Transcript Highlights:

• I do not think it would blow up the budget because the amount allocated remains the same.
• budget because uh the amount allocated budget because uh the amount allocated remains<00:28:50.159
• This means we have to pay a permitting fee and go through building inspection to ensure they're up to
• We've paid thousands in permitting fees because of our current classification.
• paid thousands in permitting fees paid thousands in permitting fees because<01:09:43.600> of<

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• towards caring capacity be allocated towards caring capacity studies<00:30:00.159> okay<00:30
• <00:43:14.640> dialed there you have a maintenance fee dialed there you have a maintenance
• fee dialed in<00:43:15.520> right<00:43:16.520> uh<00:43:17.400> whatever<00:43
• So that's what we're trying to put into the actual moving fees, but not a separate charge.
• into what the moving fee is that they would pay in our facilities.

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The Committee on Water and Land met on March 13, 2025, and first announced that SB 1456 would be deferred to the end of the agenda and ultimately worked on later, with the chair indicating the bill would be deferred and revisited in a future measure. The committee then heard SB 841 on marine life conservation districts. DLNR supported the bill, saying it would fund carrying capacity studies to inform rules and policies. Testimony noted a pilot study already underway at the Puka Marine Life Conservation District and another nearing completion at the old Kona Airport MLCD. Members discussed costs, with DLNR estimating about $300,000 per year for one user-experience study, potentially more for ecological analysis, and also discussed possible funding from the Mālama Kai special fund. DLNR said it had no objection to consulting current operators and other users, and explained the program would be a new, ongoing adaptive-management tool. The committee next heard SB 411 on capital improvement projects at small boat harbors. DLNR supported the intent, saying the bill would help expedite use of special funds for CIP work, while the Department of Budget and Finance opposed it, arguing the draft could conflict with constitutional limits on appropriations. Public testimony from an industry representative supported the bill and urged more collaboration with commercial operators, while committee discussion focused on whether DLNR could already use special funds for repairs, how much engineering and bidding work is required before projects go out to bid, and whether the current process creates bottlenecks when bids exceed initial estimates. DLNR said it can do some repairs and maintenance within existing authority and funding ceilings, but that the bill as drafted could be too broad. The committee also heard SB 5 on historic preservation, where DLNR supported the measure and NAOP Hawaii opposed it, saying the bill’s broader definition could expand the scope beyond the stated goal of narrowing reviews and reducing backlog. The committee then took up SB 1462 on the state historic preservation income tax credit. The Department of Taxation said the revenue estimate assumes the cap would be reached each year the credit is available, and DLNR supported the bill. SHPD said the prior credit had sunset, outreach had previously been done in targeted communities such as Chinatown, and owners of eligible historic properties are notified during review. Finally, the committee heard SB 268 on island burial councils. DLNR supported the bill, and OHA strongly supported it, saying the councils have struggled with quorum and expertise and that the measure would restore the original intent of having lineal descendants and cultural practitioners as decision makers, while still allowing landowners and developers to testify and participate. OHA also said it would help provide technical support and urged continued involvement from SHPD and the Attorney General’s office.

Transcript Highlights:

• separate out the companies that are doing this as a service from those that are charging reasonable fees
• and have reasonable e um ethical fees and have reasonable e um ethical structures<00:32:20.559> um
• Um, I think allocating more money to that is going to be more beneficial for us in the long run just
• Um I think allocating<00:42:48.960> more<00:42:49.200> money<00:42:49.359> to<00
• is going allocating more money to that is going to<00:42:51.359> be<00:42:52.319> um<00

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, $30 of the registration fee would go directly into the cyanobacteria fund, which is administered
• Um $30 of the registration<00:05:07.039> fee<00:05:07.360> would<00:05:07.680> go
• Um, you know, certainly if the money is allocated, we can make that system upgrade and make it happen
• Um, you know, certainly if the money is allocated, we can make that system upgrade and make it happen
• Um, you know, certainly if the money is allocated, we can make that system upgrade and make it happen

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ,<01:04:47.280> property to focus on franchise fees, property to focus on franchise fees,
• fees tax, restaurant tax, and franchise fees from<01:14:59.440> utilities.
• Other sources at almost 12% include things like 911 fees, landline fees, bank franchise deposit taxes
• <01:20:53.040> franchise, fees, landline fees, uh bank franchise, fees, landline fees, uh
• total tax revenue comes from the fee. total tax revenue comes from the fee. for<01:22:09.600>

Keywords: Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call 00:00:11 Discussion of County Clerks’ Land Records Update 00:02:42 Discussion of Area Development Districts 00:22:48 Discussion of Legislative Measures 00:50:09 Discussion of Local Taxing Sources 01:02:33 Adjournment 01:29:16, 958, all

Summary: The committee first took up an update from the Kentucky County Clerks Association on the transition to electronic recording and land records modernization. Testimony explained that legislation from the 2021 task force created funding and deadlines for counties to provide online search portals and complete a 30-year property record search, with a later move to a 60-year standard. Speakers said the money has been awarded to counties, but much of the work is still in progress because records must be scanned, indexed, and manually verified. They said only a handful of counties are fully compliant with electronic recording so far, while many are still working through staffing and vendor issues. They also noted that the 60-year standard may ultimately be easier and more efficient to complete than the 30-year standard, and that compliance is expected to improve by next summer. The clerks’ representatives also raised related issues, including deed fraud, the county document storage fee, and KDLA digitization grants. They said online recording can make deed fraud easier to attempt, so they expect to seek legislation next session to address it. They described an existing notification service available in many counties that alerts property owners when a document is recorded, which can help detect suspicious activity quickly. They also said the storage fee and separate county account structure has generally worked well, but that two recent KDLA grant cycles have not released money for clerks, limiting support for digitization work. Another topic was whether, once records are fully digitized and verified, some permanent records should remain publicly accessible or be moved to a safer archive under KDLA control. Members asked about the balance in the KDLA fund, what the General Assembly could do to help lagging counties, and how much of the $25 million modernization funding had been spent. Witnesses said they did not have the current fund balance but would try to get it, that the main obstacle now appears to be staffing rather than additional money, and that the funds have been awarded but not fully expended because work is still ongoing. They emphasized that counties are helping one another and asked members to alert association leadership if any county is struggling. The committee then heard a presentation from Dan London, executive director of the Lincoln Trail Area Development District, who described area development districts as regional staff extensions and technical resources for cities and counties, and highlighted their role in coordinating regional services and partnerships across county lines.

Transcript Highlights:

• But we're not, but we are going to only send partial allocations. for fiscal 2026, and there will be
• no allocation in 2027, because the ESF the rainy day fund balance will exceed its constitutional cap
• One of my colleagues mentioned this for something, 4.5 billion. from last session that wasn't allocated
• We spend it within the biannual that is allocated. Does that adversely impact?
• We have managed care and fee for service.

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Those you pay fees on.
• <01:08:08.720> President, little bit about fees. Mr. President, little bit about fees.
• Th those you pay fees on. Other sewage. Th those you pay fees on.
• Facilities Use Fees. Senate File 95, Facilities Use Fees.
• registration fees tribal governments. registration fees tribal governments.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• 26.320> priority Um, there's changes to the priority Um, there's changes to the priority allocation
• > deadline<00:02:27.880> for<00:02:28.000> the<00:02:28.120> beginning allocation
• deadline for the beginning allocation deadline for the beginning farmer<00:02:29.040> credit<
• of unused allocations in that credit. of unused allocations in that credit.
• This is a tax on their service fee, which we do not think we can viably be a local Mr.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• It's a straight per-pupil allocation. That's right. It's one-time money.
• Best way to allocate this. Okay. Thank you for that clarification.
• What would you find with your allocation? What types of activity?
• As such, I think we view the per-ADA allocation methodology as the best way to proportionally allocate
• One of them specifically is on the CYBHI allocation for community schools.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Summary: The committee first took up the May Revision update on Proposition 98 and the school rainy-day fund. The Department of Finance said the minimum guarantee rises by $6.4 billion over the Governor’s Budget across the three-year window, with lower average daily attendance projections offsetting some of the revenue gains. Finance also described a reduced $3.9 billion settle-up proposal, increased deposits into the Public School System Stabilization Account, and an ending reserve balance of about $10.3 billion. The LAO said the revenue and LCFF adjustments were reasonable, but urged the Legislature to be cautious about delaying settle-up payments and to consider more budget resiliency, including larger cushions or other tools to protect ongoing programs. Members then questioned the administration and LAO about the size of the settle-up, the rationale for the reserve deposit, declining enrollment, and how lower attendance is creating savings that can be redirected to other school priorities. The LAO said the May Revision’s mix of one-time and ongoing spending was generally reasonable but recommended keeping a strong cushion and considering alternatives such as advance payments or pension-related savings. Questions also focused on how the May Revision’s funding mix affects districts if revenues weaken, and on the treatment of special education, discretionary block grants, and paid family leave costs for LEAs and community colleges. The committee next heard the community colleges portion of the budget. Finance described a higher SCFF COLA, increased apportionment costs, a student support block grant, deferred maintenance, Common Cloud, Calbright, credit for prior learning, and a one-time adult learner demonstration project. The Chancellor’s Office supported the core investments but asked for more funding for enrollment growth, changes to the SCFF growth formula, and a COLA for Student Equity and Achievement. The LAO recommended funding the statutory COLA increase, noted a $52 million current-year apportionment shortfall not yet included in the May Revision, and suggested the Legislature could instead direct some funds to enrollment growth, categorical COLAs, or one-time uses. Members also clarified how COLA and hold-harmless rules apply to different community college districts. Finally, the committee reviewed the proposed state implementation of the federal Workforce Pell program. Finance proposed one-time funding for the Student Aid Commission and Cradle to Career data work, plus trailer bill changes to set up state approval of eligible programs. CSAC said the program is promising but highly complex, with new federal rules just released and significant data, regulatory, and systems work still needed; it said the state will not be ready by July 1 and that ongoing funding will likely be necessary. The LAO agreed that implementation will require careful trailer bill language and noted that ongoing administrative costs remain unresolved. Members asked about other states’ approaches and the practical effect on short-term workforce programs in California.

Transcript Highlights:

• So this particular position and the allocation, uh, is that contract only the allocation?
• uh is that contract only the allocation uh is that contract only we're<00:56:52.640> talking<
• our from our BJ table when we allocated our from our BJ table when we allocated our<01:42:56.080
• <01:43:01.280> So allocation of each budget line items.
• So allocation of each budget line items.

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• money we would like to take if allocated money we would like to take if allocated to<00:49:04.960
• :49.680> money<00:53:50.000> out part of why allocating money out part of why allocating
• models there are mostly a flat fee models there are mostly a flat fee that's<01:14:19.120> charged
• What about the disclosure of how state funding is being allocated to this to NIL students?
• to this to funding is being allocated to this to NIL<01:38:11.440> students?

Keywords: 912, senate, all

Summary: A joint informational briefing of the House and Senate higher education committees focused on how the University of Hawaiʻi athletics department plans to remain competitive in the new NIL era, including the effects of the House v. NCAA settlement, direct institutional payments, and the need to balance competitiveness with the university’s educational mission. Senators and committee members introduced themselves, and the briefing featured remarks from women’s basketball coach Laura Beeman, football coach Timmy Chang, and Athletic Director Matt Elliott. Coach Beeman said NIL has already affected recruiting and retention in women’s basketball, estimating the program has lost six to 10 student-athletes because it lacks the funding to keep comparable talent. She emphasized that the issue is not greed but retention, culture, and keeping student-athletes who value the university and community, while also using NIL as a way to teach financial literacy, privacy, and adult responsibilities. Coach Chang described similar pressures in football, including transfer portal volatility and competing offers from other programs, and gave examples of players whose personal and family circumstances made NIL support important for staying at Hawaiʻi. Athletic Director Elliott said the department’s vision is to create an outstanding student-athlete experience, recruit and retain elite athletes, compete at the top of the Mountain West, and strengthen community ties. He said the department wants to preserve the educational focus while adapting to a system in which student-athletes can share in revenue. Elliott explained that UH is seeking a $5 million annual NIL fund, is fundraising through the community and the “Boost the Bose” account, and is also pursuing individual NIL deals, corporate sponsorship-related deals, and licensing opportunities. In response to Senator Kim’s question, he said NIL compensation can come through two tracks: institutional payments within the department’s discretion and outside deals that must be reviewed for market value under the new reporting system. No votes or formal actions were taken; the meeting was informational only.

Transcript Highlights:

• And then we also have a fee-for-service for a certain population, which is quite a bit smaller than Medicaid
• And then again, as I had said earlier, there's the fee-for-service category.
• If it's fee-for-service, which Indian Health Service is fee-for-service... service, then we pay whatever
• It's a special rate for them, so we pay them on a fee-for-service rate for whatever they're coming in
• It might have been 6% or 7% for our administrative fees.

Transcript Highlights:

• There May be some additional fees on those programs that the high school may pick up.
• You know, raising all of those fees on top of seeing such an influx of public money is not the right
• The allocation will be dedicated to planning, designing, constructing, and equipping the early childhood
• The funding allocation is for Planning, Designing, Constructing, and Equipment Phase 2 of the Shiprock
• There's monies. that we've allocated to the economic development department that work in that space.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• retroactivity date so the residential subcommittee may stagger renewal and collection of licensing fees
• Amendments 12 and 13 provide that fees for the inspections on behalf of the subcommittee shall be set
• would come from the Manufactured Housing Commission currently for their licensing and enforcement fees
• Those fees would go up.
• And you would have, to the commissioner's point, some allocation...

Summary: The House Committee on Commerce met on May 11, 2026, with a quorum present and took up a series of Senate bills, a resolution, and one House bill. The committee reported favorably Senate Bill 79 to recreate Louisiana Economic Development, Senate Concurrent Resolution 5 to establish the Louisiana-Ireland Trade Commission, Senate Bill 375 on firefighting foam with amendments clarifying use in declared emergencies, Senate Bill 398 moving manufactured and modular housing oversight under the Contractors Licensing Board with technical and substantive amendments, Senate Bill 163 on virtual currency business licensing with an amendment providing for federal preemption if Congress enacts a national licensing regime, and Senate Bill 287 on virtual currency kiosks with consumer-protection provisions and technical amendments. The committee also reported favorably House Resolution 197, as amended, urging the Public Service Commission to study distributed energy generation and storage resources with LSU involvement, and Senate Bill 54, which would allow estheticians to blow-dry hair after certain services; that bill drew extensive testimony from supporters and opponents in the cosmetology and aesthetics industries before being reported favorably. Several bills prompted detailed discussion and testimony. On Senate Bill 398, the sponsor and Contractors Licensing Board representatives said the change would improve enforcement and consumer safety for manufactured-home installation, especially tie-downs, leveling, and foundation blocking, while not affecting HUD-regulated construction. On the virtual currency bills, OFI said it currently licenses 37 virtual currency businesses with 33 pending applications, and supporters described the kiosk bill as a response to fraud complaints by requiring clearer disclosures, refund procedures, live customer support, and reporting to OFI. For House Resolution 197, the sponsor, PSC officials, and energy stakeholders said the study would examine the value of distributed energy resources, including rooftop solar and battery storage, in light of rising demand and grid reliability concerns; PSC staff and LSU energy experts described the study as focused on market value and avoided-cost benefits. House Bill 744, which would have shifted regulation of certain New Orleans utilities from the city council to the PSC, generated discussion about constitutional history, rate impacts, and utility consolidation. PSC officials and the sponsor said the current city-council regulation is a constitutional exception dating back to 1921, and they argued that PSC regulation could reduce costs and simplify oversight, but the sponsor ultimately moved to defer the bill rather than force a floor fight, and the committee agreed. The committee then began consideration of Senate Bill 386, the Louisiana Data Privacy Act, adopting technical amendments and then a larger amendment package that revised definitions and compliance provisions; the transcript ends while that bill’s amendment process is still underway, with no final action shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• While campuses fund some repairs each year, the state general fund allocation cannot meet the needs of
• In a five-year span, we have allocated $5.6 billion, which is just slightly more than the need in the
• It's hard for us to allocate our share, but it's certainly an exciting prospect. we can come up with
• Into this, the allocation you're seeking versus what your plan has identified as needs.
• Funding beyond the $8 million allocated by the Governor's budget proposal.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• That is still Minnesota's allocation.
• That is still Minnesota's allocation.
• So what the bill does is to a to a fee.
• It wasn't uh farmer fees. It money. It wasn't uh farmer fees.
• It was wasn't fees on any producers.

Bills: HF3508, HF3548, HF3549

Keywords: dairy assistance, agriculture, investment, relief initiative, farm support, farm assistance, down payment, state funding, loan modification, grain indemnity, financial security, crop insurance, Minnesota agriculture, 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• So it would go into a statewide allocation system instead of being retained locally.
• Statewide uh allocation Statewide uh allocation system<05:24:26.520> um<05:24:26.920>
• I did propose that in the previous bill: it was a 3% collection fee that could be put back in.
• I did propose that in the previous bill: it was a 3% collection fee that could be put back in.
• <05:33:59.400> for allocate afforded a a processing fee for allocate afforded a a processing

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The hearing focused on HB 563, which would revise the education funding formula for pupils receiving special education services by replacing the current single special education amount with three differentiated categories. Representative Rick Ladd, the prime sponsor, said the bill largely tracks a House-passed version from the prior session with minor figure adjustments, and explained that the proposal uses projected FY26 amounts for three categories based on time in general education versus more intensive placements. He also noted that the bill does not address catastrophic aid directly, but that special education aid, CAT aid, and proration all remain issues for later work sessions. Ladd and supporters argued that weighted categories better reflect actual costs and are more sustainable than treating all IEPs the same. Representative Margaret Drye said the approach was one of the best ideas from the education funding subcommittee and urged the committee to support differentiated aid. Representative Ames asked how the category amounts were derived, and Ladd said Category A follows the FY26 base, Category B is a higher weight, and Category C is a still higher weight for more intensive services, though he acknowledged the exact multipliers were developed earlier and could be revisited. He also said the committee would continue discussing whether the weights are appropriate and how they interact with CAT aid. Testimony from Bonnie Dunham strongly opposed the bill. She argued that funding based on placement rather than actual service need would create incentives to move students into more restrictive settings, could stigmatize children with labels such as "Category C," and would undermine the least restrictive environment requirements under federal special education law. She described her son’s experience in inclusive settings as beneficial and said the bill would have penalized the district for serving him there. In response to questions, she said schools and parents should base funding on the child’s actual needs and costs, not on placement, and urged the committee to recommend the bill inexpedient to legislate.

Transcript Highlights:

• This slide shows the allocation of the inflation adjustment request among institutions.
• Institutions can raise tuition and fee rates to generate additional resources.
• lobby for higher tuition and fee lobby for higher tuition and fee increases.<00:14:53.600> Uh
• under undergraduate tuition and fees under undergraduate tuition and fees between<00:15:22.079><
• <00:15:53.600> grew<00:15:53.920> at<00:15:54.240> 4.1% fees grew at 4.1% fees grew

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee met for its fifth and final Interim Joint Budget Review Subcommittee on Education meeting, but did not initially have a quorum and approved the minutes later when enough members were present. The Council on Postsecondary Education, represented by President Aaron Thompson and Vice President Bill Payne, opened with condolences for the UPS crash victims and then presented higher education budget recommendations for the 2026-2028 biennium. Thompson emphasized the return on investment from state support for higher education, citing gains in retention, enrollment, persistence, graduation, reduced time to degree, lower student debt, and expanded dual credit participation, while noting that affordability and access remain priorities. Payne outlined CPE’s operating funds request, including $43.3 million in the first year and $86.6 million in the second year for inflation adjustments, plus $30 million and $45 million for performance funding. He said the inflation request would apply across the board to institutions to offset rising costs, and that the KSU land grant match would not need additional funding because the state has already met the matching requirement. He also explained that state support for educating students has not kept pace with inflation over time, creating pressure on institutional budgets and tuition, though tuition increases have been held to historic lows in recent years. A major portion of the discussion focused on the performance funding model and how it affects smaller institutions. CPE proposed two approaches to address institutions that have received little or no performance funding, especially Kentucky State University and Morehead State University. The first approach would create a $20 million minimum distribution pool, providing $1.95 million to each university and $4.4 million to KCTCS, with the goal of giving smaller and rural institutions a base level of support. The second approach would provide direct appropriations totaling a little over $5.6 million to Kentucky State, Morehead State, and five community colleges that have not been receiving performance funding. Members, especially Representative Tipton and Senator West, questioned how the model had treated small schools over time, and CPE officials explained that the original small school adjustment was not large enough to prevent KSU and Morehead from effectively being left out of the distribution. No votes were taken.

Transcript Highlights:

• When the government can pressure a property owner through fees, conditions, or concessions to surrender
• When the government can pressure a property owner through fees, conditions, or concessions to surrender
• It's for the capital city stormwater program with the fees assessed there, but our city has repealed
• those fees, so we just saved $18,000.
• in both the budget and Senate allocated in both the budget and Senate File<01:20:00.920> 123<

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• had mistakenly implemented a system change on June 24, 2024 that erroneously increased the Medi-Cal fee
• And the system change resulted in the CBAS rates posted to the fee schedule on our Medi-Cal website.
• California has allocated $10 million annually for ADRCs since their inception, which I was a part of
• This allocation includes operational costs and $5 million for tribal entities.
• We simply can't meet the rising need under the same funding allocations.

Summary: The joint Assembly Budget Subcommittee hearing focused first on long-term services and supports for older adults, especially the “forgotten/overlooked middle” who earn too much for Medi-Cal but cannot afford private long-term care. Administration witnesses from DHCS, the Department of Aging, and Social Services described Medicare’s limited long-term care coverage, Medi-Cal’s role, the elimination of the Medi-Cal asset test, and ongoing state studies and listening sessions on financing options. Testimony from advocates and researchers emphasized rising homelessness among older adults, the need for better navigation and coordination across health, aging, housing, and social service systems, and short-term policy steps such as share-of-cost reform, housing stability supports, and protecting home- and community-based services. Members highlighted the need for a coordinated, no-wrong-door approach and asked for the most impactful budget investments to address affordability and homelessness risk. The second major topic was the Community-Based Adult Services (CBAS) program. CDA reported that CBAS helps participants remain in the community, that 304 centers operate statewide serving about 42,000 people, and that demand is stable but access gaps remain in some regions. DHCS explained that a 2024 rate increase authorized by SB 159 became inoperative after Proposition 35, and that a separate 10% rate change on the fee schedule was the result of a DHCS system error; the department said it would not require recoupment, though managed care plans may act under their contracts. CBAS providers and advocates warned that reimbursement rates have not kept pace with costs, that several centers have closed, and that clawbacks could trigger more closures. They requested $74.8 million ongoing General Fund to close part of the rate gap and preserve the program, while members expressed concern about closures and the cost savings of keeping people out of more expensive institutional care. The hearing then moved to In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) and statewide collective bargaining. CDSS reviewed provider recruitment and retention efforts, including electronic timesheets, direct deposit, and the now-completed IHSS Career Pathways program, which trained more than 59,000 providers. CDSS also summarized its AB 102 workgroup report on statewide versus regional bargaining, saying the final report would be sent to the Legislature soon and that statewide bargaining appeared more viable than regional bargaining, though it would require clear statutory scope and major fiscal changes. The department estimated that each $1 per hour statewide wage increase would cost at least $1.3 billion to $1.5 billion annually. Labor advocates argued that IHSS wages, benefits, and training are too inconsistent across counties and called for statewide bargaining, consumer participation, and ongoing state funding. County representatives supported stronger wages but cautioned that counties need protection from new costs and administrative burdens, and consumer advocates warned that moving bargaining to the state could weaken local consumer control and the program’s consumer-driven structure.