Video & Transcript Research : 'priority claims'

Page 9 of 500
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We have no problem prohibiting the use of AI for denying claims.
  • and Claims Act and have an entirely different process.
  • That's a claims dispute.
  • When you say 'there,' you mean the original claim? Yeah.
  • Or pressing a button, and in one second denying all these AI-generated claims.
Bills: SB 6, SB6, SB504, SB765, SB815, SB929
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • She said the claim was that freestanding emergency rooms are popping up across the street from their
  • They, on the side, looked at some of the data on Medicaid claims.
  • And it's still a priority for us.
  • But this is a priority for this legislative body to make it right.
  • So our highest priorities have been very consistent over the session.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The protections include tightened timelines and increased penalties for insurance carriers for claim
  • It has various non-renewal sections for roof age and prior claims. I yield for questions.
  • Is there any kind of recourse for false claims here?
  • Is there any recourse for false claims?
  • And so if somebody willfully and knowingly lied and presented a fraudulent claim, they would be subject
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • So is it possible for the CCN to get notified of the PUC hearing so that they can make that claim if
  • Permissive authorizations for counties in a priority groundwater management area.
  • Additionally, language is added that counties in priority groundwater management areas may still apply
  • people that are not taking it seriously and certifying property that does not have water when it claims
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Get notified of the PUC hearing so that they can make that claim if that circumstance exists.
  • provision unintentionally conflicted with the preexisting permissive authorizations for counties in a priority
  • application does not comply with the TCEQ form or content requirements, and adds language that counties in priority
  • groundwater management areas may still adopt water availability requirements for... ...counties in priority
Summary: The Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs heard several water-related bills, with testimony focused on drinking water quality, groundwater contamination notice, flood infrastructure funding, water rights conservation, and utility service areas. SB 1662 would limit TCEQ’s advance notice to public water systems to no more than 24 hours before testing after a consumer complaint, to reduce the chance of temporary treatment affecting results. SB 1663 would allow TCEQ to notify private well owners, groundwater conservation districts, and nearby residents by direct means about known groundwater contamination, rather than relying mainly on first-class mail and annual reporting. SB 2124 would move the deadline for publishing the Texas Groundwater Protection Committee’s annual report from April 1 to June 1. Witnesses on the first two bills described long-running water quality problems and delayed notice in their communities and supported the measures. No opposition was recorded, and each bill was left pending for a later vote. The committee also heard SB 1967, which would expand eligibility for Flood Infrastructure Fund financing to multipurpose projects that both reduce flooding and create water supply. Senator Hinojosa and Hidalgo County representatives described the Delta Reclamation Project as a shovel-ready example that would capture flood and drainage water, treat it, and produce new potable supply while also providing detention and flood mitigation. A Sierra Club witness also supported the bill, saying such projects could help manage floodwaters and reduce polluted discharges to bays and estuaries. The bill was left pending. A lengthy and divided discussion followed on SB 1413, which would expand the streamlined expedited release process for landowners seeking removal from a water or sewer CCN in additional counties. Senator Nichols said the bill was a property-rights measure aimed at legacy monopolies and bad actors who use CCNs to hold landowners hostage, while supporters described cases where developers could not get timely service, including fire flow, or were asked to fund infrastructure without reasonable recoupment. Opponents from rural water corporations and utility associations argued the bill would undermine investment in water infrastructure, strand debt, and weaken the return on planned expansion. PUC and TCEQ resource witnesses explained that compensation is handled case by case through appraisal and can include stranded costs, planning, design, construction, and some legal fees, but members noted the statute is unclear and discussed possible committee substitute language. Public testimony was closed with the bill left pending. Later, SB 1624 would allow the Texas Water Trust within the Texas Water Bank to hold donated water rights for conservation purposes and protect them from use-it-or-lose-it cancellation, and SB 863 would address Edwards Aquifer utilities that straddle the aquifer boundary by allowing them to continue using Edwards water within their certificated areas under specified conditions. Both bills were laid out, received no public opposition in the hearing, and were left pending.
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The other question, and I get your concern about spending priorities.
  • Why isn't this bill about changing How those priorities are set, perhaps through a change in the leadership
  • This is would create an all pair claims database.
  • some others, I think we have something that everybody is in agreement with to create an all pair of claims
  • Speaker, uh, Representative, are you aware that the American Psychological Association has claimed that
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • Bill 1638 by Osborne of the House and Rader of the Senate, an Act relating to the governmental tort claims
  • Um, House Bill 1638 expands the definition of public trust in the government Tort claims act to include
  • Bill 1638 by Osborne of the House and Rader of the Senate, an act relating to the governmental tort claims
  • okay, so this 4488 updates Oklahoma's insurance law governing first-party motor vehicle damages and claims
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • But there's an entity like the state chambers made this their number one priority.
  • So if you are a member of the state chamber and you've said this is your number one priority this year
  • 3974 by Caldwellrey of the House and Paxton of the Senate, an act relating to the Government Total Claims
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/25/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's a priority.
  • and an appeals claim, but that is not the situation.
  • and an appeals claim, but that is not the situation.
  • and an appeals claim, but that is not the situation.
  • Here’s the reason why it seems your claim has been denied.
Summary: The committee first heard a lengthy presentation and discussion focused on Arizona State University’s foreign research ties, especially collaborations and funding connected to China and Chinese military-affiliated institutions. The presenter argued that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents had not been transparent about foreign gifts, contracts, and research partnerships, citing federal reporting forms, the Wolf Amendment, export-control concerns, and alleged links to dual-use technologies such as quantum systems, AI, robotics, microelectronics, and biosecurity. A witness from American Global Strategies testified in support, saying the bill would help protect U.S. research security and national security by imposing state-level guardrails on sensitive collaborations. After questions, the committee considered a strike-everything amendment to SB 1060 that would bar public universities from entering into or continuing certain loans, gifts, contracts, research partnerships, or sponsored projects involving the PRC, the CCP, and listed Chinese military-linked universities, require ABOR review and approval, and impose reporting and budget penalties. The amendment was withdrawn, and the committee instead took up SB 1327, which directs ABOR to require university research security policies and to report annually on those policies and on foreign contributions over $250,000; SB 1327 received a 4-2 do-pass recommendation, with Del Santos, Hernandez, and Márquez voting no and Kolodin, Powell, Keshel, and Gillette voting yes. The committee then heard SB 1803, a veterans bill regulating unrecognized persons who assist with VA disability claims. The sponsor and industry witnesses said the bill would protect veterans from bad actors by requiring disclosures, capping fees, banning certain practices, and filing service agreements with the Attorney General, while opponents argued it could restrict consumer choice, resemble a price ceiling, and still allow non-attorneys to engage in the unauthorized practice of law. After extensive debate over contingent fees, legal ethics, and whether the bill was too favorable to one company, the committee continued the hearing with additional testimony and questions.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Judiciary Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • valuable time by simplifying both the process of distributing a small estate and the proceeds of claiming
  • Provide the following clear priority list of who is entitled to summary.
  • List of who is entitled to summary distribution of a small estate after the claim exemptions and allowances
  • are paid and all funeral expenses and other claims are either paid or arranged for payment out of the