Video & Transcript Research : 'biofuels'

Page 1 of 10
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/10/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • line 123 is a increase to the biofuels line 123 is a increase to the biofuels infrastructure<00:
  • <00:07:59.159> un biofuels un biofuels un 111<00:08:00.960> is<00:08:01.159> 4<00
  • There's also House File 43 for the biofuel infrastructure grants that we heard on March 3rd as amended
  • Thankful for the investments in the biofuels infrastructure grant program, as well as the dollars for
  • Thankful for the investments in the biofuels infrastructure grant program, as well as the dollars for
Bills: HF1704
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/12/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • which was inadvertently dropped from the previous update due to the statute related to an advanced biofuel
  • related to an advanced biofuel related to an advanced biofuel production<00:12:11.560> incentive
  • I've carried that bill for investing in our biofuel infrastructure, but in a year like this, where we're
  • I've carried that bill for investing in our biofuel infrastructure, but in a year like this, where we're
  • I've carried that bill for investing in our biofuel infrastructure, but in a year like this, where we're
Bills: HF1704, HF2052
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Workforce Development Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • And this is in the biofuels incentive program.
  • committee, for the record, my name is Brian Werner, and I'm the executive director of the Minnesota Biofuels
  • And most relevant to this bill, advanced biofuel known as corn kernel fiber ethanol.
  • And as a cellulosic biofuel, it reduces life cycle greenhouse gas emissions by over 70% compared to gasoline
  • I'm the executive director of the Minnesota Biofuels Association. MBA supports House File 2252.
Bills: HF3217, HF2252
Summary: The committee first approved the prior day’s minutes as amended, correcting the meeting number from the 46th to the 45th meeting. It then took up House File 3217, which would restore funding for the Minnesota Bioincentive Program. Representative Kisha argued the state should honor commitments made to companies that met program requirements and had not received full reimbursement. Testifiers from the Great Plains Institute and Minnesota Biofuels Association said the program has supported bioeconomy investment, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and generated strong economic returns, but has been underfunded, leaving unpaid claims. Members raised questions about whether the bill was retrospective and whether it should be reviewed by another committee; the bill was laid over for further consideration without a vote. The committee then heard House File 2252, a proposal to modernize Minnesota’s private activity bond volume cap by shifting unused allocation from the small issuer/manufacturing bucket to the public facilities bucket while leaving the overall cap unchanged. The bill’s public finance testifier said the current allocation formula is outdated, housing would remain the top priority, and the change would be budget neutral. Testifiers from the Minnesota Milk Producers Association and Minnesota Biofuels Association supported the bill, saying it would better align financing with rural infrastructure, clean water, manure management, renewable natural gas, dairy processing, and low-carbon fuel projects, and could lower borrowing costs for those sectors. Members questioned whether the bill fit the committee’s jurisdiction and noted it might be more appropriate for another committee; the bill was also laid over for further consideration.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/9/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • to find consistency and success in, whether it’s emerging industries like how are we going to do biofuels
  • in an industry that is difficult to find consistency and success in, or emerging industries like biofuels
Bills: HF2446
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/7/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Clause 2 goes toward the advanced biofuel production incentive, renewable chemical production incentive
  • Clause 3 is Chair Anderson's bill, HF 43, that we heard on March 3rd, for biofuel infrastructure grants
  • Clause 2 goes toward the advanced biofuel production incentive, renewable chemical production incentive
  • Clause 3 is Chair Anderson's bill, HF 43, that we heard on March 3rd, for biofuel infrastructure grants
  • Clause 2 goes toward the advanced biofuel production incentive, renewable chemical production incentive
Bills: HF2446
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 3/3/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • qualifies as an advanced biofuel.
  • <01:05:38.880> as producers of these Advanced biofuels as producers of these Advanced biofuels
  • specifically produce Advanced biofuel specifically produce Advanced biofuel they<01:05:51.359>
  • <01:06:01.880> before 23,750 mmbtu of advanced biofuel before 23,750 mmbtu of advanced biofuel
  • supportive of the biofuels supportive of the biofuels infrastructure<01:19:58.679> program
Bills: HF770, HF857, HF38, HF1500, HF43
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/2/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • :30.720> of<01:02:30.799> Grants She said that, as discussed when members heard the biofuel
  • She said the next item is on the next page, page nine, line 16, for the biofuels infrastructure grant
  • this<01:03:16.079> is<01:03:16.200> for<01:03:16.319> the<01:03:16.440> biofuels
  • we uh this is for the biofuels we uh this is for the biofuels infrastructure<01:03:17.720> Grant
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 03/10/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • So it’s making sure that we understand these biofuels as something called advanced biofuels, and it is
  • It’s making sure that we understand these biofuels as something called advanced biofuels, and it is defined
  • It’s making sure that we understand these biofuels as something called advanced biofuels, and it is defined
  • director of the Minnesota biofuels director of the Minnesota biofuels Association<00:02:57.360><
  • 50 mm BTUs of B of advanced biofuels 50 mm BTUs of B of advanced biofuels that<00:04:04.079>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • This is not possible to do if biofuels or waste-based fuels are part of the mix, as they are not carbon
  • c><00:16:49.560> if 2045 this is not possible to do if 2045 this is not possible to do if biofuels
  • or waste-based fuels are part biofuels or waste-based fuels are part of<00:16:52.279> the<00:
  • grow a significant amount of biofuels grow a significant amount of biofuels instate<00:17:04.880
  • Commission we recognize that biofuels Commission we recognize that biofuels range<00:20:53.039><
Keywords: 910, house, all
Summary: The House Committee on Transportation met on April 1 and first took up HR 63 HD1 and HCR 70 HD1, which urge the Department of Transportation to facilitate and accelerate adoption of sustainable aviation fuels to help decarbonize Hawaii’s transportation sector and meet climate goals. Testimony was mixed: supporters included representatives of Island Energy Services, Par Hawaii, Alaska/Hawaiian Airlines, Life of the Land, and the Hawaii Renewable Fuels Coalition, who said aviation emissions are a major challenge for Hawaii and that further research and development of renewable fuels is needed. Opponents, including the Environmental Caucus of the Democratic Party of Hawaiʻi and Energy Justice Network, argued the resolutions would undermine the state’s greenhouse-gas reduction commitments, rely on non-carbon-free fuels, and could create land, water, and biosecurity concerns. One member, Rep. Moroka, said his concern was the word “accelerate” because of potential damage from improperly stored biofuels. The committee voted to pass HR 63 HD1 and HCR 70 HD1, with Rep. Moroka voting no and the remaining voting members in favor. The committee then heard HR 136 and HCR 142, which urge the Hawaii Tourism Authority and the Department of Transportation to expand the airport greetings program to display kākau art in all neighbor island airports. The only noted testimony was written comments from the Hawaii Tourism Authority, and there was no additional oral testimony or discussion. The committee voted to move the measures out as is, and the recommendation was adopted without opposition. The meeting adjourned after both sets of measures were approved.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • But it's because we are using these commodities for making biofuels. biofuels are a problem, but it's
  • We basically just move the crop-based biofuels...
  • We've had biofuels extensively used for 20 years now.
  • They got a lot of palm-oil-derived biofuel.
  • I'm here to talk about the role of liquid biofuel.
Summary: The hearing was a select committee discussion on the transportation costs and impacts of California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), with opening remarks from the co-chairs and members emphasizing affordability, climate goals, and the need to explain the program’s benefits to the public. The first panel from CARB and the California Energy Commission described how LCFS works as a market-based, declining carbon-intensity program that rewards lower-carbon fuels, supports zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, and is intended to reduce greenhouse gases and local air pollution. They argued the program has driven billions in private investment, increased alternative fuel use, and that LCFS credit prices are not the main driver of retail gasoline prices, which they said are dominated by crude oil, refining, and distribution costs. Members questioned the panel on the gap between the regulatory target and actual carbon-intensity performance, the role of credit banking, which fuels are generating the most credits, how the 2025 amendments affected the program, and whether LCFS credits are truly additional. CARB explained that banking helps cost-effectiveness and investment certainty, that ethanol, renewable diesel, and biodiesel currently provide the largest volumes while electricity is expected to grow, and that the updated targets were informed by the state’s 2045 carbon-neutrality goals and the 2030 scoping plan. The Energy Commission said its data show environmental programs add some cost to gasoline but do not drive price volatility, which is mainly tied to crude oil and refinery margins. The second panel, featuring academic and research experts, focused on program design, out-of-state credit generation, and broader economic effects. Speakers said LCFS is successful because it ties incentives to emissions benefit, uses life-cycle analysis, and allows flexible compliance that lowers costs compared with more direct regulation. They also said the program’s benefits generally outweigh costs, that it can reduce air pollution disparities and support equity, but that some issues—especially indirect land use change, additionality, and older program assumptions—need more research and may warrant future rulemaking. One researcher noted that while LCFS likely raises gasoline prices somewhat, the effect is uncertain by design and usually smaller than normal market fluctuations, and another warned that limiting credit generation too narrowly could create legal and efficiency problems.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Thu Feb 19, 2026 @ 9:45 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:08:21.440> or from fossil fuels to biofuels or from fossil fuels to biofuels or waste-based
  • <00:20:16.120> and building up an industry of biofuels and building up an industry of biofuels
  • available in state for growing biofuels. available in state for growing biofuels.
  • We've been in 10 or so biofuel We've been in 10 or so biofuel proceedings<00:45:04.720> before
  • <00:52:05.880> But have enough land for biofuels. But have enough land for biofuels.
Summary: The committee on Energy and Environmental Protection heard testimony on three measures related to cleaner fuels. On HB 1986, which would require the Department of Transportation to adopt rules for a clean fuel standard by January 1, 2028 and include reporting and public informational sessions, testimony was largely supportive from state commissions, fuel companies, airlines, and other industry and advocacy groups. Supporters said the bill would create a long-term framework for reducing emissions and developing cleaner fuels in Hawaii. Opposition came from Energy Justice Network, which argued that so-called clean fuels are not carbon-free, would be costly, and could delay a needed transition to electrification. The department later said it was monitoring the bill and was concerned about costs. No vote or final action was taken in the hearing. The committee then heard HB 1694, a sustainable aviation fuel tax credit bill that would provide a per-gallon credit for SAF, cap annual credits at $20 million, require reporting, and sunset in 2035. The Department of Taxation testified on administration, while the Department of Transportation said it supported the measure as a short-term strategy to jump-start SAF until the clean fuel standard ramps up. Airlines, fuel companies, the Hawaii Food Industry Association, the Hawaii Renewable Fuels Coalition, and others supported the bill, saying it would send a market signal, help close the cost gap with conventional jet fuel, and encourage local production and investment. Opponents, including Energy Justice Network, Life of the Land, and Ted Metros, argued the bill would be expensive, could lock in a transitional fuel system, and would not produce enough fuel to meet demand. Committee members asked about the likely impact and the share of total fuel demand the credit could support; DOT said the supported gallons would be only a very small percentage of annual demand and that the credit was intended to work alongside the future clean fuel standard. Finally, the committee took up HB 1695 HD1 on renewable fuel, which expands the renewable fuels production tax credit. Testimony was again mixed but generally supportive from the Department of Transportation, Department of Taxation, Island Energy Services, airlines, the Tax Foundation, Pana Pacific, and the Hawaii Farm Bureau. Supporters said the measure would encourage local feedstock production, create agricultural opportunities, and help attract investment in renewable fuels. Pana Pacific requested an amendment to explicitly include camelina in the definition of renewable feedstocks. Opponents, including Energy Justice Network and Life of the Land, repeated concerns about cost, imported feedstocks, and the risk of undermining full electrification goals. The hearing transcript does not show any vote or final committee action on HB 1694 or HB 1695 HD1.
MA

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • without adding to the supply of biofuels.
  • It’s another demand for most sustainable aviation fuel as a kind of biofuel.
  • What happens when millions of acres of arable land are used to grow crops for biofuel?
  • What happens when millions of acres of arable land are used to grow crops for biofuel?
  • , an enormous, enormous increase in the amount of biofuels that would be required.
Keywords: 995, all
Summary: The committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy heard testimony on several transportation and clean-fuel bills. Supporters of H. 3535 argued for delaying or pausing enforcement of Massachusetts’ zero-emission vehicle sales mandate, saying the current ACC2 timeline is unrealistic given low ZEV sales, limited charging infrastructure, dealer inventory concerns, and potential economic impacts on dealerships, consumers, and tax revenue. Opponents of that approach, including automakers and clean transportation advocates, said the state should stay on course with electrification and that the mandate is necessary to meet climate goals. The committee also heard support for H. 3570/S. 2326 to update vehicle emission standards for municipal and utility fleets, with municipal utility representatives saying current electric truck technology, charging access, and costs make the rules impractical for critical public services. A major portion of the hearing focused on S. 2246, the Freedom to Move Act, which would require MassDOT and regional planning agencies to set vehicle miles traveled reduction goals and align transportation spending with climate targets. Supporters said the bill would better coordinate transportation planning, encourage transit, biking, and walking, and help Massachusetts meet emissions goals while saving money and improving public health. Some committee members raised concerns that the bill could duplicate existing transportation climate mandates and could disadvantage rural residents who must drive long distances; witnesses responded that the bill is meant to add coordination and flexibility, not impose a one-size-fits-all solution. The committee also heard testimony on H. 3448, which would set deadlines to electrify school buses and public fleets and create programs for private fleet electrification. Advocates said fleet electrification is a practical way to cut emissions, improve air quality, and save money over time, especially for schoolchildren exposed to diesel exhaust. Several witnesses also supported low-carbon fuel standard bills H. 3576 and S. 2251, arguing they would reduce fuel carbon intensity and generate revenue for charging and clean-fuel investments. Others, including a coalition opposed to private jet expansion, objected to the bills’ treatment of sustainable aviation fuel, saying it is not scalable, is expensive, and could create land-use and food-supply tradeoffs. No votes or formal committee actions were taken in the hearing excerpt provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Committee on Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate - 03/19/25

Energy, Utilities, Environment, and Climate

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, but biofuels at present are not uh zero.
  • Um, but biofuels at present are not uh zero.
  • Um biofuels are not uh zero.
  • Um biofuels are not uh zero.
  • Um biofuels are not uh zero.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all