Transcript Highlights:

• But if the track is sold, they're going to want to redevelop the fairgrounds, their fairgrounds, McGee
• Let them redevelop. The way they want to redevelop. It's their city. It's their town.
• You can't redevelop your neighborhood. You can't redevelop your neighborhood.
• You can't redevelop your neighborhood. You can't have housing. You can't have this.
• Our focus is really redeveloping the area and improving the area.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On the non-recurring side, our big ticket items include 100 million for redevelopment of the state fairgrounds
• And I'm looking at 100 million for State Fair redevelopment, including 30 million for housing.
• representatives that sit on that board would know what that looks like, but there's a board that's redeveloping
• I'd love to redevelop the Spaceport. Virgin Galactic has been more than an anchor.
• It's part of their redevelopment plan for that area to do mixed-use housing, a park, the Midway, the

Bills: HB2, SB152

Keywords: general appropriation, budget, Medicaid, education funding, public safety, telecommunications, low-income assistance, lifeline, broadband, rural broadband, universal service fund, public regulation commission, PRC, 911 surcharge, telecommunications relay service, VoIP, mobile service, internet affordability, digital equity, digital inclusion

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, as currently written, the bill prohibits cities from collecting permit fees for the redevelopment
• of resources and we believe that this is one of the best ways to do them to facilitate uh the redevelopment
• The biggest thing is that Uh, redeveloping a commercial to residential, the traffic may be completely
• I've been involved in a number of redevelopment projects, including, uh, the North Overton Project in
• Uh, on a redevelopment of, um, of an office building, they can run on the thousands of dollars.

Transcript Highlights:

• Right now they're in a kind of rented metal tin building that is slated for redevelopment for housing
• parcel, and DCAM made the point to say that this intersection is slated for a big, like $3 million redevelopment
• Our city has rezoned this whole area to be a CRX rail yard redevelopment housing plan, where we plan,
• It is an important entry point into the city, and it will support the redevelopment of this area.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee opened by explaining new attendance and public-testimony procedures, including that testimony would be recorded, livestreamed, and generally made public, with possible redactions for sensitive material. The chairs also noted that no committee rules were being formally adopted yet and that no votes would be taken during the hearing. Senator Collins briefly emphasized the committee’s oversight role on land takings and Article 97 issues, including concerns about proposed regulatory changes and the legislature’s constitutional role. The first major bill discussed was H. 3324, concerning the former Christos site on Crescent Street in Brockton and a proposed transfer of state-owned land from DCAM. Representative Michelle DuBois, Representative Rita Mendes, Mayor Sullivan, the Metro South Chamber’s Chris Cooney, Catholic Charities’ Larry Mayne, and Brockton planning director Rob May all supported the bill, describing the parcel as long vacant and arguing it should be reused for a mixed-use project with Catholic Charities, including affordable/workforce housing, an early education center, food pantry, workforce development, and language classes. Several speakers said the project would help retain Catholic Charities in Brockton and bring tax revenue and community services. DuBois outlined expected amendments, including moving one parcel into a municipal sale partnership and changing a “shall” to “may” regarding a right-turn lane. Some members raised questions about whether a deed transfer to a nonprofit was preferable to a long-term lease and about affordability definitions, but the bill was generally supported. Representative Connolly then testified on two Cambridge bills: H. 3308, relating to the Riverside Boat Club and a reconfigured DCR parcel boundary to support a lease with no loss of public space, and H. 3309, which would facilitate access to justice by preserving consideration of a vacant former probate court site for future court use. Senator DiDomenico supported the Riverside Boat Club measure and the broader goal of restoring court access in Cambridge. Members discussed accessibility, possible future court configurations, and the site’s prior use as an emergency shelter. The committee then heard testimony on S. 2217/H. 2108 concerning Columbia Point and access around the UMass/Bayside area. Harbor Point residents, including Orlando Perrella, Michael Corcoran, Richard Fulham, and Miles Byrne, described severe traffic congestion, emergency-access concerns, and frustration with the UMass Building Authority’s handling of the site and prior community commitments. Senator Collins said the committee should consider seeking an SJC opinion, and possibly an Attorney General opinion, on Article 97 and public-access rights. After the in-person testimony concluded, the committee attempted to reach remaining virtual witnesses on S. 2217 but did not receive testimony. With no further witnesses, the committee adjourned without taking any votes.

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair and members of the committee, we're very excited to see this type of redevelopment in the.
• So, it could stay There, and we could just redevelop it. It could move to other areas.
• So the master The plan is supposed to come back with how we redevelop the State Fair.
• My question is, why are we Redeveloping the old fairgrounds before we build a new fairgrounds. Mr.

Transcript Highlights:

• Next up, we have SB 1170 relating to the expeditious redevelopment and development of affordable rental
• I know you didn’t comment on 1296, because I wanted you to explain why the redevelopment part is so important
• What I’m trying to get is for you to explain why redevelopment is needed versus reconstructing those
• Redevelopment may mean that the project will be substantially the same, but it may not be exactly the
• Reconstruction is like a major rehabilitation project, whereas redevelopment is you’re starting from

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The hearing opened with committee procedures and then took up SB 1, relating to vegetation management near utility lines. DLNR opposed the bill, saying it would shift rights, responsibilities, and liability onto the state and private landowners. Hawaiian Electric supported the measure with amendments, describing it as a first step to address wildfire risk and improve public safety and system reliability. The Hawaii Farm Bureau and Command Schools both raised concerns that the bill could impose significant costs, liability, and access burdens on farmers, ranchers, and other landowners, especially where easements are old or unclear. Life of the Land argued the issue belongs before the Public Utilities Commission, and PUC staff explained that the commission is already reviewing Hawaiian Electric’s wildfire mitigation plan and vegetation management in a docket, with a decision expected by September and public meetings scheduled for April 23 and 24. Committee members questioned the need for legislation versus negotiated solutions, and witnesses said private parties could potentially renegotiate easements without statute. The committee then heard HB 1296, relating to disaster recovery. DLNR and OPSD supported the bill, saying it would ease regulatory burdens in post-disaster rebuilding and help speed permit review. Testimony and member questions focused on the bill’s five-year rebuilding timeline, the role of the coastal zone/SMA process, and how long permit reviews typically take; OPSD said SMA major/use permits generally take about six months, while minor permits are faster. Members also discussed whether the bill would apply to existing structures damaged in disasters and whether the amendments from the Attorney General’s office and OPSD were acceptable; no objections were raised. Finally, the committee heard SB 1170, relating to the expeditious redevelopment and development of affordable rental housing. HHFDC supported the bill, and testimony from a Maui affordable housing project said the measure is needed to rebuild the Weinberg Court Apartments, a 63-unit affordable project in Lahaina, using insurance funds rather than government money. Members asked whether the bill would help existing affordable rental projects damaged before the enactment of related coastal rules, and the response was that the bill is aimed at existing structures damaged during events and intended to speed rebuilding of affordable housing.

Transcript Highlights:

• redevelopment of the King Plant site. redevelopment of the King Plant site.
• It would not support redevelopment, and I would direct any of those more substantive questions to our
• of the site is the redevelopment of the site is the existing<01:08:30.359> water<01:08:30.719
• It would not<01:08:34.120> support<01:08:34.480> redevelopment<01:08:35.280> and
• <01:08:35.400> I<01:08:35.520> would not support redevelopment and I would not support

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• CRAs, community redevelopment agencies, they play a crucial role in revitalizing blighted areas.
• Community redevelopment agencies are very effective tools in revitalizing areas.
• They came about with the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969.
• They came about with the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969.
• They came about with the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969.

Summary: The House opened with prayer, a moment of silence for fallen Oviedo Officer Jimmy Serrano-Torres, the Pledge of Allegiance, and recognition of Chief Joseph Tuminelli as law enforcement officer of the day. The chamber approved the journal and adopted the special order report, and the Speaker announced a schedule change canceling the floor on Monday and starting Tuesday at 10:30 a.m. The main business was CS for HB 7033, the House tax package, presented by Rep. Duggan. He described a broad set of tax changes, including the previously passed sales tax rate reduction from 6% to 5.25%, exemptions for certain bullion sales, changes to tourist development tax (TDT) use, property tax administration updates, affordable housing-related exemptions, repeal of the aviation fuel tax, delayed natural gas fuel tax implementation, corporate income tax changes, and other provisions. Debate focused heavily on the TDT section and the bill’s property tax relief structure. Amendments to preserve local flexibility or remove the TDT restrictions were offered and debated; one Duggan amendment was adopted to allow local governments to keep 25% of TDT revenues for general use while directing 75% to property tax relief, and another amendment requiring audit certification of compliance was also adopted. A combined reporting amendment offered by Rep. Eskamani to close corporate tax loopholes was debated at length but failed. On final passage, supporters argued the bill provides immediate, permanent tax relief and affordability help, while opponents said it diverts tourism dollars away from local needs and could harm tourism-dependent counties and services. CS for HB 7033 passed the House 78-29. The chamber then took up CS for CS for HB 1221 on local option taxes, which would give local governments more control over certain local taxes and, as presented, redirect TDT revenues toward property tax relief with some local flexibility. After questions and amendments, including a Miller amendment allowing 25% of TDT revenue for general purposes and another accountability amendment, the bill moved to final debate. Members split sharply: supporters framed it as immediate tax relief and local accountability, while opponents warned it would undermine tourism marketing, infrastructure, and county budgets. The transcript ends during closing debate on HB 1221, before final passage is recorded.

Transcript Highlights:

• Committee substitute for Senate Bill 1242, a bill to be entitled, An act relating to community redevelopment
• It revises redevelopment regulatory requirements, including prohibiting impact fees for replacement structures
• Revises redevelopment regulatory requirements, including prohibiting impact fees for replacement structures
• to make sure we're taking the right approach when it comes to local government regulations on redevelopment
• the state by minimizing DEP's expenditures for cleanup and assisting local governments through redevelopment

Summary: The Senate convened with prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several introductions, then moved into special order and returning messages. Early floor action included passage of HB 6503 (relief for Mandy Penny Lamon by Sarasota County), HB 1123 (sewer collection systems), HB 211 (farm products), and a joint resolution on ad valorem tax exemption for agricultural tangible personal property, all approved without opposition. Several other measures were temporarily postponed before the chamber recessed and later returned to messages from the House. The Senate then took up a series of House amendments and conference-style motions on major bills. SB 180 on emergency preparedness and response was amended and concurred in after debate over hurricane recovery, local government moratoriums, evacuation timing in the Keys, and property tax and redevelopment provisions; it passed 34-1. CS/HB 1609 on waste incineration and auxiliary containers was heavily debated over plastic and polystyrene preemption, local beach and park regulations, and landfill/incinerator provisions, then passed 26-10. CS/HB 1205 on citizen initiatives was amended to allow volunteers to carry up to 25 petitions without registration/training and passed 28-9. The Senate also refused to concur in a House amendment to SB 234 on offenses against law enforcement, and in SB 116 on veterans, seeking to restore funding for veteran suicide prevention. Later, the chamber approved or advanced several education and health-related bills. CS/HB 1255 on education was amended and passed, with changes to school readiness and other education provisions. CS/HB 875 on educator preparation passed after discussion of cognitive science, classroom management, teacher excellence programs, and the phaseout of the general knowledge test. CS/HB 1105, a large education package, passed after debate over charter school conversions, cell phone restrictions, and other school governance changes. In health care, CS/HB 1427 was introduced as a comprehensive package combining multiple health-related provisions, though the excerpt ends before final action on that bill. Throughout the day, the Senate also concurred or refused to concur in various House amendments on mental health, financial institutions, land development, brownfields, and out-of-network provider legislation, with votes generally recorded and several measures passing on divided but mostly favorable roll calls.

Transcript Highlights:

• For example, a long-standing chiropractic business which was displaced by the redevelopment of our Moorhead
• For example, a long-standing chiropractic business which was displaced by the redevelopment of our Moorhead
• that will make our redevelopment that will make our redevelopment successful.<00:09:35.360> For
• <00:09:40.959> of<00:09:41.200> our displaced by the redevelopment of our displaced
• by the redevelopment of our Morehead<00:09:41.760> Center<00:09:42.000> Mall<00:09:42.640

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I'm going to start with the House position on line 70 within the development and redevelopment programs
• R28 to R31 is a House-only article, and this article would allow housing and redevelopment authorities
• R28 to R31 is a House-only article, and this article would allow housing and redevelopment authorities
• That's where the manufactured home community redevelopment program is critical.
• And NARO represents 150 housing and redevelopment authorities, or HAs, across the state of Minnesota.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Section six, this is cleaning up before we can redevelop our brownfields.
• <00:33:22.120> Uh we can redevelop our brownfields. Uh we can redevelop our brownfields.
• the downtowns that we all redeveloping the downtowns that we all treasure.
• It invests in cleaning up polluted sites and the redevelopment of our business centers, our downtowns
• of our business and the redevelopment of our business centers,<00:41:34.640> our<00:41:34.800

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Will it produce a list of priority parcels for redevelopment?
• <00:02:54.720> How<00:02:54.879> many parcels for redevelopment?
• How many parcels for redevelopment?
• sites to be within urban redevelopment sites to be set<00:06:49.520> aside<00:06:49.840> for
• Amendments include requiring a list of parcels to be redeveloped, the number of units to be developed

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The joint hearing covered several housing-related measures. On SB 2068, which would create an affordable housing land inventory task force within the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development to study how to maximize housing on transit-oriented development and other state and county lands, testimony was mostly supportive from agencies and housing groups, with one opposition witness. In response to questions, OPSD said it was already working on a list of potential parcels but could not yet identify unit counts or a timeline, and estimated about $250,000 would be needed for staffing and contractual support. The committees also heard SB 2227 on rental assistance, which would require HPHA to make monthly rent supplement payments, prioritize certain tenants including kupuna, allow agreements with counties and nonprofits, and create a special fund supported by a transaction fee on recordings. HPHA supported the bill, and the Department of the Attorney General said it recommended amending the measure to describe the fee as a tax. Additional testimony included support from elder and community organizations and one opposition witness. For SB 2061, relating to residential condominiums and the 99-year leasehold program, HCDA and the project developer testified in support of amendments intended to preserve owner-occupant requirements while making the project more marketable and financially feasible. Members focused heavily on parking, affordability, and financing. HCDA and the developer said the parking stalls would be unbundled from the units, that the project would be a 99-year leasehold with 60% of units reserved for buyers at or below 140% AMI and 40% market-rate, and that the state’s $15 million equity contribution would cover only part of the parking garage and commercial component. The hearing then moved on to SB 3327, relating to HCDA and complete communities, but the transcript cuts off before that measure was fully discussed.

Transcript Highlights:

• Special taxing districts are things like watershed districts, housing and redevelopment authorities.
• <00:04:06.720> authorities<00:04:07.319> the<00:04:07.439> Met Redevelopment authorities
• the Met Redevelopment authorities the Met council<00:04:08.000> is<00:04:08.159> another
• For example, there are blight finding requirements for redevelopment districts.
• finding requirements for redevelopment finding requirements for redevelopment districts<00:58:16.559

Keywords: 1183, house

Summary: The House Tax Committee met to hear a House Research presentation from Jared Swanson on Minnesota’s property tax system. Before the presentation, the chair announced that the committee would put the governor’s budget on hold until the department could provide the information needed for a proper hearing. The committee then approved the prior meeting minutes without objection. Swanson gave an overview of how property taxes are structured and collected in Minnesota, explaining that the state uses a levy-based system in which local governments set levies and counties collect and distribute payments. He described the property tax cycle, the difference between referendum market value and net tax capacity, and how classification rates shift tax burdens among property types. He also outlined the state general property tax, noting it is split between commercial-industrial property and seasonal recreational property, and reviewed how Minnesota compares with other states, with residential taxes generally around the middle and commercial-industrial taxes relatively higher. The presentation also covered major property tax relief and aid programs. Swanson explained three broad relief mechanisms: shifting burdens through exclusions and classification rates, state-paid credits and refunds, and state aid to local governments or levy reductions. He discussed local government aid (LGA), township aid, and county program aid (CPA), including their funding levels, formulas, and general-purpose nature. Members asked why some cities receive no LGA and how the funds may be used; Swanson said cities with strong tax bases often receive zero aid and that the money generally can be used for the same purposes as property tax revenue. No votes were taken on the presentation itself.

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, at the city of Plymouth, City Center redevelopment and revitalization, $5 million.
• :21.800> center at the city of Plymouth City center at the city of Plymouth City center redevelopment
• <00:15:22.680> and<00:15:22.760> revitalization,<00:15:23.600> 5 redevelopment and
• revitalization, 5 redevelopment and revitalization, 5 million.<00:15:24.640> Rainier<00:15:25.240
• For the Saint Paul Port Authority, the Heights Redevelopment Site, $1 million from the general fund.

Keywords: 918, senate, all

Summary: The committee took up a large bonding bill and reviewed the final spreadsheet of capital investments. Chairs and members repeatedly thanked staff, House and Senate negotiators, and the Governor’s team for a collaborative process. The bill was described as a statewide package rather than a partisan one, with major funding for higher education asset preservation, DNR projects, public safety, transportation, the Met Council, veterans facilities, corrections, DEED/local projects, and a large water infrastructure section. House Fiscal staff and Senate fiscal staff walked through the bill line by line. Highlights included University of Minnesota and Minnesota State asset preservation, education and language immersion school funding, DNR trail and flood mitigation projects, public safety facilities, local road and bridge grants, Met Council parks and I/I grants, veterans home and armory funding, corrections projects including the Faribault vocational expansion, and many local economic development and public facility projects across Greater Minnesota and the metro. The bill also included Public Facilities Authority water and wastewater grants, housing rehabilitation funding, historical society grants, a Minnesota Zoo operating transfer, airport appropriations, and several cancellations of prior appropriations to help finance the package. Members generally praised the bill and the bipartisan work behind it. Some Republicans emphasized the one-time license fee reduction and affordability, while also saying DEED’s business development infrastructure funding was too low. Senator Nelson highlighted long-awaited transportation projects such as Highway 14 and township roads. Senator Dibble supported the transportation investments but criticized the bill for having no transit funding, calling that a major omission. No vote was recorded in the excerpt, but the discussion centered on final review and support for moving the bonding bill forward.

Transcript Highlights:

• Now we'll move to tab 9, SB 1434 on infill redevelopment, by Senator Collateaute.
• The purpose of this bill is to incentivize the redevelopment of environmentally challenged properties
• The purpose of this bill is to incentivize the redevelopment of environmentally challenged properties
• If we're truly talking about redeveloping brownfield properties, that's a conversation to have.
• You know, for years I've thought that redevelopment of Brownfield area could be something really important

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and considered a series of bills, many focused on local government authority, land use, housing, and public notice requirements. Several measures were reported favorably, including SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention, SB 1612 requiring local governments to accept electronic payments, SB 936 on temporary door locking devices, SB 962 on affordable housing protections for farms, SB 218 on land use regulations in hurricane-affected counties, SB 1020 on regulation of chickee huts, and SB 1434 on infill redevelopment of environmentally challenged properties. SB 1180 on community development district recall elections was amended to narrow and clarify the recall process and to add provisions on synthetic turf and compact urban mixed-use districts before being reported favorably. SB 380 on legal notices was also amended and reported favorably despite significant opposition from the Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and others who argued it would further fragment public notice access; supporters said it would modernize publication options and save money. Testimony on the bills was mixed. Supporters of the housing and redevelopment measures argued they would increase attainable housing, streamline approvals, and make better use of underutilized or contaminated land, while local government groups and advocacy organizations warned about overdevelopment, reduced public input, infrastructure strain, and conflicts with comprehensive planning. On SB 1444, which combined preemptions related to religious gatherings, private clubs, and certain permitting requirements, supporters framed it as protecting religious freedom and limiting local micromanagement, while the League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties opposed it as overly broad and unclear; the bill nevertheless passed favorably after debate. SB 218 was presented as restoring normal land-use authority in counties unaffected by hurricanes while preserving protections in damaged areas, and SB 984 was described as clarifying firefighter cancer benefits and health coverage rules; both passed without controversy. The committee also heard extensive testimony on SB 948, a strike-all on local government land development regulations and orders that would create a statewide framework for starter homes and lot-split rules within urban growth areas. Supporters said it would expand housing supply and reduce regulatory delays, while opponents said it would override local zoning, weaken infrastructure and environmental protections, and apply too broadly. The bill drew support from housing advocates and some local officials, but opposition from the Florida League of Cities, Florida Association of Counties, and others. The transcript ends with SB 948 still under consideration, with testimony continuing and no final vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• the Brownfield redevelopment program.
• We do have a very robust Brownfield redevelopment program.
• <00:47:36.400> for remediated, they can be redeveloped for remediated, they can be redeveloped
• And we Brownfield redevelopment program.
• do have a very robust redevelopment do have a very robust redevelopment brownfield's<00:47:42.119

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:05 Approval of Minutes 00:01:48 Welcome New Members 00:02:03 Information Items 00:02:35 Review of Executive Branch Agency Plans 00:03:33 A. Cabinet for Health and Family Services 00:04:00 B. Kentucky Department of Education 00:17:03 C. Education and Labor Cabinet 00:29:33 D. Energy and Environment Cabinet 00:42:38 E. Finance and Administration Cabinet 0:53:30 F. Justice and Public Safety Cabinet 01:13:28 G. Personnel Cabinet 01:31:04 H. School Facilities Construction Commission 01:41:39, 958, all

Summary: The meeting was the first of the year for the Capital Planning Advisory Board. Members were called, a quorum was confirmed, new co-chairs and members were welcomed, and the board approved the prior year’s meeting minutes. The chair also reviewed the capital planning timeline, packet organization, and the list of agencies that submitted plans but would not testify. The Cabinet for Health and Family Services presented first, outlining priorities centered on public safety, protecting existing infrastructure, preventive maintenance, and improving service delivery. Its major requests included a $21 million maintenance pool for 14 campuses and 175 buildings, phase 2 construction funding for a new public health laboratory, an 18-bed psychiatric hospital for children and adolescents with severe mental health needs, and several projects at Western State Hospital, Western State Nursing Facility, Hazlewood, and Oakwood. Members asked about the youth facility’s relationship to a separate DJJ project, vacant buildings, the high per-bed cost of the children’s hospital, and how the cabinet determined the need for the youth facility. CHFS said the youth project would be a separate facility serving high-acuity youth, the cost reflected the specialized nature of the unit and an 18-bed cap, and the broader youth plan also includes prevention, in-home services, and coordination across agencies. The Kentucky Department of Education then described projects for its three state-operated facilities: the Kentucky School for the Deaf, the Kentucky School for the Blind, and the FFA leadership training center. It requested additional funding for the FFA classroom and activity building after bids came in higher than expected, plus funding for a new education finance application system to support SEEK budgeting. Other priorities included a maintenance pool, FFA pool renovation, electrical upgrades, campus education enhancements, lighting improvements, safety and security work, door and window replacements, and HVAC maintenance. Members asked about student outcomes, the size of the FFA pool, and construction cost assumptions; the department said it tracks students through the schools and short-course programs, the pool size figure may have been a typo, and current construction estimates are being adjusted upward because of inflation and supply-chain pressures. The Education and Labor Cabinet began its presentation with 12 priority projects, including a state labor exchange system to connect job seekers and employers, renovation of the McDow Vocational Rehabilitation Center, and a new adult education and family literacy management information system. The cabinet said the labor exchange would help match workers with employers at no cost, while the McDow renovation was needed because the 30-year-old facility has safety and code concerns. The adult education system was described as outdated and lacking adequate case-management and tracking capabilities.

Transcript Highlights:

• In recent years, we've seen major commercial expansions and redevelopment projects from companies like
• The redevelopment plans are consistent with the city's comprehensive plan and Met Council's development
• <00:45:47.240> projects<00:45:47.559> from and Redevelopment projects from and Redevelopment
• plans Envision affordable Redevelopment plans Envision affordable housing<00:46:29.960> mixed
• greater sewer capacity the Redevelopment greater sewer capacity the Redevelopment plans<00:46:35.880

Bills: HF458, HF459, HF461, HF449, HF450, HF965, HF1280, HF612, HF615, HF616, HF622, HF650, HF651, HF1045, HF972, HF851, HF644, HF1050

Keywords: HF458, Henderson, water treatment facility, drinking water, municipal water, public infrastructure, capital investment, state bonds, bonding bill, Public Facilities Authority, water distribution system, well connection, local government grant, Minnesota capital budget, HF459, Carver levee, City of Carver, levee restoration, flood control, flood mitigation

Transcript Highlights:

• environmental cleanup laws as it relates environmental cleanup laws as it relates to<00:35:26.320> redevelopment
• <00:35:27.120> of<00:35:27.280> previously to redevelopment of previously to redevelopment
• :35:36.880> for limit liability, and then allow for limit liability, and then allow for redevelopment
• :38.920> once<00:35:39.120> a<00:35:39.200> land<00:35:39.480> has redevelopment
• Meaning, once a land has redevelopment.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00 Attendance Roll Call 02:25 SB 100 Discussion 02:59 SB 100 Roll Call Vote 31:10 SJR 134 Discussion 32:41 SJR 134 Roll Call Vote 33:43 SB 222 Discussion 34:43 SB 222 Roll Call Vote 39:55, 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 57th Legislature's second session submission of House Bill 194, a bill expanding the Metropolitan Redevelopment
• Code to include housing shortage areas, expanding the scope of metropolitan redevelopment projects,
• a housing shortage area from property taxation for up to 20 years pursuant to the Metropolitan Redevelopment
• Code to include housing shortage areas, expanding the scope of metropolitan redevelopment projects,
• a housing shortage area from property taxation for up to 20 years pursuant to the Metropolitan Redevelopment

Bills: HM3, HM11, HM14, HM15, HM18, HM21, HB10, HB11, HB12, HB13, HB14, HB31, HB50

Keywords: nurses, health care workers, healthcare workers, frontline workers, hospital staff, clinicians, allied health professionals, support staff, public health, workforce shortage, nursing shortage, safe staffing, patient safety, rural health care, frontier communities, behavioral health, mental health, substance use disorder, substance abuse, health care memorial