Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial functions'
Page 97 of 455
NH
New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session
House State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs (01/30/2026)
State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- especially those related to judicial especially those related to judicial reform<00:39:16.160>
- States including cooperation on judicial States including cooperation on judicial reform,<00:40:
- It still functions to entice people to take certain jobs for the benefits and to stay in those jobs.
- It still functions what we still have.
- Um, so Representative, you mentioned that tariffs function as taxes on imports.
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Monday, March 31, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- WEAKEN AND UNDERMINE THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND THE VOTING RIGHTS OF AMERICANS, I SAY TO YOU THAT HISTORY
- If that's $3.2 billion, you functionally bought yourself 12.5, 13 hours' worth of borrowing for an entire
- FUNCTIONALLY BOUGHT YOURSELF 12.5, 13 HOURS WORTH OF BORROWING FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR.
- I'm upset that ours is so anemic at $1.5 trillion, but if they do $3 billion, it's functioning half a
- Then if we were to take care of the President's requests, that's another $8 trillion, functionally saying
CA
Transcript Highlights:
- However, this bill has passed the Assembly as well, and there's judicial review.
- It's passed the judicial review in the Senate as well, so I'm not really sure.
- Poor mental health has drastic consequences for student success, disrupting both day-to-day functioning
- Articulation is a necessary function for transfer students who earn credits at a community college and
- Articulation is a necessary function for transfer students who earn credits at a community college and
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am
Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery
Transcript Highlights:
- Ontania, and commonly speak about: Senate 1391, House 2225, an act of harm reduction in judicial justice
- Senate 1391, House 225, an act of harm reduction in judicial justice. You just heard about that.
- behavior without it coming from the Attorney General or the district attorney's office and/or with judicial
- These sites functioned as intensified OPCs with medical personnel and staffing to ensure the safety of
- service that I've been advocating for the legalization of for years in my own home, how it was functioning
Summary:
The Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use, and Recovery held a public hearing on several harm reduction bills, including measures to decriminalize simple possession and paraphernalia, authorize overdose prevention centers, and expand access to naloxone for first responders. Chair Mindy Domb and Senator John Velis opened by describing harm reduction as an evidence-based public health strategy and noting Massachusetts’ recent decline in fatal overdoses. They emphasized that testimony would help shape whether and how the bills advance, and explained the hearing process, including time limits and written testimony.
Testimony was sharply divided. Supporters, including Rep. Kate Donaghue, Sen. Cindy Friedman, Rep. Marjorie Decker, Rep. Manny Cruz, public health professionals, recovery advocates, and people with lived experience, argued that harm reduction saves lives, reduces stigma, and can connect people to treatment. They supported overdose prevention centers and decriminalization as tools to keep people alive long enough to enter recovery, and several speakers described personal losses to overdose or family experiences with addiction. Some supporters also framed the bills as racial justice measures, arguing that criminal penalties for possession have disproportionately harmed Black and brown communities.
Opponents, including Sen. Nick Collins and several South End residents, argued that overdose prevention centers and decriminalization would worsen public drug use, crime, and neighborhood disorder, especially around Mass and Cass. They said current approaches such as Section 35, diversion, and police leverage into treatment are more effective, and they urged more treatment beds and recovery facilities instead of harm reduction sites. Committee members questioned witnesses about research, local siting, crime data, and the relationship between harm reduction and treatment, and several members said neighborhood impacts must be considered alongside overdose prevention. The committee did not take a vote during the hearing; it continued receiving testimony and announced a later break before resuming on H. 2196 and S. 1393.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Finance (01/16/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- I've served on the Election Law Committee, the Judicial Committee, and the Rules Committee, and have
- I've served on the Election Law Committee, the Judicial Committee, and the Rules Committee, and have
- in minimal cases for General funds cases in minimal cases for General funds for<00:38:25.520>
judicial - counsel<00:38:27.040>
uh <00:38:27.480>Department <00:38:27.720>of for judicial - counsel uh Department of for judicial counsel uh Department of Justice<00:38:28.200>
and <00:38
Summary:
The Finance Committee met for an organizational opening session in which the chair, Ken Weyler, called the committee to order and members introduced themselves. The introductions established the committee’s leadership and membership, including Vice Chair Dan McGuire, ranking member Mary Jane Wallner, deputy ranking member Karen Eil, clerk Jerry Griffin, and other members from both parties. Many members briefly described prior legislative service and professional backgrounds, with several noting prior experience on Finance or related budget committees.
Chair Weyler then outlined committee procedures and expectations. He emphasized that Finance handles spending bills and fiscal notes, that bills will generally be heard by the full committee and then referred to the appropriate division, and that executive sessions may be used to save time when positions are clear. He reviewed rules on attendance, dress, phones, paperwork handling, committee replacements, conflict of interest and recusal, and the process for testimony, including that members should listen without debating witnesses and that sponsors of bills must recuse themselves from questioning witnesses on their own bills.
He also described the committee’s structure and workload, noting three divisions and the role of legislative budget staff. Weyler said the committee would likely see bills from many policy committees that have fiscal impacts, and he encouraged policy committees to find offsets within their own areas rather than assume new spending will be added. No bills were heard and no votes were taken during this portion of the meeting.
HI
Hawaii 2025 Regular Session
SPEED Task Force (STF) - Thu Sept 11, 2025 @ 9:30 AM HST
Hawaii House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It is essentially a quasi-judicial proceeding.
- It is essentially a quasi-judicial proceeding.
- It is essentially a quasi-judicial proceeding.
- And if the party is judicial proceeding.
- elements XS and a lot of the functions elements XS and a lot of the functions of<00:37:59.920>
Summary:
The task force held its first meeting, beginning with roll call and introductions of members and participants in the room and on Zoom. The chair emphasized Sunshine Law transparency, noted the meeting was on September 11, and opened public testimony on the orientation report. No one testified in person or on Zoom, and the chair observed a moment of silence in remembrance of 9/11 before moving into the agenda.
The chair then reported on several orientation presentations given statewide between July 18 and September 5, including meetings with transit-oriented development, the Maui Chamber of Commerce, the Kona-Kohala Chamber, the Japanese Chamber of Commerce on Hawaiʻi Island, the Hawaiʻi Island Chamber of Commerce, the Hawaiʻi Island Native Hawaiian Chamber, and the Capo Chamber of Commerce. The main presentation item was a detailed overview from Kauaʻi County on its permitting process. County staff explained that zoning and building permits are handled separately on the outer islands, with zoning focused on form, character, and compatibility, and building permits focused on health and safety. They described a two-tier zoning system: ministerial permits that are automatically approved if not acted on within 30 days, and discretionary permits that go to the planning commission and can become lengthy contested cases if there is intervention. They also discussed special management area review in coastal areas, which can add time, and explained that building permits must conform to what was approved in zoning.
Kauaʻi County staff also outlined the building permit process, including online and in-person submission, coordination with planning, engineering, water, wastewater, health, and fire agencies, and the county’s fully electronic review system using ProjectDox and related software. They noted that applicants are encouraged to check zoning, water, wastewater, and floodplain issues before hiring someone to prepare plans, especially for homeowners. The county shared permit and utility statistics and said the public can check permit history through Click2Gov. No votes were taken during the portion of the meeting provided; after the Kauaʻi presentation, the chair opened a question period for members.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House lawmakers advance bill to boost spending on Capitol security 4/27/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Um, the first is the judicial security and courthouse bill.
- branch and all the courouses we judicial branch and all the courouses we have<00:02:00.399>
across - Um the first is<00:02:18.800>
the <00:02:19.120>judicial <00:02:19.680>security < - judicial security and courthouse bill.<00:02:21.760>
Um <00:02:22.080>that <00:02:22.400 - <00:02:40.400>
branch yellow ties here for the judicial branch yellow ties here for the judicial
Summary:
The committee took up House File 3230, a security package combining several bills related to political and Capitol security. Members first adopted the DE6 amendment, described as reflecting the negotiated allocation and appropriations language, and then heard Chair Mullen explain that the bill covers judicial security and courthouse grants, continued Capitol grounds screening, hardware and hardening improvements, legislative services home security, temporary local law enforcement support for credible threats, a new task force, funding for the BCA threat assessment team, and DPS deficiency funding tied to recent events.
Discussion focused largely on the balance between security and public access. Representative West objected to the Capitol screening and metal detectors, arguing the Capitol is the “people’s house” and questioning the cost and fairness of the measures; he also asked whether the bill changed who controls Capitol security. In response, members said the scanners were not created by this bill but were already decided by the governor and security commission, and that the bill includes a provision clarifying the chain of command and training responsibilities. Other members supported the package as a necessary response to political violence and threats, emphasizing protection for lawmakers, staff, visitors, and the public.
After discussion, the committee renewed the motion to place House File 3230, as amended, on the general register. The motion passed without opposition.
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Keeping immigration enforcement activity out of schools without a warrant 3/26/26
Minnesota House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- our school building without a judicial our school building without a judicial warrant. warrant.
- the school buildings without a judicial the school buildings without a judicial warrant. warrant
- valid judicial warrant. valid judicial warrant. That's<00:35:59.680>
it. That's it. - The Attorney General has already issued guidance to schools about judicial warrants.
- Thank you. guidance to schools about judicial guidance to schools about judicial warrants.<00:36:33.120
VT
Transcript Highlights:
- Although they are nominees, they are still bound by the code of judicial conduct, and depending on the
- However, the same concept applies here. judicial conduct, judicial conduct, similar<00:17:09.679>
- Um, as a member of the judicial Um, as a member of the judicial retention<00:22:55.679>
committee< - <00:26:00.240>
When <00:26:00.480>she our judicial system right now. - When she our judicial system right now.
OK
Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations and Budget Judiciary Subcommittee - Morning Session Jan 13th, 2026 at 09:00 am
A&B Judiciary Subcommittee
Transcript Highlights:
- That number was presented by the Board on Judicial Compensation.
- The Board on Judicial Compensation was created by the statute.
- And their budget is requesting a 517.58% judicial pay increase based on the Board of Judicial Compensation
- But I do think it's time that we have a judicial security officer housed at the Judicial Center that
- Primarily, we use the National Judicial College in Reno.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Floor Session Jun 1st, 2026
California Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- And that is not a bureaucratic function. That is a sacred responsibility.
- This is not how the state judicial and parole system is supposed to work. Thankfully, Mr.
Summary:
The Senate opened with a quorum, prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, and several floor recognitions, including a birthday acknowledgment for Senator Archuleta and introductions of former Senator George Runner and a Portuguese delegation tied to ACR 185 recognizing Portuguese Heritage Month. The body then approved the Senate journals and moved to confirmations of five Board of Parole Hearings appointees: William Muniz, Michael Ruff, Rosalind Sargent Burns, Mary Thornton, and Jack Weiss.
Each confirmation drew extended debate centered on parole decisions, public safety, transparency, and the Board’s handling of elderly parole and sexually violent predator cases. Supporters argued the commissioners were applying existing law, using evidence-based risk assessments, and were not the decision-makers in the controversial cases cited. Opponents criticized the board for releasing dangerous offenders, questioned the commissioners’ judgment, and objected to the board’s closed-door in-bank votes. Roll calls followed each item, and all five appointees were confirmed, with vote totals including 25-9, 24-9, 24-9, 25-9, and 29-9.
The Senate then took up Senate Concurrent Resolution 179 by Senator Niello, recognizing May as Celiac Disease Awareness Month. The resolution described celiac disease as a serious autoimmune disorder, highlighted symptoms and challenges with gluten exposure, and emphasized the need for awareness, labeling, and education. SCR 179 passed unanimously, 31-0. The session concluded with committee announcements and several adjournments in memory, including tributes to Marty Arnold, Jim McAulian, and Pat Gagoscos, followed by remarks from the President pro tempore about ongoing bipartisan legislation to improve transparency and public safety in parole decisions before adjournment until June 4, 2026.
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
Senate - Health and Public Affairs Feb 17th, 2026 at 10:37 am
Senate Health & Public Affairs
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
House - Appropriations and Finance Feb 15th, 2026 at 12:53 pm
House Appropriations & Finance
Transcript Highlights:
- General's designee, the Commission shall refer suspected crimes to the District Attorney of the relevant judicial
- Chair, it says line 16: the commission shall function until all timely claims against the fund are disposed
Keywords:
Shaken Baby Syndrome, abusive head trauma, child safety, training and education, healthcare funding, youth internships, workforce development, education, grant funding, employment, drinking water, water quality, environment, public health, water filtration, private well testing, federal funding, childhood sexual abuse, time limitations, civil actions
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- individual and ensures that nonprofits will continue to be able to perform their valuable societal function
- The Court of Appeals erred by misconstruing the other duties clause to encompass judicial branch duties
Bills:
HB842, HB1907, HB2844, HB2892, HB3439, HB4211, HB4536, HB5111, HB5138, HB5182, HB5247, HB5269, HB5323, HB5435, HJR201, SB871, HB3896, SJR40
Keywords:
power lines, Gulf Coast, weather-related outages, Public Utility Commission, infrastructure, government contracts, Chinese companies, information technology, cybersecurity, state regulations, food safety, mobile vendors, licensing, permitting exemptions, health inspections, nonprofit organizations, personal information, government disclosure, privacy, criminal penalties
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- establishments to obtain permanent licenses. ...from local jurisdiction and instead shifts that function
- Article 18B of the Code of Criminal Procedure. which creates unnecessary delays when applying for judicial
Bills:
HB842, HB1907, HB2844, HB2892, HB3439, HB4211, HB4536, HB5111, HB5138, HB5182, HB5247, HB5269, HB5323, HB5435, HJR201, SB871, HB3896, SJR40
Keywords:
power lines, Gulf Coast, weather-related outages, Public Utility Commission, infrastructure, government contracts, Chinese companies, information technology, cybersecurity, state regulations, food safety, mobile vendors, licensing, permitting exemptions, health inspections, nonprofit organizations, personal information, government disclosure, privacy, criminal penalties
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Fiscal Policy Apr 17th, 2025
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Elect Committee Meeting - 2025-03-19
Elections Finance and Government Operations
Transcript Highlights:
- As amended, this bill includes provisions to improve the way our elections function for voters across
- Section 12 on page 12 looks like a more substantive change, but what this effectively does is require judicial
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- no recourse other than to file for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking them to order judicial
- no recourse other than to file for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking them to order judicial
- no recourse other than to file for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking them to order judicial
- no recourse other than to file for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking them to order judicial
- no recourse other than to file for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, asking them to order judicial
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- voting and elections, because I think that opportunity for judicial review is an important balance to
- voting and elections, because I think that opportunity for judicial review is an important balance to
- Of the ideas that we have around voting and elections, because I think that opportunity for judicial
- Um, the law was not sufficient enough to have anything done about it after judicial review.
- Um, the law was not sufficient enough to have anything done about it after judicial review.
Summary:
The Senate Elections Committee met on February 6, 2025, and first considered the reappointment of Steven Swanson to the Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board. Swanson described his background in legal aid, lobbying, judging, and international rule-of-law work, and said he wanted to continue serving the public. Committee members praised his experience and discussed the importance of campaign finance oversight, including preventing corporate participation in Minnesota elections. Senator Wosinski moved to recommend Swanson’s confirmation, and the motion was adopted.
The committee then heard Senate File 529, a proposed constitutional amendment to state that elections shall be free, fair, and equal, and that no civil or military power may interfere with the free exercise of the right to vote. Senator Dibble presented the bill as a way to strengthen voting rights and provide a constitutional basis to challenge voter suppression, gerrymandering, and unfair campaign practices. Testimony in support came from David Fischer of Clean Elections Minnesota and Jean Massie of Fair Vote Minnesota, both of whom argued the amendment would protect access to voting, increase confidence in elections, and align Minnesota with other states that have similar language.
Members discussed whether the amendment’s broad language could invite judicial interpretation or affect future election laws. Senator Koran questioned how the proposal would improve Minnesota’s already high turnout, while Senator Grant raised concerns that the terms “free, fair, and equal” were undefined and could shift power to the courts. Senator Lucero proposed an oral amendment to add “ensuring one eligible citizen, one vote” after the word “equal,” saying it would address concerns about future voter ID laws. The amendment was restated by counsel and discussed, with Senator Dibble saying it did not significantly harm the bill but suggesting it might imply a requirement he did not intend. The transcript ends during discussion of that oral amendment, and no final vote on the bill itself is shown.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security
Transcript Highlights:
- healthy relationships, and then when time is done, you send them back into society and expect them to function
- The judicial system in this country is broken enough.
- shoulder pain, and chronic knee pain from arthritis, and over the years suffered a really large functional
- shoulder pain, and chronic knee pain from arthritis, and over the years suffered a really large functional
- This bill would close those gaps by setting clear standards, timelines, and judicial oversight.
Summary:
The hearing before the Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security focused on several correction-related bills, including visitation reform, elder and medical parole, incarcerated persons’ human rights, and creation of an independent correctional oversight office. Vice Chair Christopher Worrell chaired the hearing in place of Chair Dan Cahill for much of the session and explained that the committee would first hear from incarcerated individuals remotely, then move to public testimony. The committee repeatedly enforced three-minute limits and accepted written testimony as well.
Much of the testimony from incarcerated people emphasized that visitation is central to rehabilitation, family stability, and reentry, and that current DOC policies—visitor caps, pre-approval requirements, scheduling rules, dress-code enforcement, and restrictions on contact—have reduced family contact and caused harm. Several speakers argued that elderly and medically frail prisoners should be released through parole because incarceration is costly, ineffective, and inhumane for people who pose little public-safety risk. Others described poor prison conditions, limited programming, inadequate healthcare, segregation-like housing, and the impact of K2 use, suicides, and self-harm. Supporters of the oversight bill said an independent office is needed to address racial disparities, grievance failures, and lack of accountability within the DOC.
A number of speakers tied their support to personal experiences, including alleged racial discrimination, denial of programs, and barriers to family visits. Some testified that rehabilitative programming, education, and restorative justice reduce violence and improve outcomes, while others said the DOC spends too little on programming and too much on punishment. Committee members asked a few follow-up questions, including about K2 contraband and how to reduce drugs in facilities, and one member asked about typical visitation lengths. No votes were taken during the hearing; the committee heard testimony on the bills and several witnesses urged favorable reports.