Video & Transcript Research : 'PFAS'

Page 1 of 29
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Interim Joint Committee on Natural Resources & Energy.(6-4-26)

Natural Resources & Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:07:03.440> was throughout Kentucky and um PFAS was throughout Kentucky and um PFAS was
  • PFAS chemicals move very easily in water.
  • PFAS chemicals move very easily in water.
  • the landfill contains PFAS.
  • had also included four other PFAS had also included four other PFAS um<01:05:34.799> substances
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/13/26

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Department of Agriculture to review records on sewage sludge transactions to help investigate where PFAS
Bills: HF858, HF2577, HF2576
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation May 8th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • and high amounts of PFAS.
  • I work primarily as a PFAS exposure expert.
  • The published EPA map of PFAS contamination sites lists wastewater treatment plants as sources of PFAS
  • That this bill is about limits on PFAS and biosolids.
  • We know that all biosolids have PFAS in them.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/17/26

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • He said a huge reason for Nelson's enthusiasm is the plan to mitigate PFAS in landfill waste.
  • But a huge reason for his enthusiasm is the plan to mitigate PFAS in landfill waste.
  • Louis County, which focuses on treatment of landfill wastewater, or leachate, for PFAS.
  • PFAS and other contaminants of concern. PFAS and other contaminants of concern.
  • , and now as technology is moving forward, we're learning how to deal with the PFAS.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/26/2026 - House Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair and members, I don't know the exact factual nature of how PFAS— Mr.
  • The DOD is also moving away from PFAS.
  • Why is foam with PFAS in it still used?
  • Burgess whether PFAS is a single class or made up of multiple substances. Dr.
  • can be put out without these PFAS chemicals.
Summary: The committee first heard HB 2641, which would ban firefighting foam containing intentionally added PFAS chemicals. The sponsor said the bill was intended to protect firefighters and the public from carcinogenic and persistent chemicals that can contaminate groundwater, and noted Arizona had already banned the foam for training. A University of Arizona public health researcher testified that firefighters have higher PFAS levels than the general public and that AFFF use is associated with elevated exposure, while a firefighters’ association representative said alternatives exist and that the bill would remove uncertainty for departments. The committee passed HB 2641 unanimously, 15-0. The committee then heard HB 2602, a $24,000 appropriation for a 10% pay increase for Department of Public Safety employees in fiscal year 2027. The sponsor and supporters from the Arizona Troopers Association argued the raise was needed for recruitment and retention, citing vacancies, departures, and the cost of training new troopers. Several members supported the idea but raised concerns about the budget impact and the broader issue of pay disparities across agencies and state employees. The bill received a do pass recommendation on a 10-0-3 vote, with two members voting no and three voting present. Finally, the committee considered HB 2225, which would appropriate $10 million for capital costs at the Northern Arizona Regional Training Academy in Yavapai County and keep the funds from lapsing until 2029. The sponsor and Yavapai County law enforcement witnesses said the academy is overcrowded, serves multiple agencies across northern Arizona, reduces travel and lodging costs, and provides both basic and in-service training. Some members questioned whether the state should fund a county-based facility and raised concerns about the size and structure of the appropriation, while others supported the training mission but wanted the issue handled in the budget process. The committee voted to give HB 2225 a do pass recommendation, with several members voting no or present.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Currently, PFAS can be bought for 50 to $1,000 per pound.
  • PFAS wasn't on anybody's radar back then. The supply chain data doesn't exist.
  • We're not saying that PFAS are not harmful chemicals.
  • When we tell customers that we have to switch to a new component to avoid PFAS, they're grateful.
  • Did you know that many ice makers and fridges are coated with PFAS to help the ... available.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Capital Investment Committee 2/27/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • At the end of the day, we know that there are many communities that have PFAS in their water.
  • We live in the East Metro out in Stillwater, and this is an appropriation that we are seeking for PFAS
  • This is an appropriation that we are seeking for PFAS mitigation in our wells.
  • PFAS has been detected in our municipal water supply, and now we must build a water treatment plant to
  • you know the work that you're pfas you know the work that you're trying<01:30:56.520> to<01:30
Bills: HF919, HF1192, HF212, HF214
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture Finance and Policy Committee 4/7/25

Agriculture Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Met Council, and a technical panel of scientific experts on the effects of the land application of PFAS-contaminated
  • Met Council, and a technical panel of scientific experts on the effects of the land application of PFAS-contaminated
Bills: HF2446
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

AEN-HHS, AEN DEFER Public Hearings 02-02-2026

Agriculture and Environment

Transcript Highlights:
  • We are going to be facing PFAS contamination. There were over 12,000 different PFAS developed.
  • There were over 12,000 different PFAS developed.
  • Is that referring to PFAS?
  • Laauo said there's like over 12,000 types of PFAS being... >> Sure. I mean, there's like, um, Mr.
  • Laauo said there's like over 12,000 types of PFAS being... >> Well, yeah, because I thought that was
Summary: The joint Senate Agriculture and Environment and Health and Human Services hearing opened with SB 2093, which would require the fuel tank advisory committee to meet at least quarterly and provide funding. The Department of Health offered written testimony, and multiple supporters, including the Honolulu Board of Water Supply, Sierra Club, and a public member of the advisory committee, said more frequent meetings were needed to keep Red Hill cleanup, water testing, and public engagement front and center. Senators asked about public participation and whether the bill should also require meetings outside business hours; testifiers urged at least one evening or weekend meeting to improve access. No vote was taken during the discussion shown. The committee then heard SB 2095, creating a PFAS working group within the Department of Health to study PFAS and related chemicals and report to the Legislature. DOH supported the concept but requested amendments and funding, while the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity deferred to DOH. The Board of Water Supply supported the measure and asked to be included in the working group. Members asked about the bill’s reference to “other residuals,” and DOH explained it could refer to remaining PFAS components in soil, water, or other media. The discussion emphasized the widespread and long-lasting nature of PFAS contamination. Next, the committee considered SB 2046 on underground storage tanks and Red Hill-related cleanup. DOH and the Board of Water Supply testified, and a long list of community and environmental groups supported the bill. Testifiers argued the Navy caused the problem and should be held accountable for cleanup, while one witness said the bill was necessary because the Navy had delayed meaningful remediation. Senators asked whether the bill’s “large landowner” language could include the state or counties under existing statutes; DOH said it would check and later explained that cleanup responsibility generally falls first on the responsible party, then on large landowners if no responsible party exists, with the Navy currently understood to own Red Hill. The hearing then moved to SB 2096 on wastewater management, which the Department of Land and Natural Resources supported, noting PFAS can harm marine resources, and DOH’s wastewater branch offered comments. SB 2127 on water pollution drew support from Agra Business Development Corporation and opposition from the Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, Hawaii Farm Bureau, and others. The main debate centered on runoff, NPDES permitting, and whether the bill could unfairly affect agricultural and public entities; senators and witnesses discussed how heavy rainfall, cesspools, and mixed land uses complicate responsibility and compliance. The transcript ends with the committee still in discussion on SB 2127, with no final votes or actions shown in the excerpt.
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

EEP Public Hearing - Thu Jan 29, 2026 @ 9:30 AM HST

Energy & Environmental Protection

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:18:53.120> by ...builds on that particular act by including all food ware that contains PFAS
  • And then also, in light of weakening PFAS health regulations by the national administration, I think
  • it's important that we maintain our own PFAS standards in Hawaii, which is the spirit of this bill.
  • That we maintain our own PFAS standards in Hawaii, which is the spirit of this bill.
  • But obviously the goal would be to have containers that didn't include PFAS. >> Do they currently, like
Summary: The committee heard several environmental and energy bills, beginning with HB 644 on single-use plastics. DLNR and DOH supported the measure, and environmental advocates said it would reduce plastic waste in oceans and landfills. Testifiers urged the bill to avoid weakening existing county ordinances, and some supported delaying implementation to use up inventory, while Upstream opposed compostable-plastic exemptions and urged prompt passage. Committee members asked whether reusable and refillable foodware could be added to the PFAS prohibition, and Upstream said that would be consistent with the bill’s goals. The committee then took up HB 1802 on conservation mitigation banks, HB 1569 on microfiber filters for newly manufactured washing machines, and HB 1619 on electric vehicle infrastructure. HB 1802 drew mostly agency testimony from DLNR, with opposition testimony noted from environmental groups, and members discussed whether suggested amendments would address concerns. HB 1569 received limited testimony, with support from the Hawaii Reef and Ocean Coalition and opposition from the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers. HB 1619 was supported by the PUC, Hawaiian Electric, the Department of Transportation, and several advocacy groups; Earthjustice said the bill was needed to address a widening EV charging shortfall and described the funding increase as relatively small compared with the benefits. The committee also heard HB 1620, which would increase the barrel tax to fund the EV charging rebate program. The State Energy Office and PUC offered comments, while the Tax Foundation of Hawaii opposed the special-fund approach and said the bill should also address the non-petroleum fossil-fuel portion of the barrel tax. Earthjustice and youth transportation advocates supported the measure, and the chair asked for information on unused hydrogen fueling subaccount funds; PUC said no hydrogen program funds had been deployed and estimated the balance was likely around $2 million, with exact figures to be provided later. Finally, the committee heard HB 1730 on wastewater systems, which would create a wastewater technical advisory group and fund positions at DOH. DLNR, DOH, OPSD, UH, and several environmental groups supported the bill, emphasizing cesspool pollution, affordability, and the need for more staffing and technical assistance. Testifiers suggested amendments to create a separate cesspool conversion implementation working group and debated the size and composition of the advisory group, including whether to include outside engineers and whether SHIP should be on the panel. No votes were taken during the hearing segment provided.