Video & Transcript Research : 'Penal Code 30.07'
Page 95 of 461
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Plan that is currently required under Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code.
- In other words, as an example, most cities are now adopting the 2021 plumbing code.
- The code does require lower flush toilets and certain kinds of applications.
- We don't really want to give incentives for developers just to meet code.
- There is, in the local government code right now, every municipality is required to conduct an audit
Bills:
HB158, HB714, HB 1198, HB1630, HB1998, HB3509, HB3788, HB3875, HB3948, HB3977, HB4097, HB4313, HB4314, HB4317, HB158
Keywords:
housing, veterans, surplus government property, affordable housing, funding sources, housing assistance, homeless prevention, landlord incentives, rural housing, domestic violence, community development, tenant readiness, program participants, financial assistance, homelessness, rental support, Texas Tenant Readiness Program, tenant assistance, housing stability, Texas Department of Housing
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Section 3 of the Transportation Code, which was added in 2017, already prohibits the use of state money
- save money in any way they can in a time of high inflation, House Bill 2262 amends the transportation code
- 2002 as a coordinated transportation authority for the county under Chapter 460 of the Transportation Code
- HB905 amends the transportation code to prohibit any toll. project entity, including the Texas Department
Bills:
HJR58, HJR63, HB263, HB542, HB905, HB 1288, HB1402, HB2003, HB2262, HB2323, HB2429, HB2876, HB3019, HB263
Keywords:
healthcare, insurance, elderly, retirement, benefits, transit-oriented projects, constitutional amendment, state highway fund, funding allocation, voter approval, highway fund, funding, public transportation, transit projects, transportation, local transit, fund allocation, voting rights, election integrity, ballot access
AL
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm saying let's not penalize our young people because you arrested them.
- Senator Figus carried it for me last year, and it's just to amend the code with regards to human trafficking
Keywords:
hospital liens, medical billing, government healthcare, insurance claims, patient rights, blood tests, DUI, law enforcement, traffic offenses, chemical analysis, public nuisance, event liability, local government, community health, legal action, transparency, reporting, public safety, regulation, accountability
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- <01:29:47.840>
If included in the motor vehicle code. - If included in the motor vehicle code.
- , you can put in the motor vehicle code, you can put in the motor vehicle code, we<01:29:50.159><
- Um,<01:29:55.280>
penalizing <01:29:56.000>someone <01:29:56.320>for <01:29:56.560 - >
that <01:29:56.719>very Um, penalizing someone for that very Um, penalizing someone for
US
US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session
US House Floor Proceedings (Friday, September 19, 2025)
US Federal House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It's the big ugly bill that is going to penalize middle-class Americans.
- It's the big ugly bill that is going to penalize middle-class Americans.
- It's the big ugly bill that is going to penalize middle-class Americans.
- It's the big ugly bill that is going to penalize middle-class Americans.
- It's the big ugly bill that is going to penalize middle-class Americans.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Children and Family Law (01/28/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- It penalized everybody that pays child support because they can't claim the exemption anymore, because
- It penalized everybody that pays child support because they can't claim the exemption anymore, because
- It penalized everybody that pays child support because they can't claim the exemption anymore, because
- It penalized everybody that pays child support because they can't claim the exemption anymore, because
- All right, well, you may continue, and I'm not penalizing you for my speaking. Go ahead.
Summary:
The House Children and Family Law Committee met on January 28, 2025, and first heard House Bill 322, which would give a parent paying child support the exclusive right to claim the child as a dependent on taxes. Representative Barton, the sponsor, argued that because child support is no longer tax-deductible, the paying parent should at least receive the child tax credit. Committee members and later testimony from New Hampshire Legal Assistance raised concerns that the bill would override court discretion, could disadvantage low-income custodial parents, and would not account for cases where child support payments are small or where parents share support unevenly. Several members noted that judges already allocate dependency claims in divorce orders and can modify those orders when circumstances change.
After testimony, the committee moved to ITL (inexpedient to legislate) HB 322. The motion was seconded, discussion continued, and the roll call was unanimous in favor of ITL. The committee then placed the bill on consent and ended the executive session on HB 322.
The committee next took up House Bill 325, which would eliminate term and reimbursement alimony in no-fault divorces. Representative Barton testified that alimony in those cases was akin to involuntary servitude and should not survive dissolution of the marriage contract. The hearing then moved into questions about whether alimony is meant to compensate a spouse for sacrifices made during the marriage, such as supporting a partner through school or staying home with children, and the sponsor maintained that post-divorce support should not continue as a marital obligation. The transcript cuts off before any vote or further action on HB 325 is shown.
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
House - Agriculture, Acequias And Water Resources Jan 29th, 2026 at 09:07 am
House Agriculture, Acequias And Water Resources
Transcript Highlights:
- This bill is written into our tax code, as in most of our water conservation laws are not in our tax
- code, so it is a designation that will at least help property owners maintain their current status if
- maintain Mesilla's story as an ag community in their zoning laws, in their administration of town code
- None of that is in the tax code, and I think it's something that we have—it has been brought to this
- We have to look at this whole—we have to just open up the tax code and look at this again, and then be
TX
Texas 89th 2nd C.S.
Texas Ethics Commission Dec 10th, 2025 at 09:12 am
Transcript Highlights:
- The opinion also to examine the application of Penal Code 3607A, which concludes that the.
- Of course most state officers are required to file a PFS under chapter 572 of the government code and
- requester in this case to file a PFS with the TEC comes from Chapter 335 of the local government. code
- Section 572016. of the government code is very clear as the requester participated in the solicitation
- employment. constitutes an appearance before that state agency for the purposes of Texas Government Code
Keywords:
Texas Ethics Commission, HB18, SB12, political contributions, civil penalties, Attorney General, criminal election offenses, legislation
Summary:
In the latest meeting of the Texas Ethics Commission, significant discussions centered around newly passed legislation, specifically HB18 and SB12. HB18 introduces a civil penalty for members who accept political contributions while absent from the state, addressing potential obstructions to legislative actions. Senators and commissioners engaged in an in-depth dialogue about the implications of this bill, with many expressing concerns regarding enforcement and compliance. In contrast, SB12 expands the jurisdiction of the Attorney General to prosecute criminal election offenses, further tightening the oversight of election activities. The meeting concluded with acknowledgement of the efforts put forth by previous commission chairs, highlighting their contributions to the commission's success.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Federal code. Right?
- Federal Code. Right?
- Federal Code. Right?
- They're limited on codes and such.
- Again, there are codes, but they're mostly local jurisdictional codes except when you get out into the
Bills:
SB 1
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- These proposed cuts jeopardize success stories like Casey and unfairly penalize families who exercise
- In closing, I strongly urge members to protect these vital services and not penalize families purely
- families purely based and not penalize families purely based on<01:30:18.080>
a <01:30:18.480> - Those are finance code 728 reimbursements, and we'd really hope the committee rolls those out.
- Those are finance<01:36:20.960>
code <01:36:21.480>728 <01:36:22.480>reimbursements<
FL
Florida 2026 5th Special Session
Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Apr 15th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- It amends the criminal punishment code, re-ranking, lowering, enticing offenses in the severity ranking
- believe perhaps a subparagraph three that says nothing in this section is intended to criminalize or penalize
- to better understand, to better be responsible for those individuals that are in our custody in the penal
Summary:
The Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice considered and advanced a series of criminal justice bills, with most measures reported favorably after brief presentations, amendments, and roll-call votes. Among the bills approved were CS/SB 468 on fleeing or attempting to elude law enforcement, which increases offense levels and allows impoundment of involved vehicles; CS/SB 1136 on age as an element of a criminal offense, which strengthens protections for minors and was amended to adjust age thresholds and luring/enticement language; CS/SB 144 on criminal justice, which was narrowed by substitute amendment after discussion with law enforcement and includes provisions on kill switches, body cameras/AI, first responder recognition, and other corrections-related items; and CS/SB 1782, which creates penalties for dangerous excessive speeding. The committee also favorably reported CS/SB 964 on objective parole guidelines, CS/SB 1450 on arrest and detention of individuals with significant medical conditions, CS/SB 612 on murder involving unlawful drug distribution by minors, CS/SB 1838 on tampering with or harassing court officials, CS/SB 716 on enhanced penalties for sexual offenses by repeat offenders, CS/SB 1604 on corrections, and CS/SB 1360 on xylazine, which preserves veterinary use while increasing penalties for illicit trafficking and possession for sale.
Several bills drew substantive testimony and debate. CS/SB 1838 prompted concerns from the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers that the tampering language could be applied to prosecutors or defense attorneys; the sponsor said he would work to refine the language. CS/SB 964 received support from criminal defense advocates and a witness who argued Florida’s parole system needs revision due to prison overcrowding and staffing issues. CS/SB 1604 generated questions about inmate access to courts, the statute of limitations for confinement claims, and involuntary mental health treatment; the sponsor said the bill aims to balance inmate rights with timely reporting and to address bad actors in corrections. CS/SB 1360 was supported as a response to the spread of xylazine on the street, while noting its legitimate veterinary use.
The most contested measure was CS/SB 1804 on capital sex trafficking. The bill would create a capital offense for adult trafficking of a child under 12 or a mentally incapacitated person under specified circumstances, with a life-felony fallback if capital punishment is later found unconstitutional. Supporters argued it targets especially heinous conduct and closes a gap in existing law; opponents, including the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and anti-death-penalty advocates, argued it expands the death penalty beyond homicide, raises constitutional concerns, risks retraumatizing victims, and would be costly to litigate. After extensive debate, the committee adopted an amendment aligning the bill with the House companion and reported the bill favorably. The committee also approved SB 776 adding an aggravating factor for assassination or attempted assassination of a head of state, despite objections from some members who voted no. At the end of the meeting, the chair thanked members for the session, and the committee adjourned.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session May 27th, 2026
California House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Code Section 1325 is the law of the land that says, if you are... 1325 is the law of the land that says
- Code Section 1326 is if you remain in the country illegally, you have committed a crime.
- Code that defines youth by this age.
- And we must also agree that they should not be penalized for what's written in their DNA.
- Getting the code right matters. Getting these definitions matters.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 6 on Public Safety Apr 7th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- update vocational programs to reflect current job market needs by incorporating digital literacy, coding
- update vocational programs to reflect current job market needs by incorporating digital literacy, coding
- So we are required by Penal Code 2053.5, I wanted to make sure I got it, to take a look at jobs availability
- She's saying that they go by this Penal Code, but that's not true from my experience.
Summary:
The hearing focused first on sexual abuse, harassment, and retaliation in California’s women’s prisons, with testimony from CDCR wardens, the Office of Inspector General, advocacy groups, and formerly incarcerated survivors. Legislators and witnesses described a pattern of staff misconduct, fear of retaliation, gaps in reporting, and the need for stronger accountability, better investigations, and more outside access for survivor support organizations. CDCR said it has expanded training, body-worn and stationary cameras, outside partnerships, and PREA-related response procedures, while the Inspector General requested additional funding and staff to monitor more grievances and staff sexual misconduct cases under SB 1069. Members pressed CDCR on why accused staff are not always placed on leave, how cases are referred to prosecutors, and whether current protections are enough; several members argued the state should aim to investigate all complaints and do more to prevent retaliation and repeat abuse.
The second issue was rehabilitative and reentry programming in women’s prisons. CDCR’s Division of Rehabilitative Programs and the wardens highlighted education, vocational training, substance use treatment, peer support, and community reentry programs, citing increased enrollment and recent graduates earning diplomas, degrees, and certifications. They said these programs are intended to reduce recidivism and improve public safety. Formerly incarcerated advocates and community providers argued that current offerings are still too limited, outdated, and not aligned with today’s job market, especially around digital literacy and transferable credentials, and they urged more funding for community-based, trauma-informed, gender-responsive programming. A coalition representative asked for a $20 million continuation and expansion of the Wright Grant program, and members discussed additional budget requests for reentry and related women’s services.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Formal House Session 97 Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am
Massachusetts House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Second, it clarifies and lists out specifically in our statutory code...
- Second, it clarifies and lists out specifically in our statutory code that the throwing or projecting
- In passing this bill, Madam Speaker, we can effectively penalize those responsible for the crime and
Summary:
The House opened with ceremonial business, including adoption of resolutions recognizing the Copernicus Institute and honoring October 2025 as Polish American Heritage Month. Members also concurred in Senate petitions and suspended Joint Rule 12 to allow several new petitions to be referred, including proposals on employer notice of I-9 records, Lobular Breast Cancer Awareness Day, a sick leave bank for a trial court employee, and the purchase or lease of Fenn Farm. The chamber then advanced several local and administrative bills, including legislation authorizing MassDOT to convey land in Stoneham and bills on child welfare protections, transit-worker assault penalties, and other local matters.
The most substantial debate centered on House No. 4645, a substitute bill addressing assault and battery on transit workers. Supporters argued that transit employees face rising violence and deserve protections similar to other public employees, citing MBTA assault statistics and testimony from workers describing threats, spitting, weapons, and serious injuries. The House accepted the substitute bill and passed it to be engrossed by roll call, 116-0. The chamber also passed to be engrossed a child welfare bill, House No. 4644, after debate on expanded DCF reporting, discharge planning, the independence of the Office of the Child Advocate, education coordination for children in care, and child fatality review reforms; amendments were adopted, including one adding a Department of Social Services social worker to the fatality review team and another creating a commission to study a digital education portfolio for foster youth.
The House also adopted an emergency preamble for a bonds bill and passed several engrossed local bills, including measures affecting Hull, Lanesborough, and Norton. The session included a formal visit from a Hokkaido, Japan delegation marking the 35th anniversary of the Massachusetts-Hokkaido sister-state relationship, with remarks entered into the Journal. Members observed moments of silence for Bernard Fang and former Representative Thomas George, and the House later adopted a special adjournment in memory of Mark Haren before adjourning to meet the next day.
FL
Florida 2025 Regular Session
Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government Apr 15th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- ENSURES THAT THE BUILDING CODE IS CONSISTENT WITH INTERNATIONAL CODE AS IT RELATES TO IT.
- SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLE, PAYLOAD OR SPACECRAFT WITHIN A SPACEPORT TERRITORY FROM THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
- WE ARE EXEMPTING SPACE X FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE? SENATOR GRALL.
- FROM THE BUILDING CODES? SENATOR GRALL.
- THIS ALIGNS FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH NATIONAL STANDARDS AND MAKES RULES PREDICTABLE FOR DEVELOPERS,
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- limited authority over surplus lines and risk retention groups, and we do not regulate The government code
- fire origin and cause. conducting state building fire safety inspections, enforcing the state fire code
- specific to perhaps our districts are at least in Harris County or, well, if you could get it by zip code
- Our reason our code, you know, like you said the exposure where we are by the coast and having so many
- I have not had it penalize a customer, it's only helped them, so that's kind of a relief. leave for the
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- My client has, including scales, including, you know, safety officers, QR codes on their transport documents
- , but in doing so, we must ensure that enforcement mechanisms do not unintentionally restrict or penalize
- That's still within the law of of the Texas tax code on the 162 on the motor fuel tax code so this.
- That's totally fine within the tax code, but that's correct, sir.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery
Transcript Highlights:
- But we're in support of our standards and code of ethics that will hopefully keep the certified homes
- When somebody moves into your home, do you have a code of conduct that they sign and that they agree
- We do have them sign a code of conduct.
- We do have them sign a code of conduct, a set of rules and regulations, and they’ll say drug-free and
- Their penal-led policies do not match the needs of those with SMI.
Summary:
The committee held a public hearing on a broad set of mental health, substance use, recovery, and patients’ rights bills. Early testimony focused on H. 2227, which would replace stigmatizing substance use terminology in the General Laws, and H. 3950, which would support parents in recovery involved with DCF by requiring more individualized recovery plans, clearer benchmarks for parenting time, access to recovery coaches or counselors, family counseling after sustained recovery, and staff training on addiction and lived experience. Speakers described the bills as ways to reduce stigma, increase accountability, and improve reunification outcomes for families.
A major portion of the hearing centered on S. 1386, which would transfer Bridgewater State Hospital from the Department of Correction to the Department of Mental Health. Advocates, family members, and disability groups testified that Bridgewater functions like a prison rather than a hospital, with excessive restraint, seclusion, involuntary medication, poor conditions, and racial disparities, and argued DMH should oversee a treatment setting. One DMH occupational therapist and MNA member opposed the transfer, saying the real issue is mixing forensic and continuing-care patients and that DMH should instead create designated forensic units under bills H. 228/S. 1408. Committee members asked about Bridgewater’s population, the history of DOC control, capacity, staffing, and how a transfer might be implemented.
The committee also heard testimony on modernizing the six fundamental rights for psychiatric inpatients, including expanding communication options, clarifying visitation and advocacy definitions, and improving access to gender-appropriate and culturally relevant items. Another bill, H. 2216, would require stronger oversight before antipsychotic medication is prescribed in nursing homes, prompted by concerns about inappropriate use. Finally, testimony supported H. 2240 and H. 2239 on sober homes, with supporters saying discharge and relocation policies are needed when a resident returns to active use or becomes unsafe, while preserving the recovery environment and resident rights. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee Mar 18th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- thinking of a company doing their best to exclude registered copyrighted material and then being penalized
- They were penalized, and we don't want anything in this law to conflict with existing law.
- Civil Code Section 1798.125(b)(3) provides a business may enter into a financial incentive program only
- should mean that a loyalty program that's out there shouldn't be more available to non-Latino zip code
- should mean that a loyalty program that's out there shouldn't be more available to non-Latino zip code
Summary:
The Assembly Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee met with a new membership roster and adopted its committee rules after quorum was established. The hearing then began with AB 412, the AI Copyright Transparency Act, which would require generative AI developers to provide copyright holders notice when registered copyrighted works are used in training data. The author and supporters, including SAG-AFTRA, the Transparency Coalition, voice actors, writers, labor groups, and other creators, argued the bill would give artists a practical way to learn whether their works were used and to vindicate their rights. Opponents, including EFF, CalChamber, RIAA, CCIA, Chamber of Progress, Bay Area Council, BSA, and TechNet, said the proposal was technically unworkable, could burden startups, conflict with existing law and pending litigation, and raise federal preemption concerns. Members discussed the bill’s amendments, including a fingerprinting approach and narrowing the bill to model developers, and the committee voted 8-2 to pass AB 412 as amended to the Judiciary Committee.
The committee then heard AB 446, which would prohibit “surveillance pricing,” or the use of personal data to charge different prices for the same product or service. The author and supporters, including Consumer Watchdog, UFCW, labor organizations, and consumer/privacy groups, described examples of differential pricing tied to device type, location, shopping behavior, and digital price tags, and argued the bill would protect consumers from discriminatory and predatory pricing. Business and industry opponents, including CalChamber, grocers, retailers, travel, broadband, and other associations, said the bill could conflict with the CCPA, interfere with loyalty and rewards programs, and create confusion about personalized discounts and dynamic pricing. The discussion focused on how the bill would treat loyalty programs, whether existing privacy law already covers the issue, and whether the proposal would unintentionally affect legitimate discounts and promotions.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- would, uh, there would be an abbreviated training program primarily centered around Texas statutes, penal
- code, Code of Chrome procedure, those things unique to Texas that they would not have studied, but we
- One of its recommendations is to amend the Internal Revenue Service Code of 1986 to include provisions