Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjTDDSeq1xU, 2026-06-21T07:17:06+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 0:00 - SB 75 SB 75 Vote – 19:06 23:13- SB 46 SB 46 Vote – 28:28 29:17- SB 125 SB 125 Vote – 31:17 32:27- SB 107 SB 107 Vote – 37:45, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IagvnikuB5M, 2026-06-21T07:17:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Roll Call: 00:22 2023 Social Services Block Grant State Plan: 01:55 Block Grant Roll Call: 08:35 HB 125 Discussion: 11:13 HB 125 Roll Call Vote: 12:33, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZXtzs_ae7Y, 2026-06-21T07:17:03+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Roll Call: 00:20 Administrative Regulations Review: 02:30 HB 125 Discussion: 05:35 HB 125 Roll Call Vote: 08:11 HB 180 Discussion: 09:36 HB 180 Roll Call Vote: 35:33, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOi9wAlITdY, 2026-06-21T07:17:00+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00 Roll Call 01:12 SB 170 Discussion 03:02 SB 170 Vote 32:20 SB 125 Discussion 35:08 SB 125 Vote 50:14 HB 273 Discussion 53:09 HB 273 Vote 54:41, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• Just kind of section-by-section breakdown. Would that be good? Okay.
• <01:15:39.520> Would<01:15:39.679> that section by section breakdown.
• Would that section by section breakdown. Would that be<01:15:40.000> good?
• You said go to section four.
• It's in section begins at section that?

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Agency Updates: 00:01:45 26RS SB 125: 00:02:10 26RS SB 101: 01:14:58, 958, all

Summary: The Juvenile Justice Oversight Council met on February 6, 2026, took roll, approved a motion to convene, and heard agency updates from materials in the packet. The council then took up Senate Bill 125 out of order because Senator Carol was present. The bill was presented as a collaborative effort focused on creating a secure, state-run high-acuity mental health facility for justice-involved youth who need specialized psychiatric care and cannot be appropriately served in detention or by private hospitals. Speakers said the facility would fill a gap in services, improve safety and treatment outcomes, and be designed with trauma-informed, medically equipped spaces rather than a jail-like setting. The presenters also outlined other parts of the bill, including a placement process in which DJJ and CHFS would evaluate youth and provide recommendations before the judge makes the final decision, with certain hospital-declination provisions to be delayed until the new facility is operating. They described payment incentives for hospitals treating high-acuity youth, confidentiality and escape-related disclosure provisions, and contracts with a public teaching university for clinical services. The proposed facility was described as a 24-bed center at Central State, with staffing to include mental health professionals and juvenile detention staff receiving enhanced training. Dr. Clark Lester said staffing needs would vary by youth and could include one-to-one supervision for some patients. The bill also addressed female juvenile detention capacity. Speakers said the number of detained girls has risen sharply since 2024, peaking at 51 in 2025, and that current facilities cannot meet the separation requirements for boys and girls or high- and low-level youth. The proposal would build two female detention centers, with possible locations discussed in central Kentucky and western Kentucky, and a third or fourth center could be added if population data show the need. Members asked about hospital placement authority, staffing, and average length of stay for girls; the presenters said the current court-order process would remain until the new facility is built and that they would provide additional data later. No vote was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• I respectfully urge the committee to support the inclusion of criminal penalties in Section 65.013 to
• 23:56.240> criminal<00:23:56.559> penalties<00:23:57.120> in<00:23:57.679> section
• <00:23:58.400> 65.013 of criminal penalties in section 65.013 of criminal penalties in section
• And I do want to stress that on the previous version of this bill, there was a section 26 that put that

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:10 SB 11 Discussion 00:01:20 SB 11 Vote 00:05:00 SB 41 Discussion 00:5:43 SB 41 Vote 00:15:03 SB 59 Discussion 00:20:30 SB 59 Vote 00:28:15 SB 57 Discussion 00:29:40 SB 57 Vote 00:40:00 SB 125 Discussion 00:42:43 SB 125 Vote 00:50:53 SB 191 Discussion 00:53:19 SB 191 Vote 00:59:38, 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up Senate Bill 11, a proposal to create a matching-grant program for neighborhood storm shelters in rural Kentucky. Sponsor Steve Meredith and supporters from the Kentucky League of Cities and the City of Morgantown said the idea was to use FEMA-style funding to help residents who live far from community shelters, noting that in some rural counties it can take 30 to 45 minutes to reach a shelter during severe weather. The committee adopted the substitute and passed the bill 11-0, with no nay votes. The committee then considered Senate Bill 41, which would require a ballot referendum whenever a taxing entity raises property taxes more than 4 percent, rather than relying on the current petition process. Sponsor Gary Boswell said the bill would give taxpayers more direct control and argued that local governments should simply avoid raising taxes above the threshold. Superintendents from Rockcastle and Casey counties opposed the bill, saying it would weaken local control, add election costs, delay budgets, and make it harder for school districts to keep up with inflation, insurance, transportation, and construction costs. After debate, the committee passed the bill 7-3 with favorable expression. Next, the committee heard Senate Bill 59, which would add criminal penalties to KRS 65.013, the law barring public funds from being used to advocate for or against ballot questions. Sponsor Steve Rawlings said the measure was prompted by reports of school officials using public resources to oppose a 2024 ballot issue and argued the law needs real enforcement to protect taxpayers and election integrity. Members raised concerns about First Amendment issues and the bill’s gray areas, especially for public employees speaking on their own time; Rawlings said the substitute removed volunteer references, allowed balanced issue debates, and clarified that employees acting on their own time and resources would not be prohibited. The committee passed the bill 8-3 with favorable expression. The committee also began hearing Senate Bill 57, as substituted, from Senator Danny Carroll. The bill would create a nuclear-ready site readiness pilot program under the Kentucky Nuclear Energy Development Authority, with up to three projects receiving up to $25 million each to help cover early site permitting and related licensing costs. Carroll, along with witnesses from the UK Center for Applied Energy Research and the Public Service Commission, said the goal is to build a nuclear energy ecosystem in Kentucky, with safeguards including surety bonds, deadlines, and cost-recovery provisions. The discussion was still underway when the transcript ended.

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOimHwcGgqU, 2026-07-02T01:23:11+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 01:22 - HCR 125 02:08 - SR 196 06:40 - HCR 153, HD1 07:10 - GM 674 35:35 - DM Hearing Notice: HWN 10:30 AM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_HWN_04-17-23_.pdf, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=854J1wMBx8Y, 2026-07-02T01:23:04+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 02:23 - SB 724 04:33 - SB 725 08:25 - SB 125 01:01:30 - SB 270 01:26:05 - DM LBT 3:00 PM Hearing Notice: LBT 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_LBT_02-01-23_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• Public notice of this hearing was given on March 12, 2025 according to Rule 4, Section 11A of the Texas
• Uh, you've created section 35A in which you define mineral.
• proposed language that I proposed to Representative Gerges's office has a little thing where a little section

Bills: HB206

Keywords: HB206, school district bonds, bond election, voter approval, Education Code, Chapter 45, Section 45.003, Section 45.0034, Texas schools, school finance, local tax election, bond referendum, school construction, capital improvements, election frequency, five-year waiting period, district bonds, public school funding

Transcript Highlights:

• "But what this would do is it would expand that to health care fraud, the trafficking section, the public
• indecency section, and then also there's an organized crime—I think that's Chapter 43.
• I do want to point out one area where this bill could be improved, and that is in Section 5(c).
• I'd just say that the first section where it does create the right to counsel is particularly important

Bills: HB115

Keywords: public funds, lobbying, political subdivision, government spending, transparency, HB 115, taxpayer-funded lobbying, local government lobbying, county association dues, municipal lobbying, lobbyist registration, Chapter 305, Government Code Section 556.0056, Local Government Code Section 89.002, county government, city government, injunctive relief, attorney's fees, state association of counties, sheriffs association

Summary: The Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence reconvened with a quorum present and announced it would likely not vote that night because of confusion over the bill list; members were told a definitive list would be circulated the next morning and a formal meeting would be scheduled later. The chair then heard a series of bills, generally taking testimony and leaving each pending without action. House Bill 1847 would set maximum caseload standards for private attorneys handling indigent criminal appointments through the Texas Indigent Defense Commission; House Bill 2417 would expand compensation eligibility for some wrongfully imprisoned people; House Bill 2813 would require earlier and more specific victim notice of scheduled court proceedings; and House Bill 2309 would expand state and local authority in certain civil asset forfeiture cases involving human trafficking, health care fraud, and organized crime. Each bill was laid out by its author or a member, with no opposition witnesses registered, and each was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 4733, which would require sealing records for people acquitted of charges when they were not convicted on the related allegation; House Bill 2328, which would modernize expunction service by encouraging electronic notice, setting a standardized fee when electronic service is unavailable, extending clerk retention of expunction orders, and preserving certain mental health commitment orders; and House Bill 115, which would revise Texas’s “junk science” post-conviction writ law by providing counsel, changing the relief standard, requiring written decisions, and easing procedural barriers. Testimony on HB 2328 was mixed: county clerks supported the bill as a cost-saving modernization, while legal advocates warned that permanent retention of expunction orders could undermine true expunction and create privacy risks. HB 115 drew support from innocence and defense organizations, with some concern about a provision affecting subsequent writs. All were left pending after testimony. Later, the committee heard House Bill 2046, which would allow affirmative family-violence findings for any Penal Code offense rather than only Title V offenses; testimony from a Dallas County prosecutor and a committee member emphasized that family violence can involve arson, burglary, fraud, and other non-Title V conduct, and the bill was left pending. House Bill 1765 would tighten restrictions on no-knock warrants by requiring higher-level approval, judicial review, and identifiable officers; members discussed the dangers highlighted by the Harding Street raid and similar incidents, and the bill was also left pending. The meeting ended with the chair noting that some bills had been removed from the agenda at the author’s request and that members should be prepared to finalize the vote list the next day.

Transcript Highlights:

• I just want to thank you for this opportunity to lay out SB- The Texas Water Code, Chapter 16, Section
• 16.34, along with Local Government Code Chapter 232, Section 232.
• Section 232.0013, Work to Assure Orderly Development of Real Property Outside the Boundaries of a municipality
• Yeah, so when you make subdivisions of property of 10 acres and less, the Local Government Code Section
• That was the whole crux of another bill that came through this committee. ...Section 7 of the bill, and

Bills: SB1708, SB2523, SB1450

Keywords: county platting, subdivision platting, Local Government Code Chapter 232, Section 232.022, Section 232.0014, model subdivision rules, Water Code Section 16.343, Texas county subdivision law, residential subdivision, land conveyance, gift deed, family transfer, consanguinity, affinity, third degree relative, five acres or less, county land use, platting exemption, rural land division, property subdivision

Transcript Highlights:

• So as you're all keenly aware, Section 702 of FISA is an extremely useful authority to help keep our
• Senator, Section 702, which authorizes the foreign collection of non-U.S. persons outside of the United
• That section of CISA seems to have been destroyed.

Keywords: national security, cyber threats, civil liberties, transnational crime, FISA Section 702, public-private partnership, intelligence community, Annual Threats Hearing

Summary: The Senate Intelligence Committee convened for a significant meeting focused on the Annual Worldwide Threats Hearing. Prominent officials from various intelligence agencies presented their insights on emerging national security threats, including concerns over increasing cyber threats, particularly from China and non-state actors. A major discussion point included the balance between national security and civil liberties, as evidenced by conversations surrounding Section 702 of FISA and its implications for privacy protection. The challenges posed by cartels and transnational criminal organizations, especially related to narcotics trafficking, were emphasized as pressing issues necessitating coordinated responses from federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. This meeting underscored the necessity of public-private partnerships to tackle these multifaceted threats effectively.

Transcript Highlights:

• Clayman if you section 178 that Mr.
• <00:32:55.360> 179 uh to the federal changes in section 179 uh to the federal changes in section
• <00:33:13.279> 179 which um the amount of the section 179 which um the amount of the section
• Section 179 primarily benefits small and medium-sized businesses.
• benefits<00:38:13.920> small SE section 179 primarily benefits small SE section 179 primarily

Bills: HF3127, HF3816, HF3814, HF3815, HF3817

Keywords: taxation, pass-through entity, qualifying owner, partnership, S corporation, tax return, corporate franchise tax, individual income tax, research expenditures, federal compliance, Minnesota Statutes, income tax, corporate tax, section 179, federal conformity, HF3815, Minnesota taxes, tax conformity, Internal Revenue Code, IRC conformity

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2EZ2hm1l3E, 2026-07-02T01:22:39+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, House Agenda: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2022/hearingnotices/HEARING_TRN_03-23-22_.pdf 11:59 - Introduction 12:38 - SB2898 SD2 HD1 14:59 - SB3152 SD1 17:01- Decision Making 19:00 - HCR29 / HR 25 20:34 - HCR156 / HR 156 26:55 - HCR125 / HR 125 35:20 - HCR153 / HR 153 36:06 - HCR103 / HR 99 36:41 - HCR141 / HR 141 37:38 - HR181 39:11 - HCR180 / HR 180 40:38 - HCR42 / HR 37 43:23 - Decision Making, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrX8SMAfqUc, 2026-07-02T01:23:36+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:46 - SCR 117 / SR 110 13:53 - DM HWN-WLA 1:00PM 15:32 - WLA-AEN 1:01 PM 15:50 - SCR 100 / SR 94 16:46 - SCR 168 / SR 159 19:16 - SCR 133 / SR 125 35:30 - DM WLA-AEN 1:01 PM 42:41 - WLA 1:04 PM 42:51 - HB 2001, HD2 45:50 - DM WLA 1:04 PM 46:52 - WLA 1:05 PM 47:20 - SCR 170 / SR 161 48:12 - SCR 47 / SR 46 50:05 - SCR 165 / SR 156 50:35 - SCR 173 01:03:05 - SCR 94 / SR 89 01:04:56 - SCR 99 / SR 93 01:05:38 - SCR 164 / SR 155 01:10:16 - SCR 125 / SR 117 01:13:06 - SCR 104 / SR 98 01:19:02 - DM WLA 1:05 PM Hearing Notices: HWN-WLA 1:00PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_HWN-WLA_04-08-26_.PDF WLA-AEN 1:01 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_WLA-AEN_04-08-26_.PDF WLA 1:04 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_WLA_04-08-26-1_.PDF WLA 1:05 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_WLA_04-08-26_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Bills: HF1013, HF1598, HF1656, HF2162

Keywords: energy, economic development, funding, renewable resources, Clean Energy Economy Minnesota, air ventilation, geothermal, school financing, Minnesota Climate Innovative Finance Authority, geothermal energy, renewable energy, construction funding, Como Zoo, energy efficiency, HF2162, Minnesota, planning grants, renewable development account, clean energy, Department of Commerce

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXLuwNNQ3YU, 2026-07-02T01:22:33+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Hearing Agenda: http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2021/hearingnotices/HEARING_HSG_03-23-21_.HTM 6:46 - Introduction 7:34 - HCR 149 / HR 125 8:06 - HCR 167 14:28 - Decision Making for HCR 149 and HCR 167 19:31 - SB 302, SD2 (SSCR793) 21:09 - SB 867, SD1 (SSCR870) 23:38 - SB 39, SD2 (SSCR944) 26:16 - SB 142, SD2 (SSCR716) 30:46 - SB 799, SD1 (SSCR399) 31:12 - SB 804, SD1, HD1 (HSCR1031) 34:04 - Decision Making for all other bills on agenda, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTtvA5lJYPc, 2026-06-21T07:17:00+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:09 SR 126 Discussion 03:09 SR 126 Roll Call Vote 08:04 SR 116 Discussion 09:14 SR 116 Roll Call Vote 11:30 SR 122 Discussion 12:33 SR 122 Roll Call Vote 14:47 SR 123 Discussion 15:45 SR 123 Roll Call Vote 19:24 SR 117 Discussion 21:15 SR 117 Roll Call Vote 24:38 SR 114 Discussion 25:30 SR 114 Roll Call Vote 26:56 SR 125 Discussion 27:47 SR 125 Roll Call Vote 29:23 SR 120 Discussion 30:58 SR 120 Roll Call Vote 33:31 SR 119 Discussion 34:15 SR 119 Roll Call Vote 38:48 SR 118 Discussion 39:44 SR 118 Roll Call Vote 42:30 SR 115 Discussion 43:49 SR 115 Roll Call Vote 44:51 SR 124 Discussion 46:41 SR 124 Roll Call Vote 47:31 SR 121 Discussion 48:14 SR 121 Roll Call Vote 51:50 SR 26 Discussion 53:56 SR 26 Roll Call Vote 55:48 SR 148 Discussion 56:57 SR 148 Roll Call Vote 1:03:12 Discussion on Brief summary of the events at the KY State Fair & Farm Machinery Show from CEO David Beck 1:04:35, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• As it relates to section 2, I'm looking at the committee substitute.
• We've got a section on that.
• That section, I will find for you. Yes, section seven. So from filing grievances.
• Is it a cross-section of different topics?
• He explains all of this in detail in a section in one section. of the story very quickly in a way that

Bills: SB12, SB1565, SB13, SJR12, SB686, SB371, SB204, SB609, SB112, SB400, SB813, SB 12, SB 13

Keywords: parental rights, education, social transitioning, diversity, equity, inclusion, school policy, student clubs, school district, grievance procedure, public education, diversity and inclusion, funding penalties, school libraries, library advisory councils, library materials, educational content, challenging materials, constitutional amendment, school choice

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Anderson has mentioned, this was added about a decade or so ago when the personnel section
• But the data laws in the personnel section didn't allow the disclosure of that because there was no final
• <00:08:46.320> generally<00:08:46.680> if under the Personnel section generally if
• under the Personnel section generally if you're<00:08:46.880> going<00:08:47.000> to<00
• um all right thank under this section um all right thank you<00:16:09.000> Mr<00:16:09.240>

Bills: HF1917, HF1083, HF367

Keywords: data practices, public official, transparency, government accountability, employment data, domestic abuse, domestic violence, battered women, victim advocate, advocacy, confidentiality, privilege, evidence law, witness privilege, court-ordered disclosure, shelter, crisis intervention, sexual assault counselor, victim services, protective services