Video & Transcript Research : '2025 session statutes'

Page 1 of 500
MD
US

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

Joint Address to Congress by the President of the United States (Tuesday, March 4, 2025)

US Federal House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • [Applause] e [Music] The joint session will come to order.
  • [Music] [Music] e for e e e for one e e e e for morning The joint session will come to order.
  • the quorum and the Chair is prepared to direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to restore order to the joint session
  • The Chair is prepared to direct the Sergeant-at-Arms to restore order to the joint session. Mr.
  • The Chair declares the joint session of the two Houses now dissolved. Hold on.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • We're going to say July 15th instead of April 15th, 2025, then 15th thereafter.
  • We're going to say July 15th instead of April 15th, 2025, then 15th thereafter.
  • We're going to say July 15th instead of April 15th, 2025, then 15th thereafter.
  • <00:13:15.480> then 15th instead of April 15th 2025 then 15th instead of April 15th 2025 then
  • here you can put it in the statute here you can put it in the statute<00:15:31.079> if<00:15:
Summary: The Investments in IT Improvements and Modernization Projects Oversight Board met for its first meeting, approved the minutes from November 13, 2024, and then discussed BR 355, a bill draft intended to revise and clarify the board’s governing statute based on its first year of experience. The draft would rename the body as the Information Technology Oversight Committee, add or refine definitions for cybersecurity projects/systems and legacy projects/systems, move the annual submission deadline earlier, and require a six-year outline and funding-source information for transition planning. Members and staff said the bill was largely a codification of current practice, with no major controversy. State Budget Director John Hicks and CIO Jim Baird offered technical comments and suggested several drafting changes: using “system” instead of “project” for legacy and cybersecurity references, adjusting the first reporting deadline to give agencies more time if the bill becomes law in March, and clarifying that the statute should ask agencies for estimated expenditures and funding sources rather than implying an electronic link to the budget request. They also suggested that the linkage to the budget process could be handled through budget instructions rather than statute. Members discussed whether the six-year outline should be biennial and agreed that the April timing fit the capital planning process. After the discussion, the board agreed in principle to revise the draft along those lines, including changing the terminology, making the six-year outline biennial, and refining the budget-related language. The board also discussed future meeting dates and agreed to meet on Fridays upon adjournment, with February and March meetings to be scheduled later. The meeting ended with a motion and second to adjourn, which passed.