Video & Transcript : 'consumer fireworks' :

Page 1 of 478
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • It is a bill with language supported by the Department of Consumer Credit and also fixes a typo that
  • I personally could care less about fireworks. They're fine, they're fine.
  • So, currently, in state law, do we have restrictions on when you can set off fireworks?
  • Where are they buying the fireworks from?
  • So, we're sending Oklahoma citizens across state lines to buy to purchase fireworks.
Bills: SB1873 , SB1948 , SB540 , SB1653 , SB1061 , SB1534
Committee: House Business
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce Apr 7th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this bill will legalize anything that is considered consumer-grade fireworks.
  • So this bill will legalize anything that is considered consumer-grade fireworks.
  • This opens that up, and we'll give our retailers the ability to sell fireworks that are consumer-grade
  • If you go buy retail consumer-grade fireworks, you can shoot them at your party just like you can anywhere
  • Is that like a small firework? Is that a huge firework? Is that a bomb firework?
Bills: HB461 , HB467 , HB522 , HB565 , HB673 , HB799 , HB917 , HB937 , HB956 , HB977
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Local and County Government Feb 3rd, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Local and County Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Frame for consumer fireworks to be sold.
  • It talks about the display, so that's when the fireworks are going off.
  • They are not public, but even private fireworks engagements. I guess this wouldn't be.
  • You got that two-week window, everybody trying to get to the fireworks stand.
  • This is talking about consumer fireworks, well consumer fireworks.
Bills: SB1519 , SB1775 , SB1900 , SB1948 , SB2080
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on County & Regional Government Mar 17th, 2025

S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a very simple bill, it just seeks to expand the times of year when fireworks can be sold to the
  • This piece of legislation not only provides the opportunity for stakeholders in the firework industry
Bills: HB336 , HB554 , HB849 , HB 1033 , HB1338 , HB 1246
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 9th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Would this, generally speaking, overall, lower rates for consumers, raise rates for consumers, or would
  • As a result of the use of scores, higher risk consumers pay higher premiums." ...and lower risk consumers
  • Does it go into the pocket of that consumer?
  • it can hurt the consumer, right?
  • This is a consumer choice. If you take this away, consumers will not have the option to have this.
Committee: House Insurance
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Insurance Apr 9th, 2025

Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • As to trying to protect the consumer a little bit more in the use of these credit scores.
  • So the better informed and the better equipped that consumers are to understand this...
  • Not all consumers are going to, you know, not all consumers care.
  • Fair and equitable rates for these consumers. I'll be glad to address any questions.
  • But they did find that it was only a $900,000 cost shift from consumers.
Committee: House Insurance
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce May 18th, 2026

Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • And this allows for the consumer fraud section of the Attorney General's office to address that.
  • about their disciplinary proceedings, there's a wide range of conduct based on—some of them are consumer-based
  • about their disciplinary proceedings, there's a wide range of conduct based on, some of them are consumer-based
  • penny production by the United States Mint, the imposition of convenience fees or surcharges on consumers
  • credit cards or debit cards to complete transactions, and the combined effect of such practices on consumer
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Public Safety Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/26

Public Safety Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • ,</c> 10 years of experience with fireworks, 10 years of experience with fireworks, three<00:04:07.480
  • </c> hoping to open a small retail firework hoping to open a small retail firework business<00:04:18.760
  • </c> prohibits aerial fireworks. prohibits aerial fireworks.
  • </c> that aerial fireworks are not allowed. that aerial fireworks are not allowed.
  • </c> sea of fireworks. sea of fireworks.
Bills: HF3547 , HF3651 , HF4043 , HF4282 , HF4095
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on County & Regional Government Mar 31st, 2025

S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I'm still selling fireworks.
  • Alamo Fireworks operates hundreds of fireworks stands in indoor stores throughout the state of Texas
  • We agree that public safety is a big concern, which is why consumer grade fireworks are heavily regulated
  • those fireworks, and we would go and play behind the fireworks stand, me and my cousins.
  • So in this situation, the small businesses that sell fireworks would be able to sell the fireworks on
TX

Texas 89th Regular

S/C on County & Regional Government Apr 28th, 2025

S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, members, for the opportunity to present the first fireworks bill of the session, House Bill
  • We enjoy the opportunity to have another time to sell our fireworks.
  • To preface, I'm curious, are you all generally using fireworks in your celebrations?
  • Where do you all go to get fireworks? I mean, are you all trying to buy around?
  • Yeah, we usually just find them at the local firework shops, you know, when it's in season.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

PSM-TCA, PSM Public Hearings 02-05-2025

Public Safety and Military Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><00:09:44.720><c> except</c> consumer fireworks to any person except consumer fireworks to any person
  • </c><00:09:57.079><c> fireworks</c><00:09:57.560><c> and</c> cultural use of consumer fireworks and cultural
  • </c><00:10:40.680><c> fireworks</c> we do also feel that consumer fireworks we do also feel that consumer
  • SB 32 would require a permit to purchase state-approved consumer fireworks only on cultural events.
  • <00:19:08.520><c> fireworks</c><00:19:09.080><c> provision</c><00:19:09.799><c> Pro</c> consumer fireworks
Summary: The joint committees heard testimony on three fireworks-related bills. On SB 1226, which would create a shipping container inspection program and require Department of Law Enforcement reporting, the Department of Law Enforcement supported the measure, while the Attorney General recommended deleting references to explosives to avoid a single-subject constitutional issue and noted possible federal limits on military involvement. Harbor users raised concerns about logistics, delays, and cost, and HPD supported the bill; members also discussed how inspections would work and whether DLE would coordinate with county and federal partners. No vote was taken during the testimony portion. On SB 32, which would sharply restrict consumer fireworks by requiring permits for cultural use, repealing the general holiday exceptions, and imposing a $25 permit fee, the State Fire Council supported the bill as a public safety measure but said it was willing to work on problematic language. The Office of the Public Defender opposed it, arguing the bill’s use of “culture” could create constitutional and discrimination problems because permit decisions would effectively define culture. Fireworks retailers and other opponents said the bill would push consumers toward illegal fireworks and hurt lawful sales, while supporters said it would reduce injuries, fires, and respiratory harm. Members questioned whether the permit fee was new, whether the bill would affect commercial display companies, and whether permit caps should be added. On SB 1324, which expands fireworks offenses, increases penalties for injuries or death, creates new criminal offenses and an infraction adjudication system, and appropriates funds, the Attorney General strongly supported the bill and said it would give law enforcement and prosecutors better tools, while DLE said the current weight-based definitions make prosecutions difficult and labor-intensive. DLE also said disposal of seized fireworks is expensive and hazardous, and suggested violators should bear more of that cost. HPD and the Maui County prosecutor supported the bill, but some opponents argued it would overcriminalize conduct and create constitutional issues; a commercial pyrotechnics company asked for amendments to preserve lawful display work. Members asked about the appropriation, enforcement challenges, and whether existing exceptions would still allow commercial shows. The hearing ended with no final decision reported in the transcript.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Mar 17th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Fireworks displays, this consumer fireworks wouldn't, in my opinion, would be no different than any other
  • This would allow people with private property venues to do a consumer fireworks display outside of the
  • This is for consumer fireworks. Follow up, thank you, Mr. President.
  • I am not an expert in pyrotext, but consumer fireworks, however that's defined Senator Bon, you're recognized
  • , not to consume, and what they do after that.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce Apr 7th, 2026

Commerce, Consumer Protection, and International Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this bill will legalize anything that is considered consumer-grade fireworks.
  • So this bill will legalize anything that is considered consumer-grade fireworks.
  • This opens that up, and we'll give our retailers the ability to sell fireworks that are consumer-grade
  • If you go buy retail consumer-grade fireworks, you can shoot them at your party just like you can anywhere
  • Is that like a small firework? Is that a huge firework? Is that a bomb firework?
Summary: The committee met on April 7, 2026, and first handled several fire marshal-related bills. HB 917, a licensing and regulatory cleanup for life safety and property protection work, was amended with technical changes and reported favorably. HB 565 clarified that the State Fire Marshal, rather than local authorities, would handle fire safety inspections for early learning and child daycare centers; members adopted an amendment limiting the standards to state or federal codes and addressing ventilation and suppression requirements for small facilities, and the bill was reported favorably with amendments. The committee then took up HB 937, which would shift amusement ride setup inspections back to the State Fire Marshal, require licensing and insurance for rides and inspectors, and repeal provisions related to inflatable amusement devices. The author and fire marshal cited a serious festival ride accident in Pointe Coupee Parish as the impetus, and members discussed inspection timing, insurance costs, and whether background checks or public inspection certificates should be required. After technical and agreed-upon amendments, the bill was reported favorably. HB 799, a boiler inspection consolidation bill, was presented as a cleanup measure that would centralize boiler regulation under the fire marshal and rely on licensed inspectors meeting national standards. Stakeholders from industry and the fire marshal’s office described it as an efficiency and safety measure, and the committee adopted a substantive amendment on shutdown procedures and licensing details before reporting the bill favorably. HB 461, which would have allowed parishes and municipalities to adopt fortified roof standards, drew extensive testimony both for and against; supporters argued it could improve resilience and lower insurance costs, while opponents warned it would undermine Louisiana’s uniform building code, add cost, and create inconsistency. The author ultimately moved to voluntarily defer the bill. Finally, the committee began HB 977, a bill on minors’ use of applications that would require age verification, parental consent, and app store/developer safeguards. An amendment clarified definitions, consent rules, data-sharing limits, and a good-faith compliance defense. Members raised concerns about the 45-day cure period, the lack of a private right of action, and whether app stores would become gatekeepers, but the bill remained pending at the end of the excerpt.
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

PSM-JDC, JDC Public Hearings 03-13-2025

Public Safety and Military Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • TNT Fireworks has been in business in Hawaiʻi since 1982, and they strictly are involved in consumer
  • </c><00:25:44.520><c> or</c><00:25:44.679><c> P</c> consumer fireworks not the display or P consumer
  • Again, this bill under the prohibition of consumer fireworks... Thank you.
  • </c><00:41:41.319><c> fireworks</c><00:41:41.760><c> for</c> three any consumer fireworks for three any
  • consumer fireworks for cultural<00:41:42.319><c> uses</c><00:41:43.079><c> that</c><00:41:43.280><c>
Summary: The joint committees heard testimony on several fireworks-related bills. On HB 550, which would allow law enforcement to use drone recordings to establish probable cause for fireworks arrests in public areas and appropriate funds for drones, the Department of Law Enforcement and Honolulu Police Department supported the measure. The Public Defender and some public testifiers opposed it, arguing that a statute cannot mandate probable cause and that the bill raises constitutional concerns. A prosecutor later explained that the bill is intended to address Hawaiʻi case law, especially State v. Kit, which limits aerial surveillance over homes under the state constitution, and suggested that changing “shall” to “may” could reduce constitutional problems. Members also questioned whether current law already allows video evidence of fireworks violations and whether the bill was necessary. Testimony included both support and opposition from individuals and organizations, and no vote was taken during the hearing. The committees then heard HB 806, which would appropriate funds for the Department of Law Enforcement to conduct sting operations on Oʻahu to enforce fireworks laws. The department and police supported the bill, while the Libertarian Party of Hawaiʻi opposed it, arguing that fireworks are already illegal and that the measure adds unnecessary enforcement powers and constitutional risk. Committee members asked what “sting operation” means and whether the term should be defined more clearly; the department said it refers to police or criminal investigations involving deception and agreed a definition would help guide use of the funds. The department also said the funding would support training, storage, and other operational costs for undercover investigations. Finally, the committees heard HB 1483, a broader fireworks enforcement bill that would create an adjudication system for fireworks infractions, revise definitions and penalties, establish new offenses, and increase penalties when fireworks offenses cause injury or death. The Attorney General’s office strongly supported the bill, saying it would improve enforcement by clarifying definitions and allowing cases to be proven without particle testing or expert witnesses when fireworks leave no physical evidence. The Department of Law Enforcement also supported it. The Public Defender opposed the bill, focusing on the bill’s penalty enhancements for offenses that are rarely enforced and its concurrent trial provision, which it said raises problems because of the differences between civil and criminal proceedings. No final committee action or vote was reported in the transcript.