Video & Transcript Research : 'Texas Judicial System'

Page 1 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Passing this bill is a step towards reinforcing the accountability of our judicial system.
  • “I have clear evidence, and the judicial system is not doing what they’re supposed to do.
  • And this bill seeks to ensure transparency within the judicial system.
  • This law has helped Texas collect data about threats to judicial officers across our state.
  • Texas will have the strongest judicial security act in the nation if this is passed.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Passing this bill is a step toward reinforcing the accountability of our judicial system.
  • And this bill seeks to ensure transparency within the judicial system.
  • And this bill seeks to ensure transparency within the judicial system.
  • This law has helped Texas collect data about threats to judicial officers across our state.
  • We will have, Texas will have the strongest judicial security act in the nation if this is passed.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Outdoor recreation in Texas.
  • In this role, I also serve as the Executive Director of the Texas Judicial Council, which is the policymaking
  • We’re attempting to modernize and strengthen the judicial process in seven West Texas counties by authorizing
  • Court of Texas.
  • And aligning with the importance of that protection, in 2020, the Texas Judicial Council adopted a resolution
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • diminishing their trust in our judicial system.
  • A potential solution to counter implicit bias in our judicial system is implicit bias training.
  • the Texas Judicial Council recommendation to require implicit bias training for justices, judges, and
  • Did you just say that the Texas Judicial Council recommends that the implicit bias...
  • Well, we want our judicial system to be fair and impartial.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • It represents real threats and dangers that are judicially... system and the public face daily.
  • courts and the judicial system.
  • Texas.
  • Without proactive of a judicial review process, such litigants can continue abusing the system at the
  • It's important to recognize that there needs to be a balance to ensure. the judicial system remains effective
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • This committee substitute was requested by the Texas Real Estate Improvement Institute.
  • I'm an estate planning and probate attorney here in Austin, and I'm here on behalf of the Texas Real
  • in addition to letters testamentary or letters of administration, this is an old reference in the Texas
  • Senate Bill 1734 creates a legal process allowing property owners to seek judicial determination that
  • It keeps costs down and ensures that Texas disputes are handled by Texas courts, which should encourage
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence (Part I) Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This committee substitute was requested by the Texas Real Estate and Probate Institute, and that's all
  • I'm an estate planning and probate attorney here in Austin, and I'm here on behalf of the Texas Real
  • Judges from 8 years to 6 years prevent visiting judges from practicing in their assigned judicial region
  • Senate Bill 1734 creates a legal process allowing property owners to seek judicial determination that
  • Keeps costs down, makes sure that Texas disputes are handled by Texas courts, should encourage economic
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Jurisprudence Apr 9th, 2025

Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • This committee substitute was requested by the Texas Real Estate and Probate Institute, and that's all
  • This committee substitute was requested by the Texas Real Estate and Probate Institute, and that's all
  • I'm an estate planning and probate attorney here in Austin, and I'm here on behalf of the Texas Real
  • It keeps costs down, makes sure that Texas disputes are handled by Texas courts, and should encourage
  • Texas disputes are handled by Texas courts, which should encourage economic growth and more projects
Summary: The committee heard several probate, family law, judicial, property, and contract-related bills. Senate Bill 1335, relating to decedents’ estates, would remove outdated references to a clerk’s certificate, allow courts to remove personal representatives on their own motion with notice by qualified delivery method, and add independent administrators to provisions that referenced only independent executors; an estate-planning attorney testified in support, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1760, concerning guardianship transfer fees and procedures, was described as setting a $45 filing fee for transferred guardianship cases and clarifying completion and dismissal procedures; it received no testimony and was left pending. Senate Bill 2127 would shorten the eligibility period for retired judges to serve as visiting judges from eight years to six, restrict practice in their assigned region for two years, and require conflict-related certification; it also was left pending without testimony. Senate Bill 302 would shift the cost of a traveling probate judge to the requesting estate or parties rather than the county; one witness registered in favor, no one testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then considered a committee substitute for Senate Bill 252, which would clarify the parental presumption in conservatorship cases, require non-parents seeking relief against a parent to file an affidavit showing significant impairment to the child if relief is denied, require courts to state specific findings when overcoming the presumption, confirm the clear-and-convincing standard, and clarify that agreed prior orders do not defeat the presumption. The substitute was explained as consensus language from a work group, public testimony was reopened, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1734, on deed fraud, would create a streamlined ex parte process for property owners to have fraudulent deeds declared void, modeled on the fraudulent lien statute; county clerk and title association representatives testified that it would provide a low-cost self-help remedy for a growing problem, and the bill was left pending subject to the chair. Senate Bill 1975 would prevent Texas contractors from being forced to litigate disputes in foreign jurisdictions and require disputes to be handled in the county where the project is located; it was presented as a repeat of a previously vetoed bill and was left pending. Finally, the committee took up a substitute for Senate Bill 1940, concerning transfer-on-death style beneficiary designations for manufactured homes. The substitute would allow one or more beneficiaries instead of only one, transfer the interest to surviving designated beneficiaries who survive by 120 hours, extend the application period for transfer to 365 days, void the designation if not timely filed, and require mailing by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested. The substitute was adopted without objection. The committee then recessed subject to the call of the chair.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 16th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm also with the Texas Business Law Foundation and sit on the Texas Business Organization Committee.
  • ...of the State Bar of Texas.
  • This bill addresses the lack of actionable prosecution data by requiring the Texas Judicial Council to
  • It asks for a collaborative process for the Texas Judicial Council to work.
  • A mandate in the bill, it is rather the bill sets up a process by which the Texas Judicial Council will
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • The judicial branch.
  • system.
  • systems, I I think that is that's valid. systems, I I think that is that's valid.
  • crucial protections to for our judicial crucial protections to for our judicial system.<00:43:14.079
  • Um I'm not sure why system.
Bills: HF3874, HF962
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 23rd, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • Every major police system in Texas that has a pension system provides for disabilities for officers like
  • Fundamentally unfair for the educators of Texas to subsidize within their retirement system in a smaller
  • I'm also here on behalf of the Texas System Police Association. That's how we have you registered.
  • Currently, there are two judicial retirement plans in Texas: JRS1 and JRS2.
  • We show you registered as Porter Wilson on behalf of the Employees Retirement System of Texas and show
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services Apr 23rd, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • of Texas.
  • We show you registered as Porter Wilson on behalf of the Employee Retirement System of Texas, testifying
  • Texas lenders, regulated in accordance with Chapter 342, Subchapter of the Texas Finance Code.
  • Texas and our 2.5 million members across Texas.
  • Municipal Retirement System.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Transportation Apr 29th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Texas Department of Motor Vehicles recently removed Section 218.58 from the Texas Administrative Code
  • If today is an average day, 11 people will die using the Texas transportation system.
  • This bill proposes to address judicial security concerns for state and federal judges in Texas related
  • like Texas law enforcement telecommunication systems.
  • Um, Terry Hall with Texas Turf and Texas for Toll-free Highways and Liberty in Action.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Transportation Apr 29th, 2025

Transportation

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm representing Texas Turf, Texans for Toll-Free Highways, True Texas Project, Grassroots America, and
  • If today is an average day, 11 people will die using the Texas transportation system.
  • This bill helps create a fully digital, modern system.
  • like the Texas Law Enforcement Telecommunications System.
  • Bringing home delivery to Texas...
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Get the Texas Rangers to investigate the probate mafia.
  • I have supervision status in Texas.
  • This is Senator Zaffirini's bill relating to a Centers of Excellence program developed by the Texas Judicial
  • judges and justices for judicial misconduct.
  • judges and justices for judicial misconduct.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
Summary: The Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence heard testimony on Senate Bill 1015, which would clarify that the comptroller is responsible for distributing excess judicial fund payments back to statutory probate courts. Judge Guy Herman testified in support, saying the bill would help ensure probate courts receive funding they are entitled to, while Ed Heimlich testified against the bill with broad criticism of probate courts and judicial practices. The committee then heard Senate Bill 2933, which would add elder abuse training to required judicial education for several categories of judges and judicial officers; Dr. Bruce Hargrave supported the bill, citing the prevalence and underreporting of elder abuse and the need for judges to recognize warning signs. No votes were taken on either of those bills, and SB 2933 was left pending. The committee then reconsidered Senate Bill 38, an eviction-related bill, and Vice Chair Hayes described two agreed floor amendments: one limiting the summary disposition procedure to forcible entry and detainer cases involving squatters, and another requiring a notice to pay rent or vacate for tenants who had been timely payers but missed a payment. After discussion, the committee voted 6-4 to report SB 38 without amendments. The committee also adopted or advanced a series of other bills and resolutions, including SB 293, SB 1141, SB 1448, SB 1536, SB 1558, SB 1838, SB 1940, SB 2127, SB 53, SB 251, SB 311, SB 387, SB 441 (with a substitute), SB 1164, SB 1335, SB 1574 (with a substitute), SB 1719, SB 1760, SB 1839, SB 1923 (with a substitute), SB 2807, and SJR 27 (with a substitute). Most measures were reported favorably on largely party-line or near-unanimous votes, with a few close votes on SB 942, SB 311, SB 2807, and SJR 27. SB 942, relating to retroactive child support beginning at conception, initially failed 5-5 but was reconsidered and then passed 6-5. The committee adjourned after completing its agenda.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 14th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • I have supervision status in Texas.
  • This is Senator Zaffirini's bill relating to a Centers of Excellence program developed by the Texas Judicial
  • This is Senator Zaffirini's bill relating to a Centers of Excellence program developed by the Texas Judicial
  • judges and justices for judicial misconduct.
  • judges and justices for judicial misconduct.
Bills: SB1015, SB2933
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • However, complaints about the judicial system extend beyond criminal courts, encompassing state and local
  • Cass County, Texas.
  • This year, I am also the chair of the Judicial Section of the State Bar of Texas.
  • So judicial pay plays into the democratic process and the true cure for our weakness in the judicial
  • system.
Bills: SB260, SB263, SB293, SJR18