Video & Transcript : 'H.Res. 122' :

Page 1 of 46
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Tuesday, February 11, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Calendar No. 3, House Resolution 122.
  • The gentlewoman from Minnesota is recognized for one hour. house resolution 122 and ask for its house
  • resolution 122 and ask for its immediate<02:19:14.960><c> consideration</c><02:19:15.920><c> clerk</
  • </c><02:19:20.719><c> 2</c> number three house resolution 122 2 number three house resolution 122 2 resolved
  • House Calendar No. 3, House Resolution 122.
Bills: HR125 , HCR11 , HR122
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, June 9, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I urge my colleagues to support H.Res. 137. I yield back.
  • I urge my colleagues to support H.Res. 137. I yield back.
  • I urge my colleagues to support H.Res. 137. I yield back.
  • I urge my colleagues to support H.Res. 137. I yield back.
  • I urge my colleagues to support H.Res. 137. I yield back.
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US House Floor Proceedings (Wednesday, April 15, 2026)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The rule also provides for consideration of H.Res. 1156, expressing support for tax policies that support
  • The rule also provides for consideration of H.Res. 1156, expressing support for tax policies that support
  • The rule also provides for consideration of H.Res. 1156, expressing support for tax policies that support
  • The rule also provides for consideration of H.Res. 1156, expressing support for tax policies that support
  • We're debating H.Res. 1156. It's a two-page resolution. It's not particularly long.
Bills: HR1156 , HB6398 , HB6409 , HR965 , HR1174 , HR1176 , HCR40
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • SB 122 strikes the right balance.
  • SB 122 strikes the right balance.
  • We're going to move to Assembly Bill 122. Motion by Cabaldon. AB 122, the motion is due pass.
  • Please call AB 122. AB 122, motion is due pass. Senator Bauer-Kahan. Hurtado. Menjivar. Bogh. No.
  • AB 122, please call the absent members. AB 122, Blakespear, Hurtado, Menjivar, Pérez. Aye.
Summary: The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review subcommittee heard four budget trailer bills: AB 110, AB 122, AB 125, and AB 177. AB 110 was described as a budget bill junior identifying budget-related legislation. AB 122 would extend sales tax to electronically delivered or remotely accessed prewritten software, extend and later limit business tax credits, reduce the annual LLC/LLP/LP tax for first-year businesses for three years, and impose a 100% tax on certain federal anti-weaponization fund settlements. AB 125 would renew the managed care organization (MCO) tax for three years beginning in 2027 to support Medi-Cal and targeted provider rate increases. AB 177 would require the Department of Finance to return by March 1, 2027 with options for assessing large employers for the Medi-Cal costs of employees enrolled in the program, including at least one employer-paid premium option for firms with 250 or more employees, and would appropriate $1,000 General Fund for implementation. Administration witnesses said AB 122 modernizes the tax system and helps create general fund revenue, while AB 125 is needed to preserve Medi-Cal financing and targeted rate increases under new federal constraints from H.R. 1 and to avoid a budget hole if the MCO tax expires. On AB 177, Finance said the bill is only a study and does not itself impose a tax, but would direct the administration to develop options for future consideration. Supportive members argued the package is part of a balanced approach to address the structural deficit, protect health care and other safety-net programs, and ensure large corporations pay more of their share. They also said AB 177 is a necessary step toward asking large employers to help cover public health care costs for workers who rely on Medi-Cal. Opponents, led by Vice Chair Niello and several other Republicans, argued the state does not have a revenue shortage but a spending problem, warning that the proposals would raise costs on consumers and businesses, discourage innovation, and expand taxes beyond their intended scope. They criticized AB 122 as potentially taxing labor-like services and limiting research and development credits, and said AB 125 would increase premiums for commercial enrollees and employers. On AB 177, they questioned the lack of definitions and specifics, saying the bill is too vague and could eventually burden employers, including hospitals and part-time workers, without clear standards. No votes were taken in the portion of the hearing provided; the committee heard testimony and questions before public comment and later action.