Transcript Highlights:

• If you look at line 22, the general fund funding is $435,907,000.
• that has a $4.5 million per year cap out of the fund.
• A $4.5 million per year cap out of the fund.
• The bill also does not include any additional funding for...
• They draw funding from the ATV Dedicated Account, a long-established fund created by the legislature

Bills: HF2439

Keywords: environmental protection, pollution reduction, waste management, climate change, funding allocations

Transcript Highlights:

• If you look at line 22, the general fund funding in this bill is $435,970,000.
• </c><00:03:12.959><c> bill</c><00:03:13.120><c> is</c> general fund uh funding in this bill is general
• fund uh funding in this bill is $435,97,000<00:03:16.239><c> that's</c><00:03:16.560><c> 10</c><00:03
• And then on line 132, of the fund.
• </c> climate. This planning is a real need. climate. This planning is a real need.

Bills: HF2439

Keywords: environmental protection, pollution reduction, waste management, climate change, funding allocations, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• And so this was a bill we brought forward with bipartisan support to help fund and address some of those
• And so, this is money and ways that we actually get funding right out to our communities.
• Um, has this been affected by federal funds at all? Federal fund cuts at all. Representative Meyer.
• </c> been affected by federal funds at all? been affected by federal funds at all?
• </c> Federal fund cuts at all. Federal fund cuts at all. Representative<00:05:04.800><c> Meyer.

Bills: SF2077, HF2439, HF841

Keywords: environmental protection, natural resources, wildlife management, public funding, community grants, pollution reduction, waste management, climate change, funding allocations, food support, emergency funding, shelf programs, Minnesota statutes, appropriation, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• But we know the state... ...had adequately funded maintenance and preservation for the bridge.
• Federal funding uncertainty only adds to the challenge.
• So going forward, if we do move forward into the next phases, additional funding will be needed.
• Going forward, if we do move forward into the next phases, additional funding will be needed.
• Thank you so much. ...and safety-oriented mobility project funding. Thank you so much.

Bills: SB5987, SB6170

Keywords: SB 5987, SB5987, Fairfax Bridge, State Route 165, SR 165, Carbon River, WSDOT, Washington State Department of Transportation, emergency bridge replacement, infrastructure failure, transportation emergency, climate commitment account, climate investment account, clean energy, climate funding, greenhouse gas reduction, environmental justice, renewable energy, building electrification, industrial decarbonization

Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee began with a work session on the Fairfax Carbon River SR-165 Bridge closure and replacement. Wilkeson Mayor Jamie Pololi described the bridge as a long-standing state investment that was closed after years of documented deterioration, saying the closure severed access to Mount Rainier-area recreation, hurt local businesses and municipal revenue, and created emergency access problems for Fairfax and nearby communities. Pierce County’s Melissa Littleton and WSDOT’s Steve Rourke said the bridge is 105 years old, was weight-limited before closing, and is now being studied for replacement; WSDOT outlined seven alternatives, said greenfield options were ruled out, and explained that the project is in early geotechnical and pre-NEPA planning, with construction still estimated to take years. Senators asked about detour length, emergency response, historic-preservation issues, and whether the project could be accelerated; WSDOT said the bridge’s status and the need for a new alignment limit the usefulness of emergency authority, and that additional funding will be needed beyond the $7 million already spent from preservation funds. The committee then held a public hearing on SB 5987, which would declare the Fairfax Bridge closure an emergency, direct WSDOT to restore access across SR-165 as soon as possible, grant the transportation secretary limited emergency authorities, exempt the work from Executive Order 25-07 project labor agreement requirements, and make the act effective immediately. Supporters, including the mayor, local residents, recreation advocates, and trail groups, said the bill would recognize the closure as a public safety and access emergency and help restore access to public lands, businesses, and emergency routes. WSDOT testified in opposition to the bill’s practical effect, warning it could create false expectations because most delays are driven by federal NEPA and historic-preservation processes that the secretary cannot waive. The committee reported 606 people signed in support, one opposed, and two other. The committee also heard SB 6170, which would raise the dollar limits for work performed by state highway crews and for certain procurement thresholds that allow small, veteran-, minority-, and women-owned businesses to compete. The bill would increase the state-force limit from $60,000 to $100,000 in normal circumstances and from $100,000 to $160,000 in emergencies, with similar increases for related contracting thresholds; staff said the current limits have not been updated since 2005 and the bill has no fiscal impact. Senator King, the prime sponsor, said the change would better match inflation and help state workers do more routine and emergency work in-house. WFSE and WSDOT supported the bill, saying it would help maintenance crews keep up with rising costs while preserving opportunities for outside contractors; Senator Valdez asked whether it would affect minority- and women-owned contracting programs, and WSDOT said it did not expect an adverse impact but would monitor it. Public testimony was overwhelmingly supportive, with 55 signed in favor and none opposed.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> already trying to leverage our funding already trying to leverage our funding with<00:25:13.799>
• ><c> are</c> with the federal funds that are with the federal funds that are available<00:25:15.520><
• will fund the work out is mifa funds will fund the investment<00:25:44.080><c> tax</c><00:25:44.480>
• </c> our facility we need additional funding our facility we need additional funding to<00:42:30.040>
• big</c><00:46:51.760><c> cat</c> additional fund funding for our big cat additional fund funding for

Bills: HF1013, HF1598, HF1656, HF2162

Keywords: energy, economic development, funding, renewable resources, Clean Energy Economy Minnesota, air ventilation, geothermal, school financing, Minnesota Climate Innovative Finance Authority, geothermal energy, renewable energy, construction funding, Como Zoo, energy efficiency, HF2162, Minnesota, planning grants, renewable development account, clean energy, Department of Commerce

Transcript Highlights:

• We hear people say that climate is a deep concern.
• We end... ...people say that climate is a deep concern.
• And yet, within the Climate Commitment Act, only 2% of the funding went to really deal with flood infrastructure
• change, and it also doesn't build resiliency in... ...from climate change.
• And there's the accountability piece on the Climate Commitment Act funding has been something of concern

Bills: HB2159, HB2251, HB2521

Keywords: preK, education funding, childcare, youth development, state budget, climate change, commitment act, emission reductions, sustainability, environmental policy, firearms, background check, gun control, public safety, legislation, 904, all

Summary: The Appropriations Committee met in executive session on three bills. For House Bill 2159, which creates the pre-K Promise account for ECEAP, the committee adopted Amendment Clark 333 to clarify that account funds may support any children enrolled in ECEAP, not just the entitlement population. Members then voted 29-0 with two excused to report the bill out of committee with a due pass recommendation, with supporters emphasizing expanded early learning access and the role of philanthropic funding. For House Bill 2251, dealing with Climate Commitment Act accounts and revenue distribution, staff briefed a proposed substitute and two Dye amendments. The committee rejected both amendments: one would have expanded allowable uses to include items such as buoys, trails, small forest landowner grants, drought and water quality projects, outdoor recreation, and marina support; the other would have restored annual rather than biennial reporting. After debate over revenue priorities, transparency, and the structure of CCA spending, the substitute bill passed 18-12 with one excused. For House Bill 2521, which would allow the Washington State Patrol to set firearm background check fees to cover program costs, the committee considered seven amendments. All were rejected, including proposals to remove indirect costs from the fee calculation, exempt low-income residents, people near less restrictive home placements, veterans and active military, domestic violence victims, counties with fewer officers per capita, and to delay the effective date until Washington no longer has the fewest officers per capita. Supporters argued the bill would make the program cost-based and reduce general fund subsidy; opponents argued it would create barriers to firearm access and lacked oversight. The bill passed 18-12 with one excused and was reported out with a do pass recommendation.

Transcript Highlights:

• It's funding. same problem. It's funding.
• </c> less than unequal funding. less than unequal funding.
• </c> the funds. the funds.
• . funding. funding.
• </c> we should increase safe school funding. we should increase safe school funding.

Bills: HF3653, HF2717, HF3451, HF3857

Keywords: education finance, safe schools revenue, school safety, charter schools, funding, safe schools, school security, school levy, pupil units, safe schools aid, cooperative units, intermediate school district, school resource officer, peace officer liaison, sheriff liaison, drug abuse prevention, gang resistance education, violence prevention, suicide prevention, mental health services

Summary: The committee first adopted the March 3rd minutes by voice vote after Representative Lee moved them and there was no discussion. Members then reviewed hearing rules on decorum, safety, and participation before taking testimony from Dr. James Densley and Dr. Jillian Peterson of the Violence Prevention Project Research Center at Hamline University. The presenters summarized research on mass shootings and K-12 school shootings, drawing on a database of homicides in school settings from 2000 to 2025 and a smaller set of 15 K-12 mass shooting cases. They said school shooters are usually insiders, most often current or former students, and typically young males. They described common patterns including a noticeable crisis before attacks, perpetrators viewing the shooting as a final act, studying prior shooters online, and “leakage” in which most tell someone in advance. They also emphasized that many perpetrators use unsecured firearms from family members and argued that prevention should combine reporting systems, behavioral threat assessment, counseling, mentoring, secure storage, and other layered interventions rather than rely on a single solution. The presenters also discussed broader violence trends in the Twin Cities, saying much school violence is spillover from community violence and that pandemic-era disruptions and weakened trust in institutions contributed to serious violence. They cited a national survey finding that exposure to gun violence is associated with PTSD, anxiety, depression, and fear of public spaces, especially among young people. During member questions, Representative Wam asked for clarification on the data set and the rural/small-town share of the survey sample.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Climate Action Framework. Climate Action Framework.
• </c><00:42:00.560><c> Literacy,</c> of Climate Literacy, of Climate Literacy, for<00:42:01.840><c> it
• c> the</c><00:46:14.480><c> most</c> prioritized funding to the most prioritized funding to the most
• Um, climate literacy-related courses, are there climate literacy courses in high school currently?
• and climate at the forefront.

Bills: HF3776, HF3557, HF3585

Keywords: screen time, preschool, kindergarten, early childhood education, digital media, tablets, smartphones, educational technology, EdTech, classroom devices, publicly funded preschool, school policy, child development, special education, IEP, 504 plan, IFSP, Minnesota education law, climate literacy, education

Transcript Highlights:

• The funding stream adjustments that we made allow us to fill out the funding and unemployment insurance
• We're able to keep the grant funding in the first biennium and then remove funds from the base in the
• We're able to keep their base funding as is. We're also able to fund MDE's litigation.
• We captured $2 million of MDE funds that would have been canceled back to the general fund after 2025
• funds.

Bills: HF1388

Keywords: BARR Center, Building Assets, Reducing Risks, education finance, school funding, grant appropriation, evidence-based program, student achievement, social and emotional learning, school climate, teacher effectiveness, high school graduation, students in poverty, students of color, BIPOC, equity in education, Minnesota Department of Education, urban schools, suburban schools, rural schools, school coaching

Transcript Highlights:

• c><00:03:23.360><c> and</c> provided ongoing flexible funding and provided ongoing flexible funding and
• </c> bienium and then remove funds from the bienium and then remove funds from the base<00:04:31.280>
• funds.
• </c> full state funding re source resources. full state funding re source resources.
• </c> the school nutrition fund two balances. the school nutrition fund two balances.

Bills: HF1388

Keywords: BARR Center, Building Assets, Reducing Risks, education finance, school funding, grant appropriation, evidence-based program, student achievement, social and emotional learning, school climate, teacher effectiveness, high school graduation, students in poverty, students of color, BIPOC, equity in education, Minnesota Department of Education, urban schools, suburban schools, rural schools, school coaching

Transcript Highlights:

• It provides funding for the Central Campus Electrification Project at King County Metro, substituting
• funding instead of the South Annex Base Electrification Elements Project at King County Metro.
• This is a small amendment to help King County Metro better spend their funds in the budget.
• And then also there's great investments in this budget, three projects funded by the Climate Commitment
• expanding the authority that we would need to come up with the funds to do so otherwise.

Bills: HB2306, HB2711

Keywords: transportation budget, capital budget, operating budget, appropriations, Washington State Department of Transportation, WSDOT, Washington State Patrol, Department of Licensing, ferry funding, state ferries, highway maintenance, road preservation, bridge replacement, tolling, express toll lanes, traffic safety, speed cameras, ignition interlock, transit grants, public transit

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank you, Arvi-Morris, Climate Rail Alliance.
• us on funding a pilot program for our community and technical colleges.
• Liam Isak here with Climate Solutions, here to testify on this budget.
• types of investments to meet our climate targets.
• So I hope you will consider funding this program in the budget. Thank you.

Bills: HB2306, HB2711

Keywords: transportation budget, capital budget, operating budget, appropriations, Washington State Department of Transportation, WSDOT, Washington State Patrol, Department of Licensing, ferry funding, state ferries, highway maintenance, road preservation, bridge replacement, tolling, express toll lanes, traffic safety, speed cameras, ignition interlock, transit grants, public transit

Transcript Highlights:

• Bill 2416, as you'll remember, allocates no-cost allowances to a waste-to-energy facility under the Climate
• your EBB by Representative Dolio, H-3358.1, takes a different approach. ...energy facility under the Climate
• As a reminder, House Bill 2537 relates to emissions from EITE facilities under the Climate Commitment
• We've pulled landfills out of the Climate Commitment Act and have a different scheme.
• That program funding was removed, and it's been shown not to be very useful.

Bills: HB2416, HB2537, HB2575, HB2322

Keywords: waste management, energy, climate action, environmental regulations, fair treatment, renewable energy, sustainability, emissions, climate commitment act, environmental regulation, trade regulation, facility compliance, reporting obligations, energy laws, compliance, business impact, alternative fuel, carbon reduction, aviation, energy production

Summary: The Environment and Energy Committee held executive session on four bills. HB 2416, dealing with a Spokane waste-to-energy facility under the Climate Commitment Act, was presented with a proposed substitute that would remove the facility from CCA compliance, create separate emissions-reduction standards and reporting requirements, and authorize Ecology enforcement. Members discussed whether emissions accounting included biogenic emissions and whether reductions had to occur on-site. The substitute was reported out with a due pass recommendation on a 12-9 vote. HB 2537, concerning emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) facilities, would require Ecology to report recommendations on post-2035 allowance schedules, continue no-cost allowances if the Legislature does not act, and require biennial reporting and facility plans. Supporters said the bill would help identify decarbonization opportunities facility by facility, while opponents warned about competitiveness and job losses. The bill passed out of committee 12-9. HB 2575 would reduce certain reporting requirements for utilities and Commerce, including removing a heat-disconnection reporting item and making state energy strategy reporting less frequent. Members described it as a streamlining measure that would save utilities money and improve the usefulness of reports. It was reported out unanimously, 21-0. HB 2322, on alternative jet fuel incentives, was amended to base eligibility on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions, set a July 1, 2031 effective date, remove capacity thresholds, and drop a Clean Fuels Program carbon-intensity change. Supporters said the substitute clarified the tax incentives, and it passed unanimously, 21-0.

Transcript Highlights:

• Funds in the account may not be used for emergency fire costs or suppression costs.
• Funds in the account may not be used for emergency fire costs or suppression costs.
• That's actually a reference to one of the Climate Commitment Act accounts.
• used to fund the similar program in the operating budget.
• I lead our climate and energy strategy.

Bills: HB1960, HB2194, HB2089

Keywords: HB1960, renewable energy, clean energy, solar, wind, battery storage, energy storage, excise tax, property tax exemption, local investment, county revenue sharing, local taxing districts, school districts, Department of Revenue, Department of Commerce, model ordinance, siting, permitting, tribal consultation, tribal capacity grants

Summary: House Finance held hearings on three bills. HB 2194 would allow a county and a city within that county to both impose the cultural access sales and use tax at the same time, with the county providing a credit for the city tax. The sponsor said the bill would fix an unfair limitation and expand support for arts, science, and cultural programs. Olympia and Thurston County representatives testified in support, citing grants to local cultural organizations, free programming, and school access. A committee member asked about whether concurrent taxes could affect county bond repayment, and the testifier said he would follow up. No vote was taken. HB 2089 would remove the current requirement that a financial institution be located in 10 or more states in order to lose a B&O tax deduction on interest from certain mortgage-related loans, with the resulting revenue directed to the wildfire response, forest restoration, and community resilience account. Staff estimated the bill would raise significant revenue and affect about 450 taxpayers. The sponsor said the bill restores wildfire funding cut in the prior session by narrowing a tax preference that he said had primarily benefited large institutions rather than community banks. The Department of Natural Resources and public employees representing wildfire workers supported the bill as a way to restore wildfire preparedness funding. The Washington Bankers Association and community bankers opposed the bill as drafted, saying it would harm community banks and that they were working on revised language; they also said credit unions are not subject to B&O tax. No vote was taken. The committee then heard a proposed third substitute for HB 1960, a complex bill that would exempt certain renewable energy facility personal property and battery storage systems from property tax and replace that tax with a state and local excise tax based on generating or storage capacity. The bill would also create a local investment distribution account, make tribal capacity grants permanent, and set conditions for counties to receive grant funds tied to siting and consultation requirements. The sponsor said the goal is to levelize taxes over the life of wind, solar, and storage projects so local communities are not left with a shifting tax burden, and described the measure as a compromise. County officials, assessors, treasurers, the Department of Revenue, and conservation groups generally supported the approach but asked for clearer definitions, payment timing, and rate adjustments. Utilities and some renewable energy developers were in respectful opposition or signed in as con, saying the rates may be too high, the bill may not be workable for centrally assessed utilities, and some provisions need further refinement. The hearing ended without a vote, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• FAIR funds will fund improvements to municipally owned bridges across the Commonwealth.
• So the Commonwealth Transportation Fund, the legislature, in its wisdom, set up that fund to collect
• So the Commonwealth Transportation Fund, the legislature, in its wisdom, set up that fund to collect
• funding for FY27 of $400,000.
• For that reason, both the overall funding and Funding is vital to small communities like ours.

Bills: H4987, S2905

Keywords: transportation bond bill, municipal roads, municipal bridges, Chapter 90, road aid, highway funding, bridge repair, pavement, MassDOT, MBTA, rail reliability, commuter rail locomotives, Fair Share surtax, Commonwealth Transportation Fund, infrastructure financing, bond authorization, deferred maintenance, climate resilience, parkways, DCR

Bills: SF1832, HF2440, HF2442

Keywords: economic development, small business, workforce training, grants, entrepreneurship, equity, community support, labor market, employment, funding, data analysis, climate finance, energy finance, renewable development account, RDA, weatherization, preweatherization, low-income housing, energy efficiency, clean energy

Bills: SB18

Keywords: greenhouse gas emissions, environmental regulation, air quality, climate policy, sustainability, 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And it is one of the ways in which I want to express my frustration with where we are going on climate
• going to undo this whole litany of regulatory things, including everything having to do with the climate
• It doesn't just understand climate science, it teaches climate science.
• now on a place in which the person in charge of protecting us in this area is saying that it's a climate
• change religion and not climate science puts me into a... really challenging position.

Keywords: Environmental Protection Agency, David Fatui, nominations, climate science, environmental policy, public testimony

Summary: During this committee meeting, members engaged in substantial discussions regarding the nominations for key positions at the Environmental Protection Agency. The nominations for David Fatui as Deputy Administrator and another nominee received favorable reviews, with several members expressing support for their qualifications and the importance of their roles in addressing environmental issues. Notable conversations highlighted concerns about the current administration's stance on climate science and regulatory practices, particularly focusing on a controversial statement made by one of the nominees that undermined established climate science. Senator Whitehouse expressed deep frustration over the implications of this viewpoint on future environmental policy and regulation.

Transcript Highlights:

• That has been addressed through an escrow fund paid for by the facility developers, not by the customers
• That is why there is a surcharge paid for by community solar developers and put into a fund to cover
• Their protection is also consistent with key goals of the state's climate action plan.
• ushering and shepherding all of these bills through the committee and your personal fervor for the Climate
• Solutions Act and making sure that that got done and the energy assistance and low-income fund.

Bills: SB9

Keywords: wetlands protection, nontidal wetlands, Delaware, environmental sustainability, climate change, carbon sink, permitting process

Summary: The House Natural Resources and Energy Committee met and first considered SB 321 with Senate Amendment 1, the community solar utility billing bill. The sponsor explained that it would consolidate the two-bill system for community solar subscribers into one utility bill, with the utility forwarding the subscriber fee to the solar facility through an escrow mechanism so costs are not shifted to other ratepayers. Testimony from the solar industry, the Public Advocate, and environmental advocates supported the measure, emphasizing easier enrollment, fewer barriers for low-income customers, and guaranteed savings. The committee initially lacked enough members present to release the bill, but after a roll call vote it was released from committee. The committee then heard SB 9 with Senate Amendment 1, a wetlands protection bill creating a state non-tidal freshwater wetlands permitting program. The sponsor and DNREC described a framework of exemptions, general permits, and individual permits based on wetland type and value, with an advisory committee to develop regulations. Witnesses explained that “exceptional value” wetlands would include unique wetland communities and high-functioning wetlands, and that the bill was intended to preserve important habitat while allowing farming, drainage, and other exempt activities to continue. Some members raised concerns about flooding, land classification, and the balance of the advisory committee, while supporters said the bill was the product of broad stakeholder consensus and would protect wetlands without unduly harming agriculture or development. Public comment on SB 9 was strongly supportive from environmental groups, the Delaware Native Species Commission, the Home Builders Association, the Farm Bureau, The Nature Conservancy, and affordable housing advocates, who said the bill balanced conservation with practical land use concerns. After remote testimony, the committee took a roll call vote and SB 9 was released from committee. The meeting concluded with remarks thanking the chair for her service and instructions for members to sign the backers before adjournment.

Transcript Highlights:

• And that has been addressed through an escrow fund that is paid for by the facility developers, not by
• the customers. through an escrow fund that is paid for by the facility developers, not by the customers
• That is why there's a surcharge paid for by community solar developers and put into a fund to cover any
• Their protection is also consistent with key goals of the state's climate action plan.
• got done and the energy assistance and low income fund.

Bills: SB9

Keywords: wetlands protection, nontidal wetlands, Delaware, environmental sustainability, climate change, carbon sink, permitting process

Summary: The House Natural Resources and Energy Committee met to consider two Senate bills. SB 321, with Senate Amendment 1, would change community solar billing so subscribers receive one consolidated utility bill instead of separate bills from the utility and the solar provider. Supporters said the bill would simplify enrollment and payment, improve customer retention—especially for low-income customers—and include safeguards such as guaranteed savings and an escrow mechanism to prevent cost shifts to other ratepayers. After public testimony from solar developers, the Public Advocate, the Sierra Club, and others, the committee initially lacked enough members present to release the bill, so the vote was circulated to absent members and the bill was later reported out for floor action. The committee then heard SB 9, with Senate Amendment 1, a long-negotiated wetlands protection bill. The sponsor and DNREC explained that it would create a state non-tidal wetlands program with exemptions for certain agricultural, conservation, and routine activities, general permits for some lower-impact projects, and individual permits for higher-value wetlands. Witnesses described the bill as a compromise among environmental, agricultural, development, and local government stakeholders, while some members raised questions about flooding, landowner impacts, wetland delineation, and the role of the regulatory advisory committee. Public testimony was broadly supportive from environmental groups, the Farm Bureau, builders, engineers, and affordable housing advocates. The committee then voted to release SB 9 from committee. At the end of the meeting, members offered thanks and remarks recognizing the chair’s service and leadership on environmental and energy issues. Both bills were ultimately released from committee and reported out.