Video & Transcript Research : 'consultation grants'

Page 1 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Human Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Human Services Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So this bill doesn't change any of that, doesn't take away any authority, doesn't grant any additional
  • So this bill doesn't change any of that, doesn't take away any authority, doesn't grant any additional
  • It also extends the grant that was dedicated for direct care services, called a pilot project.
  • It also extends the the grant<01:13:37.200> that<01:13:37.440> was<01:13:38.120> uh<
  • uh dedicated for direct grant that was uh dedicated for direct care<01:13:40.080> services<01
Summary: The Human Services Finance and Policy Committee approved the April 8, 2026 minutes and then heard House File 1767, as amended by the DE4 amendment. Representative Garande explained that the bill, originally intended to codify Integrated Community Supports (ICS), was being redirected because of concerns about fraud vulnerability and program integrity. The DE4 would create a smaller legislative study group to redesign ICS, pause DHS changes for about six months while the group develops a transition plan, continue DHS fraud investigations and enforcement, and ultimately terminate ICS as currently structured. Testimony in support came from Mr. Buck and Zania Harut of the Residential Providers Association of Minnesota, both of whom argued that ICS is unstable, inconsistently implemented, and in need of a new statutory foundation. They said the current system mixes different service models under one rate framework, lacks clear codification, and has shifting policy guidance that creates compliance problems for providers and risks to people receiving services. They emphasized that the bill would preserve oversight and enforcement while allowing time to build a replacement service with clearer rules, documentation standards, and guardrails. Members asked about effects on counties, providers, data, audits, and fraud enforcement. Representative Curran and Mr. Berg said the bill would not change funding structures or DHS’s existing authority to audit, request documentation, investigate fraud, or sanction bad actors, and that the study group would use existing data to identify where problems are concentrated. Vice Chair Gillman supported the study-group approach as a bipartisan, public process and raised concerns about whether the bill would prevent DHS from acting on known fraud; Curran responded that the language was intended to preserve those enforcement actions. The discussion ended without a final vote on the bill in the portion provided, beyond adoption of the DE4 amendment.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Apr 2nd, 2025 at 02:30 pm

Judiciary

Bills: HB1455
Summary: The Judiciary Committee took up House Bill 1489, and Victoria Christian from Legislative Council reviewed the latest 3003 version. She explained that the bill was revised to clarify language about individuals who are or were in a dating relationship, to incorporate provisions from related Senate bills, and to narrow confidentiality and hearing provisions to domestic violence and sexual assault protection order cases. She also noted a clarification on page 12 regarding certification of certain individuals under Supreme Court rules rather than by the Supreme Court itself. Members discussed the consolidation of multiple related bills into one measure. Senator Myrdal moved Amendment 3.03 to engross House Bill 1489, and the motion passed. Senator Myrdal then moved a do pass recommendation on House Bill 1489 as amended, seconded by Senator Luick. The committee voted in favor of the amended bill by roll call, with all members present voting yes, and the motion carried. Chair Larson then asked for a member to carry the bill to the floor, and it was agreed that the bill would be carried. The committee also discussed its remaining workload and planned to clear the rest of its calendar the following week.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Judiciary Apr 2nd, 2025 at 09:00 am

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • At its core, this bill is about tribal consultation.
  • Tribal consultation is more than just a procedural step.
  • Tribal consultation is more than just a procedural step.
  • The significance of tribal consultation cannot be overstated.
  • I saw that there wasn't true consultation, and the federal government does require true consultation
Bills: HB1455
Summary: The Judiciary Committee first heard House Bill 1455, which would require the North Dakota Indian Affairs Commission to review introduced legislation for tribal implications and conduct consultation with affected tribes. Rep. Collette Brown said the bill was intended to formalize and strengthen tribal consultation, and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe representative Ross Bell testified in support. Brad Hawk, executive director of the Indian Affairs Commission, testified neutrally, saying the office already does much of this work but that the bill would add structure; several senators raised concerns about duplication, possible future staffing costs, and whether the bill was necessary. The committee amended the bill to replace “each measure” with “all legislation,” then passed a do-not-pass recommendation on HB 1455 by recorded vote, with Sen. Luick designated as carrier. The committee then took up House Bill 1032, dealing with municipal courts, appeals, and judge qualifications. Legislative Council and court staff walked through proposed amendments, including making municipal courts courts of record on a delayed effective date, clarifying appeal procedures, and adding standards for municipal judges. Members discussed whether to use the term “ethical standards” or “judicial conduct”; after questions about definitions and enforcement, the committee settled on replacing the language with “judicial conduct” in the amended bill. The committee adopted the amendments and then passed HB 1032 as amended on a do-pass vote, with Sen. Cory to carry. Later, the committee heard House Bill 1263, which would make it easier for people with criminal records to seek sealing after a denial by allowing an appeal and reducing the waiting period for a new petition from three years to one year. Rep. Nels Christensen, Christopher Davis, Travis Fink, and Brad Peterson all supported the bill’s goal of giving people a better path to rehabilitation and employment. The main point of disagreement was whether to keep the statutory presumption that the benefit to the petitioner must outweigh the presumption of openness of criminal records; several witnesses urged removing that language, while others said it was part of the compromise that created the current law. The committee closed the hearing without taking final action and said it would review the House discussion before deciding later.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

State Committee Meeting - 2026-03-26

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Office of Grants along the way.
  • met to receive public television grants. met to receive public television grants.
  • be eligible to receive state grants. be eligible to receive state grants.
  • state dollars from other grant programs. state dollars from other grant programs.
  • So, right here this is our federal grant So, right here this is our federal grant grants<01:20:35.520
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government Finance and Policy Committee 3/20/25

State Government Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • agency's internal process controls Grant agency's internal process controls Grant monitoring<00:
  • Thank you for your time. office of Grants management can exercise office of Grants management can exercise
  • <00:25:54.960> rules<00:25:55.679> currently Grants of Grant laws or rules currently Grants
  • <01:03:10.279> with requiring St agencies to consult with requiring St agencies to consult
  • <01:08:50.960> with agent a state agency to consult with agent a state agency to consult with
Bills: HF1470, HF1310, HF1837
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/24/26

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • a project from a city goes through any of the normal state pots of money where it's a competitive grant
  • attached to it and those kinds of grants attached to it and those kinds of things.<00:15:40.320>
  • <00:43:01.360> to funding for climate resiliency grants to funding for climate resiliency
  • Were there actual farmers in attendance that were helping consult in this at all? Um, Dr.
  • helping consult in this at all? Um Dr. helping consult in this at all? Um Dr.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Fraud Committee Meeting - 2025-05-05

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And I am wondering, are you mostly looking at grants and grants to non-profits?
  • I receive employment in return for awarding a grant, or I recommend that an agency award a grant.
  • and grants management, grant monitoring, and grantee evaluation.
  • Agency staff who manage grants.
  • They are two very different things: the grants, I think, and Medicaid, which is not generally grants,
Bills: HF3043, HF2891
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy Committee 5/5/25

Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, and I am wondering, are you mostly looking at grants and grants to nonprofits?
  • <00:36:26.880> Um,<00:36:27.200> is grants and grants to nonprofits?
  • Um, is grants and grants to nonprofits?
  • um not nonprofit grants. um not nonprofit grants. Representative<00:36:44.079> Greenman.
  • and grants management, grant monitoring, and grantee evaluation.
Bills: HF3043, HF2891
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Health Apr 21st, 2025

Public Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • HB 1621 facilitates the adoption of an EMR by grant funding with a match by each hospital.
  • The legislature would not be reviewing grants and appropriations to this fund.
  • Well, do you have to ask for a consultation, or are they going to be required to give a consultation?
  • However, I believe they offer consultation. They have to ask if you would like consultation.
  • Then we had a very painful consultation with our doctors.
Bills: HB216
Summary: The Committee on Public Health met with a quorum and heard public testimony on a long agenda, with members repeatedly reminded of a two-minute limit for witnesses. Several bills were voted out favorably, including HB 2588 on cottage food, HB 1639 on cancer incidence and female firefighters, HB 2581 on a reporting form for contracted services for pregnant women, and SB 922 on electronic disclosure of certain sensitive medical information. Those measures generally passed on party-line or near-unanimous votes, while HB 216 on itemized medical statements was left pending after the committee substitute was withdrawn. The committee also left pending HB 5141, HB 4638, HB 2035, HB 4813, HB 2264, HB 4014, and HB 3829 after hearing testimony and questions. The final item introduced in the excerpt was HB 4408 on health care market transparency and corporate consolidation, but the discussion was cut off before testimony or action was completed. A major theme of the hearing was mental health diversion and access to treatment. HB 5141, by Rep. Howard, would allow Travis County to use vacated Austin State Hospital property for a local mental health jail diversion center; law enforcement, the Travis County sheriff, county judge, and urban counties group all testified in support, describing the lack of alternatives for people in crisis and the burden on jails and emergency rooms. Members asked about eligible offenses, bed capacity, and whether the facility would serve only Travis County, and the bill was left pending. HB 2264, by Rep. Schoolcraft, would create a friends-and-family form for loved ones to provide information to providers during emergency mental health treatment; NAMI and hospital groups supported it, while one neutral witness and several members raised concerns about patient control, credibility of information, and liability protections. The bill was also left pending. The committee also heard multiple psychedelic-therapy and drug-policy bills. HB 4813 would speed Texas rescheduling of Schedule I substances if the FDA reclassifies them, with testimony focused on psilocybin and MDMA and their potential use for PTSD and depression; members questioned whether the bill was too broad and how state rescheduling works, and it was left pending. HB 4014 would direct HHSC to study psychedelic therapies, building on prior state research, and witnesses said Texas should prepare regulatory and clinical infrastructure before FDA approval; it too was left pending. HB 2035 would require parents to be informed that they may seek substance-use treatment for a child even if one facility turns them away, prompted by a constituent’s account of a fatal fentanyl overdose after receiving incorrect advice; it was left pending. HB 4638 would extend and expand the Texas Pharmaceutical Initiative board and timeline, with the author saying the program is still in early implementation and needs more time, and it was left pending as well. Other bills addressed public health administration and animal welfare. HB 3829 would require a study of the animal-friendly account and its grant process for spay/neuter funding, with the author arguing that the current application and reimbursement process is too burdensome for shelters and nonprofits; no opposition was heard and the bill was left pending. HB 2581 and HB 1639 were reported favorably, while HB 216 drew discussion about enforcement of itemized medical billing and was held after the committee substitute was withdrawn. Throughout the hearing, members also discussed broader concerns about homelessness, competency restoration waitlists, jail overcrowding, and the need for more treatment options outside the criminal justice system.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Veterans and Military Affairs Division 3/11/26

Veterans and Military Affairs Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • provide direct grants.
  • Office grants, and veteran service organization grants, since they each have their own statutory grant
  • A summary of the grants.
  • Veterans Service Office grants veteran service organization grants since they each have their own statutory
  • grant requirements.
Bills: HF3727, HF3684, HF3467
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Government Operations Division Apr 16th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • just says that we would have managerial control over the project and the construction management consultants
  • works with guardians, and it was providing some justification for increasing the guardians' pass grants
  • Guardianship pass grants.
  • But yes, I could reach out to everyone that we consulted with before this.
  • On your topic of the guardianship grant, I don’t remember that we had that discussion before.
Bills: SB2012
Summary: The Government Operations division met to consider House Bill 1015, the OMB budget, with several amendments already in hand. A major portion of the discussion centered on Senator Mathern’s concerns about the proposed new state hospital in Jamestown. He argued the project is outdated, too expensive, and should be delayed or reduced in favor of local behavioral health services and deferred maintenance at the existing LaHogue facility. Other members questioned him about staffing, capacity, constitutional issues, and the relationship between the hospital proposal and broader mental health investments in other bills. The committee also reviewed budget mechanics, including the transfer of up to $240 million from the Social Services Fund to the Human Services Finance Fund, a $40 million deferred maintenance fund, a $3 million deficiency appropriation for the new and vacant FTE pool, and other OMB-related items. Members discussed whether OMB should have managerial control over the Jamestown project and generally agreed that OMB oversight could help manage costs, though concerns about the hospital remained. The committee then considered two funding items that drew the most debate: guardianship grants and a pro-life education campaign. After testimony from a representative supporting the campaign, members agreed to reduce that item by $500,000 and add $1 million for guardianship grants, while leaving the overall bill to be finalized in conference. The committee adopted Amendment Version 2006 with those changes and then passed HB 1015 as amended on a roll call vote, with all members voting aye except Senator Burckhard on the amendment vote; he later voted aye on the bill itself. The chair indicated the bill would move to conference committee.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Government Operations Division Apr 3rd, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Government Operations Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • Number six adds contingent funding for human trafficking victim grants.
  • Section 8 updates the amount for human trafficking victim grants that you're appropriating in the bill
  • ... ...human trafficking victim grants that you're appropriating in the bill.
  • Talking to Grant, he thought maybe we might be able to take up adjutant general this afternoon if we
  • So, as we tally those things so far, ...$2 million from the grant that helped purchase the land.
Bills: SB2012
Summary: The Government Operations Division met to continue work on budget and bill amendments. The committee first took up the Attorney General’s budget and reviewed a detailed amendment package that adjusted FTE levels, salary equity funding, funding sources, and several one-time appropriations. Changes included removing some House-added items, adding contingent funding tied to other bills, restoring certain funding sources, increasing the electronic smoking device manufacturer fee, and adding a provision on 24/7 sobriety program fees. Senator Dwyer then offered a further amendment to make the electronic smoking device fee a $2,000 application fee with a $500 annual renewal fee, which passed. The committee then voted 4-1 to adopt the budget as amended and give it a do pass recommendation as amended. The committee next considered House Bill 1143, relating to Great Plains Food Bank funding. After testimony from Amy Cleary on behalf of Great Plains Food Bank, members discussed the organization’s statewide role and the project’s financing, including a planned $30 million facility and existing fundraising. Senator Burkhard moved to restore the appropriation from $5 million to $10 million, and the motion passed 4-1. The committee then voted 4-1 to give the bill a do pass recommendation as amended, with Senator Burkhard designated as carrier. Finally, the committee discussed House Bill 1524, which would fund regional planning councils and authorize 16 FTEs. Members expressed sympathy for the councils’ work but concerns about approving new state-funded positions. No action was taken, and the chair asked to hold the bill over for further review. The committee then recessed, noting remaining budget work and upcoming hearings.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Environmental Regulation Mar 27th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • The AFFP grant has $12 million in it total. It is one of two TRIP grants that is hard capped.
  • All it does is create a grant program in TCEQ.
  • So we're asking that that grant also include.
  • I'm the emergency manager and grant writer for Lee County.
  • But also as a grant writer, I'd like to see this because if I can get a grant for the county to assist
Bills: HB205
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Leg Committee Meeting - 2025-03-19

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Taxpayers, our constituents want to have confidence that we're making investments in grant programs and
  • And that's donations and other grants and such, I'm assuming.
  • Information today or quickly just as to the donations and other grants that all pay for the wages.
  • And so if this is going to the Board of Directors of Minnesota Humanities Center as a grant program,
  • , they would go through the grant process, correct?
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • And finally, Pell Grants. Pell. Grants take public dollars to private schools.
  • Continuation of Pell Grants, I'd actually even like to see.
  • An expansion of Pell Grants, I'd like to see short-term certificates for Pell Grants for students who
  • What do you feel about more flexibility of Pell Grants?
  • Well, I certainly would like to see workforce Pell Grants.
Summary: The committee meeting engaged in discussions focused primarily on educational reform, the influence of federal grants on local education systems, and the growing disparities in wealth and access to quality education. Members expressed concerns about the bureaucracy surrounding federal funding that hampers schools' ability to obtain necessary resources for improvement. Several members highlighted personal anecdotes from constituents, emphasizing the urgent need for reform to help students succeed in both K-12 and higher education environments. The meeting included public testimonies that provided insights into various community perspectives on these pressing issues.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Legacy Finance Committee 3/19/25

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Taxpayers, our constituents, want to have confidence that we're making investments in grant programs
  • Taxpayers, our constituents, want to have confidence that we're making investments in grant programs
  • in Grant in Grant programs<00:41:10.839> and<00:41:11.839> projects<00:41:12.480><
  • I'm other grants and such I'm assuming assuming assuming um<00:42:44.319> I<00:42:44.440>
  • would go through the grant process, correct?