Video & Transcript Research : 'priority facilities'

Page 9 of 500
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Environmental Regulation Apr 24th, 2025

Environmental Regulation

Transcript Highlights:
  • The McGregor facility will produce 500 million square feet of insulation annually and that's enough to
  • We will use 70 to 90 tons of coal daily at this facility.
  • The LBJ Hospital is a level 3 trauma facility.
  • Where concrete crushing facilities are prohibited from operating. I have witnesses here to speak.
  • Here, Patrick Casey, on behalf of the Facilities Construction and Systems Engineering – I'm sorry.
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • All these wastewater treatment facilities, whether it's 50 500,000 gallons a day or 5 million gallons
  • Within 3 miles radius of existing facilities.
  • or our proposed facilities, uh, that those smaller plants are able to meet our, uh, effluent quality
  • To provide a new regional reclamation facility.
  • And I believe that this bill does hold economics as a priority issue in it if the econ if it money's
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • I want to also mention that the SAWS Board of Trustees agrees that water loss is a top priority.
  • I would think that if our municipalities were putting a priority on this...
  • The water losses happen between the treatment facility and before it gets to the customer. Meter.
  • It's feasible, it's ready to go, and it's certainly a priority.
  • They are also in Gonzales County, on the very bottom of the priority list when it comes to well mitigation
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • All these wastewater treatment facilities, whether it's 500,000 gallons a day or 5 million gallons a
  • Proposed facilities that those smaller plants are able to meet our effluent quality.
  • have a water and wastewater facility immediately available. I appreciate that question.
  • But on the side of Sudhir, all these plants are sitting adjacent to a regional facility.
  • I believe that this bill does hold economics as a priority issue.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations Committee, February 9, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Tomorrow we have scheduled for noon time or upon Senate recess: Senate File 37K to2 School Facilities
  • 53.199> school recess of Senate file 37 K to2 school recess of Senate file 37 K to2 school facilities
  • <00:14:54.079> maintenance<00:14:54.720> and facilities maintenance and facilities maintenance
Bills: HB0105, HB0107, SF0002
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Appropriations Committee, February 9, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • appropriated to the school facilities appropriated to the school facilities commission<00:03:55.440
  • committee on school facilities and we're committee on school facilities and we're usually<00:13:01.600
  • Um I'm kind of proud of that facilities.
  • So it's an important facility. Wyoming. So it's an important facility.
  • Uh priorities uh for their buildings.
Bills: HB0105, HB0107, SF0002
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The idea I had was for instance, everybody, when you come into a healthcare facility, whether it's an
  • I was actually in a bathroom recently at one of our healthcare facilities, and they had a red sharpie
  • You know, we've got this looming danger of them closing the state-run facilities.
  • fiscal impact in the opposite direction when you have someone that's not in crisis and ending up in a facility
  • The PCS explains that if they use any kind of prescriptive medication in their facility, they would remain
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 14th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And that's where we determined, at the end of it, that that was a priority. And we put it back in.
  • Behavioral health facility grant, $5 million. Behavioral Health Facility Grant, $5 million.
  • Section 6 is the Behavioral Health Facility Grant.
  • I think this is probably reviewing the facilities and land and how that is most appropriately used.
  • Section 51 is behavioral health facility grants, reporting to the Legislative Management regarding the
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources Division met with all members present and took up several bills, focusing most of the discussion on SB 1577 and SB 1619, along with a detailed review of the HHS budget bill draft. On SB 1577, Senator Magrum explained that the bill was being revised to focus on wastewater rather than raw water, possibly shifting the Washburn project to the Department of Water Resources so it could access matching funds, and potentially converting the bill into a line of credit if federal money is restored later. Members discussed whether to keep an emergency clause or instead use a date-based approach, and agreed the bill would likely be handled through the full committee and possibly reconsidered later. On SB 1619, Senator Davison said amendments were still being worked on, including changes requested by the Bank of North Dakota, and the committee planned to hold it for possible amendment before full committee consideration. The bulk of the meeting was a section-by-section review of the HHS appropriations bill draft. Members discussed one-time funding items such as technology projects, child care programs, housing programs, behavioral health facility grants, infant and toddler care provider support, juvenile justice diversion, medical housing, and other public health and human services projects. Several adjustments were noted, including reductions or changes to IMD-related funding, incarcerated-person treatment funding, the child welfare technology project, and the provider rate increase. The committee also discussed the FTE block grant structure at length, with staff explaining that the apparent increase in positions reflected budgeting mechanics, zero-dollar “phantom” positions, and positions approved previously but not counted in the FTE total. Members raised concerns about transparency and whether the bill should list FTE numbers, but staff said the block grant was intended to give the department flexibility while quarterly reporting would provide oversight. Other topics included Medicaid expansion funding and provider reimbursement rules, the move toward certifying human service centers as certified community behavioral health clinics, a moratorium on new ICF beds, and studies or reports on Medicaid, obesity, disability services, truancy, and behavioral health facility grants. The committee also discussed removing or revising broad intent language in Section 31 so the department would report findings rather than implement changes without further legislative action. No final votes were taken in the transcript; instead, members agreed to make a few technical adjustments, continue reviewing the bill, and likely revisit it the next day before moving it to conference committee.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 11th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • And then there was also a requirement that they operate the facility for a minimum of 10 years.
  • with that okay I'll remove that part and then there was also a requirement that they operate the facility
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources Division met to finalize changes to the human services budget bill and related amendments. Members discussed several items, including a proposed $5 million appropriation for the Altru Hospital project to address inflationary costs, with the rest of the funding question left for conference committee. They also agreed to keep the 10-year operating requirement language for the project and remove a matching-funds provision that was no longer needed. The committee spent considerable time on the OASIS child welfare IT system. Donna Auckland explained that the project is still in the RFP stage, with vendor selection and contract negotiation likely taking months, and that the system will require 50-50 federal matching authority. Based on that testimony, the committee agreed to reduce the general fund amount from $14 million to $6 million and use a line of credit for the remaining authority, while preserving the federal match authority so the contract can be signed and the project can proceed. Members also approved a technical fix to add governor’s designee language for the Children’s Cabinet, which had been missed in another bill already on the governor’s desk. Keith reviewed updated long sheets showing additional budget adjustments, including provider inflation changes, a $50,000 Family Voices grant, reductions to CARES Act COVID funds, and moving the $5-per-day basic care rate increase from ongoing to one-time funding. No formal votes were recorded in the transcript, and the committee adjourned with plans to reconvene Monday if the final bill version was ready.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 02:00 pm

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • In fact, you were looking at a priority list the last time I was up here talking.
  • In fact, you were looking at a priority list the last time I was up here talking.
  • You know, where it would end up on the priority list, I do not know.
  • What program does the Manchester House use to construct their facilities?
  • may be provided separately from the facility ownership interest.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee first discussed a wastewater infrastructure bill, centered on whether state support should be provided as a grant or through the existing Clean Water State Revolving Fund as a low-interest loan program. Department of Environmental Quality official David Brushwine explained that the SRF already finances wastewater projects, can leverage federal funds with state bond proceeds, and could accommodate the Washburn, Lincoln, and Peasant projects if they are ready to proceed. Members noted that losing federal grant support would make projects harder for local residents to afford because costs would be recovered through utility rates or special assessments, but the projects would still be eligible for loans. Senator Magrum indicated he would likely concur with the budget after this discussion, and the bill was set aside for later consideration. The committee then turned to a proposed amendment for a four-plex housing project for people with disabilities or other special needs. Senator Mathern described Sections 7 and 8 as creating a design consultation appropriation and a revolving loan fund modeled on existing hospital and nursing home loan programs, while Section 9 would transfer $3.3 million from the state infrastructure fund. Members debated ownership, rent subsidies, repayment terms, and whether the state should finance the project directly or leave it to a private developer with Department of Human Services oversight. Concerns were raised that the state should not own the housing and that the proposal needed more work to be workable, but the committee ultimately reached consensus to adopt Sections 7 and 8 and leave out Section 9 for further conference committee discussion. The committee also reviewed provider inflation and long-term care rate issues, with members discussing whether to support a 2% and 1.5% inflation adjustment and how to handle the $5-per-day basic care rate. Staff explained that the $5 payment was already in the base budget, but members debated whether it should remain ongoing or be treated as one-time funding and paired with a study of rate rebasing. The committee agreed to have draft language prepared to remove the $5 from the base budget and add study language, then moved the bill forward for drafting.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 10th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • for the sake of discussion— To agree, and the CCBHCs, I think, for the sake of discussion, are a priority
  • doing, and that would save the whole discussion on the floor about having another behavioral health facility
  • is the provider rate increase, and we're going to get more information; the other is the All True facility
  • And nobody talked about any ICF facilities intending to build in the coming biennium.
  • And nobody talked about any ICF facilities intending to build in the coming biennium.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The committee met to review revised long sheets and section-by-section language for a human services/health budget bill, with much of the discussion focused on how to present block grant funding and full-time equivalent (FTE) positions for behavioral health clinics and CCBHCs. Members debated whether to keep FTE counts in the budget at all, ultimately leaning toward removing or zeroing out the FTE references while keeping the dollar authority, and reducing the salaries-and-wages block grant by about $4.75 million. They also discussed public health federal authority, agreeing to remove about $60 million in unused federal spending authority tied to COVID-era funds, and clarified that if federal money later becomes available it could be requested through the Emergency Commission. A major topic was the provider inflation increase. The House version had 2% and 2%, while members debated alternatives and appeared to settle, at least for further work, on 2% in the first year and 1.5% in the second year, with staff asked to recalculate the fiscal impact. The committee also reviewed FMAP changes, noting a revised 2027 FMAP estimate and its effect on general fund and other funds, and discussed whether to adjust public health and other line items accordingly. Several members emphasized that many of these numbers are still tentative and will be refined before final action. The committee also touched on several policy items and capital-related provisions, including behavioral health services, Medicaid expansion, the moratorium on new ICF beds, and a proposed amendment for a medical homes/fourplex-related item that would show a $400,000 legislative investment with repayment from a developer. There was extended discussion of the All True hospital/facility proposal, with some members favoring leaving it in with a smaller initial commitment and others preferring to remove it and revisit later in conference committee. The meeting ended with staff asked to continue updating the bill language and members instructed to review remaining sections before the next meeting; no final votes were taken in the portion provided.
ND

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 7th, 2025 at 09:30 am

Appropriations - Human Resources Division

Transcript Highlights:
  • Intermediate care facilities.
  • Is this outline here for one facility?
  • This is for one facility, about a 5,000-square-foot facility, which would house four individuals.
  • care facilities that we've done out in Dickinson or the hospice facilities.
  • care facilities that we've done out in Dickinson or the hospice facilities.
Bills: SB2015
Summary: The Senate Appropriations Human Resources division met with a quorum and spent much of the meeting on a proposed “medical home” concept for people with significant disabilities and medical needs. Matt Schwartz described the need for small, community-based homes so adults like his daughter could live in a least-restrictive setting without losing housing if service providers change. Architect Jeff Eubel presented a conceptual budget for one roughly 5,000-square-foot facility for four residents, explaining that the design would likely include four large sleeping units, common space, support areas, and medical infrastructure such as emergency power, oxygen, sprinklers, and accessibility features. Committee members and George Sink, joining by phone, raised questions about layout, zoning, ownership, staffing, and whether families would actually move loved ones into such facilities if they were far from home. The department said the concept was not in the governor’s budget and identified staff who could continue discussions; the committee did not take final action and instead discussed refining the language with interested members. The committee then turned to amendments related to long-term care and behavioral health funding. One amendment would reduce a planned $4 million general fund incentive payment and instead create a withhold-based quality program for nursing facilities, to be developed collaboratively by the department and providers and reported to Legislative Management by September 2026. The department said it could live with the language but preferred the governor’s timing; several senators questioned whether the committee should be directing an operational policy change and whether the study would simply delay implementation. No vote was taken, and the amendment was set aside for later consideration. A second amendment would clarify use of an existing $2 million general fund item for behavioral health services in nursing homes and basic care facilities, directing it toward training, technical assistance, consultation, and direct patient care for residents with medically based behavioral health disorders. Members noted the funding was already in the bill and discussed it in the context of other budget items, but again deferred action. The committee also clarified that a separate $750,000 juvenile justice diversion appropriation in House Bill 1425 was distinct from a similar amount in the budget and should likely remain in that separate bill. The chair indicated a goal of having amendments ready by the end of the week, and the committee recessed without final votes on the discussed items.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Children and Families Finance and Policy Committee 2/12/25

Children and Families Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • to<00:43:19.839> do<00:43:20.079> the<00:43:20.280> necessary Care Facilities
  • to do the necessary Care Facilities to do the necessary testing<00:43:21.480> that<00:43:21.599
  • My priority is to be the best parent and husband ever; that trumps anything I do.
  • is to be the best parent do my priority is to be the best parent and<01:00:12.880> husband<01
  • is a priority for Second Harvest<01:37:34.440> Heartland<01:37:34.960> who's<01:37:35.159
Bills: HF22, HF45
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/3/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • , assuming this facility is built.
  • So we lose a child care facility.
  • Um, so we lose a child care facility. Um, so we lose a child care facility.
  • This is a joint facility, a regional facility, including MnDOT, our city, and our county.
  • We operate out of a facility that's 48 years old and another facility that's 70 years old.
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/1/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Skraba. air traffic facilities. This $5 billion air traffic facilities.
  • It's a youth facility off Zane.
  • Paul Public Works facility.
  • It is an old facility built in 1970.
  • It is an old facility built in 1970.