Video & Transcript Research : 'congressional redistricting'

Page 1 of 145
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Anybody who thinks that he does not deserve to represent Congressional District 2, you are on the wrong
  • And to say that we don't deserve to have the members in Congress, or Congressional District 2 does not
Bills: HB1
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • elections, as well as all special or other congressional elections prior to the adoption of a new congressional
  • </c><00:48:20.840><c> elections</c> and 30 congressional elections and 30 congressional elections as<
  • </c> or other congressional or other congressional elections<00:48:29.120><c> prior</c><00:48:29.640>
  • > &gt;&gt; In congressional district one, &gt;&gt; In congressional district one, two, Two, two, six,
  • </c> look at the districts, congressional look at the districts, congressional districts<01:03:24.320
Bills: HB1
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 12th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • redistricting.
  • It meets all of the redistricting principles.
  • We will not be erased through redistricting.
  • It represents a more balanced and equitable approach to congressional redistricting in Louisiana.
  • We know redistricting is not the end goal here.
Bills: SB116, SB121, SB130, SB407
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Senate and Governmental Affairs May 8th, 2026

Senate & Governmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • The reason why we're here today is because there's a suspension of ongoing congressional elections.
  • But there's already an ongoing election regarding congressional maps that are in place.
  • After the governor issued his suspension, you would agree with me that the congressional election...
  • ...issued his suspension, you would agree with me that the congressional elections have remained on the
  • I only asked like two questions. the congressional elections, are those votes going to be counted or
Bills: SB116, SB121, SB130, SB407
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House State Government & Tribal Relations Jan 21st, 2026 at 01:30 pm

State Government & Tribal Relations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Six states have implemented new congressional maps, and another four have taken steps in the redistricting
  • redistricting for partisan advantage, which is a fairly unusual... ...mid-decade congressional redistricting
  • And what I really wish, as I said, would be a nonpartisan congressional redistricting process in all.
  • And what I really wish, as I said, would be a nonpartisan congressional redistricting process in all
  • H.J.R. 4209 would allow mid-decade congressional redistricting by simple majority vote if triggered by
Bills: HJR4209, HB2260, HB2259
Summary: The committee heard three measures related to Washington’s initiative and redistricting processes. House Bill 2260 would require petition circulators to sign and date the declaration on each petition sheet, provide their address and county, and would require the Secretary of State to verify that a signer’s residence address matches voter registration records before counting a signature. House Joint Resolution 4209 would amend the state constitution to allow the legislature, by simple majority, to modify congressional districts mid-decade if another state adopts a new congressional map absent a court order. House Bill 2259 would require 1,000 registered-voter signatures before an initiative or referendum filing proceeds and would prohibit paying circulators per signature, with civil penalties and a private right of action for violations. Supporters of HB 2260 and HB 2259 argued the bills would improve accountability, transparency, and integrity in the initiative process, citing concerns about fraud, misinformation, duplicate signatures, and the need for better records and verification. Opponents said the measures would burden or chill direct democracy, especially for rural residents and smaller campaigns, and argued existing verification systems already work well. On HJR 4209, the prime sponsor and supporters said Washington should respond to mid-decade partisan redistricting in other states to avoid one-sided disadvantage, while opponents said Washington’s bipartisan commission system is superior and should not be weakened in reaction to other states. Several witnesses and the Secretary of State testified against HB 2259 and HB 2260, warning that the new requirements would slow the process, create barriers, and potentially disenfranchise eligible voters or circulators. The Secretary of State said the office already has effective verification procedures and suggested higher fees, better technology, or stronger penalties for fraud instead of new restrictions. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided; the chair suspended and reopened hearings to move between the three bills and took public testimony on each.
TX
Bills: SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, HB4
Summary: The Senate briefly convened and received a message from the House stating that the House was taking a vote. No bills, motions, or substantive policy matters were discussed in the exchange. Pursuant to a previously adopted motion, the Senate then adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday, August 21.
TX

Texas 89th 1st C.S.

Senate Session (Part II) Jul 21st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Again, I think you referred to, we did congressional redistricting in 2003.
  • The only difference is the resolution is narrowed to congressional redistricting.
  • This includes the... ...by the name Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting.
  • And I remind you that in 2003 we had three on congressional redistricting.
  • Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting. Chair: Senator King.
Summary: The meeting centered around the discussion of congressional redistricting, where the committee established the procedures to ensure a fair and transparent process. Led by Senator King, the session focused on adopting a resolution that authorized a special committee dedicated to congressional redistricting and allowed for regional hearings to gather public input via videoconferencing. Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate notice for public participation, especially from marginalized communities potentially affected by proposed changes. Disagreements emerged regarding the timeline for regional hearings and how to address the implications of the redistricting process on minority districts. Overall, participants acknowledged the complex nature of redistricting and the importance of engaging constituents in the legislative process.