Video & Transcript : 'USDA funding freeze' :

Page 1 of 500
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • The threat from the illegal freeze of funding that is imposed by the USDA on thousands of signed contracts
  • funding freeze that I would request consent to have placed into the record.
  • freeze on signed contracts. and to require USDA to make all past due payments and I'm hoping others on
  • Could you just for a moment talk... about the impact you are seeing from the USDA funding freeze on the
  • So with the funding freeze, a lot of opportunities that farmers have, like myself, to go out and get
Summary: The meeting of the agricultural committee focused on significant concerns regarding the current state of America's rural economy, highlighting the need for a strong five-year farm bill to address the challenges faced by farmers, particularly young and beginning farmers. Key testimony was given by multiple stakeholders including agricultural leaders and young farmers, emphasizing issues related to crop insurance, access to credit, and the adverse impact of recent USDA funding freezes. Various members discussed the necessity of risk management tools that farmers rely on to secure financing, which is crucial for sustaining agricultural operations and supporting rural communities. The importance of timely legislative action was underscored, as many farmers reported struggles in the current economic climate, raising urgency for reforms within the Farm Bill framework.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • Studi, for your testimony and for your work at USDA.
  • Estudi, yes or no, did President Trump and the USDA cut $1 billion in funding for schools and food banks
  • The answer to that question is also yes, USDA notified grant applicants on March 24th.
  • In March of 2025, USDA suspended millions of dollars in Commodity Credit Corporation funds originally
  • The additional grant funding has allowed for the expansion of farm to school initiatives.
Bills: SB222
Summary: This meeting of the committee focused primarily on the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, S222, which aims to permit schools to offer a fuller range of milk options, including whole, reduced, and low-fat varieties, that have garnered bipartisan support. Chairman Bozeman opened the session by highlighting concerns over children's nutrition and the obesity epidemic, emphasizing the significance of nutritious school meals in addressing these issues. Experts from various organizations were invited to discuss the implications of this bill as well as the current challenges facing school meal programs, including budget constraints and food supply issues. The meeting included passionate testimonies about the direct impacts of current dietary guidelines and federal funding reductions affecting schools' abilities to provide healthy meal options.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • of USDA employees.
  • freeze.
  • This morning they sent a list that included 15 programs affected by the funding freeze.
  • USDA has the authority to do that.
  • , when there was such a fund, a specialty crop fund.
Summary: The meeting focused on the nominations of Judge Stephen Alexander Vaden for Deputy Secretary of Agriculture and Mr. Tyler Clarkson for General Counsel at the USDA. Members expressed concerns regarding the challenges farmers and ranchers face, especially in navigating the impacts of recent tariffs imposed by the President. Significant attention was given to how these nominations could influence agriculture policy and support rural communities amidst economic uncertainty. The committee emphasized the necessity for strong leadership in the USDA to advocate for farmer needs and ensure the proper implementation of assistance programs.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

02/02/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Would the funding for ASL be impacted at all if we did or did not fund this program?
  • fund, pilot funds are necessary.
  • , and the trust fund would fund the innovation pathway.
  • fund, pilot funds are necessary.
  • Once the trust fund is distributing, then 4% goes to the fund.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/26/2026 - House Health & Human Services

Health & Human Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • It funds the state match costs for the Medicaid expansion population, and then, number two, it funds
  • Obviously there are different aspects of the Rural Health Transformation Fundfunds that will be deployed
  • To keep their federal funding and state funding, there's no doubt that hospitals would be summarily forced
  • It's federally funded and comes from CMS.
  • It's federally funded comes from CMS.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/31/2026 - Senate Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Appropriations, Transportation and Technology

Transcript Highlights:
  • with the security freezes and any credit fraud issues.
  • compensation fund.
  • And so it's not even clear that they need these funds.
  • So right now we're relying on federal funding, and if there is any funding through the court system that
  • "Groups that get this funding—are there clawbacks?
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Feb 25th, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Ways and Means General Fund.
  • Which creates about a little over $600,000 line item for the general fund.
  • redirected to this committee because that's this committee's responsibility to look after the general fund
  • so,</c><00:15:17.519><c> I</c><00:15:17.680><c> think</c><00:15:17.760><c> that's</c> the general fund
  • And so, I think that's the general fund.
Bills: HB44 , HB400 , HB444 , HB487 , SB249 , SB252 , SB58 , HB44 , HB400 , HB444 , HB487 , SB249 , SB252 , SB58
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/23/2026 - Senate Federalism and Family Law

Federalism and Family Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The fund consists of legislative appropriations, grants, gifts, contributions, and devices.
  • In addition, the bill's infrastructure funding would give us And families.
  • The credit freeze must remain in effect until the child reaches 16 years of age.
  • After that, the child may elect to have the freeze remain or be removed.
  • freezes and any credit fraud issues.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><01:52:14.119><c> approved</c> USDA inspected and a USDA approved USDA inspected and a USDA approved
  • USDA, yeah, you're talking about, like, yeah, USDA... seen that.
  • USDA facility.
  • c> established by the USDA or was it USDA established by the USDA or was it USDA or<02:37:08.319><c>
  • under the cost of care fund?
Summary: The committee first held a work session on HB 505, which would allow the sale of freeze-dried foods produced in homestead food operations. Members raised concerns about the bill’s broad language, especially the provision stating freeze-dried food would not be considered potentially hazardous. Several suggested narrowing the bill to specific products such as processed foods, berries, fruit, dairy products, ice cream, or vegetables, and requiring use of commercial freeze-drying equipment rather than dehydrators. There was also discussion of oxygen absorbers, moisture control, sanitation, and whether the issue should be handled in statute or rules. By the end of the discussion, members generally agreed the topic should be treated in a separate section of law rather than folded into the existing homestead food license, and the chair said the matter would be sent to the food safety subcommittee, with the possibility of a study committee if more time was needed. The committee then moved to HB 277, a technical correction to the animal cruelty statutes. Representative Bixby explained that current law refers to a “colt,” which applies only to male baby horses, leaving fillies unaddressed; the bill would replace “colt” with “foal” and make related wording changes so the restriction applies to any horse under 90 days old not being nursed by its dam. The New Hampshire Farm Bureau testified in support, saying the change was requested to clarify and modernize the statute and that the issue had been identified during work on related animal cruelty legislation. No votes were taken in the portion provided. The chair recessed the work session until 11:00 a.m. and announced that Representative Ktoa would take over the hearing on HB 277.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • It should not be freeze-dried; it should be just USDA-inspected meat.
  • USDA inspected meat that has been freeze-dried<04:46:01.638><c> without</c><04:46:01.920><c> a</c><04
  • meat may sell USDA-inspected meat that has been freeze-dried?
  • meat may sell USDA-inspected meat that has been freeze-dried?
  • meat may sell USDA-inspected meat that has been freeze-dried?
Summary: The Environment and Agriculture Committee opened by noting member absences and then reviewed the governor’s HB 2 trailer bill language creating a solid waste site evaluation committee. The chair explained that Finance would want the committee’s input on the proposal and also announced a temporary change to the committee’s schedule, with additional Wednesday meetings planned around school vacation. The committee then moved into a work session on several bills. On HB 150, Representative Ktoa offered a simple amendment changing food-processing language from “washed and rinsed” to “cleaned and sanitized” in the processing area. Members agreed the change better matched food safety practice, and the committee indicated support for advancing the bill. On HB 307, dealing with homestead food production areas, members discussed proposed amendment language that would add clearer sanitary requirements, including handwashing access, sanitary storage, sanitizable food-contact surfaces, and pest exclusion. The committee also discussed whether to replace “potentially hazardous food” with “time temperature control safe food,” but several members favored keeping the existing term because it is already well defined in food safety law. The bill was held for further amendment work rather than being executed immediately. The committee spent substantial time on solid waste legislation. For HB 479, members recalled a prior plan for a letter to the solid waste working group and agreed to proceed with the bill in executive session, with an offer of drafting help from Representative Bixby. For HB 77, which would require DES to establish site-specific setback distances for proposed new landfills, Representative Penza said his amendment was not ready yet but was close, and the bill was left for further discussion. The most detailed discussion was on HB 2115, which would require landfill permit applicants to submit a report on the project’s harms and benefits. Representative Germana explained an amendment that would replace section one, expand the list of benefits to include economic potential and infrastructure improvements, and set up a third-party review process in which the applicant submits a list of reviewers, DES screens the list, and the commissioner selects a reviewer if no agreement is reached within 60 days. Members asked about who could serve as contractors, whether they had to be local, and how DES would judge qualifications; the response was that environmental engineering and similar firms could be used, local or outside the community, and that the process would remain somewhat flexible. Representative H. Haskins asked whether the legislature or subcommittee would be formally notified of preliminary review problems, and the chair said no additional notification process would be built in beyond existing practice. The committee planned to continue work on the bills in upcoming executive sessions, including after school break.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband and Rural Development - 02/17/25

Agriculture, Veterans, Broadband, and Rural Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • This program has funded $2 million annually from the USDA FSIS, and that helps fund 27 staff positions
  • This program has funded $2 million annually from the USDA FSIS, and that helps fund 27 staff positions
  • All of the federal funding for the board is from USDA APHIS, and this is the form of cooperative agreements
  • c><01:24:23.000><c> falls</c><01:24:23.360><c> through</c><01:24:23.719><c> I</c> USDA so if that funding
  • falls through I USDA so if that funding falls through I would<01:24:23.960><c> urge</c><01:24:24.480
HI

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

JDC Informational Briefing 08-14-2025

Hawaii Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c> have the education funding freeze case. have the education funding freeze case.
  • > um</c> categorical funding freeze was issued um categorical funding freeze was issued um almost<00:
  • streams, it was not freezing the funds.
  • streams, it was not freezing the funds.
  • </c> was in fact a freeze um that these funds was in fact a freeze um that these funds began<00:57:38.880
Summary: The Judiciary Committee held an informational briefing on the State of Hawaii’s affirmative litigation against the federal administration, with no public testimony. Attorney General Lopez and deputies said the office’s goal is to enforce the rule of law, not make partisan points, and noted that Hawaii is involved in 27 ongoing cases. They grouped the cases into four broad areas: immigration, funding freezes and grant terminations, federal agency dismantling/reductions in force, and protecting elections, health, and safety. Several immigration-related cases were discussed in detail. These included a challenge to the federal sharing of Medicaid data with DHS for immigration enforcement, a similar challenge to USDA’s demand for SNAP applicant and recipient data, and litigation over immigration-enforcement conditions attached to federal grants. The office also described the birthright citizenship executive order, saying it conflicts with the 14th Amendment and Supreme Court precedent; lower courts granted preliminary relief, and the U.S. Supreme Court later addressed only the scope of nationwide injunctions, not the merits. In the Department of Transportation case, the court granted a preliminary injunction against the “Duffy directive,” finding the immigration conditions lacked statutory authority, were arbitrary and capricious, and violated the Spending Clause and APA. The briefing also covered multiple funding disputes. In the education funding freeze case, the Department of Education and OMB withheld about $6 billion in formula funds, including roughly $33 million for Hawaii; after suit was filed, the funds were released. Other cases included the termination of over $11 billion in public health grants, which affected Hawaii Department of Health grants, the NIH indirect cost cap case, and NIH grant terminations tied to DEI, transgender issues, and vaccine hesitancy. The speakers said some cases have already resulted in preliminary or permanent injunctions, while others remain on appeal or are still being litigated.
NH
Transcript Highlights:
  • That is the freeze-dried food bill, and I hope everybody has a copy of the amendment.”
  • That is the freeze-dried food bill, and I hope everybody has a copy of the amendment.
  • The USDA said no; it has to come from the state general fund.
  • And just so you know, I actually had to call in the USDA to do a surprise inspection on a USDA facility
  • And just so you know, I actually had to call in the USDA to do a surprise inspection on a USDA facility
Summary: The committee opened a hearing on HR 18, a resolution urging New Hampshire’s congressional delegation to seek federal changes that would let very small slaughter plants use custom-exempt inspection criteria with a third-party inspector present, so beef, pork, lamb, and goat could be sold as individual cuts directly to consumers. Representative Judy Aron said the resolution was drafted in lieu of state legislation because the issue is governed by USDA rules, and she noted she was also working on an amendment to ensure the measure covered federal “very small” plants. Representative Miner asked for clarification about custom slaughter versus retail sales, and Representative Scully supported the resolution while suggesting language to make clear it applied only to local end consumers. Joyce Brady of the New Hampshire Farm Bureau testified in support, saying the state’s four USDA slaughterhouses and the bottleneck in custom cutting made the issue important. After no further testimony, the chair closed the hearing. The committee then moved into a work session on several bills. For HB 616, members discussed an amendment that had been revised after public comments and Commissioner Jasper’s feedback; Representative Guber said it balanced the competing positions, and Representative Penza and Representative Ger said the language now addressed concerns about animal suffering by allowing euthanasia if a treating veterinarian determines the animal is in extreme suffering. The committee then discussed HB 77, with Representative Penza describing changes to landfill-related standards, including replacing aquifer references with drinking water wells, removing a penalty section, changing discretionary language to mandatory language for the department, and adjusting an in situ soils standard. Members praised the compromise, though Representative Scully raised concerns about the 1,500-foot setback and suggested engineering controls such as berms; Penza responded that current rules do not include such controls and that the setback was intended to address surface spills. Several members said the bill reflected a hard-fought balance and should not be rewritten at the last minute. For HB 505, the freeze-dried food bill, Representative Aron explained that the amendment replaced a simple exemption with a requirement that homestead food operations selling freeze-dried foods from a farm stand, farmers market, or retail food store obtain a homestead food license under RSA 143-A:4. She said the amendment defines freeze-dried foods as fruits, vegetables, and commercially prepared dairy products, and delays the effective date 120 days to allow rulemaking. Members generally supported the approach as a light-touch oversight mechanism for potentially hazardous foods, though Representative Ktoa asked for clarification about how the amendment interacts with existing licensing and inspection exemptions, and Aron clarified that these products would not be exempt from licensing under the relevant law. The committee then turned to HB 250, concerning local authority over dog muzzling, where members broadly supported the amendment as a simple solution, while Representative Ktoa asked about the underlying definition of a vicious dog and whether all listed behaviors would warrant muzzling. The discussion noted that the amendment would allow towns to require muzzling for dogs meeting the statutory definition, while excluding hunting, working, herding, and similar dogs.
US
Transcript Highlights:
  • This requires adequate staffing and stable funding.
  • freeze that has been imposed on thousands of USDA contracts.
  • If the USDA does not immediately release the funding to our farmers, I hope this committee will quickly
  • So tell me, how is the federal funding, Mr. Boring, freeze affected our specialty crop growers?
  • Second, we must ensure we protect our animals from foreign animal diseases by funding USDA programs.
Summary: The committee meeting focused on crucial discussions surrounding the challenges faced by the agriculture sector, particularly concerning avian flu and its impact on poultry and dairy producers. Members provided insights into the economic struggles within the industry, emphasizing the need for a new bipartisan farm bill that addresses the diverse needs of specialty crop and livestock producers. Witnesses from various agricultural sectors spoke about their experiences, illustrating the high costs, regulatory burdens, and emerging diseases that threaten their operations. The meeting underscored a commitment to exploring solutions that will help maintain market stability and ensure food security.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • But this week, the USDA announced that it would not use emergency funds specifically allocated to this
  • The USDA has contingency funds and is legally obligated to release them for SNAP benefits.
  • So we do get 20% of our allocations in cooperative agreement funds from USDA. Those are safe.
  • </c><01:19:16.480><c> Those</c><01:19:16.719><c> are</c> agreement funds from USDA.
  • Those are agreement funds from USDA.