Video & Transcript Research : 'expense allowance'

Page 9 of 500
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Mar 5th, 2025

Alabama House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • everything that we that you will allow everything that we that you will allow everything that we do
  • today we leave the journal open to allow today we leave the journal open to allow the clerk to complete
  • then a DA at yet uh so this now allows then a DA at yet uh so this now allows then a DA at least to
  • and allow the econom Development and Tourism allow the econom Development and Tourism allow the econom
  • those things are allowed it just can't be things are allowed it just can't be things are allowed it
Keywords: 1136, house, all
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence May 7th, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • , future medical expenses, lost wages, future loss of earning capacity, all of the future medical expenses
  • Your subsidy can be limited to your past medical expenses.
  • This bill still allows that.
  • Aside from my purposes, the issue of medical expenses.
  • The plaintiffs are allowed to do it on any expert.
Bills: HB4806
VA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Was that in addition to the out-of-pocket expenses, could you tell?
  • So Virginia law allows a landlord to collect a security...
  • expenses on top of that.
  • That they would be allowed to charge prior to lease signing.
  • They would be allowed to charge this.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • This allows expenses to be awarded against the department in... advocate that we go with the House advocate
  • And then Court-Awarded Expenses. And then Court-Awarded Expenses.
  • This<00:37:53.200> allows<00:37:53.640> expenses<00:37:54.240> to<00:37:54.359><
  • c> be<00:37:54.480> awarded This allows expenses to be awarded This allows expenses to be
  • costs across 13 expense codes. costs across 13 expense codes.
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The Free Conference Committee on the 2026 General Assembly budget met to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of House Bill 500. Leaders opened by thanking the other chamber’s work, asking members to turn microphones on and off to avoid feedback, and stressing the need to clearly note decision points so both chambers record the same actions. Staff then walked through the bill page by page, explaining that the committee was comparing only House and Senate differences, not the governor’s proposed budget. The discussion covered a wide range of appropriations and language items, including next generation non-911 services, school safety reporting tools, restored funding for brain injury, epilepsy, veteran service, homeless veterans, and rocket docket programs, debt service changes, rural infrastructure, disaster aid caps, Attorney General and Medicaid fraud funding, agriculture and county fair grants, auditor and pension-related appropriations, school facilities and SEEK funding, and numerous education programs. Members also discussed charter-related funding such as Star Academy, Dolly Parton Imagination Library, school resource officers, school-based mental health providers, AP/IB exams, Governor’s Scholars and Entrepreneurs, and several pilot or initiative programs in economic development, energy, and labor. Several items were described as technical corrections or restorations of language and funding, while others reflected differences in amounts or how funds would be distributed. There were several questions and comments from members about wording such as “implement and carry out,” the absence of the governor’s budget from the comparison document, and whether SEEK funding should be tied to teacher raises. The chair and other members emphasized that the committee’s role was to reconcile the two chambers’ budgets, not to adopt the governor’s proposal. Members also raised concerns about opioid settlement funds and the Dolly Parton Imagination Library match rate, with one senator urging restoration of the House language. No final vote or formal action was taken in the portion provided; the meeting primarily consisted of explanation, questions, and discussion of proposed budget differences.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 20th, 2026 at 04:16 pm

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • So Sections 1 and 2 are appropriations for the expenses as of the 2026 regular session.
  • expense, and then the Legislative Council would vote on that item.
  • On looking at a spreadsheet, it shows the district staff office expense.
  • The House for expenses not itemized. I'm just curious. Mr.
  • I want to know what the unitemized expenses are. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Exactly.
Bills: HB1
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Appropriations and Finance Jan 20th, 2026

House Appropriations & Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, Sections 1 and 2 are appropriations for the expenses as of the 2026 regular session.
  • For example, next year's session preparations, interim legislative expenses.
  • expense, and then the Legislative Council would vote on that item.
  • On looking at a spreadsheet, it shows the district staff office expense.
  • I want to know what the unitemized expenses are. Mr.
Bills: HB1
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

03/16/2026 - House Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Public Safety & Law Enforcement

Transcript Highlights:
  • And to her point, we have many duplicate expenses because those, as we all know, those expenses don't
  • Expenses because those, as we all know, those expenses don't stop when we are at home.
  • And any idea how much additional expense the towns are bearing by allowing support staff to participate
  • Thank you, but I still have no idea what the expense is. It would be very... Mr.
  • Does this also allow the officer, if he wins... I, Isaacson, thank you.
ND

North Dakota 2026 1st Special Session

Administrative Rules Committee Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:00 am

Administrative Rules Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • The revised rule now allows for additional pay... ...to reflect broader options.
  • Thank you once again for allowing me to appear. At this time, I stand for any questions.
  • So it allows for communication with the individual.
  • So it allows to have the communication with the individual. Next section.
  • It allows for communication with the individual.
Keywords: 908, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

March 4, 2025 - 04:00 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • Those related to expenses the university incurred for chartered private flights, expenses the university
  • But can you talk a little bit about the P-card expenses?
  • actual expenses.
  • We were just looking at the actual expenses. Follow up?
  • They were in various other states, and these expenses...
Summary: The Higher Education Budget Subcommittee met to hear a presentation from the Florida Auditor General’s office on recent operational audits of four universities and to discuss how audit findings are handled. The Auditor General explained that financial audits occur annually and operational audits at least every three years, with universities required to respond in writing to findings; the office generally follows up in the next audit cycle, though it can audit sooner if needed. Members asked about accountability, whether findings are referred to other bodies, and how internal university audit functions interact with the state audit process. The chair emphasized the committee’s oversight role in ensuring public funds are used appropriately. The audit findings highlighted issues at New College of Florida, Florida A&M University, the University of Florida, and Florida Atlantic University. At New College, auditors cited invoice/payment errors, delinquent student account collection delays, prohibited extra compensation, exceeding state remuneration limits for certain employees, weak purchasing card controls, construction management cost documentation issues, and subcontractor licensing documentation gaps. At FAMU, auditors found investment accounting classification issues, delayed bank reconciliations, late vendor payments, and incomplete annual employee evaluations. At UF, auditors reported concerns over a $6.4 million consulting contract, event and catering spending, president’s office hiring and salary practices, bonus and relocation payments, continued high compensation after the president transitioned to another role, travel expenses including charter flights, and remote work agreements. At FAU, auditors found distance learning fee revenue exceeded allowable costs by about $2.8 million, carry forward funds were underreported by about $77 million, and credit card controls needed improvement. Members pressed the Auditor General on whether overpayments were refunded, whether any findings involved statutory violations, and what enforcement exists beyond the audit report. The auditor said some issues were corrected by the universities, such as New College recovering excess compensation from foundation funds, but others would be revisited in future audits; if potential fraud were identified, it would be referred to the state attorney’s office. The chair closed by noting that accountability for public spending rests with the Legislature and the committee, and the meeting adjourned without any vote or formal action beyond receiving the presentation.
KY
Transcript Highlights:
  • There is a deleted paragraph relating to operating expense reductions.
  • <00:03:30.320> reduction change the operating expense reduction change the operating expense
  • operating expenses paid to counties. operating expenses paid to counties.
  • be no use allowance paid. be no use allowance paid.
  • expense data. expense data.
Summary: The Kentucky Senate Appropriations and Revenue Committee met with a quorum and first took up House Bill 503, the legislative branch budget, adopting a committee substitute and reporting it favorably. The chair said the Senate version fully funds defined calculations, provides 2% raises in each fiscal year for legislative employees, removes a paragraph on operating expense reductions, and includes $1 million in the first year for a judicial branch salary study. House Bill 504, the judicial branch budget, was then amended and reported favorably; changes included 2% annual raises for judicial employees, revised operating expense language, $1 million each year for county current services, retention of Boyle County fit-up language, reporting requirements for smaller capital projects, full funding for nine judges added in 2022, and removal of furlough prohibitions and certain budget implementation language. Both bills passed the committee unanimously with favorable expressions to the floor. The committee then considered House Bill 500, the executive branch budget, adopting a committee substitute before hearing a lengthy summary of major spending and policy changes. The chair described statewide 2% annual employee raises, agency base reductions with many exemptions, increased school safety and 911 funding, veterans and military funding, local government and severance-related changes, attorney general and auditor funding, pension and retirement system support, education funding changes including SEEK, postsecondary and scholarship provisions, public safety and corrections funding, and multiple capital projects. The chair also highlighted Medicaid-related provisions, including added waiver slots, increased state-directed payments, a 2.5% reduction in managed care vendor payments for plan years 2027 and 2028 with savings redirected to fee-for-service rates, and additional funding for behavioral health and public health programs. The bill was reported favorably after members explained their votes, with several noting they had only recently received the full 228-page bill and wanted more time for detailed review. Finally, the committee adopted a committee substitute for House Bill 900, an appropriation measure for government agencies, and reported it favorably. The chair said the bill remains a work in progress and that one-time funding requests from across the Commonwealth and across party lines would continue to be addressed as the process moves forward. All measures considered during the meeting passed the committee with unanimous or near-unanimous favorable votes, and the meeting adjourned after no further business.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee May 6th, 2026

Revenue and Taxation

Transcript Highlights:
  • Land is expensive.
  • Thank you all for allowing me to speak with you today.
  • It is expensive, an expensive upfront investment.
  • We want to look at the total value of credits allowed.
  • It allows qualifying taxpayers to deduct medical expenses above 4% of their income, focuses the relief
Keywords: 987, senate, all
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Health Care Affordability, Select May 1st, 2026

Health Care Affordability, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • The plan has to allow it. The plan has to allow it. The parent is not forced to do it.
  • Medical expenses.
  • I mean, why isn't it getting less expensive?
  • PCP costs are not our most expensive costs, as you all know.
  • It was hospitals that were very expensive.
Keywords: 1184, house, all
CO

Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 118 May 12th, 2026

Colorado House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's unsustainable to allow people to It's unsustainable to allow people to ship in to avert births.
  • But we already know what made insurance expensive. This room made insurance expensive.
  • Sorry, contract of insurance against loss or expense resulting from the sickness or expense resulting
  • It does keep the status quo to allow an option for online schools to Allow an option for online schools
  • We all agree that everything's too expensive, but then we pass bills that are making things more expensive
Keywords: 981, all
MN
Transcript Highlights:
  • We should not hold these projects hostage to the expense of mitigation, especially when there's no money
  • This expensive piece of infrastructure is much more likely to contribute to greenhouse gas reduction
  • This expensive piece of infrastructure is much more likely to contribute to greenhouse gas reduction
  • The costs of offsetting greenhouse gases are expensive. You've heard that today.
  • By doing these projects, we allow more movement, less emissions.
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 748, a bill revising Minnesota’s transportation greenhouse gas and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impact assessment requirements for trunk highway projects. The chair first moved and adopted the A2 author’s amendment and then the A3 amendment, which was described as adding implementation time and project exemptions when federal dollars are available. The bill author explained that the measure responds to concerns from stakeholders that the current law can force costly mitigation, delay or stop safety and capacity projects, and create uncertainty because key implementation details are still being developed by a technical advisory committee. Testimony was split. County and city engineers, county commissioners, the Minnesota Transportation Alliance, and the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities generally supported the bill, arguing that the current requirements can add 20% to 40% or more to project costs, are difficult to administer, and could jeopardize critical safety improvements, congestion relief, and federal funding. They cited examples such as Scott County and Trunk Highway 65, and said VMT mitigation is especially hard to quantify and fund. Opponents, including Move Minnesota and Sierra Club, argued that safety and climate goals are not in conflict, that reducing driving can save lives and reduce pollution, and that the bill would weaken an important tool for cutting transportation emissions. Members also asked about how GHG and VMT are measured, whether the required assessment was ready, and who would be responsible for mitigation assets and costs. After discussion, the committee held a roll call vote. The bill, as amended, passed 8-7 and was moved to the General Register.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 3/26/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair, for allowing Well, thank you, Mr.
  • It's only expenses and stuff like that.
  • expensive expensive um<00:30:27.720> for<00:30:28.320> specifically,<00:30:29.120>
  • But the difference is our expenses in child care allowed the—it was hard.
  • It's very expensive.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee considers HF169 3/11/25

Transcript Highlights:
  • With heavy state and local taxes on top of other bills we must pay, these expensive expenses handcuff
  • With heavy state and local taxes on top of other bills we must pay, these expensive expenses handcuff
  • With heavy state and local taxes on top of other bills we must pay, these expensive expenses handcuff
  • With heavy state and local taxes on top of other bills we must pay, these expensive expenses handcuff
  • These expensive expenses handcuff our posts from helping the veterans in their community who are suffering
Keywords: 919, house, all
Summary: The committee took up House File 169, which would change the tax structure for charitable gambling. Representative Robbins offered and the committee adopted the A1 author’s amendment, described as a technical correction to ensure sports-themed tip boards are not inadvertently taxed under the bill. Robbins then presented the bill as a way to replace the current tiered combined net receipts tax on charitable gambling with a flat 5% rate, arguing charities were being overtaxed and that prior promises of relief had not been fully delivered. Chair Stevenson pushed back on several of Robbins’ factual claims, correcting the record on the status of E-pull tabs, the share of charitable gambling revenue they represent, and the amount of tax relief already enacted in 2023 and 2024. He said E-tabs were not eliminated, that the revenue split between paper pull tabs and E-tabs is closer to 45/55, and that charities had already received a $15 million tax cut plus savings from reduced developer fees. Robbins responded that the changes still significantly reduced revenue and that the bill was intended as a middle-ground approach. Testimony largely came from charitable gambling and veterans groups in support of the bill. Rachel Jenner of Allied Charities of Minnesota said nearly 1,000 charities depend on charitable gambling, cited high taxes and fees, and said many organizations were seeing revenue declines after the new E-pull tab rules took effect. Dr. Christy Jano of the American Legion Department of Minnesota said charitable gambling funds support veterans, youth, and community programs, and that a flat 5% tax would help posts continue those efforts. Members asked about the size of the revenue drops and how much gambling proceeds go to overhead and operating costs; Jenner said the losses varied by organization and that it was too early to know the long-term effect, while Jano said some expenses are used for property taxes and building upkeep. The committee then moved on to additional testimony, including Tim Angstrom, but no final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Natural Resources Mar 26th, 2025

Natural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • Martinez, for allowing me to be here this morning.
  • Not to mention how expensive wastewater systems are.
  • It is a system, fair or not, that is very expensive.
  • This makes it easier; it is a very expensive process.
  • It's very difficult, so it's expensive; there's just no way around it.
AR

Arkansas 2026 Regular Session

ALC-PEER Mar 17th, 2026

ALC-PEER

Transcript Highlights:
  • Are those operating expenses more than what you'd anticipated?
  • And it is a higher expense month for them.
  • So those payments, in addition to regular expenses, can cause it to be a very expensive quarter.
  • So what we try to do is match the money with the expenses.
  • It in the Medicaid match to pay ongoing regular expenses.
Keywords: 1204, all
NH

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

House Education Funding (01/27/2026)

Education Funding

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'm not allowed to ask any questions. I'm not allowed to ask any questions.
  • software upgrades or printing expenses. software upgrades or printing expenses.
  • expenses pretty effectively.
  • our for supplies, here's our expenses our for supplies, here's our expenses for<00:18:42.320>
  • are expenses? are expenses?
Keywords: 1189, house, all
ND
Transcript Highlights:
  • The driver will then pull over and allow the rider to get off.
  • , are then used to absorb the costs for the remaining expenses.
  • And it's also a lot more expensive than public transportation.
  • That is only allowed to be put towards expenses associated with paratransit.
  • That is only allowed to be put towards expenses associated with paratransit.
Summary: The committee met as a study subcommittee on fixed-route public transportation and first approved the December 11 minutes. It then heard detailed presentations from transit leaders in Grand Forks, Bismarck/Mandan, and Fargo about their systems, including route structures, paratransit service, ridership trends, fare changes, funding sources, fleet replacement needs, and operational challenges. Grand Forks described Cities Area Transit’s 17 routes, university shuttle service, expanded paratransit coverage, a 2025 fare increase, and rising costs for labor, fuel, parts, and new buses. Bismarck/Mandan’s Bisman Transit outlined its fixed-route and paratransit operations, recent service expansions approved for April 1, fare structure, ridership recovery since COVID, and major funding streams including mill levies, federal grants, and new local sales tax revenue. Fargo’s MATBUS representative emphasized the importance of continued state support for urban fixed-route transit. Members asked extensive questions about cost per ride, fare increases, school transportation, veteran service partnerships, app-based ticketing, local funding formulas, and whether ride-share or microtransit could replace fixed routes. Transit officials said fixed-route service remains essential because it provides reliable capacity, supports jobs and access to services, and preserves federal funding tied to public transit operations. They also said paratransit is costly but necessary for riders with disabilities, and that vehicle and maintenance costs have risen sharply. Minot’s transit superintendent added context on the state’s existing transit aid formula, explaining that it is weighted more toward rural and paratransit providers and that urban fixed-route systems are seeking a separate, dedicated funding source rather than changes to the current formula. The committee also heard public testimony from North Dakota Protection & Advocacy supporting both fixed-route and paratransit service for disabled riders, and from Minot staff on refurbished buses, CDL driver recruitment, and why the agency is not pursuing full electric buses. Near the end, members discussed whether to recommend additional state funding for the four urban fixed-route systems. A motion passed to have Legislative Council prepare a summary of the subcommittee’s activities for inclusion in the Government Finance Committee’s report to Legislative Management. Members then continued discussing possible recommendations, including a separate funding source for urban fixed-route transit and whether the four urban systems should meet to develop a proposed amount.