Transcript Highlights:

• Awardees for this program will have 4 years to complete projects once awards are final.
• We set 24 counties, created the project areas around the counties themselves, large projects, so very
• expensive projects.
• Uh, low Earth orbit internet, and that's what Project Kuyper is building.
• Uh, so, so Project Kuiper, our first satellite batch is launched production satellites.

Transcript Highlights:

• We don't, you know, project that, but we rely on the projections that Moody's Analytics has for that.
• One of the projects is a two-year project, and the other one we anticipate to take three years to build
• The total cost for both of those projects came in at $168 million when you had construction engineering
• So that project itself in total is ...in total is $71 million when you add in the construction costs
• I do project that many of these districts that did qualify will continue to qualify into I do project

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• strong rule of statutory construction. strong rule of statutory construction.
• These $130 million projects are capital projects.
• we these uh projects.
• So projects that we these uh projects.
• If that project came to fruition, when would they start construction?

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:14:11.320> type coverage for all construction type coverage for all construction type
• Now, the unknown factor is we can only project how successful the HHF is going to be.
• <00:16:56.480> how factor is we can only project how factor is we can only project how successful
• Are you basing your projection for premiums on historical data rather than a model that's actually projecting
• model that's actually projecting risk, like for hurricane risk?

Keywords: 910, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• this project is successful.
• as with DGS, our project partners in this, to complete the end of construction.
• First about some of the construction and maintenance projects related to the skilled nursing and memory
• For the roofing projects at the theater and the chapel and the independent living projects, where do
• That's a two- or three-year construction project in total because there's five roofs.

Keywords: 987, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This amendment broadens that definition even further to include projects that are qualified opportunity
• If I were to construct a new church or a new church property, like any other development, might I be
• Yeah, um, a specific project? A city? A county? Anywhere? No, uh, thank you for the question.
• We generally focus on policies rather than taking positions on specific projects. Okay.
• When we're able to do that, we can dramatically reduce the cost of construction.

Summary: The committee met with a quorum and considered a series of bills, many focused on local government authority, land use, housing, and public notice requirements. Several measures were reported favorably, including SB 984 on firefighter cancer benefits and prevention, SB 1612 requiring local governments to accept electronic payments, SB 936 on temporary door locking devices, SB 962 on affordable housing protections for farms, SB 218 on land use regulations in hurricane-affected counties, SB 1020 on regulation of chickee huts, and SB 1434 on infill redevelopment of environmentally challenged properties. SB 1180 on community development district recall elections was amended to narrow and clarify the recall process and to add provisions on synthetic turf and compact urban mixed-use districts before being reported favorably. SB 380 on legal notices was also amended and reported favorably despite significant opposition from the Florida Press Association, Common Cause, and others who argued it would further fragment public notice access; supporters said it would modernize publication options and save money. Testimony on the bills was mixed. Supporters of the housing and redevelopment measures argued they would increase attainable housing, streamline approvals, and make better use of underutilized or contaminated land, while local government groups and advocacy organizations warned about overdevelopment, reduced public input, infrastructure strain, and conflicts with comprehensive planning. On SB 1444, which combined preemptions related to religious gatherings, private clubs, and certain permitting requirements, supporters framed it as protecting religious freedom and limiting local micromanagement, while the League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties opposed it as overly broad and unclear; the bill nevertheless passed favorably after debate. SB 218 was presented as restoring normal land-use authority in counties unaffected by hurricanes while preserving protections in damaged areas, and SB 984 was described as clarifying firefighter cancer benefits and health coverage rules; both passed without controversy. The committee also heard extensive testimony on SB 948, a strike-all on local government land development regulations and orders that would create a statewide framework for starter homes and lot-split rules within urban growth areas. Supporters said it would expand housing supply and reduce regulatory delays, while opponents said it would override local zoning, weaken infrastructure and environmental protections, and apply too broadly. The bill drew support from housing advocates and some local officials, but opposition from the Florida League of Cities, Florida Association of Counties, and others. The transcript ends with SB 948 still under consideration, with testimony continuing and no final vote shown in the excerpt.

Transcript Highlights:

• That local million towards this project.
• Why should the Kentucky General Assembly support this project?
• Importantly, this project is not just a dream on paper.
• design, development, and construction design, development, and construction documents<00:12:14.399
• , Berry, architects, Calhoun Construction, Berry, architects, Calhoun Construction, and<00:12:18.959

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 Attendance Roll Call 00:00:20 Kentucky Humane Society 00:01:20, 958, all

Summary: The committee heard a presentation from Alyssa Gray, president and CEO of the Kentucky Humane Society, on the organization’s statewide animal welfare work and its request for a $5 million matching contribution from the General Assembly for a new Kentucky Animal and Community Campus in Louisville. Gray said KHS, an independent nonprofit founded in 1884, serves cats, dogs, and horses, reaches 96 counties, provides shelter relief, spay-neuter services, low-cost veterinary care, and disaster response, and has supported communities during recent tornadoes and floods. She described the new campus as a hub for disaster housing, shelter transfers, veterinary training, and expanded services to reduce overpopulation and relieve pressure on county shelters and local governments. Members asked about the campus’s location, staffing, veterinary student involvement, and the scope of KHS’s services. Gray said the new site would be next to KHS’s current spay-neuter clinic on Preston Highway, that the facility would include shelter medicine, high-volume spay-neuter, and a low-cost clinic, and that it could host veterinary students and interns for hands-on training. She also explained that KHS works with county officials and shelters to move animals during crises or cruelty cases, can connect counties with partner organizations when KHS is full, and provides mobile clinic services and occasional grant support for rural shelters. Committee members praised the presentation and discussed how KHS could fit into disaster recovery planning. One member suggested the organization could be folded into long-term recovery efforts because of its role in post-disaster animal care. The presenter said KHS wants to be a formal disaster response resource and already works with the Kentucky Veterinary Medical Association and other partners. No vote on the funding request was taken during the meeting. At the end of the meeting, the committee noted it still lacked a quorum, so approval of the minutes was postponed to the next meeting, tentatively scheduled for October 15. The meeting then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We also have updated visibility into the program and project timelines as we see those projects progress
• So, projects are built by independent project managers.
• In terms of wages, construction, etc.
• or rooftop projects.
• Energy efficiency projects and homes.

Transcript Highlights:

• They have a requirement that all of their new construction that the construction materials used in their
• So, You know, we've got construction going on all over.
• And right now, many Building developers, project developers, whether it be the hyperscalers, whether
• You're going to say, okay, well, it costs, you know, this particular project product costs a lot more
• Yeah, I do not, at this point, or this bill does not require me to seek projects or just require that

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• , and then there were a couple of projects in 2018 and 2019, one emergency-funded project.
• And then new projects, or funding available for new projects, is the dashed line.
• And then new projects, or funding available for new projects, is the dashed line.
• When we had originally approved the project, we approved a construction cost per square foot of 194,
• not building-aid-eligible projects, but other projects that schools may have to apply for.

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The Finance Committee Division II met with the New Hampshire Department of Education to review school nutrition programs and related funding. Department staff Melissa White and Kelly Rambo walked through a packet covering the National School Lunch Program, Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program, Community Eligibility (CEP), After School Snack Program, Child and Adult Care Food Program, and Summer Food Service Program, explaining that these are federally funded USDA programs, with some state supplemental funding in certain areas. They also reviewed reimbursement rates for lunch, breakfast, child/adult care, and summer meals, noting that summer rates follow calendar-year timing while most others follow the state fiscal year. Members asked several questions about how the funding works, especially the difference between federal reimbursements and the state match. Staff explained that the state lunch line in the budget is a fixed match amount tied to federal participation, while breakfast funding is broken out by meal type and reimbursement category. They also discussed why FY 2022 federal spending was much higher during COVID, when USDA covered meals at the free rate for all students, and why FY 2023 and FY 2024 dropped as normal income-eligibility rules returned. A committee member also asked about the “severe need lunch” two-cent rate, and staff said they did not know USDA’s formula. A substantial portion of the meeting focused on summer meals and the distinction between the Summer Food Service Program and Summer EBT. Staff explained that SFSP provides meals at approved sites, which can be open or closed sites, while Summer EBT is a separate DHHS-operated benefit program that provides funds to families. They said some schools or sites may not qualify under USDA rules, but eligible children can often use another nearby open site, and the department posts an interactive map and phone line to help families find locations. The committee also discussed the Community Eligibility Provision. Staff said New Hampshire currently has three CEP schools, that the eligibility threshold had recently been lowered from 40% to 25% identified students, and that the program allows participating schools to offer free meals to all students while the local district covers the non-federal share. Members asked whether any districts in the 25% to 40% range had joined; staff said no. The department offered to provide the eligibility report in Excel and noted that the CEP intent is to reduce application burden, though the lower threshold can make the local cost share harder for some districts to absorb.

Transcript Highlights:

• the project.
• the project.
• I would like to note that for formal referral projections they are projected for the total number of
• The parole supervision population projection is projected to remain stable at 165.
• Chair: ...The parole supervision population projection is projected to remain stable at 165.

Bills: SB 1

Keywords: campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• we are targeting one particular project for clawing back funding.
• , when we could seek reimbursement after construction.
• 10:29.320> construction<00:10:30.079> this reimbursement after construction this reimbursement
• <00:11:06.519> underway so we get this um construction underway so we get this um construction
• So do you believe that statewide taxes should go to local township projects?

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• report to the Capital Projects million report to the Capital Projects and<00:22:26.160> Bond<00
• projects totaling $4 million. projects totaling $4 million.
• pool projects totaling $2.5 million. pool projects totaling $2.5 million.
• funding for the siting and construction funding for the siting and construction of<00:35:16.000>
• in projects. in projects.

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• This project will ultimately secure $20 million in federal construction funding once complete.
• We have five different vertical construction projects in four different counties, and I have one full-time
• The hangar and logistics facilities that you see there, that's fixed construction.
• We have aviation hangar construction in Lakeland at Lakeland Linder.
• Highway construction and maintenance is at $4.9 billion.

Summary: The committee met to hear the Governor’s proposed budget for the Transportation, Tourism, and Economic Development silo and to consider one bill. The Governor’s Office outlined a $117.4 billion state budget, including $18.3 billion for the TED area, with major allocations for the Department of Transportation, Commerce, Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, State, Military Affairs, Emergency Management, and the Florida State Guard. Agency heads then presented their priorities, including housing and disaster recovery funds at Commerce; pay, vehicles, aviation, and data systems at Highway Safety; facility modernization, recruitment, retention, and maintenance at Military Affairs; election audit, conservation lab, and historic preservation funding at State; transportation, aviation, seaport, and safety investments at DOT; and emergency response, flood mitigation, grant systems, and alerting at Emergency Management. Members asked questions about Visit Florida’s private match, FHP’s role in immigration enforcement and body cameras, National Guard deployment tempo and staffing, State Guard staffing and facilities, arts grant rules, rail funding, and the number of detainees at the Everglades detention site. Several notable positions were expressed during questioning. Visit Florida said it met and exceeded its private match requirement and described the match as important to ensuring value from public dollars. The Highway Patrol said its aviation assets have been used more heavily in immigration enforcement and that in-vehicle camera systems were a higher priority than body cameras at present. The National Guard and State Guard both emphasized heavy operational demands, readiness needs, and the importance of additional funding for facilities, personnel, and equipment. The Department of State said its audit funding would help counties move to automated post-election audits and that its arts grant rule changes were intended to create more consistent scoring rather than reduce access. The committee then took up CS/SB 48 on accessory dwelling units. The bill requires local governments to allow property owners to voluntarily create ADUs, preserves homestead treatment for the primary residence portion, limits parking restrictions, and extends density bonus incentives to housing for military families receiving basic housing allowance. An amendment was adopted removing reusable tenant screening reports and clarifying that compliant ADUs are allowed by right without a separate hearing or permit. Testimony from the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association supported the bill, especially the long-term rental requirement, as a tool to help workforce housing. The committee reported the bill favorably by a roll call vote, and then adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• For construction and operating permits.
• In fact, EPA projections were 40%. Mr.
• In the state, there are a total of 25 acid gas disposal projects.
• You actually really want to involve everybody in the project.
• You're not going to have a project. Okay, when you, Representative Dixon, Dr.

Transcript Highlights:

• Also, with Notice Tremble or Unity Construct, so we're able to look at not only the fund level and project
• status report, are going to move together so we can see active projects and then future projects and
• So, as you'll note, there may be projects that are still actively in construction or other phases, but
• We project to bring.
• on projects that.

Transcript Highlights:

• That was directing the department to consolidate four existing projects into a single project as part
• We would be taking our terminal construction for ferries and the vessel construction sub-programs and
• So while you're—so the terminal projects, are those the main projects that you're consolidating?
• It's a sub-program for both the terminal construction and the vessel construction.
• The project support for both of those.

Keywords: 904, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The revenue from one of these projects would almost double that, or one of the projects you can see in
• holder of that project.
• project.
• So, two different potential projects that would represent a very large scale... ...projects that would
• This would not include a project such as the JetX project.

Summary: The committee met at the Coteau Freedom Mine in Mercer County, approved the June 2 minutes, and heard an overview of the mine from Coteau Properties president Andrew Hawbaker. He described the Freedom Mine as the largest lignite mine in the United States, supplying coal to Dakota Gasification, Antelope Valley Station, and Leland Olds Station. He emphasized the mine’s scale, safety record, reclamation work, workforce needs, community involvement, and economic impact, including payroll, taxes, royalties, scholarships, and local hiring. Members asked about how long land stays in production, how quickly it returns to agriculture after reclamation, labor shortages, and how mining affects groundwater and water wells. Hawbaker said most tracts are mined for about three to five years, reclamation is coordinated with landowners, and the company continues to struggle to find electricians, welders, mechanics, operators, and engineers. The committee then heard from Public Service Commission Chairman Randy Christman on coal mining reclamation and permitting. He reviewed North Dakota’s coal mining history, the state’s reclamation laws, federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act primacy, bonding, permit renewals and revisions, prohibited mining areas, inspection and enforcement, and contemporaneous reclamation requirements. Christman stressed that North Dakota’s program is professional and thorough, with frequent inspections, financial assurance, and a 10-year revegetation monitoring period before bond release. He also discussed federal coal ownership issues that can delay mine plans, the treatment of prime farmland, and how reclamation differs for wind and pipelines. In response to questions, he said one challenge is sometimes releasing land too soon before long-term compaction issues are fully understood, and he noted that data centers do not currently have a comparable reclamation model because they typically own the land. In the afternoon, the committee received an update from Lignite Energy Council president Jonathan Fortner on the lignite industry. He said North Dakota’s lignite sector supports five commercial power plants, four mines, about 12,000 direct and indirect jobs, and more than $5.5 billion in economic activity, while helping keep the state’s electricity rates among the lowest in the nation. Fortner reviewed coal severance and conversion tax revenues, the lignite research fund, federal regulatory rollbacks, carbon capture policy, and the industry’s legal costs fighting federal rules. He also highlighted a study on large-load development, saying new data centers and critical mineral processing facilities could create major local tax revenue and help justify new baseload generation. Members asked whether new gas pipelines would crowd out coal plant development and whether the economic study included jobs and broader local impacts; Fortner said the industry sees room for both and that the study did include construction, operations, jobs, and tax effects.

Transcript Highlights:

• This project is to construct three new communication facilities. to replace the Red Mountain facility
• of projects supporting children and youth experiencing homelessness.
• Hello, my name is Jay Cole. born, also from California Appellate Project.
• I am the executive director of Project Sister Family Service.
• We are another appellate project.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Bills: SB27, SB8, SB15, SB30, SB268, SB568, SB650, SB1405, SB1540, SB1610, SB1637, SB1660, SB2024, SB2217, SB2308, SB2753, SB2878, SB2900, SB2972, SB3059, HB4, HB40, HB46, HB119, HB145, HB493, HB705, HB1545, HB2017, HB2516, HB2885, HB2963, HB2974, HB3642, HB3909, HB5138, HB5246, SJR36, SJR50, SJR63, SCR12, SCR39, SB2023, SB62, SB666, SB847, SB284, SB854, SB810, SB1505, SB583, SB507, SB1434, SB1772, SB2016, SB1122, SB731, SB397, SB508, SB1436, SB287, SB1882, SB393, SB1791, SB209, SB2429, SB1085, SB1975, SB2717, SB1262, SB636, SB2056, SB884, SB1200, SB1845, SB2458, SB801, SB3014, SB3013, SB758, SB2797, SB2076, SB2876, SB1640, SB1449, SB1181, SB1234, SB2926, SB2841, SB1528, SB1854, SB317, SB1250, SB2082, SB1237, SB2819, SB629, SB2608, SB1602, SB2009, SB867, SB640, SB1698, SB2680, SB913, SB1071, SB1086, SB1087, SB1483, SB1444, SB1553, SB1556, SB1703, SB2133, SB2297, SB2298, SB2622, SB2955, SB2334, SB1367, SB2044, SB2363, SB2565, SB1888, SB3036, SB3057, SB3043, SB3063, SB3035, SB203, SB2688, SB2522, SB2459, SB2655, SB2251, SB1884, SB2928, SB2566, SB2549, SB2553, SB2919, SB1944, SB1232, SB1798, SB2603, SB2607, SB2683, SB1319, SB3045, SB3071, HB796, HB1523, HB5294, HB748, HB3395, HB180, HB3171, HB146, HB5596, HB5694, HB1135, HB3225, HB186, HB1449, HB3793, HB112, HB104, HB3336, HB3520, HB3320, HB5663, HB2399, HB111, HB3483, HB4580, HB3748, HB632, HB4730, HB5690, HB5689, HB3385, HB4359, HB5381, HB123, HB5606, HB1057, HB3664, HCR141, HCR40, HCR59

Keywords: immigration enforcement, ICE agreements, sheriff grants, law enforcement, county jail, federal immigration law, SB 15, Texas Local Government Code, zoning preemption, housing affordability, small lots, lot size, lot density, single-family zoning, residential subdivision, municipal land use, local control, state preemption, parking requirements, setbacks