Video & Transcript Research : 'acceptance'

Page 1 of 438
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • . >> Motion to accept the minutes as written. >> We have motion, second. >> Second. >> I think thank
  • I believe that moved out of the Senate for colleges to accept the CLT.
  • 00:19:31.480> to out of the Senate to for colleges to out of the Senate to for colleges to accept
  • So I was just curious if accept the CLT.
  • of them were anonymous and we do accept of them were anonymous and we do accept anonymous<01:17:
Summary: The Education Assessment & Accountability Review Subcommittee approved the minutes from its October 14 and November 4 meetings and also approved the Office of Education Accountability report analyzing student discipline data in Kentucky schools. The main presentation came from KDE Commissioner Dr. Robby Fletcher on implementation of House Bill 257, which he said has two major parts: selection of a statewide college entrance exam through a new procurement process, and development of locally designed indicators of quality for accountability. On the college exam, Fletcher explained that the state had to reopen procurement after Senate Bill 197, with the RFP released May 21, vendor questions handled through the Finance and Administration Cabinet, proposals due June 22, and scoring and review expected in July and August, with a vendor decision not likely until October. He emphasized that the exam is a norm-referenced college-readiness measure, not a test of Kentucky academic standards, which are assessed by the KSA. Members asked about the science requirement in statute, the possibility of multiple vendors or district choice, and whether the CLT could participate; Fletcher said vendors must address science in the RFP, multiple vendors could be possible, and any vendor could submit a proposal if it meets the rubric. He also noted that ACT and SAT differ in structure, that either can meet college-readiness benchmarks, and that there were no major complaints about the SAT during its first year of use. The second major topic was the locally developed indicators of quality under House Bill 257. Fletcher said these are intended to let districts measure themselves against their own goals rather than compare districts statewide, while still aligning with Kentucky standards. He described examples such as achievement, growth, student well-being, safety, fiscal responsibility, civics, internships, apprenticeships, project-based learning, and defenses of learning. He said districts may use local assessments such as MAP, STAR, and I-Ready alongside state data, and that local models should be developed with families, community members, and workforce partners. He added that KDE is providing technical assistance, has applied for a federal CGSA grant, and will use a one-time $15,000 cost offset for districts implementing local accountability models, with a superintendent webcast planned for August.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • . or early voting ballot board to review mail-in ballot carrier envelopes to determine whether to accept
  • those issues.] and we're going to discuss someone who socially transitioned after the war and was accepted
  • school employees teaches our children. children a dangerous lesson: that hate and discrimination are acceptable
  • Discrimination and violence towards transgender individuals is deemed acceptable, if not encouraged,
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2020, when restaurants were forced to ...accept and deserve.
  • They accepted the Nevada plan and it will start being in effect next year.
  • I'll accept a motion. So move to do pass. Thank you very much.
  • I will accept a motion. So moved to do pass. Thank you very much.
  • I'll accept a motion. So move to do pass. Thank you very much. I'll accept a motion.
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • Right now the law accepts counseling, clinical, and school psychology, or a combination of the three:
  • ; that<00:28:39.039> we<00:28:39.200> may<00:28:39.360> not<00:28:39.600> accept
  • 00:28:40.159> Uh<00:28:40.480> so<00:28:40.720> for >> that we may not accept
  • Uh so for >> that we may not accept.
  • c> They would have to be doctoral degrees, and then we would also have to change section seven to accept
Summary: The committee heard testimony on SB 2047, relating to pharmacy benefit managers. The Insurance Division said the bill would require new enforcement resources and estimated an appropriation of about $1.5 million and five positions. Kaiser Permanente asked for an amendment to exclude HMOs from the definition of third-party PBMs, saying the bill should not interfere with integrated care models. PCMA and the Hawaii Pharmacist Association supported narrowing amendments, with pharmacists objecting to section 3 and warning the bill as amended could create major operational burdens and a significant general fund cost. No vote was taken in the portion provided, and the chair moved on to the next measure after questions. The committee then took up SB 2080, which would allow Hawaii to join the psychology interjurisdictional compact. Supporters, including DCR, the Hawaii Association of Health Plans, the Hawaii State Association of Counties, the Grassroot Institute, and others, said the compact would expand access to psychology services, especially for people in rural areas or those needing continuity of care while traveling. Opponents, including the Board of Psychology and a Shamanad University psychology professor, raised concerns about client safety, crisis-response procedures, enforcement costs, FBI background checks, and possible loss of state control over training and specialization standards. The board said Hawaii’s current 1,900-hour internship/postdoc requirement is higher than the compact’s standard and that the state is still implementing a separate provisional licensing law that may address some access issues. The discussion focused on whether the compact would meaningfully reduce shortages and whether Hawaii should instead pursue changes within its existing licensing system. Finally, the committee heard SB 2277 on hospital price transparency. The Office of Consumer Protection initially noted the bill could require significant staffing, but later testimony from SHIP suggested the measure could be handled more simply by working with the Healthcare Association of Hawaii and publicly posting violations. The Healthcare Association of Hawaii opposed the bill, arguing hospitals already must comply with federal CMS transparency rules and that adding state requirements would increase costs and legal exposure, especially if violations were treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices. Steve Fenberg testified in support, saying the bill would simply codify existing federal requirements in state law and that he was open to amendments removing state enforcement and the unfair trade practice language. No final action was taken in the excerpt provided.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you very much, and I'll accept a motion.
  • Thank you very much, and I'll accept a motion.
  • Thank you very much, and I'll accept a motion. I'd so move to do pass.
  • Thank you very much, and I'll accept a motion. I'll so move to do pass.
  • I'll accept a motion. So move to do pass. Thank you very much, Senator Wynn.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Conference Committee on SF3045 5/13/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • The proposal here is to accept Senate section 33.
  • On line 14, the proposal is to accept On line 14, the proposal is to accept Senate<00:09:29.519>
  • <00:09:51.360> Senate Line 16 uh proposes to accept Senate Line 16 uh proposes to accept Senate
  • <00:10:32.399> a On line 18, the proposal is to accept a On line 18, the proposal is to accept
  • On line 19, the proposal is to accept On line 19, the proposal is to accept the<00:10:49.160>
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The State and Local Government and Elections Conference Committee met on May 13, 2025, to adopt agreed-upon provisions from the elections article. The chair noted they initially lacked a quorum on both sides, but later confirmed quorum was present. Members and staff walked through a grid of proposed sections, covering voter registration and student proof-of-residence rules, public voter information list deadlines, electronic rosters for combined polling places, absentee ballot procedures, candidate filing and ballot preparation notices, write-in candidate timelines, municipal boundary adjustments, emergency polling place signage, county election training, special election filing periods for legislative vacancies, school district election timing, voting system testing, town elections, hospital board elections, and repeal of the voting equipment grant account. Several items were described as technical or clarifying changes, including wording fixes, consistency edits, and updated effective dates, with many provisions set to take effect January 1, 2026. One item, line 15, involving a cannabis-related provision, was set aside because an amendment had not been posted and printed in time; members agreed to take it up later. The committee also discussed a mix of House-only and Senate-only provisions, including third-party presidential electors, phonetic spelling on affidavits of candidacy, notification of ballot preparers when candidate names change, emergency polling place procedures, training requirements, and rules for temporary polling places on tribal land. After the staff walkthrough and brief questions, Vice Chair Aldenorf moved to adopt the provisions in the document titled “Elections Provisions Proposed Sections for Adoptions, May 13, 2025,” excluding line 15, and include them in the conference committee report. The motion passed on a voice vote with no opposition recorded. The committee then adjourned, with members noting that work on remaining elections provisions could continue afterward.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • On line 17, the Senate accepts the House offer to eliminate ongoing funding for the student loan debt
  • On line 33, the Senate accepts the Act.
  • On line 34, the Senate accepts program.
  • So that's one change that we move forward that we thought hopefully you'd accept.
  • Um and on the sexual you'd accept.
Keywords: 1183, house
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Healthcare budget: the House accepts Senate bump offer number one on budget.
  • The House accepts Senate bump offer number one on budget.
  • Healthcare budget: the Senate accepts the House offer on proviso, Healthcare budget: the Senate accepts
  • We accept House bump offer number one on HB 5201, S.E.
  • The Senate accepts your offer on HB 7031E relating to taxation.
Summary: The Budget Conference Committee met to exchange final offers across the major budget areas, including agriculture and natural resources, healthcare, justice, K-12 education, higher education, state administration and general government, transportation and economic development, administered funds, and PICO. Both chambers largely accepted each other’s bump offers, proviso language, back-of-the-bill items, implementing bills, and several related bills, including measures tied to fuel taxes, petroleum, prisons, retirement, collective bargaining, taxation, and higher education. Each side also reviewed and accepted the other chamber’s supplemental funding list, while the House offered its supplemental funding list for consideration. No public testimony was taken; the chair noted the offers had been publicly noticed and would not be explained individually. After the exchange of offers, Senator Hooper moved to allow staff to make technical and conforming adjustments to the budget and tax package, and the motion was adopted without objection. The committee then closed with brief closing remarks and adjourned, concluding the 2026 budget conference.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Healthcare budget: the House accepts Senate bump offer number one on budget.
  • The House accepts Senate bump offer number one on budget.
  • We accept House bump offer number one on HB 5201, S.E.
  • The Senate accepts your offer on HB 7031E relating to taxation.
  • List, and we accept your list as well. Is there a public testimony?
Summary: The Budget Conference Committee met to exchange final offers between the House and Senate on the state budget. The discussion covered multiple budget areas, including Agriculture and Natural Resources, Health Care, Justice, Pre-K through 12 Education, Higher Education, State Administration and General Government, Transportation and Economic Development, Administered Funds, and PICO, along with related implementing bills, proviso language, supplemental funding lists, and the tax package (HB 7031E). Each chamber indicated acceptance of many of the other side’s bump offers and related items, including several bills tied to petroleum, retirement, prisons, collective bargaining, and higher education. No public testimony was taken; the chairs noted the offers had already been noticed to the public and declined to call individuals to explain them. After the exchange of offers, Senator Hooper moved to allow staff to make technical and conforming adjustments to the budget, conforming language, and tax package, and the motion was adopted without objection. The committee then closed with brief remarks from the chairs and adjourned, concluding the 2026 budget conference.
FL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Healthcare budget: The House accepts Senate bump offer number one on budget.
  • The House accepts Senate bump offer number one on budget.
  • We accept House bump offer number one on HB 5201, S.E.
  • The Senate accepts your offer on HB 7031E relating to taxation.
  • List, and we accept your list as well. Is there a public testimony?
Keywords: 999, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Working Group on Omnibus Taxes Bill - 05/21/25

Minnesota Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Uh and then<00:14:20.399> accept<00:14:20.880> are<00:14:21.040> accepting<00:14
  • :21.440> provisions<00:14:22.079> as then accept are accepting provisions as then accept
  • That is still a pretty thorny issue. to us and we would accept but at this to us and we would accept
  • <01:00:26.880> this something that could be accepted this something that could be accepted
  • <01:22:20.239> a be prepared uh with um uh to accept a be prepared uh with um uh to accept
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
WY
Transcript Highlights:
  • um accepting or soliciting donations<00:02:24.319> during<00:02:24.879> session.
  • <00:03:08.640> In<00:03:08.879> addition, acceptance of a donation.
  • In addition, acceptance of a donation.
  • I didn't actively accept or something like that. And I don't think we want that.
  • I didn't actively accept only solicited.
Keywords: 916, all
Summary: The Senate rules committee continued work on a proposed rule restricting campaign fundraising in the Capitol and during session or special session. Senator Nethercott and LSO attorney Mr. Shaw explained that the draft was revised to add clarity after concerns that the earlier language could unintentionally penalize a senator who merely received a contribution without affirmatively soliciting it. The committee discussed two options: option one, which would prohibit knowingly soliciting a contribution and accepting it by affirmative act, and option two, which would prohibit knowingly soliciting or accepting a legislative campaign contribution by affirmative act. A new subsection C was also added to make clear the rule would not apply when a senator merely discovers that a contribution was made and took no affirmative act to solicit or receive it. Members focused on how the term “solicit” should be understood, including whether a campaign website donate button or online promotion would count as solicitation. Mr. Shaw said the rule does not define the term and suggested it should be applied reasonably, noting that a static donate button may be treated differently from actively promoting donations. Several senators said subsection C addressed the main concern about accidental receipt of a mailed contribution, but that further guidance may still be needed on passive receipt and how to handle donations connected to pending legislation. Senator Duro said the committee was responding to an unacceptable incident that occurred in the building and wanted to make clear such conduct would not be tolerated. After discussion, Senator Rothfuss moved option two and Senator Gierau seconded. The committee voted to adopt option two, with Senators Gierau, Nethercott, Salazar, and Chairman Biteman voting aye; Senator Rothfuss also voted aye. The committee then adjourned, and it was noted that the adopted rule would become part of the permanent Senate rules unless changed at the start of a future session.