Video & Transcript Research : 'cancellation'

Page 1 of 127
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Elections and Ethics Apr 6th, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Elections and Ethics

Transcript Highlights:
  • know that you did come from another state, and then for him to reciprocate back to that state to cancel
  • Does it automatically cancel your voting privilege in the former place inside Oklahoma?
  • Do we have an automatic cancellation process?
  • Why can't that automatically cancel your ability to vote in your prior location?
  • Why can't that automatically cancel your ability to vote in your prior location?
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cap Committee Meeting - 2025-04-29

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • So House File 3220 cancels the otherwise expiring balance of 1.8 million dollars from the 2018 school
  • But this is on a Senate file, and the fiscal note request by the Senate fiscal analyst was cancelled.
Bills: HF3220
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/29/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • So um, House File 3220 cancels the otherwise expiring balance of $1.88 million from the 2018 school safety
  • House File 3220 cancels the otherwise expiring balance of $1.88 million from the 2018 school safety grants
  • So, you know, House File 3220 is a really smart use of these cancelling dollars.
  • a really smart use of these cancelling a really smart use of these cancelling dollars.<00:07:38.479
  • So it was not completed cancelled.
Bills: HF3220
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Banking and Insurance Jan 13th, 2026

Banking and Insurance

Transcript Highlights:
  • an evolving mechanism over the course of months and oftentimes years, where if a consumer wants to cancel
Summary: The Committee on Banking and Insurance met with a quorum and took up several bills, beginning with SB 834 on insurance requirements for nonprofit religious organizations and health care sharing ministries. The bill repeals a recent restriction on licensed insurance agents marketing or selling faith-based health care sharing programs. Supporters argued the change restores free speech and consumer education while preserving existing fraud and disclosure protections; opponents said allowing agents and brokers could create consumer confusion and has been associated with bad actors. A title amendment was adopted, and after debate the committee reported the bill favorably. The committee also heard and passed SB 642, which extends reporting and duty requirements to foreign and alien bail bond insurers, and SB 394, a technical bill updating reinsurance intermediary manager law to match current DFS practice. SB 266, which lets vulnerable adults rescind public adjuster contracts without penalty, was reported favorably after testimony from supporters in the insurance and elder law communities and a public adjuster who said the intent was good but the bill may need refinement. SB 832, a residential property insurance transparency bill requiring rate breakdown reports and a consumer resource center, also passed after discussion about consumer clarity and whether the required cost categories can be compiled as written. Later, the committee approved SB 540, which creates cybersecurity requirements for mortgage and money service businesses, closes a regulatory gap for certain investment advisers, adjusts OFR examination-payment deadlines, changes de novo charter requirements, allows virtual credit union meetings, and makes other financial regulation updates. Several amendments were adopted, including a substitute amendment removing fintech sandbox provisions. Finally, SB 1028 on Citizens Property Insurance Corporation was reported favorably after debate over a commercial lines clearinghouse intended to reduce Citizens’ exposure and shift more business to the private market; members discussed taxpayer risk, market competition, and consumer protections. The meeting ended with adjournment.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Policies are denied, non-renewed, or canceled. People need to know why.
  • Consumers request reasons for being declined, canceled, or non-renewed.
  • You can't non-renew or cancel someone without a reason. I've had it happen.
  • For cancellations, just on a statewide basis.
  • There wouldn't be any information as to why there was a reason for canceling or who canceled.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Commerce, Consumer Protection and International Affairs May 6th, 2026

Commerce, Consumer Protection, and International Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • H.B. 750 is what we're calling a click-to-cancel law.
  • , confusing chatbots, and hard-to-find cancellation links.
  • In H.B. 750, the cancellation process should be as easy as the process for signing up.
  • Cancellation should be available through the same method used to subscribe.
  • If you subscribe online, you should be able to cancel online.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 13th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • the ETJ of a municipality. and under Texas local local government code chapter 232008 A county may cancel
  • that ETG. under 242-001-D2, and there is no local authority, there is no. local authority that can cancel
  • there's an existing agreement between the county. in the city allows that county the authority to cancel
Bills: HB23, HB363, HB447, HB954, HB23
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Business and Commerce May 20th, 2025

Business & Commerce

Transcript Highlights:
  • Additionally, the bill does not apply to goods and only addresses cancelable services.
  • cancelable at any time hb 3466 would not remove consumer protections as all regulatory oversight of
  • days additionally the bill does not apply to goods and only addresses cancelable services a majority
  • with specific cancellation information, as well as issuing refunds if the consumer cancels the service
  • Also, making contracts cancelable is not necessarily as strong a protection as you might think.
Summary: The committee took up several pending business items and reported a series of House bills out of committee, including HB 2467, HB 2468, HB 2518, HB 4310, HB 4386, HB 4490, HB 5323, and HB 149. Most of these were advanced on committee substitute motions and sent to the local and uncontested calendar or reported favorably to the full Senate. HB 2467 drew one nay vote, while the others were approved without opposition. HB 4310 and HB 4386 were described as committee-substitute versions with changes narrowing disclosure requirements and preserving attorney-client privilege in certain circumstances. A major portion of the meeting focused on HB 149, an AI governance bill. The substitute was explained as addressing biometric identifier capture and storage, exempting certain AI uses for security and fraud prevention, clarifying definitions, restricting AI systems that simulate explicit child sexual content, adjusting Attorney General investigative authority, refining sandbox program waivers, reducing Texas AI Council powers and membership, and adding DIR coordination provisions. The committee adopted the substitute and reported the bill favorably. The committee then heard extensive testimony on HB 1500, the DIR sunset bill. The author said the bill would continue DIR for 12 years, restructure its board, update advisory committees, require regular cybersecurity assessments and penetration testing for state agencies, improve IT procurement training, and transfer the e-grants program to the Comptroller. A Texas 2036 witness supported the bill as a way to strengthen governance, procurement, and cybersecurity. Members asked detailed questions about the bill’s structure and then left HB 1500 pending. The committee also heard a lengthy presentation on HB 150, which would create the Texas Cyber Command as a component of the University of Texas System, administratively attached to UTSA and located in San Antonio. The author argued the command would centralize cyber threat intelligence, incident response, and digital forensics, and would be able to support state and local entities, with optional services for local governments. Members raised concerns about university mission drift, governance, security, chain of command, procurement authority, gifts and donations, and civil liberties implications of proactive cyber monitoring. Witnesses from UTSA/NSCC and SecurityScorecard testified in support, emphasizing the security of the downtown San Antonio facility, the existing cyber ecosystem there, and the need for a dedicated cyber capability. The bill remained under discussion with no final committee action announced in the excerpt.