Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:12 SB 197 Discussion 00:01:10 SB 197 Vote 00:06:55 SB 90 Discussion 00:09:24 SB 90 Vote 00:11:20 SB 8 Discussion 00:12:45 SB 8 Vote 00:22:20, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Let me begin with Chapter 90.
• Affordability continues to be a central part of Chapter 90.
• I'd love to fund Chapter 90 at $400 million.
• I'd love to fund Chapter 90 at $400 million.
• Chapter 90 funding is vital to small communities like ours.

Bills: H4987, S2905

Keywords: transportation bond bill, municipal roads, municipal bridges, Chapter 90, road aid, highway funding, bridge repair, pavement, MassDOT, MBTA, rail reliability, commuter rail locomotives, Fair Share surtax, Commonwealth Transportation Fund, infrastructure financing, bond authorization, deferred maintenance, climate resilience, parkways, DCR

Summary: The Transportation Committee heard testimony on House Bill 4987, the Healey-Driscoll administration’s transportation bond bill centered on long-term municipal road and bridge funding. Administration officials described the bill as a roughly $5.5 billion package that would continue Chapter 90 at $300 million per year for four years, with $100 million allocated by road miles, and also authorize funds for accelerated bridge and pavement work, municipal pavement and Shared Streets and Spaces programs, housing-related transportation improvements, DCR parkway and bridge resilience work, and MBTA rail modernization and reliability. They emphasized that the proposal is backed by Commonwealth Transportation Fund revenues, including registry fees, gas tax, and Fair Share surtax revenue, and said the bill would support local planning, affordability, housing production, and regional rail/electrification efforts. Committee members and the administration discussed the bill’s housing-related $200 million transportation authorization and the MBTA’s $200 million rail modernization funding, including questions about how flexible those funds would be and how they would support electrification and regional rail. Officials said the housing funds would be kept broad to address transportation barriers that block development, and that the rail money would support locomotive procurements, reliability, and future electrification work, including the Fairmount and Providence corridors and other lines. One member raised concerns about the fiscal outlook and whether a four-year authorization was prudent given possible revenue pressures, but administration witnesses responded that the funding is capital bond authority tied to dedicated transportation revenues rather than operating funds. Municipal officials and the Massachusetts Municipal Association strongly supported the bill, saying Chapter 90 is essential for predictable local road and bridge maintenance and that the road-mile-based allocation improves equity for smaller and rural communities. Testimony from Sherborn, Conway, and Yarmouth highlighted how the increased funding and multi-year certainty would help towns plan projects, bundle work, and address backlogs, culverts, sidewalks, and resilience needs more efficiently. A Better City and MAPC also supported the bill but urged the committee to use the bond bill to advance broader transportation policy changes and new revenue tools, including electrification timelines, procurement reforms, and possible updates to TNC and other transportation fees. The committee took no vote and adjourned after testimony concluded.

Transcript Highlights:

• committee is constituted to do business this evening, and the first item on our agenda is House Bill 90
• We have a sub on House Bill 90. Do I have a motion to adopt the sub? I, I, I — yes, yes, yes.
• and we have our agenda is House Bill 90 and we have a<00:16:56.000><c> sub</c><00:16:56.399><c> on</
• c><00:16:56.639><c> House</c><00:16:56.920><c> Bill</c><00:16:57.160><c> 90</c><00:16:57.680><c> do</
• , and we have a sub on House Bill 90.

Keywords: Call to Order 00:00 Roll Call 16:20 HB 90 Discussion 17:00 HB 90 Vote 25:40 HB 398 Discussion 30:55 HB 398 Vote 38:52 HB 580 Discussion 40:10 HB 580 Vote 42:10 HB 87 Discussion 44:12 HB 87 Vote 44:54 HB 422 Discussion 46:00 HB 422 Vote 46:43 Adjournment 47:20, 958, all

Summary: The Senate Standing Committee on Licensing and Occupations met on March 12, 2025, after waiting for the Senate to adjourn so the committee could officially convene. The committee first took up House Bill 90, which concerned freestanding birthing centers and related medical language. Testimony from Representative Jason Nemes, Dr. Jeffrey Goldberg of ACOG Kentucky, and a representative from Kentucky Right to Life focused on clarifying what medical procedures are not abortions under Kentucky law, including miscarriage management, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, sepsis, hemorrhage, and stillbirth. Supporters said the committee substitute was intended to reduce confusion and barriers to care for physicians and patients, while Senator Armstrong and Senator Berg raised concerns about the late-arriving substitute, terminology, and whether the bill was being accurately described as supported by ACOG. The committee substitute and title amendment were adopted, and House Bill 90 passed with favorable expression. The committee then considered House Bill 398, relating to occupational safety and health. Representative Walker Thomas said the bill would prevent Kentucky from adopting or enforcing regulations stricter than federal OSHA standards, arguing it would create uniformity for businesses operating in multiple states while preserving worker safety. Senator Armstrong questioned what would happen if federal OSHA were eliminated and argued the bill could reduce Kentucky’s ability to address state-specific workplace hazards; Representative Thomas responded that Kentucky is a state-plan state and would retain the ability to act if needed, and that the measure was about administrative regulation rather than legislation. After a committee substitute was adopted, the bill passed 8-1, with Senator Armstrong voting no. House Bill 580, concerning alcohol and drug counselors and peer support specialists, was presented next. Representative Kim Moore and Elena Sweezy explained that the bill would add structure, training, and supervision requirements for peer support specialists, limit group settings to eight patients, shorten temporary peer support status to nine months, and require additional supervision hours so trainees can complete required training. The bill passed with favorable expression, with Senator Nemes voting no. House Bill 87, relating to employment and occupational licensing, followed; Representative Emily Callaway said it would reduce barriers for people with felony records and help “second chance” citizens enter the workforce. Several senators supported the goal but Senator McDaniel noted caution about substance-use billing and oversight, and the bill passed with favorable expression. Finally, House Bill 422, relating to administrative regulations, was described by Representative Derrick Lewis as a streamlining measure that would reduce paperwork and simplify the regulatory process. It also passed with favorable expression, and the committee then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• Preston said, we have whole chapters in the statute books about how this is a protected class.
• Preston said, we have whole chapters in the statute books about how this is a protected class.

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:09 State of the Judiciary: 00:02:33 The Corrections - KCTCS Reentry Program: 00:49:44 Update on 2022 RS SB 90: 01:27:49, 958, all

Summary: The Juvenile Justice Oversight Council met with a quorum, approved the October 8, 2025 minutes, and welcomed guests including Marshall County Attorney Jason Darnall. The main topic was juvenile interrogation, with a presentation from Kentucky Youth Advocates by Courtney Downs and Shannon Moody. They said their organization is supporting a 2026 Blueprint priority requiring children to consult with an attorney before waiving Miranda rights, and they emphasized research on adolescent brain development, susceptibility to peer pressure and impulsive decision-making, and the risk of false confessions. They cited National Registry of Exonerations data showing high rates of false confessions among exonerated youth, especially younger children, and described approaches in other states such as Maryland’s Child Interrogation Protection Act, Indiana’s statute allowing certain adults to waive rights in some circumstances, and laws in other states requiring recording of interrogations or limiting deceptive tactics. Members asked about trauma and adverse childhood experiences, whether the proposal would require attorney consultation in every juvenile interview, whether parents could instead be the ones consulted, and how such a rule would affect law enforcement investigations and juvenile accountability. Senator Carroll and others raised concerns about feasibility, delays, and whether juveniles might avoid accountability if attorneys are required before questioning. The presenters responded that they were focused on ensuring children understand their legal rights, that some states use age- or offense-based limits, and that parent consultation is another model used elsewhere, though they said a lawyer is best suited to explain legal rights and process. Members also discussed the role of the Department of Public Advocacy and whether legislative action or court decisions should address the issue. The council did not take final action on the policy, but requested additional materials, including the text of laws from Maryland, Indiana, and North Carolina, for further review.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> competency by 90%. competency by 90%.
• It's about 90 pages.
• It's about 90 pages.
• </c> makes uh Senate Bill 90 what it is. makes uh Senate Bill 90 what it is.
• So we are uh uh Senate Bill 90 sunsets.

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:09 State of the Judiciary: 00:02:33 The Corrections - KCTCS Reentry Program: 00:49:44 Update on 2022 RS SB 90: 01:27:49, 958, all

Summary: The Interim Joint Committee on the Judiciary met on November 6, 2025, approved the minutes, and welcomed guests including Kentucky Specialty Courts manager Elizabeth Nichols and Boyle/Mercer Family Court Judge Bruce Petri. The committee then heard the Chief Justice of Kentucky, Deborah Lambert, deliver her state of the judiciary address, focused largely on judicial branch funding, facilities, technology, and specialty court programs. Chief Justice Lambert said the branch is facing a projected $14.3 million shortfall for fiscal year 2026 and asked lawmakers for supplemental support, access to reserve funds, and higher base appropriations to cover inflation and nondiscretionary costs. She also requested a 15% across-the-board pay increase for judicial branch employees, citing salary gaps with other state workers and declining judicial compensation relative to national averages. She emphasized that the branch has received a clean FY 2025 audit and said the requests were intended to sustain current operations rather than expand them. A major portion of her remarks covered court technology and facilities. She described the move to Chamberlain during Capitol renovations, the purchase of that building as a cost-saving measure, and the need to fund courtroom audio/video systems and a new statewide case management system. She also discussed courthouse maintenance, flood damage, mold issues, security system upgrades, and the $47 million asset preservation fund created last session, while asking for additional local facilities funding and one-time disaster-related support. Lambert highlighted specialty court and statewide program results, including foster care review boards, family recovery courts, court designated worker programs, drug and mental health courts, and the Judicial Commission on Mental Health. She thanked legislators for prior bills and support, including House Bill 1, Senate Bill 26, and the CES law, and said 2026 recommendations will focus on civil commitment reforms under KRS 202C. During questions, Senator Wheeler asked whether some courthouses are being overbuilt; Lambert said most facilities are inadequate, though some may be larger than needed, and that future needs and population changes must be considered. She also noted that virtual hearings and technology have improved efficiency. No votes or formal committee actions were taken beyond approving the minutes and receiving the presentation.

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_Xm2LgZbVE, 2026-07-02T01:22:34+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, ACT 90 WORKING GROUP Senator Lorraine R. Inouye, Co-Chair Rep. David A. Tarnas, Co- Chair, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlwvcHukiWs, 2026-07-02T01:22:34+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, ACT 90 WORKING GROUP Senator Lorraine R. Inouye, Co-Chair Rep. David A. Tarnas, Co- Chair, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI House YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OBU8pWP51w, 2026-07-02T01:22:34+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, ACT 90 WORKING GROUP Senator Lorraine R. Inouye, Co-Chair Rep. David A. Tarnas, Co- Chair, 910, house, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• of legislation that says that uh Department of Revenue, the appeals process, we went from 30 days to 90
• piece of legislation that says that Department of Revenue, the appeals process, we went from 30 days to 90
• went from<00:04:43.199><c> 30</c><00:04:43.440><c> days</c><00:04:43.680><c> to</c><00:04:43.840><c> 90
• </c><00:04:45.680><c> So,</c><00:04:46.000><c> we</c> From 30 days to 90 days. Okay?
• </c> progress in. 90% of the businesses progress in. 90% of the businesses across<00:08:37.440><c> the

Bills: HB69, HB114, HB161

Keywords: firearms, possession, Class 1 municipalities, criminal penalties, federal law, stolen firearms, prohibited persons, HB114, Alabama Sunset Law, sunset bill, Board of Dental Examiners of Alabama, dental board, dental licensing, dentist regulation, professional licensing, occupational licensing, healthcare regulation, licensure board, state agency continuation, agency sunset review

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGFoMvcaYLQ, 2026-06-21T07:17:00+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Roll Call 00:06 SR 89 Discussion 00:46 Roll Call Vote 02:24 SR 95 Discussion 03:17 Roll Call Vote 05:19 SR 90 Discussion 06:14 Roll Call Vote 09:56 SB 15 Discussion (Info Only No Vote) 14:23, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhxiyFaPSio, 2026-07-02T01:23:11+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:26 - HCR 90 01:20 - HCR 31 01:48 - HCR 19 02:19 - HCR 150, HD1 02:50 - HCR 68 03:22 - HCR 16, HD1 05:50 - HCR 33 07:00 - HCR 16, HD1 cont. 10:47 - TCA 3:00 PM Hearing Notice: TCA 3:00 PM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_TCA_04-13-23_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: KY LRC YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4uzu-jcEcQ, 2026-06-21T07:17:02+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:03 Overview of Opioid Abatement Initiatives: 00:03:01 The Kentucky Opioid Response Effort (KORE): 00:25:18 Recovery Ready Communities Initiative: 01:01:30 The Kentucky Judicial Commission on Mental Health: 01:15:30 The Behavioral Health Conditional Dismissal Pilot Program (2022 RS SB 90): 01:34:04, 958, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tLyC7Za0QY, 2026-07-02T01:23:07+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:39 - HB 90 08:46 - HB 91 HD1 22:04 - HB 93 23:22 - HB 97 HD1 35:39 - HB 99 37:27 - HB 130 HD1 38:28 - HB 137 HD1 43:15 - HB 138 46:12 - HB 140 47:44 - HB 142 49:29 - DM JDC 10:00 AM Hearing Notice: JDC 10:00 AM http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2023/hearingnotices/HEARING_JDC_03-09-23_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Keywords: HI Senate YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1P3PeddAKk, 2026-07-02T01:23:35+00:00, 2.2.24, Data collected via generic collector engine, 00:00 - Start 00:39 - SCR 83 / SR 73 04:11 - SCR 95 / SR 90 07:55 - DM EIG-AEN 3:00 PM 11:06 - AEN 3:06 PM 11:44 - SCR 71 / SR 66 12:42 - SCR 120 13:35 - SCR 129 / SR 121 19:54 - DM AEN 3:05 PM Hearing Notices: EIG-AEN 3:00 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_EIG-AEN_03-27-26_.PDF AEN 3:05 PM https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2026/hearingnotices/HEARING_AEN_03-27-26_.PDF, 912, senate, all, 2.2.42, 2.1.47

Transcript Highlights:

• The law is Chapter 241.
• I don't think you want to amend the condominium statute. ...that we amend Chapter 241 and, in doing that
• I'm sorry, I'm 90 years old, so I sometimes don't think as fast as I used to when I was here.
• But one of the reasons may be that Chapter 241 has been used mostly for... ...it started off in the Middle
• I would say it's not unusual, but it's at the lower end of the scale of using Chapter 241. Got it.

Bills: H5314

Keywords: condominium conversion, co-owned property, tenants in common, two-unit building, duplex, partition action, Land Court, chapter 183A, chapter 241, master deed, shared ownership, housing, property law, real estate, easements, common areas, common expenses, condominium ownership, small multifamily housing, 1212

Transcript Highlights:

• There's a subsection of Chapter 4 that would specifically exempt those conversations with nonprofit organizations
• the House hasn't taken a position, so can you show me in the statute, because I'm right here with Chapter

Bills: H5004

Keywords: public records, public records law, transparency, open government, government accountability, legislature, general court, governor's office, executive records, legislative records, constituent communications, policy drafts, deliberative process, freedom of information, FOIA, records access, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 66, Chapter 4, veterans services records, initiative petition

Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on Initiative Petition 25-14, H 5-004, “an act to improve access to public records.” Chairs Cindy Friedman and Alice Peisch outlined the Article 48 process and explained that the committee was hearing expert testimony, then proponents, then opponents, before any public testimony. The first expert, Will Clark of the National Conference of State Legislatures, gave a general overview of public records laws across the states, emphasizing that all states have some form of open-records law but that exemptions, timelines, fees, and coverage of legislatures vary widely. He discussed legislative exemptions, legislative privilege, and court cases showing that outcomes often turn on the exact language of state constitutions, statutes, and chamber rules. Rebecca Murray, General Counsel for the Secretary of the Commonwealth, testified about Massachusetts public records administration, saying requests and appeals have risen sharply since the 2017 law update, with state agency requests increasing from 22,572 in 2017 to 47,776 in 2025 and appeals reaching a record 4,051 cases in 2025. She said the initiative would extend the law to the General Court and the Governor’s office and add exemptions for those branches, while warning that the volume and complexity of requests could require more resources. The proponents, led by Jesse Littlewood of the Coalition for Healthy Democracy, Scotia Hila of Act on Mass, and Auditor Diana DiZoglio, argued that Massachusetts is an outlier for exempting the legislature and governor from public records law and that the proposal would create needed accountability without exposing personal constituent communications or internal deliberations. They said the measure would make records such as committee votes, final bill drafts, amendments, expenditures, attendance records, minutes, and public testimony available, while preserving exemptions for constituent services, draft legislation, internal staff communications, and policy development discussions. DiZoglio emphasized that the initiative is aimed at basic administrative and financial records, citing her own difficulty obtaining receipts, contracts, and procurement documents, and said the public should be able to see how taxpayer dollars are spent. Committee members questioned the witnesses extensively about the scope of exemptions, constituent privacy, legislative privilege, and whether the measure could reach communications with nonprofits or lobbying-type interactions; proponents responded that privacy and constituent-service exemptions were intended to remain in place, though some members pressed for clearer statutory language. The hearing also included a contentious exchange over whether the initiative could affect legislative communications and whether the Senate had already taken a position against the measure. Some members raised concerns about separation of powers, legislative privilege, and the possibility of exposing constituent communications or internal deliberations, while proponents argued that the initiative was narrowly tailored and that any legal disputes could be resolved in court. No votes or formal actions were taken at the hearing. The committee concluded the testimony portion after hearing from the proponents and their questions, with the matter left pending for further consideration.

Transcript Highlights:

• There's a subsection of Chapter 4 that would specifically exempt those conversations with nonprofit organizations
• Because I'm right here with Chapter 4 and I can't find it.

Bills: H5004

Keywords: public records, public records law, transparency, open government, government accountability, legislature, general court, governor's office, executive records, legislative records, constituent communications, policy drafts, deliberative process, freedom of information, FOIA, records access, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 66, Chapter 4, veterans services records, initiative petition

Summary: The Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions held a public hearing on initiative petition 25-14, H5-004, “an act to improve access to public records,” which would extend Massachusetts public records requirements to the General Court and the Governor’s office. The committee first heard from two subject-matter experts: William Clark of the National Conference of State Legislatures, who gave an overview of how public records laws and legislative exemptions vary by state and discussed legislative privilege and court cases, and Rebecca Murray of the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s office, who described Massachusetts public records trends, including sharp increases in requests, appeals, and fee/time-extension petitions since the 2016 law update. Murray said the proposal would add the legislature and governor to the law and create two new exemptions specific to those offices, while also noting resource pressures on the public records system. The proponents, led by Jesse Littlewood of the Coalition for Healthy Democracy, argued the measure would close a major accountability gap by applying the same public records rules that already cover cities and towns to the state legislature and governor. They said the proposal is limited and includes carve-outs for personal information, constituent services, internal staff communications, draft legislation, policy development discussions, and communications among legislators, while making final decisions, expenditures, committee votes, and other administrative records public. Auditor Diana DiZoglio, speaking for the campaign, said the public should be able to see basic records such as receipts, contracts, invoices, and budget documents, and argued that transparency would improve trust and help her own efforts to audit legislative spending. Committee members questioned the witnesses extensively about the scope of the exemptions, especially whether constituent communications, lobbying-style communications, and sensitive casework would remain protected. Proponents said constituent service communications and deliberative legislative discussions would be exempt, but some members pressed for clearer statutory language and raised concerns about legislative privilege, separation of powers, and whether the initiative could be used to alter internal legislative rules. No vote was taken at the hearing; it was an informational and testimonial session only.

Transcript Highlights:

• Under current law, a resident age 90 or older may fish without a license.
• get a free fishing license, senior citizens or retired veterans are forced to wait until the age of 90
• law<00:03:27.959><c> a</c><00:03:28.120><c> resident</c><00:03:28.560><c> age</c><00:03:28.840><c> 90
• /c><00:03:29.200><c> or</c><00:03:29.319><c> older</c><00:03:30.000><c> fish</c> law a resident age 90
• at which time it is until the age of 90 at which time it is very<00:04:48.840><c> difficult</c><00:04

Bills: HF276, HF413, HF411

Keywords: human services, Medical Assistance, Medicaid, long-term services and supports, LTSS, public assistance, application process, eligibility determination, customer service survey, wait times, form complexity, lead agencies, Department of Human Services, Department of Children Youth and Families, streamlining, administrative reform, case management, reassessment, intake system, adaptive eligibility form

Transcript Highlights:

• 144.5 to 111.56, and the definition of a nursing home employer references chapter 256R that outlines
• 144.5 to 111.56, and the definition of a nursing home employer references chapter 256R that outlines
• 144a and statutes references chapter 144a and statutes 144.5<00:25:48.240><c> to</c><00:25:49.000><c
• 256 r that outlines Medicaid chapter 256 r that outlines Medicaid reimbursement<00:25:57.880><c> so<
• It's amazing that you're working on the I-90 project. That's just great, really good for our state.

Bills: HF339, HF1272, HF2121, HF2122, HF1216, HF1003, HF2319

Keywords: HF339, Nursing Home Workforce Standards Board, nursing homes, long-term care, elder care, workforce standards, certified worker organizations, labor funding, general fund appropriation, worker grants, Minnesota labor law, nursing home staffing, caregiver workforce, section 181.214, HF1272, nursing home, boarding care home, nursing home workers, labor standards, Medicaid-certified facility

Bills: H5012, S2927

Keywords: student nutrition, food allergies, celiac disease, gluten-free meals, allergen-free meals, medically restricted diets, school meals, college dining, K-12 education, higher education, disability access, accessibility services, food service, nutrition information, website disclosure, school website, meal accommodations, special diets, Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 71

Summary: The Joint Committee on Higher Education held a hearing on two late-filed bills, H. 5012 and S. 2927, titled An Act Relative to Students Accessing Food and Nutritional Information, sometimes referred to by witnesses as the “Snack Act.” The bills would require schools to make clearer, centralized online information available about gluten-free and allergen-free meals, including menus, food safety protocols, ingredient information, and contact information, so students with celiac disease and other medically necessary dietary restrictions can safely participate in universal school meal programs. Representative Michelle Badger and Senator Joan Lovely both testified in support, describing the legislation as an equity measure that would help families trust school meals and reduce barriers to participation. A series of witnesses, including pediatric and adult gastroenterologists, a Harvard Medical School faculty member, a Celiac Disease Foundation representative, parents, and several children and college students with celiac disease, said that celiac disease requires a strict lifelong gluten-free diet and that lack of clear communication often leads families to avoid school meals. They emphasized risks from cross-contamination, the stress and social exclusion children experience, and the fact that many schools already have the underlying information but do not present it in an accessible way. Committee members responded positively, praising the young witnesses and noting that the bill could benefit students beyond the celiac community by improving transparency for all medically restricted diets. One member suggested the Department of Public Health might also address the issue through regulations, similar to a prior restaurant allergy protocol effort. No votes were taken at the hearing, and the chair closed the hearing after testimony concluded.