Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:12.080> So<00:25:12.880> again,<00:25:13.760> working<00:25:14.000>
• > two<00:25:17.840> two<00:25:18.159> units<00:25:18.400> on<00:25:18.720
• <00:25:20.880> against<00:25:21.360> them<00:25:21.919> and<00:25:22.159>
• :22.720> get<00:25:22.880> back<00:25:23.039> to<00:25:23.200> the<00:25:
• <00:25:26.400> get<00:25:26.880> I<00:25:27.120> did<00:25:27.440> when

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee began with routine business, including the Pledge of Allegiance, approval of the minutes, seating of an alternate member, and approval of the consent agenda. It then took up Department of Health and Human Services Rule 25188 on New Hampshire Early Childhood and Out-of-School Time Credentials. Staff explained that the rule adopts two new parts to implement RSA 170E:50, which had long required rules. The main issue was an unclear comment created by changes in the department’s amended conditional approval request: language defining out-of-school-time basics and a requirement tied to the New Hampshire Professional Registry training transcript had been removed, creating a mismatch between the form and the rule text. The department said it revised the language so the form and rule now match. A member also asked about the fee schedule, and the department said the fees are sufficient and supported in part by federal funds. The committee then approved Rule 25188 as amended, with oral edits, on a voice vote. The committee next considered Department of Environmental Services Rule 25206, dealing with subsurface wastewater rules and an administrative fine schedule. Staff said most comments had been addressed, but one remaining issue concerned the fine schedule because the prior interim rule had expired years ago. Staff also noted public concerns about septic tank replacement sizes, but pointed to waiver provisions and replacement-in-kind language that would still allow smaller existing systems to be replaced under certain conditions. DES officials explained that the rule package adds the fine schedule into the program rules and that no fines have been brought under these expired provisions for many years. They also described the waiver and grandfathering provisions as intended to protect existing systems and seasonal campgrounds from unnecessary upgrades. A public witness, Christopher Albert, testified that two sections of the rule would harm manufactured home parks and cooperatives. He argued that the new “two people per bedroom” assumption and the minimum bedroom threshold for using water-meter data would inflate design flows, make water-meter data unusable, and increase costs for low-income residents. Committee members questioned both the witness and the agency about the assumptions. DES staff responded that the two-person-per-bedroom standard is meant for individual on-site system design, not citywide planning, and that water-meter data is only useful in larger or unusual facilities. They said the rule still allows flexibility through waivers and grandfathering for existing uses, and that the drinking-water rule cited by the witness was not the correct comparison. No final vote on Rule 25206 was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:51.039> This<00:25:51.200> is<00:25:51.279> on<00:25:51.600> 65.
• :25:20.800> of<01:25:21.120> the<01:25:21.280> se<01:25:21.600> of<01:25:
• projects and state building projects. projects and state building projects.
• Um those are kind of the kinds of<02:25:01.280> projects<02:25:01.600> that<02:25:01.760
• <02:25:03.280> This of projects that they take on. This of projects that they take on.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:16.799> But<00:25:17.120> in<00:25:17.440> 2017,<00:25:18.799> the
• athletes<00:25:26.960> and<00:25:27.279> guests<00:25:28.080> in<00:25:28.400><
• > Kentucky<00:25:30.240> Horse<00:25:30.559> Park<00:25:30.960> all<00:25
• Um Lee<00:25:36.080> Carter<00:25:36.880> uh<00:25:37.120> brought<00:25:37.360>
• <00:25:58.000> And<00:25:58.240> so,<00:25:58.799> um,<00:25:58.960> I'd<

Keywords: Cabinet for Economic Development – Bluegrass State Skills Corporation Overview 02:35 ----Discussion of BR 868, 2026 Regular Session 24:08, 958, all

Summary: The meeting began with a quorum call and approval of the August 21 minutes. The main presentation was from the Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development on the Bluegrass State Skills Corporation (BSSC), which was created in 1984 and is administratively tied to the cabinet. Staff explained that BSSC supports workforce training for companies in Kentucky through two main programs: the grant-in-aid reimbursement program and the skills training investment tax credit. They also described the board’s structure, quarterly meetings, annual audit, and the metropolitan tax credit tied to UPS in Louisville, along with public-private training consortia supported by the program. The cabinet outlined eligibility and funding rules: applicants must be qualified companies, trainees must be full-time Kentucky residents meeting wage requirements, and eligible training includes in-house company-specific training, train-the-trainer efforts, safety/OSHA training, and outside training through KCTCS or other providers. Grant-in-aid is a 50% reimbursement program capped at $75,000 per company per fiscal year and $2,000 per trainee, while the tax credit is capped annually and is awarded on a first-come, first-served basis. Applications are scored based on county tier, wages, workforce development activity, veteran hiring, participation in consortia, and job growth. Members asked for data on trainees and industries served, and staff said they could provide it. They also discussed coordination with other workforce programs, especially KCTCS and the state’s TRAIN program, to avoid overlap and double dipping. Several members asked about program usage and differences between fiscal years. Staff said the tax credit is less popular because it is not refundable and requires tax liability, while grant-in-aid is more attractive because it is cash reimbursement. They said lower or delayed spending in some years can reflect one-year training windows, reimbursement lag, new facilities ramping up, consortia activity, and special allocations such as those tied to Ford facilities. Questions also covered support for new businesses, which staff said can receive favorable scoring for new jobs and may have funds set aside for new location projects. On veterans, staff said they connect companies to Kentucky Valor and other resources, but the program does not track veteran retention outcomes. The final discussion was on a draft bill related to the Kentucky Horse Park and the U.S. Center for SafeSport. Representative Vanessa Gracel and Kentucky Horse Park President Lee Carter explained that the proposal is intended to help the park maintain integrity and protect athletes, volunteers, coaches, trainers, and guests from abuse and misconduct. They described SafeSport’s federal role in Olympic and Paralympic sports and said they hope to move the draft forward as legislation in 2026. No votes were taken on the BSSC presentation or the horse park discussion.

Transcript Highlights:

• They're a<00:25:14.320> big<00:25:14.480> part<00:25:14.640> of<00:25:15.360>
• um<00:25:15.679> what<00:25:16.000> sale<00:25:16.320> tax<00:25:16.640>
• <00:25:22.559> Uh<00:25:23.200> really<00:25:23.520> appreciate<00:25:23.919
• Exactly.<00:25:25.039> With<00:25:25.279> that<00:25:25.520> being<00:25:25.760>
• Could you<00:25:31.360> guys<00:25:32.080> get<00:25:32.320> us<00:25:32.640>

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I mean, we can talk about projections to some degree, and there's an AON slide that has some projections
• <00:08:58.399> to know, we can talk about projections to know, we can talk about projections
• meal program in state fiscal year uh 25 meal program in state fiscal year uh 25 and<00:42:57.760
• <00:48:57.920> Um projections were pretty accurate. Um projections were pretty accurate.
• May of 25. May of 25.

Keywords: Meeting Start 00:00:00 State Health Insurance Plans 00:00:03 Executive Branch Salary Schedule Adjustments 00:29:15 Nutrition Program for the Elderly 00:34:52 Update on DORIS 01:05:38, 958, all

Summary: The committee met on November 5, 2025, and first approved the minutes after a moment of silence for the UPS airport tragedy. The main presentation was from the Personnel Cabinet on the state health insurance plans and executive branch salary schedule adjustments. Officials said the health plan covers roughly 265,000 active members and up to about 300,000 across all benefit offerings, including school board employees, retirees, and other eligible groups. They described rising claims and expenditures, especially from high-cost claimants and pharmacy spending, and said recent premium and benefit changes were intended to balance costs while preserving recruitment and retention efforts. They also explained that employee premiums had not increased for several years, while employer contributions rose sharply in recent years, and projected a 10% employer increase and 3% employee increase going forward based on actuarial analysis. Committee members asked about deductibles, GLP-1 drug costs, claims validation, and the causes of cost growth; officials said the plan uses multiple payment-integrity vendors and that the increases reflect utilization, drug trends, and high-cost cases rather than a change in coverage. The committee also discussed executive branch salary schedule adjustments. Personnel and budget officials explained that when the legislature approves annual pay increases, the salary schedule is adjusted by the same percentage through executive order so the minimum and midpoint stay aligned with approved compensation levels. They said the 2025 adjustment was a 3% match effective September 16 and that the change was costless because salaries had already been increased. Members raised concerns about salary compression, noting that new hires can sometimes be paid near the level of long-serving employees. Officials said the adjustment helps prevent compression from worsening but does not solve it, and they acknowledged prior RFP efforts to address the issue were unsuccessful because no qualified bidder met the requirements. After the health plan and salary discussions, the committee began a presentation from the Cabinet for Health and Family Services on Kentucky’s senior meal program. Secretary Stack explained that the program is a federal-state-local partnership under the Older Americans Act, with area development districts helping deliver services. He outlined eligibility rules, noting that congregate meals at senior centers are available to people age 60 and older, with a spouse of any age allowed to join, and that home-delivered meals have additional homebound and assistance requirements. Members asked whether there was any means test for congregate meals, and the secretary said there is not; the only threshold is age for the center-based meals, while the home-delivered program has additional criteria.

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:14.799> Farmers<00:25:15.120> can<00:25:15.279> grow<00:25:15.440>
• <00:25:16.400> same<00:25:16.559> year<00:25:16.799> such<00:25:16.960> as
• <00:25:23.360> By<00:25:23.600> growing<00:25:23.840> over<00:25:23.919>
• ><00:25:28.240> cover<00:25:28.400> the<00:25:28.559> soil<00:25:28.799> and<
• Second,<00:25:32.880> they<00:25:33.039> flower<00:25:33.360> early<00:25:33.520

Bills: HF1669, HF4709, HF3531, HF4048

Keywords: tax credits, sustainable aviation fuel, environmental policy, corporate franchise, Minnesota taxation, electricity generation, property tax exemption, renewable energy, incentives, economic development, fuel delivery, tax exemption, retail transactions, diesel exhaust fluid, fuel lubricants, healthcare tax, gross receipts tax, hospitals, chiropractors, healthcare providers

Transcript Highlights:

• > bit<01:25:14.639> I<01:25:14.760> think<01:25:15.080> we<01:25:15.199><
• > Minnesota<01:25:17.000> I<01:25:17.119> also<01:25:17.360> thank<01:25:
• 20.199> both<01:25:20.360> of<01:25:20.520> you<01:25:21.040> that<01:25:
• and<01:25:25.400> how<01:25:25.560> do<01:25:25.679> we<01:25:25.920>
• :25:27.719> will<01:25:27.880> share<01:25:28.159> with<01:25:28.320> my<

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <00:25:04.279> proposed<00:25:04.799> project<00:25:05.159> that<00:25:05.279
• > would facility a proposed project that would facility a proposed project that would be<00:25
• :05.559> based<00:25:05.880> within<00:25:06.120> 20<00:25:06.520> minutes
• <00:25:13.440> the<00:25:13.600> backbone<00:25:14.120> of<00:25:14.240>
• ><00:25:18.559> Air<00:25:18.799> Force<00:25:19.799> while<00:25:20.039> the

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• :47.200> was<00:25:47.440> on<00:25:47.600> the<00:25:47.760> same<00:25:
• /c><00:25:51.679> the<00:25:51.840> site<00:25:52.000> and<00:25:52.400> and<
• <00:25:55.120> And<00:25:55.200> now<00:25:55.440> the<00:25:55.600> DOE<
• > uh<01:25:53.679> projects P3s uh may not complete any uh projects P3s uh may not complete
• any uh projects on<01:25:54.239> land<01:25:54.560> that's<01:25:54.800> owned<

Keywords: 910, house, all

Summary: The committee on Education met on March 19 and moved through several bills under time pressure, hearing mostly brief testimony. SB 2024 SD2 and SB 896 SD2, both concerning public-private partnerships for charter school facilities, drew support from the Department of Education, the Charter School Commission, White Kids Can, and Hawaii Technology Academy. DOE said any P3 model should apply only to charter schools on private land and not affect public schools on DOE land. Supporters argued the approach could speed construction, reduce costs, and keep public money in public assets, while UPW and HGA raised concerns about privatization. In response, SFA said the intent was to mirror the existing conversion charter school model, with public ownership of assets and unionized staff, and noted some regions have waited years for schools. SB 2613 SD1 on TMK transfers was heard next. DOE said the bill had originally been supported as part of the governor’s package but was amended to require DOE to convey lands for 13 libraries on DOE property, which DOE said would create “donut holes” in campuses and was unnecessary because existing agreements already govern library use. The State Public Library System supported the bill, saying it has long coexisted with DOE but needs clearer separation and more reliable control over its sites. The Attorney General’s office said the library system currently lacks express statutory authority to own real property and flagged implementation issues because some of the affected parcels are not currently owned by DOE. Committee members questioned both sides about current agreements, communication, and how the bill would change operations. SB 494 SD2, concerning charter school audits, received comments from the Charter School Commission, which said the bill was redundant because charter schools already undergo annual audits during the term of their contracts. The Office of the Auditor was also present. SB 2391 SD2, relating to automatic pay increases for teachers, drew strong opposition from the Office of Collective Bargaining, which said step movement and longevity increases are negotiated in each contract and do not automatically carry over when a contract expires; it warned the bill could affect upcoming negotiations with HSTA. HSTA and several other supporters argued the bill would standardize annual step movement, improve retention, and reflect existing contract language. No votes or final actions were taken in the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• > see<00:25:02.720> that<00:25:02.960> as<00:25:03.120> a<00:25:03.279>
• Uh,<00:25:08.240> I<00:25:08.480> will<00:25:08.640> say<00:25:08.880> that
• <00:25:11.679> that's<00:25:12.000> phrased,<00:25:12.480> no,<00:25:12.720>
• <00:25:17.840> I<00:25:18.080> will<00:25:18.320> say<00:25:18.480> that<
• We do<00:25:27.279> advise<00:25:28.720> there<00:25:28.960> is<00:25:29.120>

Keywords: 958, all

Summary: The committee first established a quorum, approved the minutes from the November 10 meeting, and then approved a large agenda of contracts and related items, with the total agenda amount stated as $359,638,393.88. Most items were approved without objection, but two contracts were pulled for discussion: attorney general panel counsel contingency fee contracts and a Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission personal services contract. For the attorney general’s office, Chris Lewis explained that the contracts were panel counsel contingency fee agreements, with 14 qualified awards from 16 applicants. He said the contracts were contingency-based, so no money would be paid unless cases were successful, and that the fee structure worked out to roughly 5% under the statutory waterfall. Senators asked about the size of the contracts, whether the terms were uniform, why no Kentucky firms were among the awardees, and how the public should understand the large dollar figures. Lewis said one Kentucky firm applied but was disqualified for a late submission, other Kentucky firms had inquired but did not apply, and local firms could still work with national firms on cases. The committee then approved the contracts. The Kentucky Legislative Ethics Commission contract drew more extensive questioning. Commission representatives said they had previously had a contract disapproved because the proper process was not followed, so they used an RFI process posted on the state and commission websites for at least three weeks. They received one applicant, a Kentucky firm, and set the rate at $125 per hour. Members questioned whether the commission was acting beyond its ethics mission, whether staff were helping draft complaints against legislators, and whether the commission was taking on a prosecutorial or human-resources role. The commission said its role is limited to enforcing the legislative code of ethics, providing advisory guidance, and following the formal complaint process; it does not pursue matters outside that code. Members also raised concerns about the earlier procurement misstep and the commission’s credibility, and the commission apologized, said it had corrected the process, and pledged to comply going forward. The committee then approved the contract.

Transcript Highlights:

• This<00:25:30.000> statute<00:25:30.480> was<00:25:30.640> amended<00:25:31.120>
• c><00:25:32.960> of<00:25:33.200> 2024<00:25:33.919> to<00:25:34.159> change<
• 25:13.600> now<01:25:14.400> and<01:25:14.639> you<01:25:14.800> pay<01:25
• Some projects, you know, a 25, 80% increase in the amount of energy that we're going to need.
• Some some project you<01:33:44.800> know<01:33:45.120> 25<01:33:45.920> 80%<01:33

Keywords: This meeting was split into two parts due to a technical issue. This is the complete meeting pulled from backups. Meeting Start: 00:00:00 Roll Call: 00:00:01 24RS HB198: “Angela’s Law”: 00:01:22 KRS Chapter 202C: 00:11:50 Eminent Domain: 00:54:35, 958, all

Summary: The committee first approved the June 10, 2025 minutes, then took up House Bill 198, Angela’s Law, sponsored by Representative Samara Heavrin. The bill would add a new aggravating circumstance in death-penalty cases when an offender abuses the corpse of a kidnapping or murder victim by engaging in deviate sexual intercourse, sexual intercourse, or sexual contact. Representative Heavrin and the victim’s parents described the underlying case and argued the current law does not adequately account for postmortem sexual abuse, leaving the offender parole-eligible despite the family’s view that the conduct warranted harsher punishment. Several members expressed sympathy and support, and one member suggested the proposal should be drafted carefully so it would apply broadly enough to cover co-conspirators or multiple offenders. No vote on the bill was taken in the portion provided. The committee then heard an informational presentation on KRS Chapter 202C from Judge Lisa Payne Jones and Shauna Mitchell of the Kentucky Judicial Commission on Mental Health. They explained that Chapter 202C, enacted in 2021 to close a gap in the civil-commitment statutes, applies to respondents found incompetent to stand trial who are charged with qualifying serious offenses such as capital offenses, certain Class A and Class B felonies causing death or serious injury, rape in the first degree, or sodomy in the first degree. The process begins with a Commonwealth’s petition, followed by a prompt evidentiary hearing, appointment of a guardian ad litem, and then a commitment hearing if the offense is proven. The presenters outlined the procedural standards and recent statutory changes. At the evidentiary hearing, the Commonwealth must prove the charged offense by a preponderance of the evidence before a judge, with the respondent able to present defenses; if the Commonwealth fails, the respondent must be released. If the case proceeds, the commitment hearing requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of at least one involuntary-commitment criterion, and the hearing may be before a jury if requested. They noted that a 2024 amendment changed the commitment criteria from requiring all four factors to only one, and added language about recent criminal behavior and prior involuntary hospitalizations under Chapters 202A or 202B. If commitment is ordered, the respondent is placed in a designated forensic psychiatric facility, currently KCPC.

Transcript Highlights:

• and while we<00:25:03.120> are<00:25:03.240> affiliated<00:25:03.720> with<00:25
• So, uh<00:25:17.320> we<00:25:17.480> also<00:25:17.800> have<00:25:18.000> got
• <00:25:27.280> Vice<00:25:27.560> Chair,<00:25:27.800> Chairman,<00:25:28.560
• <00:25:30.480> we<00:25:30.640> support<00:25:31.120> the<00:25:31.200> intent
• Our<00:25:34.360> concern<00:25:34.920> is<00:25:35.120> how<00:25:35.360> this

Keywords: 958, all

Transcript Highlights:

• <01:25:12.360> if<01:25:12.520> we<01:25:12.719> use<01:25:13.040> the<01
• > I<01:25:25.960> I<01:25:26.080> had<01:25:26.280> someone<01:25:26.560>
• <01:25:33.040> have<01:25:33.199> one<01:25:33.400> employee<01:25:34.040>
• > do<01:25:36.520> that<01:25:37.040> but<01:25:37.239> I<01:25:37.320>
• 01:25:41.600> I<01:25:42.040> I<01:25:42.159> hopefully<01:25:42.480> we'll

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• those prediction as far as completing those projects<00:25:16.080> if<00:25:16.240> if<
• :25:17.760> your projects if if it does fall in your projects if if it does fall in your folks
• projecting<00:25:37.760> it's<00:25:38.000> going<00:25:38.080> to<00:25:38.240
• > stay<00:25:38.799> in<00:25:39.039> the<00:25:39.120> DOE projecting it's
• projects out. projects out.

Bills: HB2185, HB2621, HB2179, HB2534, HB2168, HB2427, HB2560, HB2565, HB2172, HB2298, HB2304

Keywords: sports officials, referees, umpires, athletic directors, school administrators, league administrators, coaches, assault, first-degree assault, substantial bodily injury, temporary restraining order, TRO, private counsel, Department of Education, DOE, sports safety, school sports, amateur athletics, professional sports, public schools

Transcript Highlights:

• . project. project.
• We<00:25:01.200> are<00:25:01.360> concerned<00:25:01.600> that<00:25:01.840>
• not meet the constitutional ownership requirements<00:25:05.200> for<00:25:05.520> projects
• <00:25:05.840> that<00:25:06.080> receive requirements for projects that receive requirements
• for projects that receive state<00:25:07.000> bonds.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• In<00:25:22.960> doing<00:25:23.279> so,<00:25:24.640> it<00:25:24.960> does<
• /c><00:25:25.120> move<00:25:25.440> KCNA<00:25:26.240> out<00:25:26.480> of<
• There<00:25:34.720> are<00:25:35.279> uh<00:25:35.440> several<00:25:35.840>
• :25:39.120> to<00:25:39.279> House<00:25:39.520> Bill<00:25:40.000> 314.
• The<00:25:42.400> first<00:25:42.640> one<00:25:43.039> that<00:25:43.520> it

Keywords: HB 66 (discussion only) -- 00:05:33 Consideration of HB 213 -- 00:12:16 Consideration of HB 314 -- 00:22:11, 958, all

Summary: The House State Government Committee opened its first meeting of the year with prayer, the pledge, a roll call, and a reminder of committee procedures, including sign-up rules for public testimony, decorum expectations, and recognition of staff. The chair noted the committee had a quorum and outlined the day’s agenda, which included three bills. Representative Hodgson presented House Bill 66 for discussion only, explaining that it would distinguish between boards and commissions that can meet entirely electronically and larger public agencies that should have a quorum physically present unless there is an emergency. He said the bill also aimed to require agencies to post member information and contact details online so the public can provide feedback. Representative Tipton asked whether the bill would apply to state and local bodies, and Hodgson said it would; no vote was taken on HB 66. The committee then considered House Bill 213, sponsored by Representative Emily Callaway, on reemployment of retired police officers. A committee substitute was adopted unanimously. Callaway said the bill would reduce barriers to rehiring retired law enforcement officers, allow local agencies and universities to offer health benefits in lieu of retirement benefits, lower the service threshold for this specific rehiring from 20 years to 15 years, and give agencies flexibility on retirement contributions. She emphasized that the bill would not allow double dipping and had no quantified fiscal impact. Members raised a question about review by the Public Pension Oversight Board; Callaway said that had not yet occurred, and the chair noted the committee’s practice that pension-related bills are typically reviewed by that board first. Despite that concern, the committee voted 16-2 to report HB 213 favorably, with two members passing. Finally, the committee took up House Bill 314, relating to the Kentucky Communications Network Authority and declaring an emergency. After adopting a committee substitute, Representative Matt Lockett said the bill was intended to reorganize oversight of Kentucky Wired by moving KCNA into the Finance and Administration Cabinet under the Commonwealth Office of Technology, abolishing KCNA’s separate executive director, transferring KCNA functions and records to COOT, and restructuring the board with new members and two governor appointments from lists submitted by KACo and KLC. He said the measure was meant to provide stronger oversight and more direct control over the project, and that the emergency clause was needed because of budget implications. Members asked for clarification on the differences between committee substitutes, and Lockett said one prior substitute removed the attorney general from the board at his request, while the current one added the governor’s appointments. He also said a floor amendment would strike language related to a nonprofit board associated with Kentucky Wired. The transcript ends during discussion of HB 314, before any final vote is shown.

Transcript Highlights:

• Another way of expressing that is how... ...much the pie has grown over FY 25, and we are projecting
• For appropriations for FY 25, we're projecting reserves to be at approximately $4 billion, or 38.4%.
• The bottom of the slide indicates the general fund reserves projections for both FY 24 and FY 25.
• So, if revenue projections hold true to current projections, how much revenue will be deferred to revenue
• loading up the water project fund with $222 million, essentially supplementing the amount of projects

Transcript Highlights:

• c> ongoing So, that's the existing ongoing So, that's the existing ongoing projects.<00:25:27.240
• > So,<00:25:27.320> they're<00:25:27.480> projects<00:25:27.960> that<00:
• 25:28.160> have projects.
• So, they're projects that have previously<00:25:29.120> been<00:25:29.360> funded<00:25
• :25:39.400> 7,<00:25:40.360> 8,<00:25:41.040> 9,<00:25:41.720> 10,<00:25:

Keywords: 927, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• /c><00:25:40.360> the<00:25:40.480> committee<00:25:40.880> I<00:25:41.200> I
• > to<00:25:41.559> offer<00:25:41.840> just<00:25:42.000> a<00:25:42.120>
• It is 23% of our projected revenues today, down slightly from 25% more recently.
• It is 23% of our projected revenues today, down slightly from 25% more recently.
• It is 23% of our projected revenues today, down slightly from 25% more recently.

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Other needs assistance we have a 25% cost share.
• It includes project management fees and BI.
• That was in fiscal year 25.
• So we we take we've taken on that IT project.
• It's got some projects that three projects.

Keywords: 914, all