Transcript Highlights:

• Uh this service legislative session.
• Um so [clears throat] legislator ease.
• legislators didn't say here's the limit. legislators didn't say here's the limit.
• Um, and so having a policy or procedure for when is it needed, right?
• Um, and so having a policy or procedure for when is it needed, right?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Before we begin, I want to make sure everyone understands our committee procedures to ensure we maintain
• SB 16 requires county behavioral health directors to maintain procedures governing the designation and
• At least three counties lack 5150 procedures.
• SB 16 requires counties to develop procedures identifying the professional disciplines, qualifications
• It allows local control for the county, but requires the counties to develop policies and procedures.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, we passed legislation and a years.
• objective procedure. Voting no. objective procedure. Voting no.
• Anyone object to<01:11:35.600> that<01:11:35.840> procedure? to that procedure?
• to that procedure?
• Anyone object that procedure? Anyone object that procedure? Voting<01:21:51.760> no.

Keywords: MS Senate Floor - 25 February, 2026; 10:00 AM, 925, all

Summary: The Senate convened with a quorum, opened with prayer by Reverend Max Smith of Jesus Name Tabernacle in Florence, and then led the Pledge of Allegiance. The chamber quickly dispensed with the reading of the journal and committee reports, and then spent much of the morning recognizing guests, including multiple FFA groups, the Mississippi FFA state officer team, the Mississippi Food Bank Collaborative, optometrists visiting for Optometry Day, and representatives from engineering and fire service organizations. On the calendar, the Senate took up several finance-related bills. Senate Bill 2824, extending deadlines related to renewable energy fee-in-lieu agreements and construction start dates, was explained and adopted, then passed by use of the morning roll call with three no votes and one present. Senate Bill 2867, revising the income tax credit for employer-provided dependent child care or child care stipends, was explained as a targeted, capped credit for actual employer spending on licensed child care; it was adopted and passed by morning roll call. Senate Bill 3109, clarifying that a nonprofit leasing and managing LaFleur’s Bluff State Park land is not subject to ad valorem taxes on state-owned park land, was adopted and passed by morning roll call with one no vote. The Senate also considered Senate Bill 2840, which would provide a 75% rebate or sales tax credit related to inventory taxes and eliminate local privilege taxes. After extended discussion, the committee substitute was adopted, a reverse repealer amendment was added, and the bill passed by morning roll call with one no vote. Senators discussed the burden of inventory taxes on retailers and the need for more data before fully implementing the proposal. Finally, Senate Bill 2868, creating a tax credit tied to employer contributions for individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs), was introduced and explained as a way to encourage employer-supported health coverage for small and midsize businesses; the transcript cuts off during the explanation before final action on that bill.

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, I rise in support of this rule and in support of the underlying legislation. Mr.
• Speaker, I rise in support of this rule and in support of the underlying legislation.
• SUPPORT OF THE UNDERLYING LEGISLATION.
• My Republican colleagues are trying to use today's procedural rule vote to sneak in a provision that
• DON'T SNEAK IN PROCEDURAL ROADBLOCKS TO CONSIDERING TARIFF POLICIES BY THE HOUSE.

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, February 10, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And I strongly urge legislators and their staff to attend as well.
• It must go to the capital to your legislators.
• Talk to your legislators. Figure out who your legislators are. We do not have a voice.
• So we have policies and procedures regarding the body camera.
• They follow those policies and procedures.

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• > that follows up on legislation that follows up on legislation that Representative<00:02:48.160
• Probate and Trust Section Legislative Probate and Trust Section Legislative Committee<00:05:13.360
• <00:10:23.279> documents scrutinize those procedures. documents scrutinize those procedures
• :19:20.320> legislator.
• <01:19:21.840> You >> a legislator. That's right. You >> a legislator.

Bills: HF3560, HF3295, HF2937, HF3540

Keywords: electronic signatures, estate planning, uniform law, legal documents, Minnesota statutes, open meeting law, transparency, public engagement, social media, government accountability, parenting consultant, parenting time, custody, family court, family law, neutral third party, alternative dispute resolution, child custody, visitation, parenting coordinator

Transcript Highlights:

• Council, Office of Legislative Council.
• 00:37:36.640> that resulting legislation will ensure that resulting legislation will ensure that
• adopted as the name of the legislation. adopted as the name of the legislation.
• Um, the committee is aware that the court's judicial procedures and the rules of civil procedure and
• procedures and the rules<00:47:29.440> of<00:47:29.680> civil<00:47:30.000> procedure

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House opened with a devotional, the Pledge of Allegiance, and the formal swearing-in and seating of newly appointed Representative Jack Bighgam of St. Albans Town, who was also assigned to the Committee on Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry. The chamber then introduced House bills 911 and 912 and referred them to the Agriculture, Food Resiliency, and Forestry Committee and the Judiciary Committee, respectively. Several other bills were referred to money committees under House rules, including H.558 and H.775 to Ways and Means and H.632 and H.778 to Appropriations. Members also made announcements recognizing visiting groups, including fire and rescue personnel, community action agencies, 4-H participants, and other guests, along with caucus meeting notices. The House then took up H.907, a Government Operations and Military Affairs Committee bill to review and repeal outdated reporting requirements. The committee explained that the bill categorizes reports into those repealed, those to be reviewed again in four years, and those retained permanently, with an effective date of July 1, 2026. The committee reported unanimous support, and the House ordered the bill to third reading after agreeing to the committee recommendation. Next, the House considered H.205, dealing with agreements not to compete and stay-or-pay provisions. The Commerce and Economic Development Committee described the bill as generally prohibiting non-compete agreements, especially for lower-wage workers, while allowing narrow exceptions, and limiting stay-or-pay provisions to voluntary, reasonable, and clearly disclosed arrangements. During questioning, a member raised concern about a specific carveout for teacher contracts, arguing it could be used to restrict teacher mobility; the presenter said the language was intended to clarify that the bill did not conflict with existing teacher-contract law. The House adopted the committee amendment and ordered the bill to third reading. The House then began second reading of H.639 on genetic data privacy. The committee described the bill as creating strong protections for consumers’ genetic information, requiring express opt-in consent for collection, use, disclosure, transfer, retention, and marketing uses; allowing revocation of consent; requiring deletion of data and biological samples upon request; restricting storage and transfer outside the United States; and prohibiting disclosure to insurers, employers, and most government access without a warrant. The committee also said the bill would impose security requirements and anti-discrimination protections, and the detailed presentation continued as the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• For the record, I am DCYF general counsel and legislative liaison.
• And to give a little bit of procedural And to give a little bit of procedural background<00:30:49.360
• That enacted legislation of counsel.
• Sharon Carson amongst other legislators. Sharon Carson amongst other legislators.
• <00:52:25.599> last<00:52:25.920> week with some legislation last week with some legislation

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• These changes include new and revised policies and procedures for identifying and addressing conflicts
• We've adopted streamlined investigative procedures.
• Cardona: I'm comfortable that we've put in place procedures and things that I think will prevent that
• We've adopted kind of streamlined investigative procedures.
• So we've tried to put in place all those procedures to try and address those things. Thank you.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Rules Committee first established a quorum and then approved several non-appearing gubernatorial appointments, including Rick Simpson to the Commission on Teacher Credentialing and Trinidad Solis, M.D. and Gerald Talbert, M.D. to the Medical Board of California. The committee also approved reference of bills to committees and floor acknowledgments, with all of those items receiving unanimous 5-0 votes. The main public business was the confirmation hearing for George Cardona, reappointed as Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California. Cardona described reforms made in response to the Girardi scandal, including stronger conflict-of-interest and gift rules, improved auditing and investigative procedures, efforts to reduce discipline disparities, and steps to address a growing backlog amid staffing vacancies and rising complaints. Senators questioned him about Girardi-related safeguards, backlog and funding pressures, discipline disparities affecting Black and Latino attorneys, unauthorized practice of law by notarios, and the State Bar’s use of AI; public witnesses from the State Bar, SEIU Local 1000, and others testified in support. The committee advanced Cardona’s appointment to the full Senate on a 3-1 vote, with Senator Jones withholding support. The committee then heard Laura Enderton Speed’s confirmation as Executive Director of the State Bar. She emphasized fiscal stability, public trust, and operational improvements, and said the Bar is addressing the troubled February 2025 remote bar exam through audits, internal investigations, and a forthcoming recommendation to the Supreme Court on the exam’s future. Senators asked about the budget deficit, the bar exam failures, conflict-of-interest safeguards after Girardi, and how the Bar is preparing for future fee and staffing pressures. Supporters from the State Bar Board of Trustees, SEIU Local 1000, the California Defense Counsel, and a colleague testified in favor, and the committee approved her appointment to the full Senate on a 5-0 vote. The meeting concluded with thanks and a farewell to Senator Jones, who was leaving the committee, followed by a cake presentation and adjournment of the public portion.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, there are very few procedures less than $5,000.
• Because now we have somebody who needs a procedure who doesn't get it.
• You could do the $20,000 procedure, but $40,000 is going to break the bank, right?
• There's a list of procedures you can only do in a hospital.
• And how do y'all engage with state legislators? Do you all participate with NCSL?

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The changes are structural and format-related that the Legislative Council deemed necessary and removes
• , and establishes that public utility agencies are subject to the same regulatory framework and procedures
• that will help us...” “...to work with the representative on legislation and it'll help us protect our
• . ...conditions of service and some grammatical clarification suggested by the Legislative Council.
• And water loss is another issue that this committee is trying to address through other legislation.

Bills: HB4530, HB4931, HB5559, HB5560

Keywords: water rights, Texas Water Trust, water bank, environmental conservation, water quality, instream flows, aquifer, water injection, Edwards Aquifer, environmental regulation, groundwater, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, water conservation, drought, utility regulation, water use restrictions, Public Utility Commission, civil penalties, drought contingency, environmental protection

Summary: The Committee on Natural Resources met with a quorum present and first took up several pending bills for reconsideration and committee substitute adoption. House Bill 2692, relating to codification and clarification of local laws concerning the San Antonio River Authority, was reported favorably to the full House and sent to the Committee on Local and Consent Calendars by an 11-0 vote. House Bills 1407, 1520, 1535, 2970, 4153, 291, 3663, and 3915 were also reconsidered or laid out as pending business, with committee substitutes adopted where needed and each bill reported favorably, generally by unanimous vote, to the full House and then to Calendars or Calendars/Calendars-related referral as applicable. The committee then heard House Bill 4530, which would expand the Texas Water Trust framework to include groundwater rights, require Texas Water Development Board review and approval of groundwater dedications, and notify local groundwater districts when groundwater rights are placed in the trust. The bill’s author and witnesses from the Environmental Defense Fund, The Nature Conservancy, and Chispa Texas supported the measure as a conservation tool and a way to create a clear process for voluntary donations; a Texas Water Development Board witness testified neutrally. The bill was left pending. House Bill 4931, relating to an aquifer storage and recovery project in Medina County, drew support from the author, the Medina County judge, and a regional water alliance witness, who described severe stress on the Edwards Aquifer, low levels at Medina Lake, and the need for a local water-supply tool. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5559, which would clarify enforcement of drought contingency plans for investor-owned water utilities and involve the PUC in model plan development, received support from groundwater district representatives but also concerns from water company and utility witnesses about enforcement authority, approval procedures, and potential conflicts with existing obligations to provide continuous service; the committee substitute was withdrawn and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5560, which would raise the maximum civil penalty for certain groundwater conservation district enforcement actions from $10,000 to $25,000 per violation, prompted debate over whether current law is already sufficient; supporters said the higher cap would better deter overpumping, while opponents argued existing penalties are already severe. That bill was also left pending, and the committee adjourned subject to call of the chair.

Transcript Highlights:

• Committee Member: And procedure, even though it says grounds for immediate termination?
• However, all procedures for termination of state employees still apply, as well as union policy and procedure
• It doesn't trump or replace SPO policy, procedure, or union policy and procedure, and most importantly
• It is... there are manufacturing procedures where at some point in that procedure, it will get above
• Where other states have passed similar legislation, they are now embroiled in lawsuits.

Transcript Highlights:

• reasonable security procedures. reasonable security procedures.
• companies must also develop procedures companies must also develop procedures that<01:08:40.560>
• fabulous legislative council, Rick fabulous legislative council, Rick Segal.<01:12:26.960> Uh
• ensures ongoing legis- legislative ensures ongoing legis- legislative oversight<01:28:24.400>
• We heard from legislative counsel.

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So this is a procedure. It's what we did with the capital sex battery.
• But the reality is that this is groundbreaking legislation.
• I went through a whole procedure to make that happen. That was in 2013.
• It's not, legislation is full of intent, right? We know that.
• This is the third year in a row I'm running this legislation.

Summary: The committee met and first reported favorably CS for SB 1782, which creates a new offense for dangerous excessive speeding, with support noted from the Orange County Sheriff’s Office and the Florida PBA. It also reported favorably CS for SB 306, which addresses Medicaid managed care provider network access by requiring after-hours and holiday appointment availability and a minimum level of primary care participation. CS for SB 716, imposing mandatory minimum sentences for certain sexual offenses committed by registered sex offenders or predators, and CS for SB 1084, expanding protections against non-consensual dissemination of intimate images and digitally forged intimate images, were also approved. The committee then approved CS for CS for SB 1604, a corrections package that would require prepayment of court costs for certain inmate lawsuits, shorten the limitations period for confinement-condition claims, allow consecutive sentencing in some cases, and revise mental health treatment procedures in correctional settings. Members discussed constitutional concerns and access-to-courts issues, but the bill was reported favorably. CS for CS for SB 1804, which creates a capital offense for trafficking a child 12 or younger or a mentally incapacitated person for sexual exploitation, drew extensive debate and opposition from the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and Floridaans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty; despite objections about constitutionality and ethics, it was reported favorably. The committee also approved CS for SB 1838, expanding protections for court officials against tampering, harassment, and retaliation, and CS for CS for SB 890, the Emily Adkins Family Protection Act, which creates a statewide VTE registry and requires blood clot screening and training in hospitals and care facilities. Members and public witnesses spoke in strong support of the blood clot bill, including family members and survivors. Finally, the committee reported favorably CS for SB 1252, directing FDLE to study a statewide pawn data database, CS for SB 468, increasing penalties for fleeing or eluding law enforcement and allowing vehicle impoundment, CS for SB 490, expanding off-duty concealed carry eligibility for correctional officers and correctional probation officers, and CS for SB 572, the Pam Rock Act on dangerous dogs, which was amended to refine enclosure, confiscation, euthanasia, and insurance requirements.

Transcript Highlights:

• And on to our procedural motions.
• Procedural Motions.
• I rise on behalf of the California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus and I rise on behalf of the California Legislative
• Those people look like the members of the Legislative Black Caucus.
• that I legislate with my heart.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Now, 21 years later, this is a routine procedure, with numerous people in this legislative body that
• Now, 21 years later, this is a routine procedure, with numerous people in this legislative body that
• Now, 21 years later, this is a routine procedure, with numerous people in this legislative body that
• Now, 21 years later, this is a routine procedure, with numerous people in this legislative body that
• There's both federal legislation and state legislation around that.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, we do have a screening procedure policy and procedure for the judicial center, and we do limit all
• <00:02:09.360> or<00:02:09.679> budgetary<00:02:10.319> asks pursue legislative
• or budgetary asks pursue legislative or budgetary asks from<00:02:10.879> the<00:02:11.120>
• a a screening procedure policy and procedure<00:05:46.800> for<00:05:47.039> the<00:05
• <00:29:57.600> career are and uh as as my legislative career are and uh as as my legislative

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee reconvened in open session after a closed discussion of sensitive security details and reviewed the public executive summary of the Minnesota State Capitol Complex Security Assessment by Axtel. Members discussed weapon screening and access control at length, including testimony from Capitol security and judicial center staff about screening procedures, prohibited items, and how screening is managed for visitors and authorized personnel. The chair emphasized that the committee was voting on high-level recommendations to be included in the final ACAST report and that the Department of Public Safety and Department of Administration would be encouraged to pursue the necessary work, including any legislative or budget requests. The committee then took a series of roll-call votes on the Axtel recommendations. Access control screening and visitor management (5.11) passed 4-2, while authorized access control and credential oversight (5.12), internal circulation and zoning controls (5.13), perimeter and exterior grounds (5.14), staffing models/post orders/operational readiness (5.15), technology and system integration (5.16), and protective intelligence (5.18) all passed unanimously 6-0. Each approved item was added as a recommendation in the final report. After the votes, the Department of Administration, Department of Public Safety, and House and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms offices walked through the draft final report. They highlighted staffing improvements, security infrastructure already installed, and remaining needs, including an estimated $41.008 million request for future enhancements such as kiosks, glass-resistant film, door access controls, cameras, lighting, bollards, and an updated distributed antenna system. The report also includes recommendations on trauma-informed safety drills, conduct rules for hearings, and designating the Minnesota State Patrol Capital Security Division as the primary investigative authority for potential criminal activity on Capitol grounds.

Transcript Highlights:

• likely satisfied the procedural likely satisfied the procedural requirements requirements requirements
• <01:18:02.719> important legislators and it's really important legislators and it's really
• Um can you speak to what the outlines of what those policies and procedures are?
• Um I I'm just interested procedures are? Um I I'm just interested actually. actually. actually.
• So he's the one that we should pass proposed legislation to. >> Yes. >> Okay.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee held an informational briefing on federal and state authority over National Guard deployment in response to civil protest or unrest, prompted by recent federal actions and the California litigation in Newsom v. Trump. The chair explained the purpose was to help lawmakers and the public understand the legal background, the status of the California case, and possible Hawaii policy responses. David Day of the Attorney General’s office outlined several recent federal immigration-related executive actions and enforcement directives, then described Hawaii’s participation in multiple lawsuits challenging federal funding conditions, data-sharing demands, and the birthright citizenship order. A major portion of the briefing focused on Newsom v. Trump. Day summarized the June 2025 Los Angeles protests and the president’s memorandum federalizing National Guard units under 10 U.S.C. 12406, which California challenged as ultra vires, procedurally improper, and violative of the Posse Comitatus Act, the Tenth Amendment, and the APA. He said the district court initially granted relief, but the Ninth Circuit stayed the TRO and held, in a published decision, that review under section 12406 is highly deferential and that the president lawfully exercised authority under paragraph 3. He also noted California-law issues about orders being issued through the governor, and said Hawaii had supported California through amicus briefs and would continue to do so; the bench trial was scheduled for August 11-13. Members then asked how Hawaii law differs from California’s and whether the Ninth Circuit ruling would control here. Day said the standard-of-review aspects would likely apply, but the California-specific procedural language about orders issued in the governor’s name does not appear in Hawaii law. The committee also heard from Colonel Lloyd C. Phelps of the Hawaii Department of Defense, who explained that National Guard activations generally occur under Title 10 federal orders, state orders, or other statuses, and said the June 2025 federalization mechanism was a Title 10 call-up. He began addressing the president’s authority, the Posse Comitatus Act, and Hawaii’s own preparedness, but the discussion was cut short and members indicated they would return to the topic later. No votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• and its own procedures, into one set of procedures used by both agencies.
• These procedures, as I position.
• it is preferable to have a legislator it is preferable to have a legislator offer<00:24:27.520><
• Um, the proposed legislation<00:26:20.080> in legislation in legislation in LCPR25-003<00:26:22.559
• <01:03:43.680> bring<01:03:44.319> legislative have legislators bring legislative have

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So this legislation gives the court discretion to support that restitution.
• But this legislation is more than a response to these statistics.
• So maybe if you can speak to any guardrails that would be in your legislation that would protect some
• Last year, legislation unintentionally limited TNCs' ability to provide paratransit services.
• Last year, legislation unintentionally limited TNCs' ability to provide paratransit services, making

Summary: The committee heard and voted on a long series of criminal justice, public safety, victim protection, and regulatory bills. Several measures were reported favorably, including SB 1374 on school district reporting requirements, SB 1378 on restitution for leaving the scene of a crash, SB 1072 creating an expedited DNA testing grant program, SB 1140 establishing a Hillsborough County criminal offender substance abuse pilot program, SB 1266 revising public records protections for crime victims and certain law enforcement identities, SB 1546 delaying and refining background screening requirements for athletic coaches, SB 1430 on post-judgment execution proceedings related to terrorism victims, SB 1444 making a broad set of criminal justice changes, SB 240 on domestic and dating violence protections, SB 606 clarifying public lodging and food service removal procedures for nonpaying guests, SB 1450 giving law enforcement discretion in arrests involving people with significant medical conditions, SB 44 increasing penalties for impersonating law enforcement with unauthorized red or blue lights, SB 1000 expanding court-ordered sealing options, SB 1400 requiring platforms to remove altered sexual depictions, and SB 1696 addressing rideshare impersonation and transit service rules. Many of these bills were amended before final passage, often with strike-all amendments or technical changes, and several had support from law enforcement, advocacy groups, or industry representatives. Testimony was generally supportive on the public safety and victim-protection bills, with speakers emphasizing faster DNA testing, better protections for domestic violence survivors, clearer rules for hotel and motel operators, and stronger tools against fraud, impersonation, and trafficking. Some bills drew notable concerns or opposition. SB 1266 prompted questions about whether a 72-hour cooling-off period for officer identities could be extended too broadly, while SB 606 drew concerns that the bill could affect families living in hotels or extended stays during the housing affordability crisis. SB 1444 generated discussion about false reporting language, off-duty carry for prosecutors and judges, and the scope of automatic sealing changes. SB 1000’s expanded sealing relief received broad support but was narrowed by amendments excluding certain offenses such as DUI and indecent exposure. The most contentious measure was SB 1804, which would create a capital offense for trafficking a child under 12 or a mentally incapacitated person for sexual exploitation. The sponsor argued it targets the most severe trafficking cases and includes safeguards such as excluding minors from capital punishment and preserving life imprisonment if the capital procedure is invalidated. Opponents, including the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops and Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, argued the death penalty is unconstitutional for non-homicide crimes, costly, and ineffective, and committee members raised concerns about whether the bill would incentivize traffickers to kill victims to avoid identification. Debate also touched on broader concerns about the death penalty’s constitutionality and whether life imprisonment is a more severe punishment. The transcript ends during that debate, without a final vote on SB 1804 included in the excerpt.