Transcript Highlights:

• So, I was interpreting what you were doing completely different than just have I agree it is permissive
• So, I I was<00:47:34.720> interpreting<00:47:35.520> what<00:47:35.760> you<00:47
• :36.000> were<00:47:36.160> doing was interpreting what you were doing was interpreting
• And they put in there, as interpreted by Mississippi law. would say 90 plus% of the time, will would
• As interpreted by Mississippi law, which you cannot enforce Mississippi law in Wyoming, nor can you enforce

Bills: SF0035, SF0090, SF0072

Keywords: education, cell phones, smart devices, school policy, student conduct, school property, rental fees, youth activities, education policy, Wyoming legislature, teacher licensure, teacher mobility, interstate compact, education compact, licensure reciprocity, reciprocal certification, teacher certification, professional teaching standards board, out-of-state teachers, military spouse

Transcript Highlights:

• I want to put in clarifying language that this paragraph shall not be interpreted to delay a committed
• want this paragraph to be interpreted to delay a committed person's scheduled release.
• I want to clarify, put in clarifying language, that this paragraph shall not be interpreted to delay
• a committed person's scheduled release, because that was a potential interpretation of this, and I in
• no way would want this paragraph to be interpreted to delay a committed person's scheduled release.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs heard SB 104, which would restrict the use of restrictive housing or solitary confinement in state-operated and state-contracted correctional facilities, with specified exceptions. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation strongly opposed the bill, saying its existing policy already meets or exceeds ACA and National Institute of Corrections standards, and objecting to language they said would give the oversight commission operational decision-making authority. The Hawaii Correctional System Oversight Commission supported the bill, but also said it was not intended to run operations and described concerns about restrictive housing practices, including CoreCivic’s SHIP program at Saguaro. Supporters included the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, the Office of the Public Defender, the Disability Rights Center, ACLU Hawaii, Easter Seals Hawaii, and individual testifiers. They argued that Native Hawaiians are disproportionately impacted by incarceration, that solitary confinement is harmful and linked to depression, anxiety, suicidality, and poor reentry outcomes, and that confinement beyond 15 days is widely condemned under international standards. Several testifiers cited suicides and deaths in custody as reasons to codify limits in statute rather than rely on policy alone. The department responded that it already has 24/7 medical care, though not 24/7 mental health coverage at one facility, and explained that it uses four custody categories: disciplinary segregation, administrative segregation, protective custody, and placements for inmates seeking separation for safety reasons. Members questioned the department and commission about the SHIP program, whether the bill was based on other states’ laws, and how current policies compare with national standards. The director said the bill was too ambiguous in places and that the department was willing to work with the commission on policy changes, but still opposed the measure as written. The committee took testimony and questions; no vote or final action was taken in the portion provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So she's here to opine on that. >> So the way we've always interpreted under our law is that PBMs are
• Pursuant<01:35:40.159> to<01:35:40.560> interpretation<01:35:41.280> from<01:35:
• 41.520> attorney Pursuant to interpretation from attorney Pursuant to interpretation from attorney
• >> So the way we've always interpreted >> So the way we've always interpreted under<
• law already is and how we've interpreted law already is and how we've interpreted it.<01:36:58.400

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• we got, if the representative offering the amendment understood the enrollment process, could be interpreted
• we got, if the representative offering the amendment understood the enrollment process, could be interpreted
• understood the enrollment process<01:07:26.960> could<01:07:27.280> be<01:07:27.440> interpreted
• as<01:07:28.559> a<01:07:28.960> no<01:07:29.280> and process could be interpreted
• as a no and process could be interpreted as a no and that's<01:07:29.760> exactly<01:07:30.079

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The House took up Senate File 4476, described as the human services program integrity package, and first adopted a motion declaring urgency so the bill could move quickly to conference committee before the end of session. The House then adopted a DE amendment to insert House language, followed by a technical A7 amendment clarifying that prepayment review would apply to all fee-for-service systems. Members then debated the A5 amendment, which would have removed a sunset on the periodic data matching reporting requirement tied to eligibility checks for medical assistance and MinnesotaCare. Supporters argued the report is essential for fraud prevention, accountability, and ensuring only eligible recipients receive benefits, citing missed or delayed reports and claiming the process can save the state money. Opponents said the report had been received, that federal HR1 changes would require different data-matching procedures, and that the amendment was not the right vehicle. After roll call, the A5 amendment failed, 63-67. The House next debated the A6 amendment, which would require DHS reporting on homelessness programs, including outcomes, costs, and participant movement, and would allow recoupment of funds if reporting was not provided. Supporters said the state spends tens of millions on homelessness without clear results and needs better data to guide policy; opponents said homelessness reporting and stakeholder work are already underway and objected to the amendment’s approach. Debate continued with questions about the amendment’s details and stakeholder consultation, but the transcript ends before a final vote on A6.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, this is just making changes to align with how we uh interpreted that section.
• So, this is just making changes to align with how we uh interpreted that section.
• we<00:58:33.280> uh changes to align with how we uh changes to align with how we uh interpreted
• interpreted that section. interpreted that section.

Bills: HF4338

Keywords: human services, medical assistance, Medicaid, provider enrollment, provider revalidation, fraud prevention, program integrity, background study, background check, fingerprinting, licensing, license revocation, payment withholding, payment suspension, prepayment review, postpayment review, surety bond, compliance training, case management, targeted case management

Transcript Highlights:

• However, there is concern from folks that the way that line is drafted could be interpreted as us saying
• However, there is concern from folks that the way that line is drafted could be interpreted as us saying
• However, there is concern from folks that the way that line is drafted could be interpreted as us saying
• However, there is concern from folks that the way that line is drafted could be interpreted as us saying
• However, there is concern from folks that the way that line is drafted could be interpreted as us saying

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: The committee took up Senate File 856, a bill to create a statewide Office of Inspector General to combat fraud. Representative Norris presented a delete-everything amendment that would keep most of the Senate bill but add more emphasis on fraud prevention, fully fund the office, avoid duplicating work already done by the BCA’s financial crimes division, and preserve subject-matter expertise by keeping some existing inspectors general in their agencies. He said the amendment would retain strong investigative powers, including subpoenas, while using the BCA for arrests, and he acknowledged his original version was likely too broad, so he planned to offer smaller amendments if needed. Chair Nash and other members challenged the DE on both process and substance. Nash said the amendment had not been shared with key stakeholders, noted that the Senate author had publicly distanced herself from it, and pointed to a governor’s office document saying the administration wanted a different approach than the Senate bill. He argued the Senate bill was a bipartisan, bicameral product and said the committee should be careful about accuracy and process. Representative Davis questioned Norris about the claim that the Senate bill was underfunded and about the governor’s role in selecting the inspector general, arguing that the governor should not have broad control over the office. Norris responded that the Senate bill’s fiscal note estimated roughly $12 million for the biennium, but the bill appropriated less than that amount, and he said the Constitution requires the governor to appoint the inspector general if the office is in the executive branch. He said the DE tried to preserve independence through a bipartisan advisory commission, Senate confirmation, a five-year term, restrictions on partisan activity, and removal only for cause with a public hearing. After debate from several members, the committee held a roll call and the DE failed on a 7-7 tie, so it was not adopted.

Transcript Highlights:

• I interpret this to mean destruction because it says any remaining unclaimed property may be removed
• , that should give a little bit more substance and scope, because the bill currently, from my interpretation
• c> from<01:39:49.360> my currently is already from my currently is already from my interpretation
• 50.400> is<01:39:50.560> a<01:39:50.719> cleanup<01:39:51.119> deal interpretation
• this is a cleanup deal interpretation this is a cleanup deal tax<01:39:51.840> has<01:39:52.239

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several transportation-related bills. HB 1688, which would provide a general excise tax exemption for certain aircraft maintenance materials, parts, tools, and facility construction, received comments from the Department of Taxation and support from Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Kohala Coast Resort, the Activities and Attractions Association of Hawaii, and the Tax Foundation of Hawaii. Testimony indicated the measure was intended to clarify an existing exemption rather than create a new one. The bulk of the hearing focused on HB 2386, which would authorize the Public Utilities Commission to establish automatic adjustment mechanisms and a water carrier inflationary cost index. The Department of Transportation said it would change its testimony to support the bill, citing a 2020 working group recommendation, while the PUC and DCCA offered comments. Matson, the Maritime Group, Hawaii Harbors Users Group, and Young Brothers supported the measure, arguing it would modernize regulation, improve predictability, and help maintain reliable interisland shipping. Hawaii Farm Bureau offered comments, while Hawaii Food Industry Association, Maui Brewing Company, Lani Kai Brewing Company, and the Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Hawaii opposed it, arguing automatic rate increases were not the solution and that underlying costs and efficiencies should be addressed first. The chair noted the bill was essentially the same as one previously considered, and asked questions about how Hawaii’s water carrier regulation compares with other states. The committee also heard HB 1691, which would allow electronic signatures for certain motor vehicle title transfers after total-loss insurance settlements and remove the notary requirement for that narrow transaction. The City and County of Honolulu Department of Customer Services, Hawaii Insurers Council, Copart, American Property Casualty Insurance Association, and one individual supported it, with Copart saying the change would reduce delays and could allow a faster, largely electronic settlement process. Members asked about county impacts, and Copart said counties would only see a different form with no added cost or electronic integration. HB 1680, requiring county finance directors to notify agencies through a centralized system for vehicle transfers, drew opposition from the City and County of Honolulu Department of Customer Services and one individual in support. HB 2516, raising helmet requirements for electric foot scooters and bicycles and requiring helmets for high-speed or Class 3 electric bicycles, received support from DOT, DOH, AAA Hawaii, and the Hawaii Bicycling League. HB 193, allowing deaf vehicle owners to register a deafness designation visible to law enforcement, drew support from the City and County of Honolulu Department of Customer Services, the Hawaii Disabilities Rights Center, and an individual who suggested amendments to broaden the bill to deaf and hard of hearing individuals and adjust the proof standard. HB 2442, increasing required accessible and van-accessible parking spaces in larger parking lots, was supported by the Disability and Communication Access Board, the Council on Developmental Disabilities, and the Disability Rights Center, which said the bill would address shortages of accessible parking and may need technical amendments to align terminology with the ADA.

Transcript Highlights:

• Well, let's work with what we got, but it seems like it'd be clear if you instructed the courts to interpret
• instructed the it'd be clear if you instructed the courts<01:25:29.040> to<01:25:29.199> interpret
• it<01:25:30.800> um<01:25:31.199> using<01:25:31.600> Wyoming courts to interpret
• it um using Wyoming courts to interpret it um using Wyoming law<01:25:33.120> in<01:25:33.360
• Now, it's my interpretation that without limitations, we should be able to put funding as part of this

Bills: SF0028, SF0030, SF0031, SF0032

Keywords: voting, elections, electronic voting systems, transparency, public testing, voter registration, qualified elector, residency requirements, voting rights, mortgage modification, priority, electronic signatures, real property, financial covenants, 911 services, emergency response, grant funding, next generation technology, government accountability, public safety

Transcript Highlights:

• And certainly that could be a situation in the long-term homeowners, but by my interpretation, by putting
• And certainly that could be a situation in the long-term homeowners, but by my interpretation, by putting
• <00:54:24.400> my<00:54:24.800> it<00:54:25.119> my<00:54:25.440> interpretation
• Um it it is not my it my interpretation Um it it is not my it my interpretation this<00:54:26.640

Bills: HB0045

Keywords: property tax, exemption, homeowners, long-term, aged, 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Uh, but the reason there's fraud is just maybe it's not really fraudulent, but a very liberal interpretation
• Uh, but the reason there's fraud is just maybe it's not really fraudulent, but a very liberal interpretation
• really fraudulent but um a<00:18:36.880> very<00:18:37.120> liberal<00:18:37.600> interpretation
• <00:18:38.240> of<00:18:38.400> what a very liberal interpretation of what a very liberal
• interpretation of what the<00:18:38.720> rules<00:18:39.039> are<00:18:39.600> and<

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee approved the minutes unanimously and then heard extended testimony from Senator Jimmy Higdon, who reflected on Kentucky’s 2011 childhood obesity task force and said the state’s childhood obesity problem has worsened since then. He described prior recommendations from that task force, including more physical education, nutrition education, classroom-based physical activity, complete streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, and safe routes to school. Higdon also argued that government programs have contributed to obesity and drug abuse, focusing especially on SNAP and Medicaid, and said he has long advocated for a waiver to distribute SNAP benefits twice a month rather than once a month. Higdon said SNAP fraud and abuse are significant, claiming some recipients sell benefits and some retailers bend the rules on eligible purchases. He also said spreading benefits through the month could help families keep fresh food in the home and stabilize grocery store business, especially in food deserts and rural areas. In response to questions, he said he would not support allowing hot prepared foods under SNAP, though he said a grocery-store produce incentive similar to the farmers market match could be beneficial if structured separately. He also said the WIC program is a model for how SNAP could be better administered. Members thanked Higdon for his service and discussed whether the issue is food insecurity or poor nutrition. Senator Douglas emphasized adding stronger guardrails to nutrition-related programs, and Representative Proctor asked about the challenges of operating grocery stores in rural areas and food deserts. Higdon said independent grocers face thin margins, competition, and cyclical market pressures, and that SNAP distribution patterns can worsen those challenges. After Higdon’s testimony, the committee heard from Ann Cressilious, a registered dietitian with the Kentucky Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, who began a presentation on the profession and on efforts to improve nutrition and access to nutrition information in Kentucky.

Transcript Highlights:

• But my interpretation of KCV Gardner is you cannot disallow specifically an out-of-state ID.
• But my interpretation of KCV Gardner is you cannot disallow specifically an out-of-state ID.
• But my interpretation<01:00:09.040> of<01:00:09.200> KCV<01:00:09.680> Gardner<01
• :00:10.079> is<01:00:10.400> you interpretation of KCV Gardner is you interpretation of

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That's how we interpreted it as well. Yeah. Okay.
• That's how<00:42:55.680> we<00:42:55.920> interpreted<00:42:56.480> as<00:42:56.640
• how we interpreted as well. Yeah. Okay. how we interpreted as well. Yeah. Okay.
• That's the way I interpret it. I'm still trying to understand.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee took up HB 164, dealing with homeowners and certain service agreements tied to residential real estate. Much of the discussion focused on whether the bill should be framed as prohibiting “service agreements” or more specifically as banning “future right to listing” agreements, and whether the bill should mirror Maine’s newer law. Mike Padmore of AARP New Hampshire presented suggested edits, including clarifying that the agreements are unenforceable, striking a provision at Roman 6C, and adding language making clear that registry of deeds staff are not liable when they record documents they are statutorily required to file. Bob Quinn of the New Hampshire Association of Realtors said the bill and Maine’s law reach the same result, but he preferred simpler wording and argued the bill should not include a two-year time limit because legitimate listing agreements should not create liens at all. Members and witnesses debated whether the bill should simply make the practice illegal outright, whether the Consumer Protection Act is the right enforcement vehicle, and whether the lien-removal process should be modeled on the recent undischarged mortgage bill. A consumer protection official said the bureau supports the statute and explained that under RSA 358-A, consumers could seek damages and equitable relief to strike a lien, while also noting that the bureau often uses the Consumer Protection Act as an enforcement tool. The committee also discussed narrowing the bill to residential real estate, with the sponsor and witnesses saying the problem has been seen in residential transactions and that commercial property was not the focus. The testimony described the underlying problem as companies, often national rather than New Hampshire-based, using long-term or future listing agreements to impose liens or penalties on homeowners, sometimes in connection with estate transfers or home sales. Witnesses said legitimate real estate listings do not normally place liens on houses, but these arrangements can include hidden or unclear penalties, including a reported 3% charge on home value. No vote was taken in the excerpt, but the committee appeared to be working through possible amendments and whether to adopt Maine-style language or a simpler New Hampshire-specific approach.

Transcript Highlights:

• I know there are some people who interpret the separate search and state to mean that.
• Politicians are saying, this tradition, this document, and this interpretation of that document.
• And how will they interpret that contention? passage.
• Will they interpret it in a Jewish or Christian or... some other way? Texas teachers are clever.
• Although Jews follow the Ten Commandments, we translate, enumerate, and transcribe this categorize and interpret

Bills: HB4, HB54, SB 10, SB 24, HB4, HB54, HB775, HB850, HB 1122, HB 1249, HB1405, HB2336, HB2757, HB3372, HB3622, HB4442, HB4687, HB4893, HB5089, HB5515, HB5606, SB10, SB24, HB1573, HB3369

Keywords: district composition, congressional election, Texas, legislature, voting districts, citizenship, U.S. citizen, non-citizen, public office, advisory board, task force, state government, local government, political subdivision, commission board, appointment eligibility, officeholder qualifications, public service, naturalization, Texas Government Code

Transcript Highlights:

• Kona speaks for my unwavering commitment to uphold the Constitution, to studying, learning, and interpreting
• Kona speaks for my unwavering commitment to uphold the Constitution, to studying, learning, and interpreting
• constitution into studying,<00:25:57.679> learning,<00:25:58.400> and<00:25:58.720> interpreting
• <00:25:59.200> the studying, learning, and interpreting the studying, learning, and interpreting

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: The Judiciary Committee heard testimony on Governor’s Message 767, the nomination of Kanoi AD Jackson to serve as circuit court judge for the Third Circuit. The chair announced that the committee would not vote on the governor’s message or two judge nominations until Tuesday, April 15, but planned to vote that day on two Defender Council items. Testimony on Jackson’s nomination was limited to two minutes per speaker, and the hearing was conducted partly by Zoom. Supporters emphasized Jackson’s qualifications, work ethic, judicial temperament, and community ties. Testifiers included the West Hawaii Bar Association, family members, a retired teacher, retired Judge Robert Kim, and the Hawaii State Bar Association. The West Hawaii Bar Association said Jackson received high marks from its review process and that the Third Circuit needed a permanent judge for stability. Judge Kim and others praised her preparation, intelligence, humility, and experience as a prosecutor and litigator. Jackson also spoke in her own behalf, acknowledging that her background is primarily criminal rather than civil, but saying she is committed to learning the civil docket and serving the community if confirmed. Members questioned the Hawaii State Bar Association about the basis for its support, including how many members responded and whether concerns were raised about Jackson’s lack of civil experience. HSBA said it uses a confidential review process, receives both positive and negative comments, and does not track votes or percentages, but its board voted to support her. Judge Kim responded that judges can learn new areas of law, that civil dockets can be managed with benchbooks and help from other judges, and that Jackson’s trial experience would serve her well. No vote was taken on Jackson’s nomination during this hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• So it is going to, I think it's, it leaves it open very widely to interpretation based on the...
• So it is going to, I think, it leaves it open very widely to interpretation based on the... so it' primarily
• widely<01:20:14.960> to leaves it open very widely to leaves it open very widely to interpretation
• 15.920> based<01:20:16.239> on<01:20:16.400> the<01:20:16.960> the Interpretation
• > amendment<01:42:44.719> hasn't Um, the constitutional amendment hasn't yet been interpreted

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• They need interpreters. They need services. Those charter schools can't change that.
• They have to have an interpreter. Dr.
• They have to have an interpreter.<00:53:11.680> Dr.
• :12.640> sorry<00:53:12.960> we<00:53:13.119> have<00:53:13.280> to interpreter
• I'm sorry we have to interpreter. Dr.

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The language was confusing because some people interpret it as the doctor has to do the screening versus
• The language was confusing because some people interpret it as the doctor has to do the screening versus
• because Um the language was confusing because some<00:29:23.360> people<00:29:23.600> interpret
• it<00:29:24.240> as<00:29:25.039> the<00:29:25.440> doctor some people interpret
• it as the doctor some people interpret it as the doctor has<00:29:26.159> to<00:29:26.399>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• There's been some confusion, and DLI already interprets the language to only apply the standards to this
• <01:17:17.199> already some confusion and DLI already some confusion and DLI already interprets
• 18.159> language<01:17:18.480> to<01:17:18.719> only<01:17:18.960> apply interprets
• the language to only apply interprets the language to only apply the<01:17:19.760> standards<
• included in the board's purview, which, as Senator Pappas mentioned, is already how the department interprets

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• However, since that time, we have found a lack of clarity in interpreting the out-of-state training requirements
• However, since that time, we have found a lack of clarity in interpreting the out-of-state training requirements
• However, since that time, we have found a lack of clarity in interpreting the out-of-state training requirements
• However, since that time, we have found a lack of clarity in interpreting the out-of-state training requirements
• However, since that time, we have found a lack of clarity in interpreting the out-of-state training requirements

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• There's already a process to not exclude location-type data about a person under protection, and my interpretation
• Even when it is not intentional misinformation or disinformation, people may interpret or may not know
• Even when it is not intentional misinformation or disinformation, people may interpret or may not know
• whether it means after the polling place is closed for the night, which is how I think you would interpret
• night which is how I think<01:24:28.920> you<01:24:29.000> would<01:24:29.199> interpret

Keywords: 1183, house