Video & Transcript Research : 'constitutional convention'

Page 1 of 400
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Rules 2nd REVISED Apr 6th, 2026 at 08:30 am

Rules

Transcript Highlights:
  • Follow up, but because this is statutory Not constitutional.
  • The ability to move this in the constitution the way it's in the constitution is rigid, and we have no
  • This simply asks the voters to move it from the constitution to the statute.
  • And that program also been put in the constitution.
  • If it's in the constitution, we can't manage it; it just happens.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 27th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Constitutional Convention. No, it's the revision or the new Constitution, right?
  • Good luck on your constitutional amendment, and I think that's why we need the constitutional convention
  • HB 4 originally called for a constitutional convention.
  • Like I said, I'm a big constitutional convention proponent.
  • Any constitutional convention bill, or calling it anyway, is a good bill.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/11/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, members, House Bill 2908 outlines the criminal charges for faithless Arizona constitutional convention
  • debates about what the Constitution is for. ...constitutional debates about what the Constitution is
  • go to the convention and they vote for some constitutional amendment other than the call that we passed
  • the legal convention scope.
  • If the convention adjourns immediately upon voting to approve a new constitution or a package of amendments
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2908, which would impose criminal penalties on faithless Arizona Article V convention delegates, require delegates to take an oath, and direct the legislature and governor to ratify any approved amendment through the normal legislative process. The sponsor argued the bill adds guardrails to any future convention, while Common Cause Arizona opposed it as ineffective and insufficient to prevent a runaway convention. After debate about whether the bill could meaningfully constrain delegates, the committee voted 5-2 to return HB 2908 with a do pass recommendation. The committee then considered HB 2608, a veterans housing measure creating a military transitional housing grant program at the Arizona Department of Housing with a $7 million General Fund appropriation in FY 2027 and changes to the military transitional housing fund. Testimony focused on revisions to the bill, including limiting use of funds to new construction and requiring veteran-led or veteran-managed organizations. Several members said the bill was too similar to prior versions and had not gone through the Veterans Caucus process. On a motion to table, the committee voted to lay HB 2608 on the table. After a recess, the committee took up HB 2805, as amended, which creates a secure online portal for nomination petition signatures for local governing board candidates and related election administration changes. The sponsor said the bill was intended to give school board candidates and other local candidates equal access to the state’s electronic signature system, while members debated whether requiring candidates to declare party affiliation would undermine nonpartisan races. The Gillette amendment was adopted, and the committee then voted 5-2 to return HB 2805 as amended with a do pass recommendation. Finally, the committee heard HB 2775, which would bar the state and its subdivisions from using state assets or money to implement or enforce rules, taxes, or policies of international organizations, and would add restrictions on Arizona public universities’ dealings with certain foreign entities. Members discussed a proposed amendment to create oversight of foreign funding at Arizona State University and the Board of Regents, but raised concerns about rulemaking authority and constitutional issues. The committee ultimately voted to hold HB 2775 for further work, and then adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • The connection to the convention center or hotel.
  • Starting constitutes having a contract or breaking ground? Starting constitutes having a contract.
  • The convention center and hotel open the door to tourism.
  • The convention center's been on the books for over a decade.
  • The convention center, because we have not actually issued the bonds for that convention center, and
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/16/2026 - Senate Federalism and Family Law

Federalism and Family Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • Lastly, the bill classifies knowingly acting as a faithless constitutional convention delegate as a class
  • The first example is that this state has already passed a call for a constitutional convention.
  • So we get an amendment back from a constitutional convention. We don't know what it looks like.
  • of any sort, a constitutional convention of any sort, whether it is Article 5 or other.
  • convention is,... ...a sufficient deterrent given that once this Constitutional Convention is called
Summary: The committee approved the March 9, 2026 minutes and then heard House Bill 2908, which would require any approved U.S. constitutional amendment to be ratified by bill and gubernatorial action, create oath and reporting requirements for convention delegates, and impose penalties for “faithless” delegates. The sponsor and supporters argued the bill was a needed safeguard against a runaway Article 5 convention, while opponents said the proposed guardrails would be ineffective and could create a false sense of security. An amendment changing recall to disqualification was adopted, and HB 2908 as amended passed 4-3. The committee then considered HCR 2047, a memorial supporting the use of “Judea and Samaria” instead of “West Bank” in official state communications. Supporters framed it as a matter of historical and biblical accuracy and solidarity with Israel, while opponents argued it injected the legislature into an international conflict and raised First Amendment and civil-rights concerns. The memorial passed 4-3. The committee also passed HCM 2006, urging Congress to reform the Endangered Species Act and Migratory Bird Conservation Act in response to Mexican gray wolf impacts on ranchers, and HB 4042, which clarified the evidence needed to terminate a parent-child relationship by requiring a potential father to both file and serve a paternity action within 30 days. Later, HCM 2005 passed 4-3 after debate over restricting foreign ownership of real property by communist or authoritarian governments. The committee then took up HCM 2001 and HCM 2002, both focused on Muslim organizations: HCM 2001 urged the President and Congress to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a foreign terrorist organization, and HCM 2002 urged a review of CAIR for possible terrorist designation. Witnesses and members opposing both measures argued that state lawmakers lacked authority or evidence for such designations and that the memorials would stigmatize Muslim communities and chill civic participation; supporters described them as appropriate statements of concern. Both memorials passed 4-3, and the committee adjourned after completing its calendar.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 5th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • So they are the protectors of the fund, and it actually says in our Texas Constitution that they are
  • In the Texas Constitution, it requires that a home equity loan must be closed at the office of the lender
  • If this provision were not in the Texas Constitution related to home equity loan, those retail installment
  • say that that it's a large, like we should credit all the thoughtful work that went into the constitutional
Bills: HJR40
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Appropriations May 8th, 2025

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, SJR 4 would raise the constitutional cap on the maximum balance of the Economic stabilization
  • these questions, but the ESF is what this bill contemplates making amendations to the, uh, a constitutional
  • But the, the, there would be, it would, the, the constitutional, uh, ramifications of how we can appropriate
Bills: SJR 4
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Rules and Legislative Administration Committee 4/15/26

Rules and Legislative Administration

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, House File 3900 is a constitutional amendment that is working on amending our state constitution
  • state statute and state constitution. state statute and state constitution.
  • state constitution. state constitution.
  • It's right in our constitution.
  • constitutional duty? constitutional duty?
Bills: HF3900, HF1849
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Local Legislation Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Local Legislation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Anytime you get people to participate in their process, this is a constitutional process.
  • This is a constitutional amendment. Yes, sir. And um, it's just a... ...amendment. Yes, sir.
  • I would also add this is a constitutional amendment as well, for a vote of the citizens of... ...for
Bills: HB486, HB508
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Education Finance Committee 3/17/26

Education Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • the way we handle it on our constitution the way we handle it on our constitution is<00:09:35.360
  • the constitutional amendment together. the constitutional amendment together.
  • four constitutional comprised of the four constitutional members<00:20:48.400> of<00:20:48.559
  • <00:25:04.640> provisions Minnesota's constitutional provisions Minnesota's constitutional
  • <00:38:12.240> and<00:38:12.480> statutory constitutional and statutory constitutional
Bills: HF3900
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Aug 20th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Bills: HB16
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence met with a quorum present and took up House Bill 16, the omnibus courts bill that had been vetoed by the governor after the regular session. The committee substitute made several changes, including moving certain court creation dates, creating a new county court at law for Maverick County, repealing a missed youth diversion article, removing a civil preference for the 456th District Court in Guadalupe County, clarifying the digital court recording study makeup, correcting a drafting error involving prosecutors in the Special Prosecution Unit, and allowing the Office of the Attorney General to represent SPU prosecutors. Megan LaVoie of the Office of Court Administration testified as a resource witness in support of the bill and thanked the committee for working with the judiciary on the measure. Steve Bresnan of the Texas Court Reporters Association also testified in support of the bill, but used his time to urge action on a separate anti-SLAPP appeal that he said had been pending for 47 months; he distributed materials and proposed an amendment to impose deadlines on the courts, though he said he was not expecting discussion of it that day. After public testimony closed, the committee adopted the substitute without objection. Representative Hayes moved that House Bill 16, as substituted, be reported favorably to the full House with the recommendation that it be passed and printed. The motion prevailed on a 10-0 vote, and the committee then adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • To be consistent with what's in Article V of the Constitution, the Texas Constitution of course.
  • So, I'm in Article 5 of the Constitution section.
  • In the Constitution, was that originally written as that way, or was that an amendment to the Constitution
  • You're recognized by the constitutional three-day rule. Constitutional three-day rule.
  • This constitutional amendment will change the cap from 10 to 15 percent as to constitutional amendment
Summary: The meeting focused on several crucial pieces of legislation, notably Senate Joint Resolution 40, which proposed a constitutional amendment to clarify the powers of the governor, the legislature, and the Supreme Court during emergencies. Senator Birdwell presented the resolution, emphasizing the need for legislative involvement during prolonged crises. It garnered broad support, passing with 29 votes in favor and only 1 against. Following this, Senate Bill 871, considered the enabling legislation, was also moved for discussion, with the aim of reinforcing the legislature's authority during emergencies while establishing clear guidelines for the governor's powers.