the age for transfer to adult prison in some cases, allowing earlier transfer of determinate-sentence youth, and restricting release when a criminal case is pending. Juvenile probation officials supported the bill as a public safety and victim-rights measure, while the Texas Civil Rights Project opposed it, arguing it would send children to inappropriate adult facilities and conflict with juvenile justice principles; the bill was left pending. SB 1437 would expand the juvenile justice do-not-hire registry to include non-certified positions, and it passed unanimously after supporters said it would help close loopholes that allow predators to move between child-serving jobs. SB 2289, requiring counties that house inmates out of state to report that information and any deaths to the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, also passed unanimously. Finally, SB 989, requiring criminal background checks for court personnel who determine bail, and SB 664, establishing statewide qualifications and oversight for magistrates and associate judges, were explained and discussed as transparency and public-safety measures, with SB 989 reported favorably and SB 664 under committee consideration at the end of the transcript.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, this is a cleanup bill for the Code of Criminal Procedure, and it is part of the legislative
  • Unlike the Government Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure does not require interpreters to be licensed
  • cases must adhere to the Government Code standards.
  • Generally, then, Senate Bill 1537 would clean up the language of the Code of Criminal Procedure by first
  • Tribes generally lack criminal jurisdiction.
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice heard a series of bills focused on criminal procedure, public safety, victim protections, and law enforcement administration. SB 1537 would require criminal-proceeding interpreters to meet the same appointment standards used in the Government Code, and SB 993 would let the Comptroller’s Criminal Investigative Division seek mobile-tracking warrants directly in motor fuel theft and related tax-fraud investigations. SB 693, as substituted, would create a criminal offense for notaries who notarize documents without the signer personally appearing, with a higher penalty when real property is involved, and would add continuing education for notaries. SB 1610 would tighten rules for civilly committed sexually violent predators at the Texas Civil Commitment Office, including penalties for new crimes and assaults on staff, sex-offender registration requirements, and removal of certain provisions from the filed version; the substitute reduced some of the harsher penalties and preserved parole/community-supervision eligibility. SB 836 would expand privacy protections for sexual assault survivors by limiting livestreaming of certain trials, allowing pseudonyms earlier in the process, and protecting forensic exam evidence and invasive recordings under protective orders. SB 1563 would require county jailers to receive training on interacting with veterans, with testimony emphasizing suicide risk, PTSD, and the need for better identification and support in jails. SB 906 would give the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo authority similar to other Texas tribes to commission peace officers under state law to enforce Texas laws on tribal land. SB 781 would standardize confidentiality rules for peace officers’ personal information and create a confidential departmental file system modeled on Chapter 143 civil-service practices, though members raised concerns about whether the bill could affect disciplinary records and existing disclosure rules. Testimony was largely supportive for the bills, especially from prosecutors, law enforcement representatives, victim advocates, and agency officials. Supporters of SB 693 described widespread deed fraud tied to improper notarizations; supporters of SB 836 stressed survivor privacy and the harms of livestreamed sexual-assault proceedings; supporters of SB 1563 said jailer training could help prevent veteran suicides and improve treatment; and supporters of SB 906 said state commissioning would improve public safety and coordination on tribal lands. SB 781 drew support from police and TCOLE witnesses who said the bill would extend confidentiality protections already used in civil-service departments, while some members questioned whether the bill duplicated existing law or could be read to shield misconduct information. Public testimony included opposition to SB 1610 from a civil-rights advocate who urged waiting for Sunset review, and opposition to SB 781 from a family member of a person killed by police, who objected to expanding confidentiality for officers. Several bills were left pending after testimony because the committee lacked a quorum or chose to hold them for later action.