Transcript Highlights:

• But in general there are protections that would cover health data in the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy
• sensitive data under the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act.
• So, the bill adds a couple of definitions to the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, including the definition
• So, the bill adds a couple of definitions to the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, including the definition
• Minnesota Consumer uh data privacy act Minnesota Consumer uh data privacy act uh<01:12:59.760> including

Bills: HF3642, HF2700, HF3615

Keywords: virtual currency, kiosks, prohibition, customer payouts, cryptocurrency regulation, consumer privacy, data privacy, health data, sensitive data, Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, personal data, data broker, targeted advertising, geofencing, location tracking, health care privacy, patient privacy, consent, minor privacy, children's privacy

Summary: The Commerce Finance and Policy Committee met on House File 3642, which would prohibit virtual currency kiosks in Minnesota. The bill was laid over, and the committee adopted a DE1 author’s amendment. Chair Kaggel and Representative Perryman described the measure as a response to widespread scams using crypto kiosks, especially against older adults and other vulnerable people, and said they would continue working with the Department of Commerce and other stakeholders. Testimony from law enforcement and advocates strongly supported the ban. A St. Cloud police sergeant and a Woodbury detective described cases in which victims lost large sums, said the current safeguards and refund rules are being bypassed, and argued that the kiosks are difficult to investigate because funds move quickly and often overseas. An AARP Minnesota volunteer also supported the bill, saying kiosks are a preferred tool for scammers and that existing protections have not kept pace with the problem. The Department of Commerce said it strongly supports the bill and reported that it has received 120 complaints over three years involving nearly $1 million in reported losses, with 2025 the worst year so far. The main opposition came from CoinFlip’s general counsel, who argued that the problem is fraud generally, not kiosks themselves, and said Minnesota already has consumer protections, including refunds for eligible victims. He urged stronger regulation rather than a ban, citing blockchain analytics, hold periods, and 24-hour customer service as alternatives. Committee members then asked questions about how long kiosks have operated in Minnesota, how many there are, who owns them, and the scale of losses; Commerce said there are hundreds statewide, operated by a variety of companies, and that reported losses are likely undercounts.

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, members, this bill adds a section to the end of the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Rights
• Consumer Data Privacy Act to establish a data broker registry like those that already exist in Texas
• Consumer Data Privacy Act.
• Minnesota consumers have really important rights under the Data Privacy Act to, you know, allow and require
• I'll tell you, under the Consumer Data Privacy Act, consumers do have a right to know who the companies

Bills: HF4456, HF4544, HF3698

Keywords: data broker, data brokerage, consumer privacy, personal data, data privacy, Minnesota attorney general, registration, public registry, civil penalties, enforcement, special revenue fund, privacy rights, data sales, data collection, consumer protection, chapter 325M, controller, processor, data broker registry, transparency

Transcript Highlights:

• Basically, this bill adds a definition of health data to the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act.
• For the most part, the act only restricts the sale of data, but a lot of the data of this nature seems
• For the most part, the act uh only data.
• under the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act, the only thing you're really restricting is the sale,
• So, the Consumer Data Privacy Act in 325M that this is amending does not apply to government entities

Bills: SF1750, HF2700, HF1606, HF3356, HF3946, HF3970, HF3658, HF3875, HF2627, SF856, HF1268, HF1338

Keywords: common interest community, CIC, homeowners association, HOA, condominium, planned community, cooperative, unit owner, association board, declarant, declarant control, special declarant rights, assessment lien, foreclosure, late fees, fines, attorney fees, resale disclosure, annual report, maintenance plan

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, now it's just if you control 25,000 consumers or more, and those are Alabama citizens, or 25% of
• your revenue is generated from the sale of data, then you're covered by default if you don't fall under
• It's also any group that's part of the controlling group that controls the data.
• Um, now it's just if you um control<00:10:37.600> 25,000<00:10:38.320> consumers<00:10:
• , and control 25,000 consumers or more, and those<00:10:39.519> are<00:10:39.680> Alabama

Bills: HB351, HB351

Keywords: ad valorem tax, road funding, local government, referendum, Choctaw County, data privacy, consumer rights, personal data, data protection, Alabama Personal Data Protection Act, 1136, house, all

Bills: HB282, HB283, HB95

Keywords: government contracting, state agencies, local agencies, procurement, marketing contracts, advertising contracts, media monitoring, fact-checking, news ratings, bias ratings, misinformation, journalistic standards, news accuracy, vendor certification, contractor certification, public relations, media analytics, government procurement, Alabama, data privacy

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:05:09.000> legal I'm an attorney at Mid Minnesota legal I'm an attorney at Mid Minnesota
• She said that is a general protection for private data that exists in the Government Data Practices Act
• > data<00:28:40.799> Practices in the government data Practices in the government data
• under our state data privacy act and under the federal FERPA law.
• > yeah<00:37:13.280> you the student data level um but yeah you the student data level

Bills: HF1027, HF101, HF1021

Keywords: mortgage foreclosure, redemption, foreclosure surplus, sheriff's sale, junior lienholder, mortgagor, homeowner protections, loss mitigation, dual tracking, foreclosure redemption period, certificate of redemption, certificate of sale, sheriff, county recorder, registrar of titles, homeownership center, lien priority, real property, foreclosure by advertisement, surplus funds

Transcript Highlights:

• And so this is a data privacy bill.
• So this is a data privacy bill.
• to an act of criminal investigation, and that the requesting agency understood Minnesota data practices
• This is uh data privacy and how uh local jurisdictions handle that data privacy.
• data to be handled in Minnesota. data to be handled in Minnesota.

Bills: HF3479, HF4205, HF3782, HF4081, HF4138

Keywords: foreclosure, mortgage, redemption period, homestead, Minnesota Statutes, automated license plate reader, ALPR, license plate recognition, vehicle surveillance, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, BCA, data privacy, government data practices, law enforcement data, surveillance technology, location data, vehicle tracking, warrant requirement, probable cause, exigent circumstances

Transcript Highlights:

• you language for data privacy um thank you language for data privacy um thank you to<00:04:24.600
• for interpretation and application of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.
• > Act Minnesota Government data Practices Act Minnesota Government data Practices Act we<00:45
• Wiberg has that right under the Minnesota Data Practices Act to ask the district for that data, and then
• the<01:26:07.480> data<01:26:07.800> is the data Practices Act if the data is the

Bills: HF1662, HF1224, HF1836, HF1367, HF1168, HF1999, HF1792, HF102, HF2127, HF104

Keywords: veterans, veterans affairs, State Soldiers Assistance Program, Veterans Stable Housing Initiative, MAXIS, human services data, data sharing, eligibility verification, informed consent, private data, benefits coordination, veteran housing, veteran assistance, Department of Human Services, Children Youth and Families, state benefits, federal benefits, privacy, public assistance, foreclosure

Transcript Highlights:

• of the Attorney General on the Consumer Data Privacy Act.
• And I would like to Data Privacy Act.
• So, in May of 2024, the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act was signed into law.
• 01:41.280> Act<00:01:41.520> was<00:01:41.680> signed Consumer Data Privacy Act
• was signed Consumer Data Privacy Act was signed into<00:01:42.400> law.

Bills: HF3794, HF3408

Keywords: surveillance, price discrimination, wage discrimination, automated decision systems, consumer protections, data privacy, biometrics, consumer protection, price setting, biometric data, retail, privacy, 1183, house

Summary: The committee first approved the minutes from March 3, 2026, and then received a presentation from the Minnesota Office of the Attorney General on the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act. Assistant Attorney General Caitlin Miko and Deputy Attorney General Jessica Whitney reviewed the law’s scope, consumer rights, business obligations, and enforcement history. They said the law took effect July 31, 2025, gives Minnesotans rights to access, delete, and opt out of sale, profiling, and targeted advertising, and is enforced by the Attorney General with penalties up to $7,500 per violation. They reported more than 200 complaints in the first six months, many warning letters, and a shift from education to active enforcement now that the initial warning-letter period has expired. Committee members asked about how the universal opt-out works, what happens when companies deny deletion or editing requests, how the office determines willful noncompliance, and whether the law could burden small businesses. The AG’s office said the opt-out can be set through privacy-protective browsers or extensions, companies must respond to consumer requests within 45 days, small businesses are exempt as defined by the SBA, and investigations look for patterns and evidence of willful conduct rather than minor technical violations. The office also said it needs additional funding to fully staff enforcement efforts and noted that it has already issued subpoenas and civil investigative demands. The committee then took up House File 3408, the Stop Grocery Surveillance Price Gouging Act. The author explained that the bill would prohibit retail grocers, physical and online, from setting individualized prices based on consumer information, would limit certain uses of facial recognition and electronic shelf labels, and would preserve narrow exceptions for discounts and loyalty programs. Public testimony followed from the Minnesota Farmers Union in support, arguing that grocery consolidation and surveillance pricing could worsen already high food costs and harm fair competition. The Minnesota Grocers Association opposed the premise that grocery stores use surveillance pricing, said shelf prices are generally uniform and set from a single storewide database, and argued electronic shelf labels are efficient and not nefarious. A technology company representative similarly said ESLs do not use personal data or facial recognition, prices are uniform, and a 2025 study found no meaningful price increases after ESL adoption. The bill was laid over for possible further discussion after the testimony.

Transcript Highlights:

• But this is data privacy.
• Uh, this is because the federal government hasn't acted; it probably won't act on privacy, and the fact
• But this is data privacy.
• Uh, this is because the federal government hasn't acted; it probably won't act on privacy, and the fact
• Uh, this is because the federal government hasn't acted; it probably won't act on privacy, and the fact

Bills: HB351, SB109, HB351, SB109

Keywords: ad valorem tax, road funding, local government, referendum, Choctaw County, Tuskegee University, education funding, Alabama Education Trust Fund, appropriation, agricultural research, data privacy, consumer rights, personal data, data protection, Alabama Personal Data Protection Act, peer-to-peer car sharing, vehicle insurance, liability, shared vehicles, taxation

Transcript Highlights:

• So at the very end, this will replace what is there and put in instead of October 1st, 2026, this act
• So at the very end, this will replace what is there and put in instead of October 1st, 2026, this act
• Basically, it's protecting the dollars of an existing HSA, and it's basically a consumer protection bill
• Basically, it's protecting the dollars of an existing HSA, and it's basically a consumer protection bill
• Basically, it's protecting the dollars of an existing HSA, and it's basically a consumer protection bill

Bills: HB300, HB40, SB19, HB283, HB179, HB296, HB300, HB40, SB19, HB283, HB179, HB296

Keywords: HB300, Choctaw County, probate court, probate judge, recording fee, filing fee, deed tax, mortgage tax, deeds, mortgages, property records, recordation, county local act, local legislation, technology upgrades, digitalization of records, recordkeeping, county treasury, special fund, court administration

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh this bill is uh data privacy.
• , the Driver's License Privacy Protection Act, and HIPAA.
• <00:15:34.880> Act,<00:15:35.279> and License Privacy Protection Act, and License Privacy
• > for about data privacy protections um for about data privacy protections um for other<00:30:
• <00:31:01.279> of<00:31:01.440> resources data privacy or what kind of resources data

Bills: HF1567, HF2809, HF3380

Keywords: public safety officer, peace officer, correctional officer, law enforcement, police privacy, officer safety, doxxing, personal information, data privacy, government data practices, private data, internet posting, online disclosure, residential address, phone number, email address, family member protection, child safety, school information, public records

Transcript Highlights:

• I have met with both Minnesota State and the University of Minnesota in meeting with them.
• are moving to Minnesota. are moving to Minnesota.
• graduated from a Minnesota high school. graduated from a Minnesota high school.
• seven Minnesota state universities. seven Minnesota state universities.
• Minnesota post-secondary institutions. Minnesota post-secondary institutions.

Bills: HF3432, HF3411

Keywords: resident tuition, employment, higher education, Minnesota, tuition rates, state universities, immigration status, immigration, postsecondary education, privacy, data access, federal officers, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• the Minnesota Promise Report. the Minnesota Promise Report.
• > Affairs Minnesota, the Minnesota Indian Affairs Minnesota, the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council
• least 55 counties across Minnesota. least 55 counties across Minnesota.
• Minnesota. Minnesota.
• Data shows since 2018, the number of Minnesota foster families has decreased by 35%, reducing the number

Bills: HF3877, HF3714, HF3750, HF3024

Keywords: public authorities, dissolution cases, court system, child protection, legal notice, foster care, child welfare, enrollment priority, education programs, child care assistance, foster youth, extended foster care, bill of rights, out-of-home placement, Minnesota Statutes chapter 260C, social services agency, caseworker, permanency team, sibling visitation, relative contact

Transcript Highlights:

• That data is classified as nonpublic and private under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, and
• That data is classified as nonpublic and private under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, and
• Government Data Practices Act to be able to share that.
• Government Data Practices Act to be able to share that.
• Government Data Practices Act to be able to share that.

Bills: HF696, HF1429, HF1379

Keywords: HF696, rural EMS, ambulance, emergency medical services, uncompensated care, payment pool, rural health, Office of Emergency Medical Services, public safety answering point, PSAP, nontransport, unpaid ambulance calls, EMS reimbursement, rural ambulance provider, general fund appropriation, Minnesota health finance, specialized life support, metropolitan counties, emergency response funding, HF1429

Transcript Highlights:

• is an enabling act.
• So, large requests are contemplated and allowed under the Data Practices Act.
• Without a standard system of data collection in Minnesota, our pretrial system lacks transparency.
• I mean, there are privacy and other concerns with having, if you look at the raw data here, all this
• sometimes health-related data or other kinds of data.

Bills: HF2233, HF1999, HF1995, HF1614, HF2781, HF1775, HF1316, HF2127, HF2521, HF689, HF2380, HF1273

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• So large requests are contemplated and allowed under the Data Practices Act.
• Without a standard system of data collection in Minnesota, our pre-trial system lacks transparency.
• Without a standard system of data collection in Minnesota, our pre-trial system lacks transparency.
• She said that there are privacy and other concerns with having all of the raw data up as raw data, and
• The speaker said there are privacy and other concerns with having all of the raw data available.

Bills: HF2233, HF1999, HF1995, HF1614, HF2781, HF1775, HF1316, HF2127, HF2521, HF689, HF2380, HF1273

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• Pulling straight in, trying to grab personal or otherwise protected consumer data that they would have
• So, a different section within that act that we put in place last year.
• There's not intent in it, but just being horribly careless about data.
• We would have to go back to when we put the act in place. There was a physical impact on it.
• There's an organization called Metter M E T R that measures this data.

Bills: SB1670, SB1716, SB1521

Keywords: security breach, data breach, cybersecurity, breach notification, privacy, consumer protection, class action, civil liability, Attorney General, district attorney, financial institution, banking regulator, data security, reasonable safeguards, breach notice, Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act, artificial intelligence, AI, generative AI, chatbot

Transcript Highlights:

• part of their network, the consumer part of their network, the consumer would<00:14:48.720> most
• Thank you. with Office of Consumer Protection. Um, with Office of Consumer Protection.
• consumer protection. Thank you. consumer protection. Thank you.
• Credit Reporting Act? Credit Reporting Act? >> Sure. >> Sure. >> Sure.
• <00:50:32.720> Uh relating to consumer protection. Uh relating to consumer protection.

Bills: HB1849, HB2000, HB1753, HB1511, HB276, HB1513, HB2188, HB1876

Keywords: licensing, professional license, individual taxpayer identification number, immigration, state residency, right to repair, wheelchairs, consumer protection, repair providers, device documentation, HB1753, Hawaii Social Media Data Deletion Act, social media, account deletion, data deletion, privacy, consumer privacy, personal information, sensitive personal information, data retention

Summary: The committee on Consumer Protection and Commerce met on February 10, 2026, and heard testimony on several bills. HB 1849 relating to licensing drew comments from DCCA’s Professional and Vocational Licensing Division and the Hawaii Real Estate Commission, both of which stood on written testimony. The Hawaii Coalition for Immigrant Rights testified in strong support, emphasizing that some immigrants, including DACA recipients, are already contributing in Hawaii and that the state should help create pathways for them to remain and advance professionally. No vote or final action was taken on HB 1849 during the portion shown. The committee then heard HB 2000, the wheelchair right-to-repair bill. Encart opposed the measure, arguing that repair delays are largely driven by insurance prior authorization and that wheelchair repairs involve FDA-regulated medical devices where improper repairs could create health risks. Peter Fritz testified in support, saying the bill was modeled on similar laws in other states and that he had personal experience through his sister’s use of a wheelchair. Members questioned whether repairs done outside insurer networks might not be reimbursed, and Fritz said that was a concern but that the need for timely repair outweighed it. The committee also discussed HB 1753 on social media, where DCCA’s Office of Consumer Protection supported the bill but suggested an amendment to the definition of personal information. On HB 1511 relating to consumer protection, DCCA’s Insurance Division supported the bill, while the Alliance for Automotive Innovation and the Hawaii Automobile Dealers Association offered comments seeking to preserve legitimate manufacturer and dealer communications about vehicles, warranties, recalls, and related services. The committee also took up HB 276 HD1 and HB 1513 on condominiums. The Hawaii Real Estate Commission offered comments on HB 276 HD1. For HB 1513, the Hawaii Green Infrastructure Authority supported the bill, but DCCA’s Insurance Division opposed it, warning that diverting HHRF funds could weaken reinsurance arrangements and raise premiums for consumers who rely on the fund. Members questioned whether the proposed condo loan program would need HHRF money and whether the amounts in the bill were necessary, and the division said it opposed using HHRF for that purpose. The committee also heard HB 2188 on housing, where OCP supported the measure and the Hawaii Association of Realtors raised concerns about conflicts with the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the use of tenant screening reports, noting that a working group is already addressing landlord-tenant issues. Members asked OCP to research how other states handle similar laws and whether additional language is needed to avoid federal conflict. Finally, on HB 1876 relating to mental health, the Department of Health’s Adult Mental Health Division supported the bill but said it remains opposed to harmful, non-evidence-based treatment modalities; Pride at Work Hawaii also testified in strong support. No final votes or committee decisions were reported in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• Section 3 allows changes to the Government Data Practices Act.
• Section 4 applies the Minnesota Department of Government Data Practices Act to the legislature as well
• Section 20 is about Minnesota Management and Budget, and it decreases an appropriation for data collection
• to consumers who were harmed by unlawful acts or practices that were the subject of the Attorney General's
• and Minnesota consumers.

Bills: HF2783, HF2603, HF2846, HF2354, HF1836, HF2713, HF1198, HF1389

Keywords: state government finance, biennial budget, appropriations, Minnesota Management and Budget, Healthy Aging Subcabinet, Office of Healthy Aging, older adults, aging policy, long-term care, caregivers, public health, Medicaid fraud, medical assistance fraud, attorney general subpoena power, fraud enforcement, business filing fraud, Secretary of State, deceptive mailings, consumer protection, certified public accountant