Transcript Highlights:

• The Chero calls Bill Patterson. We show you're registered as Bill Patterson.
• I am here today to support House Bill 517. Yesterday I supported Senate Bill 542.
• And for filing this bill.
• Strong support of the bill.
• Senate Bill, um, 209.

Bills: HB 186

Keywords: public funds, lobbying activities, political subdivisions, government expenditure, transparency, local government, political subdivision, county, city, municipality, special district, taxpayer-funded lobbying, lobbying restriction, registered lobbyist, government association, county association dues, Texas Legislature, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, Chapter 556

Transcript Highlights:

• bill.
• the bill on her behalf.
• the bill on her behalf.
• This is a good bill.
• Bill 2046 pending.

Bills: HB115

Keywords: public funds, lobbying, political subdivision, government spending, transparency, HB 115, taxpayer-funded lobbying, local government lobbying, county association dues, municipal lobbying, lobbyist registration, Chapter 305, Government Code Section 556.0056, Local Government Code Section 89.002, county government, city government, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, state association of counties, sheriffs association

Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• The bill also provides. notice by other commercially reasonable methods that it tracks. at least three
• are affected by this bill.
• Strong support of the bill.
• So this bill here.
• But when I read the bill, as I understand the bill, a child is defined as underage.

Bills: HB186, HB517, HB 1093, HB 1268, HB1395, HB186

Keywords: social media, children, account verification, data privacy, parental control, property owners' association, residential watering restrictions, vegetation, fine limitations, drought, technology, innovation, economic development, grants, Texas Economic Development, business funding, HB 1395, private passenger vehicle rental, car rental, vehicle rental

Transcript Highlights:

• , House Bill 3928.
• Special education in Senate Bill 568 and House Bill 2 by closing the $1.7 billion per year funding gap
• 568 and House Bill 2.
• We have two bills currently being considered: House Bill 2 and Senate Bill 568.
• House Bill 2 goes further than Senate Bill 568 in terms of funding, but the conversation still needs

Keywords: special education, funding gap, dyslexia, House Bill 2, Senate Bill 568, House Bill 3928, disability penalty

Summary: The meeting primarily focused on special education funding, with significant discussions around House Bill 2 (HB2), Senate Bill 568 (SB568), and House Bill 3928 (HB3928). Key speakers advocated for increased funding to close the estimated $1.7 billion annual gap that affects special education in Texas public schools. Several witnesses, including educators and students affected by dyslexia, provided personal testimonies about the impact of insufficient funding and the disability penalty, which penalizes schools financially for identifying students needing special education services. The committee demonstrated a strong commitment to advocate for changes that would improve special education resources and training for teachers, thereby ensuring that all Texas children receive the educational support they need to thrive.

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj7q8MpO214, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Attendance Roll Call: 00:10 Senate Bill 290 (Sen. Carpenter): 00:43 House Bill 403 (Rep. Meade): 03:22 House Bill 443 (Rep. Rudy): 07:44 House Bill 137 (Rep. Bratcher): 10:48 Senate Bill 283 (Sen. Higdon): 13:37 Senate Bill 259 (Sen. Harper Angel): 18:43 Senate Bill 130 (Sen. Southworth): 29:58 House Bill 135 (Rep. Bauman): 32:45 House Bill 136 (Rep. Bauman): 38:11 Adjournment: 50:17, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u24LqDsSsc, 2026-06-21T07:17:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Attendance Roll Call: 00:02 House Bill 43 (Rep. Hodgson): 00:35 House Bill 100 (Rep. Witten): 02:13 House Bill 595 (Rep. Johnson): 06:14 House Bill 581 (Rep. Upchurch): 12:40 House Bill 512 (Rep. Koch): 16:50 House Bill 492 (Rep. Lockett): 18:58 House Bill 596 (Rep. Dixon): 24:36 House Bill 44 (Rep. Hodgson): 28:36 Adjournment: 34:52, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWtG275mz_Y, 2026-06-21T07:17:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:11 House Bill 3: 00:00:38 House Bill 206: 00:04:58 House Bill 244: 00:07:25 House Bill 551: 00:13:23 House Bill 804: 00:17:16 House Bill 11: 00:20:08 Discussion in Opposition to House Bill 11: 00:22:25, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrPmb7UpNqQ, 2026-06-21T07:17:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Attendance Roll Call: 0:30 House Bill 575: 1:15 Votes on House Bill 575: 8:00 House Bill 335: 10:07 Votes on House Bill 335: 11:25 House Bill 712: 12:22 Votes of House Bill 712: 17:45 Adjournment: 20:24, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvEl9S7Tp5A, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:18 House Bill 159: 00:00:53 Senate Bill 153: 00:05:30 Senate Bill 202: 00:11:35 Senate Bill 249: 00:14:44 House Bill 155: 00:17:39 House Bill 207: 00:32:59, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gs0RVhAlJcg, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 PSS 1 to Senate Bill 193: 0:43 Votes on Senate Bill 193: 10:00 PSS 1 to Senate Bill 101: 12:18 Votes on Senate Bill 101: 18:28 Senate Bill 118: 19:13 Votes on Senate Bill 118: 27:11 Adjournment: 28:13, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh_gyJG2q6k, 2026-06-21T07:17:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Reuploaded to restore full recording Meeting Start: 00:00 Attendance Roll Call: 00:16 House Bill 580 (Rep. Decker): 01:37 House Bill 99 (Rep. Johnson): 18:08 House Bill 635 (Rep. Meade): 21:11 House Bill 472 (Rep. Freeland): 23:58 House Bill 482 (Rep. Dietz): 28:26 House Bill 583 (Rep. Lawrence): 30:30 House Bill 509 (Rep. Hodgson): 32:17, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAyuDV2_rnU, 2026-06-21T07:17:05+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Attendance Roll Call: 00:15 Senate Bill 10: 02:02 Senate Bill 17: 10:36 Senate Bill 57: 16:20 Senate Bill 63: 26:19 House Bill 161: 28:00 Adjournment: 34:43, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAv3QIxJo1o, 2026-06-21T07:17:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Attendance Roll Call: 00:14 House Bill 517 (Rep. Meade): 00:49 House Bill 622 (Rep. Rudy): 04:24 House Bill 53 (Rep. Hodgson): 09:11 House Bill 456 (Rep. Heavrin): 13:14 House Bill 513 (Rep. Hale): 15:30 House Bill 388 (Rep. Nemes): 20:35 Adjournment: 41:24, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UngTw8eLwn0, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:03 Senate Bill 376: 00:00:30 Senate Bill 319: 00:03:10 House Bill 87: 00:06:37 House Bill 194: 00:08:49 Senate Bill 347: 00:14:22, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• on the agenda today first first bill on the agenda today Senate<00:05:30.000> Bill<00:05:30.280
• The 2022 bill was amazing.
• <00:11:28.200> was front of us and uh the 2022 bill was front of us and uh the 2022 bill was
• You've got one bill behind you.
• That'll have to be the final word on House Bill 241. I'll make a motion on House Bill 241.

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:01:04 Attendance Roll Call: 00:01:12 Senate Bill 3 (Sen. Wise): 00:05:28 Senate Bill 6 (Sen. Givens): 00:32:17 House Bill 241 (Rep. Truett): 00:52:18 Senate Bill 268 (Sen. Reed): 01:11:57 Adjournment: 01:24:48, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Education met and first handled introductions of guests and visitors from several school districts and education groups. The committee then took up Senate Bill 3, which relates to student athletes and includes an emergency clause. The bill sponsor and invited witnesses, including athletics directors from the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville, said the measure is intended to update Kentucky’s NIL laws in light of the House v. NCAA settlement and other national changes in college athletics. Supporters said SB 3 would let Kentucky universities directly compensate student athletes, help them secure third-party NIL deals, require reporting of deals over $600, and create guardrails and fair-market-value review to reduce pay-for-play concerns. They emphasized that the bill is meant to keep Kentucky institutions competitive, align with expected national standards, and prepare for changes expected around July 1, 2025. Witnesses also discussed the need for more uniform rules nationally, the role of the Power Four conferences in developing governance and clearinghouse systems, and the desire to preserve both athlete mobility and continuity in college sports. Several members raised concerns about the transfer portal, NIL incentives, and the broader effect on college athletics, with one senator saying NIL and the portal have damaged the sport but acknowledging Kentucky must compete. Witnesses responded that tighter portal windows and clearer national rules would help, while still preserving student-athlete transfer rights when needed. After discussion, the committee moved to a vote on SB 3; the roll call was taken, and the bill advanced out of committee, with at least one senator explaining a reluctant yes vote because of competitive pressures on the Commonwealth.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair lays out House Bill 5082.
• the bill.
• Against House Bill 5082. Seeing none, the Chair recognizes Chairman Leach to close his bill.
• the bill.]
• I think I could go on and on into the details of the bill; it's a 30-page bill.

Bills: HB229, HB3990, HB5082, HB5510, HB229

Keywords: biological sex, government information, definitions, sex-based distinctions, public health, flags, display, state law, municipalities, government buildings, drug enforcement, local control, home rule, municipal charter, county policy, ordinance preemption, state preemption, attorney general enforcement, civil penalties, mandamus

Transcript Highlights:

• That's not why I'm against the bill, sir. I'm against the bill because I...
• House Bill 5510 is left pending. Chair lays out House Bill 3990.
• This bill is not new.
• House Bill 3990 is left pending. The chair lays out House Bill 229.
• the bill.

Bills: HB229, HB229, HB3990, HB5082, HB5510

Keywords: HB 229, Texas, political subdivision, local government, county dues, county association, state association of counties, lobbying, lobbyist, public funds, taxpayer lawsuit, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, Government Code Chapter 556, Local Government Code Section 89.002, legislative advocacy, municipal government, county government, city government, special district

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diPhO28SEpM, 2026-06-21T07:17:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, The live stream for this meeting cut off before the meeting was finished. This version is the full version of that meeting. Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:15 House Bill 3: 00:01:41 House Bill 254: 00:15:59 Senate Bill 70: 00:33:03 House Bill 626: 00:43:59 Discussion in Opposition to House Bill 626: 01:02:00 House Bill 619: 01:09:00 House Bill 286: 01:16:42, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwRsodIt4q0, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00:01 Roll Call: 00:01:22 House Bill 436: 00:02:47 House Bill 258: 00:12:46 House Bill 45: 00:30:24 House Bill 47: 00:38:38 Discussion in Opposition to House Bill 47: 01:06:06, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• know, I think the proof is in the pudding, and you heard it from Senator West when he said he had a bill
• We are here to share some of our thoughts and concerns about Senate Bill 688. ...that passed the DEI
• bill.
• concerns, and for asking some very good questions and making some very profound statements on how this bill
• know, I think the proof is in the pudding, and you heard it from Senator West when he said he had a bill

Keywords: Senate Bill 688, Senate Bill 9, equity, meritocracy, social progress, policy reform, public testimony

Summary: During this meeting of the committee, significant discussions centered around Senate Bill 688 and Senate Bill 9, with members expressing deep concerns over the implications of the proposed legislation. Chair Carol Alvarado initiated the meeting by addressing the audience and highlighting the need for robust dialogue regarding the bills in question. Senator Royce West actively contributed to the discussions, emphasizing the necessity to reform existing policies that some believe would regress social progress in the state. The debate revealed a passionate division among committee members, as they navigated the complexities of equity and meritocracy in legislation.