Video & Transcript Research : 'construction projects'

Page 9 of 500
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 24, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • . project. project.
  • projects in the omnibus construction bill at the November meeting jointly.
  • <01:08:28.239> projects<01:08:28.560> in along with our construction projects in along
  • with our construction projects in the<01:08:28.960> omnibus<01:08:29.440> construction
  • So then we can complete the construction of the project. Okay.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

House Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources Committee, February 24, 2026

Agriculture, State and Public Lands & Water Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • projects have a 5-year time construction projects have a 5-year time frame.<00:08:19.440> So,
  • Um, there are 17 projects, construction projects in the account 2 portion of the work this year.
  • 10:37.440> construction there are 17 projects, construction there are 17 projects, construction
  • pre-construction projects where we fund pre-construction projects where we fund the<00:13:40.959
  • project. them to come in and get the construction them to come in and get the construction funds<00:
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • relating to state construction projects. relating to state construction projects.
  • design review of state construction design review of state construction projects<00:37:41.680>
  • submitted for state construction submitted for state construction projects<00:38:02.560> administered
  • Instead of having one large construction project taking up...
  • construction projects and some people construction projects and some people accuse<00:42:08.800>
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Energy Resources Mar 17th, 2025

Energy Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • What does it look like the day we're getting ready to start construction?
  • Without these projects, our great state and oil and gas can be stymied.
  • Frankly, most counties are not familiar with projects of this size.
  • Much less cost to the construction company and much more efficient.
  • Thank you. actually built in fairly recent history, right, as far as construction projects go, so. 50
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 27th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • construction because time is money.
  • Chairman, have you done some of these projects in other states?
  • or an industrial project and a school or parish.
  • so that would be additional tax credits for the project.
  • They actually supported the project.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management Mar 27th, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Projects? I don't think the city can weaponize.
  • For a potential pause on their construction projects and allow enough time to get ready for a public
  • This could lead to a city with water concerns halting the construction of residential projects while
  • allowing commercial projects to proceed.
  • Construction of new homes while allowing a water-intensive commercial construction use such as a car
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/9/26

Capital Investment

TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We have 40 years of Texas case law on statutory construction that warns us about this kind of negative
  • I'm a policy attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project here in opposition to SB14.
  • I'm representing the Texas Civil Rights Project and I don't want to belabor any of the points that have
  • The Texas Civil Rights Project is opposed to the legislation.
Bills: SB7, SB14, SB 7, SB 14
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Arizona and have seen how they are actually harming cis women who do not fit the stereotypical social construct
  • I'm representing. ...the Texas Civil Rights Project in opposition to SB7.
  • private utility districts, municipal utility districts, land developers, and the good old boy construction
  • I'm the executive director of Texas Family Project, and I'm here testifying in support of Senate Bill
  • 7 on behalf of both myself and Texas Family Project.
Bills: SB7, SB14, SB 7, SB 14
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • Unfortunately, not all developers include parks and green space in their desired projects, and counties
  • The lack of stability in zoning regulations discourages developers from pursuing long-term projects,
  • It seems to me that if I wanted to develop a project with this bill in place, I would have to wait two
  • occurring after January 1st of 2026 unless an agreement concerning the construction was entered into
  • Spiller just said, you know, this is a great project looking to add bonding to be able to build out the
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Land & Resource Management May 1st, 2025

Land & Resource Management

Transcript Highlights:
  • practice in many zones and would... ...eliminate the affordability gained by some of that incremental construction
  • back to not just complications with taking a structure like that and making a complaint with the construction
  • The restrictions that local governments place on the construction of who can build, what can be built
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Jan 12th, 2026

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • Review costs published on the fee schedule and not based on project valuation; set subjective compatibility
  • standards for residential projects within the same zoning and future land use category.
Bills: S0014, S0016, S0024, S0208, S0762
Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee heard several bills, beginning with SB 762, which was amended by a strike-all to remove a one-year sunset and delete a reporting requirement to the Legislature. The bill would allow offices of criminal conflict and civil regional counsel to take on certain capital cases from outside their region on an optional basis, with supporters saying it could save money and use existing in-house death penalty expertise. After testimony from Senator Martin and the Second Region’s regional counsel, the committee reported CS/SB 762 favorably. The committee also considered three local claims bills. SB 16, relating to relief for Heriberto A. Sanchez Mayan by the City of St. Petersburg, described severe injuries allegedly caused during an arrest and transport; the claimant’s counsel supported the bill, while President Gaetz spoke against the claims-bill process generally and voted no. The bill passed 9-1 and was reported favorably. SB 14, for Jose Correa against Miami-Dade County, involved injuries from a bus-pedestrian collision and was supported by the claimant and county; it passed 9-1 and was reported favorably. SB 24, for Lourdes and Edward Latour against Miami-Dade County, was an uncontested $500,000 settlement bill and passed unanimously. Finally, the committee took up SB 208 on land use and development regulations. A late-filed strike-all amendment, described as a negotiated compromise, would make development application fees transparent and cost-based, tie them to direct and reasonable indirect review costs, and set subjective compatibility standards for residential projects, with carve-outs for PUDs, master planned communities, and historic districts. Multiple local government, planning, environmental, and business groups appeared in support. The amendment was adopted, and the committee then reported CS/SB 208 favorably on a 10-0 vote.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Workforce Development Committee Meeting - 2026-04-09

Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • for manufacturing projects. for manufacturing projects.
  • > water Projects, including clean water projects, wastewater cleanup, recycling-type projects,
  • disposal projects.
  • because one project is limited to $10 million per manufacturing project.
  • at least two projects because one project project project it's<00:36:17.520> limited<00:36:17.839
Bills: HF3217, HF2252
Summary: The committee first approved the prior day’s minutes as amended, correcting the meeting number from the 46th to the 45th meeting. It then took up House File 3217, which would restore funding for the Minnesota Bioincentive Program. Representative Kisha argued the state should honor commitments made to companies that met program requirements and had not received full reimbursement. Testifiers from the Great Plains Institute and Minnesota Biofuels Association said the program has supported bioeconomy investment, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and generated strong economic returns, but has been underfunded, leaving unpaid claims. Members raised questions about whether the bill was retrospective and whether it should be reviewed by another committee; the bill was laid over for further consideration without a vote. The committee then heard House File 2252, a proposal to modernize Minnesota’s private activity bond volume cap by shifting unused allocation from the small issuer/manufacturing bucket to the public facilities bucket while leaving the overall cap unchanged. The bill’s public finance testifier said the current allocation formula is outdated, housing would remain the top priority, and the change would be budget neutral. Testifiers from the Minnesota Milk Producers Association and Minnesota Biofuels Association supported the bill, saying it would better align financing with rural infrastructure, clean water, manure management, renewable natural gas, dairy processing, and low-carbon fuel projects, and could lower borrowing costs for those sectors. Members questioned whether the bill fit the committee’s jurisdiction and noted it might be more appropriate for another committee; the bill was also laid over for further consideration.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/9/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's about a $100 million project.
  • That's about a $100 million project.
  • That's about a $100 million project.
  • That's about a $100 million project.
  • That's about a $100 million project.
Bills: HF4841, HF4234, HF3697