Video & Transcript Research : 'MPCA'

Page 1 of 10
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • What it does is it makes sure that when notifications are going off when there is, when the MPCA does
  • When the MPCA does a notification of a discharge that has happened upstream from different facilities
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-04-16

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • If the MPCA determines that the installation will not be effective, the balance of the appropriation
  • If the MPCA determines that the If the MPCA determines that the installation<00:01:57.520> will
  • and EPA thresholds for exceeded the MPCA and EPA thresholds for levels<00:04:46.760> of<00:04
  • We've worked extensively with the City of Eagan, with Dakota County, with Bianca here, with the MPCA
  • Next, I have Tom Johnson from the MPCA. Welcome to the committee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-03-26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • But there are maps available on the DNR eGIS site and MPCA for what is known right now.
  • Uh, we have been working very closely with MPCA and other stakeholders in this process, and that discussion
  • NWRA is grateful also to the MPCA, AMC, and Eureka for getting this conversation started and hosting
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:02:34.959> issue um key items are making the mpca issue um key items are making the mpca
  • <00:05:24.080> it to cost and timelines with the mpca it to cost and timelines with the mpca
  • But given the fact that this affects MPCA the most, Mr.
  • It is an important snapshot, and we... affects mpca the most U Mr Johnson we're affects mpca the most
  • Um, perhaps I could start with the MPCA.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 1/23/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:08:58.160> also within 150 days um the mpca also within 150 days um the mpca also prioritizes
  • it um we also did meet with the mpca it um we also did meet with the mpca before<00:21:23.960>
  • MPCA was specifically invited to be present for today's hearing and declined to do so.
  • As I mentioned earlier, we invited MPCA.
  • Section 3 would allow MPCA to issue separate permits for operation and construction.
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee approved the January 21, 2025 minutes and then heard a presentation from the Minnesota Chamber Foundation on its report about Minnesota’s environmental permitting system. The presenters said the report was based on research by Barr Engineering and the Policy Navigation Group and argued that permitting delays can discourage investment and make Minnesota less competitive for manufacturing, mining, energy, clean tech, and other industrial projects. They highlighted that Tier 1 permits are generally issued quickly, but Tier 2 air and water permits often take much longer than the state’s 150-day goal, with some median timelines ranging from 419 to 771 days for Tier 2 air permits and similar delays for industrial water permits. The report also said Minnesota’s permit timelines were longer than peer states and estimated that reducing delays could increase annual output by $260 million to $910 million and support 960 to 3,400 additional full-time-equivalent jobs per year. Committee members asked about which businesses fall under Tier 2 permits, the economic impact of permitting delays, and whether the Chamber had discussed the report with the governor or MPCA. The presenters said Tier 2 permits typically involve higher-emitting facilities such as manufacturing, utilities, mining, and other industrial operations, and that the economic estimates were based on modeling rather than exact lost-job counts. They also noted that the governor had been briefed and that MPCA had been invited to the hearing but did not attend. The committee then took up House File 8, which Chair Heintzeman said is intended to improve permitting efficiency while maintaining environmental standards. He described provisions that would reduce the number of 60-day wetland application extensions, require MPCA to issue permitting efficiency reports twice a year, break out data on missed timelines by municipal versus industrial applicants, treat failure to meet the 150-day Tier 2 deadline as a final action subject to judicial review, and require quicker notice when applications are incomplete. He also outlined sections that would allow separate construction and operating permits, expand expedited permitting, and change environmental assessment worksheet petition rules. The bill was moved to be re-referred to the Labor and Workforce Development Committee, and the discussion began, but the transcript ends before any final vote on the bill is shown.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 2/20/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The MPCA has six regional offices. Seventy percent of the MPCA staff is in the St.
  • and I know that in that report the mpca and I know that in that report the mpca said<00:51:39.760
  • Thanks, Director Johnson." has been working for mpca for four has been working for mpca for four years
  • Chair and were happy to follow up as well. the case um the mpca for any of its the case um the mpca for
  • <01:27:22.719> uh mpca uh mpca uh employees<01:27:26.320> have<01:27:27.000> some
Bills: HF276, HF413, HF411
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2024, we did have dialogue with the MPCA.
  • In 2024, we did have dialogue with the MPCA.
  • I'm just wondering, have you worked with the MPCA on addressing the concerns for the products?
  • wondering have you worked with the mpca wondering have you worked with the mpca on<00:37:20.200>
  • I did, in fact, sit down with the MPCA, one of their representatives.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 737, which would amend Minnesota’s lead- and cadmium-related product restrictions and was re-referred to the Committee on Environment, Finance and Policy. Representative Bjorn Olson said the bill was prompted by a constituent who could no longer make cadmium-based art supplies in Minnesota, and he argued the law unintentionally swept in professional art materials that are used safely and are important to Western art culture. The committee first adopted the author’s A2 amendment, which broadened the bill to include additional exemptions beyond paint and pastels, including certain pens, mechanical pencils, and vehicle keys/key fobs. Testimony in support came from Darren Reenie of Wet Paint Artist Materials and Framing, who said artist paint and related supplies account for a significant share of sales and that the ban threatens independent art supply businesses and artists’ access to essential pigments. Josh Fiser of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation supported the key and key fob exemption, saying the current law is overly broad, exposure risk is minimal, and Minnesota should align with California and European Union standards. Bill Morgan of the Arts and Creative Materials Institute and Writing Instrument Manufacturers Association also supported the amendment, arguing there was little scientific basis for including pens, mechanical pencils, and professional artist materials, and citing prior reviews in the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the European Union. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, through Assistant Commissioner Kirk Kadelka, opposed broad exemptions and emphasized that no amount of lead is safe for children. He said the law was based on evidence from consumer products associated with elevated blood lead levels and argued that safer alternatives exist for many of the items in the amendment, including pens, mechanical pencils, and some key components. He also raised concerns about exposure during production and disposal. Committee members questioned the scope of the exemptions and whether the industry had workable alternatives. The A2 amendment was adopted, and the bill was then advanced for further consideration and re-referred as noted by the chair.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 2/13/25 - Part 1

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • But given the fact that this affects MPCA the most, Mr.
  • But given the fact that this affects MPCA the most, Mr.
  • But given the fact that this affects MPCA the most, Mr.
  • But given the fact that this affects MPCA the most, Mr.
  • this is written it would have the mpca this is written it would have the mpca drop<00:53:41.000>
Keywords: 1183, house
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • It requires Riverview to notify the MPCA 3 days before manure is land applied.
  • I have some questions for MPCA, Mr. Johnson. Welcome to the committee, Mr. Johnson.
  • I have some questions for MPCA, Mr. Johnson. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
  • <00:41:08.360> and had a citizens board of our MPCA and had a citizens board of our MPCA and
  • Um the MPCA will be proposed expansion.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2025-03-27

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • In our governor's proposal, the ombudsman would be at MPCA.
  • As opposed to MPCA, I think that makes a lot of sense.
  • What changes is the MPCA seeking regarding those permits?
  • I want to thank Chair Fischer and the MPCA for House File 1208.
  • By MPCA to place undue burdens on municipality-owned utilities.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Environment Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • the MPCA where all your manure is going. the MPCA where all your manure is going.
  • somebody from the MPCA come up. somebody from the MPCA come up.
  • with those pieces uh in addition to MPCA with those pieces uh in addition to MPCA staff.<00:26:19.920
  • It requires Riverview to notify the MPCA It requires Riverview to notify the MPCA 3<01:07:13.520
  • I have some questions<01:20:08.680> for<01:20:08.920> MPCA questions for MPCA questions
Bills: HF4740, HF3940
Summary: The committee approved the March 26, 2026 minutes and then heard House File 4740, authored by Rep. Hansen, which would require feedlots with at least 1,000 animal units to provide financial assurance for closure costs. Hansen argued the bill would shift cleanup responsibility from taxpayers to owners, citing abandoned feedlots, changing ownership structures, and the 2024 Pure Prairie Poultry bankruptcy as examples of why public funds should not be used for closures and cleanup. He also said the bill would apply to new or renewed permits and suggested a statutory definition of abandoned feedlot storage units may be needed. Farm and livestock groups testified in opposition. Minnesota Farmers Union, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, Minnesota Pork Producers Association, and Minnesota Farm Bureau Federation said existing MPCA and county permit rules already require closure planning and reporting, and that the bill would add unnecessary costs and barriers for family farms, beginning farmers, and expansion. They warned the financial assurance requirement could function like an animal-unit cap, encourage fragmentation or out-of-state relocation, and impose annual costs that would not improve environmental outcomes. Several testified that true abandonment is rare and that current permitting and closure processes already address it. MPCA staff said the agency has concerns with the bill, noted there is currently no formal fiscal note, and said the agency would need to ensure any appropriations cover ongoing staffing needs. MPCA officials explained that permitted feedlots already must notify the agency before closure, follow a checklist of closure requirements, and undergo follow-up inspection; they said abandonment notifications are uncommon and they are not aware of any currently permitted facilities in abandonment process. Members questioned whether the bill was needed, what form financial assurance would take, how other states handle similar requirements, and whether the proposal would unfairly burden smaller or family operations. No vote on HF 4740 was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/24/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Tom Johnson from MPCA.
  • from MPCA. Go ahead with your testimony. from MPCA. Go ahead with your testimony.
  • Thank you." being felt on our end rather than MPCAS. being felt on our end rather than MPCAS.
  • MPCA is keep looking. But what happens MPCA is keep looking.
  • I can't for the MPCA really quickly.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 2/19/26

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, Assistant Commissioner Cadelka, MPCA.
  • to hear from MPCA to hear from MPCA on<00:02:57.120> PAS.
  • Assistant Commissioner Cadelka, MPCA. Assistant Commissioner Cadelka, MPCA.
  • Looks like you both are Affairs, MPCA.
  • about the bioolid strategy that the MPCA about the bioolid strategy that the MPCA was<00:15:42.959
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/25/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The MPCA is working to understand why there continues to be testing by MPCA and MDH that shows that there
  • > by<01:18:49.520> that the MP MPCA stands by that the MP MPCA stands by that recommendation
  • And uh regarding paints, the MPCA And uh regarding paints, the MPCA appreciated<01:19:30.400>
  • there continues to be uh testing by MPCA there continues to be uh testing by MPCA and<01:20:12.480
  • <01:31:34.920> submitting worked with the MPCA submitting worked with the MPCA submitting
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Environment, Climate and Legacy - 04/07/26

Environment, Climate, and Legacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • the<00:16:04.840> time<00:16:05.160> it MPCA told legislators at the time it MPCA
  • <00:34:59.960> process<00:35:00.400> of The MPCA has begun the process of The MPCA
  • from both MPCA and our sister agencies. from both MPCA and our sister agencies.
  • <00:41:26.440> So, uh, the MPCA. So, uh, the MPCA.
  • um MPCA is playing nice with them. um MPCA is playing nice with them.
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Environment, Climate and Legacy - 02/04/25

Environment, Climate, and Legacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • We have presented to the MPCA these studies.
  • We have presented to the MPCA these studies.
  • We have presented to the MPCA these studies.
  • We have presented to the MPCA these studies.
  • submit and we've told this to the mpca submit and we've told this to the mpca that<01:30:35.360>
Keywords: 1187, senate, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, as I mentioned earlier, we invited MPCA.
  • Clarifying in bullet point three that the failure of the MPCA to meet the 150-day goal for issuing a
  • <00:04:29.199> to that that the failure of the mpca to that that the failure of the mpca to
  • <00:04:57.520> to section two is requiring mpca to section two is requiring mpca to immediately
  • MPCA to issue separate permits for operation and construction.
Keywords: 1183, house
Summary: The committee heard House File 8, which was moved for referral to the Labor and Workforce Development Committee. The bill’s author described it as a permitting and environmental review reform measure intended to maintain environmental standards while making permitting more predictable and timely for businesses, municipalities, and agricultural projects. He walked through nine sections, including limiting Wetland Conservation Act extension requests, requiring the MPCA to issue permitting efficiency reports twice a year, separating municipal and industrial permit data, allowing judicial review when the MPCA misses a 150-day two-tier permit goal, requiring quicker notice of incomplete applications, allowing separate construction and operation permits, creating a business permitting ombudsman at DEED, eliminating duplicative scoping EA requirements for projects already requiring a mandatory EIS, and adding an intent statement that the bill does not relax standards. The author and supporters emphasized that the bill is meant to reduce delays and duplication rather than weaken protections. He cited letters of support from groups including Building Trades, Mining Minnesota, pork producers, the Minnesota Biofuels Association, Apex, and the Red River Watershed, while noting that some groups opposed the bill. Testimony in support came from the Minnesota Pork Producers Association, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, the Red River Watershed Management Board, and Minnesota Milk, all of whom said permitting delays and inconsistent processes add significant cost and uncertainty. They argued the bill would help farmers, watershed projects, and businesses invest and expand in Minnesota while preserving environmental standards. Supporters also provided examples of the costs of current permitting processes, including long delays for air permits, repeated extensions, and large sums spent on environmental review before projects are halted or delayed. The Red River Watershed Management Board said its projects have spent millions on permitting and review, with some projects taking years and involving many permits from state, local, and federal agencies. Minnesota Milk said the bill and amendment would let farmers and responsible governmental units sequence applications more efficiently. No vote was taken in the portion provided beyond the motion to recommend re-referral, and the committee proceeded to public testimony.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/27/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • MPCA. We'll try to keep it brief today. MPCA. We'll try to keep it brief today.
  • > resources<00:10:55.600> to The MPCA needs additional resources to The MPCA needs additional
  • <00:14:30.720> has dioxane and of course PAS the MPCA has dioxane and of course PAS the MPCA
  • I think that makes a opposed to MPCA.
  • 31:04.960> addressing provisions from the MPCA addressing provisions from the MPCA addressing
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

Environment committee approves HF81 3/4/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • I know you also oversee land policy for MPCA.
  • I know you also oversee land policy for MPCA.
  • I'm not sure if this is a question for the MPCA or for Mr.
  • This would be for the MPCA Assistant Commissioner Kadelka.
  • This would be for the MPCA Assistant Commissioner Kadelka.
Keywords: 1183, house
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee 3/4/25

Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Jordan: I have some questions for the MPCA.
  • I know you also oversee landfill policy for MPCA.
  • I'm not sure if this is a question for the MPCA or for Mr.
  • This would be for the MPCA Assistant Commissioner Adel.
  • intentionally added peas uh to the mpca intentionally added peas uh to the mpca from<00:46:45.760
Keywords: 1183, house