Transcript Highlights:

• from the schools, the tuition and fees from the schools, the tuition and fees which<00:10:12.080
• Um but our changes in tuition and fees.
• <00:13:30.639> and<00:13:30.880> the factors like tuition and fees and the factors
• because things like tuition and fees because things like tuition and fees have<00:13:56.240>
• The 4-year tuition and fee cap was capped at a 2% increase for each fiscal year 26 and 27.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• In some cases, no fee increases are needed.
• In some cases, no fee increases are needed.
• charge, higher parking fees, and/or private funds.
• Yeah, no general admission fees.
• fees specific to water agencies.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Summary: The committee first heard opening remarks from Secretary of Food and Agriculture Karen Ross, who reviewed the department’s budget and priorities. She emphasized California agriculture’s record production, but also the pressures facing farmers from climate change, drought, groundwater regulation, supply chain disruptions, low commodity prices, and federal funding cuts. Ross highlighted ongoing investments in Farm to School, local food procurement, food hubs, climate-smart agriculture, invasive pest prevention, bird flu response, and food safety, and she warned that proposed USDA cuts and market disruptions could harm research, pest control, and export development. Members also discussed the importance of local food systems, school kitchens, and the need to better connect farmers to schools, food banks, and institutions. A major topic was the Farm to School program and related local food initiatives. The chair raised concerns that the Legislative Analyst’s Office was recommending against continued funding for Farm to School because it did not meet the state’s “must-have” standard, and suggested pairing it more closely with the Local Food Purchase Assistance Program and food hubs to broaden its impact. Ross responded that Farm to School has already reached nearly half of California students, has helped small farms, and is part of a larger strategy that includes school kitchen investments and culinary training. Members also discussed Market Match/CNIP, which Ross said was not funded in the current budget, and Proposition 4 climate bond spending, including SWEEP, Healthy Soils, urban agriculture, invasive species work, tribal food sovereignty, and land access programs. The committee then moved to Item 1 on eliminating vacant positions at the Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Parks and Recreation, and Food and Agriculture. The LAO explained that the Governor proposed eliminating 6,000 vacant positions statewide, with the JLBC previously not concurring with 650 of them, including 174 in these three departments. The LAO recommended retaining the special-funded positions at Fish and Wildlife and Food and Agriculture because they support important functions and do not materially help the budget, while weighing the General Fund positions against other priorities. Finance said the vacancy reductions were intended to improve budget resiliency and preserve flexibility, noting that vacant positions can be used to cover other operational costs or be reclassified. Department representatives argued some eliminated positions were hard to fill and that the cuts would affect permitting, public safety, maintenance, and pest detection, though they said immediate impacts would be limited because many positions were already vacant. Members pressed Finance and department staff on whether the savings justified the program impacts, especially at Fish and Wildlife, where permitting bottlenecks were described as a concern for housing, clean energy, water, and transportation projects. Several members questioned why special funds tied to fees were being reduced, and why Fish and Wildlife’s special funds were treated differently from other departments. Parks said the proposed ranger and maintenance cuts would not have immediate effects but could slow long-term maintenance and staffing capacity. CDFA said some of the eliminated positions supported early pest detection, the broom rape program, and other oversight functions, but that the department believed it could still meet its mandate through reclassification and internal prioritization. No votes were taken, and the chair noted that public comment would come after all items were heard.

Transcript Highlights:

• Pay a fee to the local Board of Health to inspect their facility. Pay a waste collection fee.
• And if you think the state fees and taxes are bad, have them fill out the federal forms, okay?
• Pay a waste<01:10:14.920> collection<01:10:15.400> field<01:10:15.960> fee.
• Fill out all waste collection field fee.
• And if you think the state fees to do.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• On line 127, the Senate includes an increase for the civil court filing fee.
• On line 358, there is on both sides a charter school inspection fee increase.
• to impose correctional supervision fees to impose correctional supervision fees on<00:32:48.320>
• On R9, House section 13 increases marriage license fees.
• increases marriage license fees. increases marriage license fees.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• We're proposing to increase transfer fees and exempt reporting advisor fees, not all license fees.
• We're proposing to increase transfer fees and exempt reporting advisor fees, not all license fees.
• This is the fee revenue. This would bring in 1.47 million in each biennium.
• on line six, you can see uh some fee on line six, you can see uh some fee revenue<00:47:52.880><
• So this is the fee explained earlier.

Bills: HF1646, HF2443

Keywords: medical debt, debt relief, healthcare financing, consumer protection, financial hardship, commerce, cannabis, insurance, housing, ombudsperson, affordability, property, task force, financial institutions, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• of wire transfer fee of wire transfer fee of $7.50 Plus plus one and a half% of $7.50 Plus plus one
• there is a fee because them to wire there is a fee because them to wire there is a fee because there
• that we fee that we fee that we are placing on individuals again who are are placing on individuals
• I think I think starting with the fee I think I think starting with the fee I think I think starting
• it is so it's it's a flat fee it is so it's it's a flat fee $7.50 and if it's regardless of the $7.50

Bills: SB82, SB78, SB4, SB6, SB62, SB66, SB77, SB63, SB79, SB53, SB55, HB14

Keywords: SB82, warrant recall, outstanding warrants, stale warrants, misdemeanor warrants, Class B misdemeanor, Class C misdemeanor, municipal magistrate, circuit court clerk, criminal procedure, court administration, docket cleanup, warrant audit, law enforcement notification, domestic violence, sex offense, weapons offense, deadly weapon, dangerous instrument, felony-related charges

Transcript Highlights:

• Thank industry from this delivery fee.
• Most of our delivery delivery fee.
• <00:14:10.160> while the only the business pays a fee while the only the business pays a fee
• this fee was an unintended consequence. this fee was an unintended consequence.
• <00:15:37.199> covered exemptions in the delivery fee covered exemptions in the delivery fee

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Contractors and customers may face the pricey fees, and some HOAs.
• that can be exceeded if the fee is flat and posted publicly.
• Permit fees are really not a meaningful contributor to the project costs.
• Permit fees are really not a meaningful contributor to the project costs.
• So we're doing our best... ...massive fees and massive just out of nowhere.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• fee, it's 1490. >> Thank you.
• , and establishes fee deadlines.
• <00:49:44.520> and<00:49:44.720> bulk an application fee and bulk an application fee
• ,<00:50:08.040> and<00:50:08.200> establishes<00:50:08.960> fee proposed fees
• , and establishes fee proposed fees, and establishes fee deadlines.<00:50:10.440> Revises<00:50

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The subcommittee considered an emergency regulation from the Kentucky Board of Optometric Examiners, 201 KAR 5021E, along with a staff amendment to conform the text to KRS Chapter 13A. The regulation was described as implementing an Attorney General opinion and a review of optometrists licensed during the 2020–2023 period when alternative testing and waivers were used during the COVID-19 era. The board explained that the rule requires affected licensees to complete specified examinations or an alternative certification before renewing in 2027, and that it now removes the OEBC Canadian exam as a future pathway while preserving recognition of OEBC results submitted during the period when that option was in effect. The staff amendment was approved without objection. Testimony was sharply divided. Board representatives and the Attorney General’s office said the regulation is needed to protect public health and to bring the licensure review into the formal administrative process. They said the NBEO Part 3 exam is the nationally recognized hands-on clinical licensure test, while the American Board of Optometry certification is a post-licensure credential for already licensed practitioners and is not a substitute for initial licensure testing. They also said no other state uses the ABOC certification for licensure, and that the board’s approach balances fairness, due process, and public protection. Opponents argued the regulation would allow individuals who were improperly licensed to continue practicing without meeting the same standards as other Kentucky optometrists. A representative from the Kentucky School for the Blind Charitable Foundation described cases of alleged inadequate care and urged the committee to require full national board passage before independent practice. Representatives from ARBO and NBEO said the emergency regulation is not justified as an emergency, does not adequately address public safety or fiscal impacts, and exceeds the board’s authority by creating a renewal path for licensees whose initial licensure was challenged. They emphasized that NBEO Part 3 is a practical, hands-on exam and that the ABOC certification is not designed or validated for initial licensure. The committee asked several questions about the differences between the exams, and no final vote on the regulation itself was described in the transcript beyond approval of the staff amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• CalRecycle announced their new fee, and it's about 5,000 percent higher than the interim fee.
• the processing fee set originally for bag-in-a-box was arbitrary.
• The processing fee has to have some relevance to the cost of recycling.
• the places and what are these fees.
• This program is administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

Summary: The committee heard presentations on several energy, environmental, and consumer protection bills while operating at times without a quorum. Senator McNerney presented SB 925, which would direct the California Energy Commission to develop a statewide roadmap for fusion energy, and SB 1350, which would expand the use of green hydrogen in the power sector by allowing renewable portfolio standard credit for power plants using hydrogen. Supporters said both bills would help California maintain leadership in emerging clean-energy industries, attract investment, and create jobs. Opponents of SB 1350 raised concerns about greenwashing, resource shuffling, and increased NOx emissions from hydrogen combustion, while supporters said committee amendments added guardrails against those outcomes. Senator Ashby presented SB 1010, a manufacturer-funded extended producer responsibility program for refrigerants in appliances; supporters said it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve recovery, while opponents argued existing laws already regulate refrigerants and that the bill could raise costs and disrupt recycling markets. Senator Grayson presented SB 1145 to streamline CEQA and federal reuse procedures for qualifying projects in the Concord Reuse Project Area, which supporters said would help deliver long-planned housing, jobs, and open space, while one housing group sought stronger affordable-housing guarantees. Senator Cabaldon presented SB 1341, which would give CalRecycle authority to reduce processing fees for wine and spirits bag-in-a-box containers when fee collections exceed program needs; supporters said the current fee increase was abrupt and excessive, while opponents warned against giving the agency too much discretion. Senator Padilla presented SGR 13, urging the U.S. to secure enforceable commitments to eliminate transboundary sewage pollution in the Tijuana and New River watersheds during the 2026 USMCA review, and SB 1033, which would require testing and disclosure of heavy metals in protein products; SGR 13 drew strong support from border and environmental justice advocates, while SB 1033 drew support from consumer and health groups and opposition from industry groups concerned about labeling burdens and scope. Senator Caballero presented SB 1183, requiring a state study of the environmental, land-use, and economic impacts of industrial solar in the Central Valley; farm and land-use advocates supported the bill, while solar industry groups opposed unless amended, saying it should better reflect solar’s benefits and existing state analysis. After testimony, the committee took roll and adopted several measures on a 4-0 or 3-0 basis, with bills including SJR 13, SB 925, SB 1350, SB 1145, SB 1341, SB 1033, and SB 1010 advanced on call to Appropriations or, in the case of SB 1010, already voted with a 3-1 result before being held on call.

Transcript Highlights:

• The main fiscal impact of the bill comes from the changes in fees.
• The increase in the fee would generate roughly $50,000 in additional annual fee revenue.
• deposited in the general fund. annual fee revenue.
• The changes in fee annual fee revenue.
• million from the AG's fees special fund. million from the AG's fees special fund.

Keywords: 926, house, all

Summary: The House opened with a devotional reading by Theo Novak, a student and Vermont Poetry Out Loud finalist, followed by several announcements, including a welcome for the guest speaker and a reminder about a freshman legislator gathering and the day’s corporate cup road closures. The House then postponed action for one legislative day on Senate Bill 208, relating to law enforcement identification; Senate Bill 212, relating to portable water supply and wastewater system connections; and House Bill 639, relating to genetic data privacy. The main floor action centered on House Bill 648, banking, insurance, and securities. The Commerce and Economic Development Committee presented Senate amendments and its own further amendments, including clarifications to consumer reinvestment reporting and a proposal to extend and then effectively end the moratorium on new cryptocurrency kiosks in Vermont. The committee described extensive testimony and data on crypto kiosk fraud, money laundering, and consumer losses, and also added a new licensing framework for merchant cash advance providers. Ways and Means reported the fiscal impact would be very small. After a brief question about the $1 million exemption threshold for commercial financing, the House concurred in the Senate proposal of amendment with further amendment thereto. The House also passed Senate Bill 243, distributing funds to the Vermont Language Justice Project, in concurrence with proposal of amendment. It then took up Senate Bill 198, regulating tobacco products and tobacco substitutes. The Commerce and Economic Development Committee described updates to the definition of tobacco substitutes, creation of a wholesale licensing system under the Department of Liquor and Lottery, tighter controls on online sales, and bans on deceptive products that resemble school supplies, food, smartphones, inhalers, or video games. The committee heard testimony from health, enforcement, industry, and advocacy witnesses and voted 11-0 in favor. Human Services then proposed a strike-all amendment to the committee report, with further consideration to continue.

Transcript Highlights:

• Article 6 is all of the fee increases from the Secretary of State's office.
• <00:38:36.440> increases Article 6 is all of the fee increases Article 6 is all of the fee
• So, they really don't need a fee increase if they're returning money.
• the advanced deposit wagering uh fee the advanced deposit wagering uh fee from<00:41:43.200>
• are very modest increases to filing fees are very modest increases to filing fees and<00:42:58.720

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Chair, Representative Youakim, the bill as amended affects seven state taxes and a fee.
• Chair, Representative Youakim, the bill as amended affects seven state taxes and a fee.
• Chair, Representative Youakim, the bill as amended affects seven state taxes and a fee.
• Chair, Representative Youakim, the bill as amended affects seven state taxes and a fee.
• and a fee and a fee and<00:30:15.800> um<00:30:16.160> the<00:30:16.720> two

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up House File 4949, as amended by the adopted H4949A2 and H4949A3 amendments. The bill would create a sports and events reimbursement program intended to give Minnesota a more reliable funding mechanism to compete for major sporting and entertainment events. Representative Lislegard and supporters argued that events such as the Super Bowl, NFL Draft, Final Four, World Juniors Hockey, and Olympic trials generate substantial economic activity, tax revenue, and statewide visibility, and that Minnesota has lost opportunities because it lacks a standing competitive fund. Testifiers from the Minnesota Business Partnership and Minnesota Sports and Events strongly supported the bill, describing it as a performance-based, closed-loop model that reinvests tax revenue generated by events into securing future events. Jess Graba, Cheryl Lindsey, and Dr. William Campbell emphasized community benefits beyond economics, including youth inspiration, school improvements, inclusion, and positive local engagement tied to events like the Olympic trials, the Women’s Final Four, and WWE appearances. Several testifiers cited specific figures, including roughly $71.5 million in economic impact and $4.7 million in tax revenue for World Juniors, about $74.8 million and $5.7 million for the gymnastics trials, and more than $430 million in lost economic impact from events Minnesota did not secure. Members raised concerns about the funding mechanism, especially the use of revenue that would otherwise go to the general fund or other accounts. Representative Huot said he supported bringing events to Minnesota but was uneasy about diverting general fund money and suggested stronger legislative oversight, possibly through a formal sports committee. Representative Youakim asked how the bill’s revenue capture would work and noted concerns about taking money from transportation-related accounts; staff explained that the amended bill affects seven state taxes and a fee, including motor vehicle rental taxes and the retail delivery fee, with some revenue directed to non-general fund accounts. Members also requested more information on the methodology behind the University of Minnesota Extension economic impact studies, and staff said those studies could be shared. No final vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• directed payment for uh dispensing fee directed payment for uh pharmacies<00:08:57.440> at<00
• Uh, line 850 is a Senate position, one-time, relating to reporting for facility fees.
• Line 858 is a Senate proposal relating to speech language pathology assistance fee adjustment.
• uh fee uh fee adjustment.<00:22:33.919> On<00:22:34.159> line<00:22:34.679> 862
• <00:24:27.760> is<00:24:28.000> not fee is not fee is not included. included. included.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Some broadband providers report application fees up to $250 per pole.
• Fees that serve more as a barrier to entry than a meaningful administrative cost.
• Any study fees need to be recovered. All of that must take place.
• And not on artificial rates, fees, or deferred maintenance.
• It's not going to be a set fee.

Bills: HB3445, HB3448

Keywords: telecommunications, electric cooperative, rights-of-way, infrastructure, provider access, right-of-way, pole attachment, regulatory access, 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• penalty on withholding, oil and gas proceeds, pass-through entity withholdings, and workers' comp fees
• It also diverts tax revenues to pay attorney and collection fees, meaning taxpayer...
• to the appropriate jurisdiction. of pennies, not just the remittance or payment of taxes and fees to
• So in the very slim chance that we pay attorney's fees, which is rare, we would like to be able to net
• So in the very slim chance that we pay attorney's fees, which is rare, we would like to be able to net

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Representative Hart-Lowman: Will cities and municipalities be able to create various fees?
• Are we filling it with fees?
• The last time I checked, I can deduct property taxes off of my IRS bill, but I can't deduct fees.
• It will be made up by fees. Is that right? Is that wrong?
• If fees are used and not simply relying on a single source.

Transcript Highlights:

• the pharmacy dispensing fee and the fact the pharmacy dispensing fee and the fact that<00:12:29.240
• the fee to respond to the requests.
• The fees were increased last year for this purpose, but somehow the appropriation of those fees got dropped
• appropriation of those fees got dropped. appropriation of those fees got dropped.
• Sections 1 and 2 create a fee schedule for the Commissioner of Health to assess fees on individuals and

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The determination of fees, charges, and rates of certain benefits under Medicaid for the Community and
• group home facilities, including optional county and municipal permitting requirements, authorizing a fee
• Cole, relating to the provision. of solid waste disposal services by certain counties authorizing a fee
• It'd be 2504 by, 2504 by Hayes really. to the fees changed by certain property owners associations for
• HB 2524 by Cook, relating to recovery fees.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So I noticed that you took out some of the language regarding pre-approval and the impact fee provisions
• itself, which was the first amendment, the provisions requiring the waiver of impact and mobility fees
• So..." the waiver of impact and mobility fees for ADUs.
• , we prohibited local government from exercise against authority to establish an impact or mobility fee
• I think the best way to characterize it, what I think this bill sponsor is after, is fee parity.

Summary: The Committee on Community Affairs heard three measures. First, SB 184 by Senator Gates would require local governments to allow accessory dwelling units in single-family residential areas, with exceptions for planned unit developments and master-planned communities. The bill and its amendments were discussed at length, including parking restrictions, homestead exemption treatment, short-term rental concerns, impact and mobility fees, pre-approved designs, manufactured ADUs, and an OPPAGA study on mezzanine financing and tiny homes. Testimony from the Florida League of Cities raised concerns about parking, short-term rentals, and fee parity, while several senators supported the concept but asked for further refinement. The committee adopted the amendments and reported CS for SB 184 favorably. The committee then took up SB 118 by Senator Brodeur, which preempts regulation of presidential libraries to the state and defers regulation to the federal government, with the stated purpose of preventing local governments from imposing obstacles to a future presidential library in Florida. There was no debate or public testimony, and the bill was reported favorably. Finally, the committee considered SPB 7704, a proposed committee bill to repeal the sunset date on a public records exemption for property photographs and personal identifying information of applicants or participants in disaster-related housing assistance programs held by state and local housing entities. With no questions, debate, or public testimony, the committee approved the motion to submit it as a committee bill and reported it favorably. The meeting then adjourned.