Video & Transcript Research : 'Supreme Court'

Page 1 of 466
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Committee, February 13, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:03:48.720> Court<00:03:48.959> under<00:03:49.280> this by the Supreme Court
  • , even the Wyoming Supreme Court, was...
  • Chairman, members of the committee, where state court—whether it was the Supreme Court or district—did
  • So, when the language exists that says the court has permission, we remove that, the Supreme Court is
  • So, when the language exists that says the court has permission, we remove that, the Supreme Court is
Bills: HB0066, HJ0005, HB0010
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Feb 26th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Court before we continue?
  • I can't remember how many cases, but it's a number from federal courts, state courts.
  • It went through the grand jury, through the Supreme Court, and went through a trial with unfavorable
  • This gives the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, in conjunction with the district attorney and Attorney
  • these courts, which probably are a few that I'm not aware of that have municipal courts.
TX
Bills: SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, SB1, HB4
Summary: The Senate briefly convened and received a message from the House stating that the House was taking a vote. No bills, motions, or substantive policy matters were discussed in the exchange. Pursuant to a previously adopted motion, the Senate then adjourned until 7 p.m. on Thursday, August 21.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Aug 15th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • burden our court system further.
  • That case is sitting at the 15th Court.
  • The court is going to decide very soon, and every court who's looked at...
  • The court is going to decide very soon, and every court who's looked at this has said most of the documents
  • This is the omnibus courts bill.
Bills: SB6, SB7, SB8, SB11, SB12, SB13, SB15, SB17
Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 8, the Texas Women's Privacy Act, and heard extensive public testimony both for and against the measure. Supporters, including representatives of Texas Values and Texas Values Action, argued the bill was needed to protect women’s privacy and safety in restrooms, locker rooms, showers, prisons, domestic violence shelters, and other government-controlled spaces, and said it would provide clear, sex-based rules. Opponents, including many transgender Texans, civil rights advocates, clergy, business and public safety voices, and others, argued the bill would invite harassment, gender policing, lawsuits, and invasive inspections, while harming trans, intersex, and gender-nonconforming people as well as cisgender women who do not fit stereotypes. Several witnesses said the bill would conflict with federal law or prison standards, worsen safety in shelters and prisons, and hurt Texas’s reputation and economy. The chair repeatedly noted the compressed special-session schedule and said flood relief remained the session’s top priority. Public testimony on SB 8 was eventually closed, and the bill was left pending. The committee then moved to Senate Bill 6, dealing with consumable hemp product restrictions. Testimony on SB 6 focused on whether the bill went too far in restricting hemp-derived THC products. Opponents argued hemp and THC have medical and economic value, that the bill would criminalize conduct and burden courts, and that regulation—not prohibition—was the better approach. Some witnesses supported tighter rules such as testing, child-resistant packaging, and limits on marketing to children, but still opposed the bill’s broad THC ban, higher fees, and age restrictions. Several speakers emphasized benefits for veterans, chronic pain patients, and small businesses, and warned that prohibition would push consumers toward the illicit market. The committee heard the testimony and then continued with additional witnesses, with no final vote or disposition reported in the excerpt.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 12th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • Court... ...the Supreme Court may issue writs of prescindos, certiorari, quo warranto, and mandamus
  • In the Constitution, the general jurisdiction is described as that of the Supreme Court, reaching all
  • or come to the Texas Supreme Court.
  • To put more jurisdiction in place, you have accepted from the Supreme Court cases involving less than
  • It would have the governor's office and the Texas Supreme Court appoint new ones that would start on
AL

Alabama 2026 1st Special Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Feb 11th, 2026

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • asking that right now AOC holds money for the Supreme Court, the Court of Civil Appeals, and the Court
  • So right now AOC is holding money for the Supreme Court, Civil Appeals, and Criminal Appeals.
  • Director of courts, we are also asking that right now AOC holds money for the Supreme Court.
  • The Court of Civil Appeals' fund holds money for the Supreme Court, the Court of Civil Appeals, and the
  • So right now AOC is holding money for the Supreme Court, Civil Appeals, and Criminal Appeals.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Supreme Court has recently spoken on this, and the Supreme Court was very clear.
  • Court has said is upheld.
  • Then the con, like, as a Supreme Court.
  • In the 90s, I believe, the Supreme Court passed a bill or put in a regulation that every new individual
  • It directs the Texas Supreme Court to create rules for a new motion to dismiss process, specifically
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • . courts, the Supreme Court of Texas and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
  • When the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Court of Supreme Court disagree.
  • and the Texas Supreme Court.
  • And if you do want to have the Supreme Court as the master Supreme Court, then we need to dedicate a
  • So what the Supreme Court has represented, how you said when he laid out the bill, the Supreme Court.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Courts have well recognized this broad authority, therefore it is.
  • Courts take pages and pages just to talk about.
  • I know that they filed a response with the court, and I believe the court issued a response.
  • You're telling the court, because this is going to court, that you made.
  • Court that that will be proven to be true in court.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • How did the Supreme Court... well, 2003, the Supreme Court decision... Came down in 2006.
  • Yeah, the United States Supreme Court said... of the district. 23 Latino voters were poised to elect
  • I know we just asked for all the court documents. Court filings on the El Paso case.
  • If it didn't meet this deadline, the Texas Supreme Court would adopt a plan by December 30th, with all
  • Court.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Supreme Court ruled in Allen v.
  • Supreme Court, Democrats and minorities will prevail in contesting the 2021 and the 2025 elections. .
  • And just recently, As the Supreme Court is getting ready to debate and entertain some of the issues that
  • Supreme Court in Louisiana versus Calais, acting in bad faith, dismantling existing majority-minority
  • I hope that they will not, that the Supreme Court will not decide that these maps are OK under some new
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Senate Session Aug 19th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that was the law for decades until a few years ago when the Court of Criminal Appeals discovered that
  • However, to address their concerns, uh, the statute which they blocked, which the Court of Criminal Appeals
  • Um, I'm reading from a trial transcript, sworn testimony given in open court, taken down by a court reporter
  • the majority of the Senate for the judgment of the majority of council members and commissioners, courts
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/11/2026 - House Judiciary

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chairman, members, Senate Bill 1148 requires the Supreme Court to directly license attorneys in Arizona
  • So the Supreme Court delegated its authority to a non-government organization, a 501(c)(6), Arizona Bar
  • The Supreme Court has already repeatedly warned that overly broad defamation rules can...
  • The Supreme Court has already repeatedly warned that overly broad defamation rules can chill speech and
  • It also amends the acts that constitute forcible detainer and directs the Supreme Court to adopt rules
Summary: The committee heard and advanced several bills dealing with attorney discipline, bar licensure, drug sentencing, campus firearms, suppressors, defamation, emergency-service calls by businesses, mandatory child-abuse reporting, eviction procedure, and protections for utility workers. SB 1039 would allow attorneys who prevail in disciplinary matters to recover lost earnings and seek compensation for reputational harm from the State Bar; SB 1148 would require the Arizona Supreme Court to directly license attorneys rather than delegate that function. Both bills were supported by the sponsor as restoring accountability and limiting delegation, and both received due-pass recommendations despite some opposition votes. Members also heard SB 1061, which lowers the fentanyl trafficking threshold from 200 grams to 9 grams; opponents from the ACLU and defense bar argued the threshold would sweep in personal-use cases and increase incarceration, while supporters said it targets traffickers. The bill was recommended do pass. SB 1068, barring public colleges and universities from prohibiting lawful concealed carry by permit holders, drew strong opposition from gun-safety advocates and campus representatives who cited suicide and campus safety concerns, and support from gun-rights groups who argued campuses are not exempt from constitutional rights; it also received a due-pass recommendation. SB 1069, removing suppressors from Arizona’s prohibited-weapons definition, was opposed by Moms Demand Action and supported by gun-rights advocates as aligning state law with federal law and protecting hearing; it likewise passed out of committee. The committee also advanced SB 1099, which would codify statutory defamation elements and add an internet-related limitation period; the ACLU warned it could chill speech and conflict with evolving First Amendment law, while the sponsor said it would clarify existing case law and address online defamation. SB 1271, prohibiting cities from penalizing businesses for legitimate emergency-service calls, passed unanimously after testimony that some municipalities had discouraged 911 calls for theft and other incidents. HB 1127, requiring mandatory reporters with direct knowledge of child abuse or neglect to report immediately and personally, passed after Phoenix Children’s Hospital and DCS said they supported the intent but wanted implementation language clarified for medical emergencies. SB 1426, changing forcible-detainer procedures by removing the written-demand requirement, passed despite concerns from the multi-housing industry that the current language could disrupt holdover-tenant evictions. Finally, SB 1448, as amended, expanded aggravated-assault protections to utility, telecom, video-service, and related workers; supporters cited threats and assaults against field crews, while opponents argued existing assault laws already cover the conduct and the bill is overly broad. The amendment and the bill as amended were adopted, and the committee gave SB 1448 a due-pass recommendation.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Jan 27th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 1500 implements recommendations of the Supreme Court Work Group on uncontested probate proceedings
  • The other three were convicted, even after the United States Supreme Court overturned two of those convictions
  • Even after the United States Supreme Court overturned two of those convictions, violence followed.
  • Court by Senator on trust fund interest for purposes approved by the Supreme Court by Senator Graal.
  • Tab 9 members, Senate Bill 1000, trust fund interest for purposes approved by the Supreme Court, by Senator
Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee met with a quorum present and first postponed SB 532. It then heard and approved SB 620, which requires candidates for federal, state, county, district, judicial, and school board office to disclose any citizenship other than U.S. citizenship. The bill drew one waiver in opposition from Common Cause and passed 8-0. The committee also heard SB 1396 on litigation financing consumer protection. Supporters said it would add transparency, limit funder control over litigation, and require disclosure of foreign entities involved in funding; opponents argued it would create strategic advantages for defendants and could burden plaintiffs. The bill passed 7-2. The committee later approved SB 192, repealing a $1,500 cap on patient funds held in trust by chiropractic physicians, and SB 888, extending limits on indemnity and insurance requirements for design professionals in private contracts; both passed unanimously among those voting. The committee also approved several Judiciary-related measures. CS/SB 332, as amended, creates a narrow temporary public meetings/public records exemption for certain pre-suit Burt Harris litigation strategy discussions by local governments, and passed 7-0. SB 820, which strengthens quarterly reporting requirements for problem-solving courts, passed 10-0. SB 1500, implementing probate process recommendations to raise small-estate thresholds, clarify access to safe deposit boxes, and improve enforcement in uncontested probate, also passed 10-0. SB 144, creating a public records exemption for personal information of current and former Judicial Qualifications Commission employees and their families due to harassment concerns, passed 9-1. The committee then approved CS/SB 1224, as amended, making it a third-degree felony to fraudulently obtain possession of a rental unit through false written statements, counterfeit documents, or impersonation; the bill passed 10-0. SB 1000, setting a floor and ceiling for interest rates on law firm trust accounts tied to the Wall Street Journal prime rate, passed 10-0 after testimony from banking and credit union representatives and support from Senate leadership. Finally, CS/SB 694, providing compensation to the descendants of the Groveland Four, was heard with emotional testimony from family members and advocates describing the wrongful convictions, killings, and decades-long effort for redress; an amendment specified equal shares for the four families, and the bill passed 10-0. Several members requested to be recorded as voting in the affirmative on specific bills before the committee adjourned.