Transcript Highlights:

• Some departments have strong practices in place, while others do not.
• This bill does three practical things.
• In practice, we were seeing situations where permit applications for outdoor advertising... ...Act.
• This bill does not regulate imports, pricing, sourcing decisions, or blending practices.
• Bottom line is AB 1885 modernizes an outdated financing practice.

Committee: House Governmental Organization

Transcript Highlights:

• And I'd reiterate Cattlemen's comments around practicability and reality.
• Wilbur actually spoke to this, and I made one word in my comment that talked about practicability.
• So we're talking right now about practicability of these non-lethal deterrence.
• How does the bill account for situations where non-lethal deterrence is not practical or feasible due
• Yeah, that's the practicality thing that we're working on right now.

Committee: Senate Natural Resources and Water

Transcript Highlights:

• I think it's a common-sense courtesy section about best practices.
• This section doesn't have any practical changes.
• It's a practical matter. I think you could get there a lot of different ways.
• I mean, as a practical matter, I think you could get there a lot of different ways.
• I mean, people, it's not a practical."

Committee: House Special Committee on Rural Issues

Summary: The Special Committee on Rural Issues heard House Bill 3375, sponsored by Rep. Koslow, a broad eminent domain reform measure aimed at protecting landowners, especially farmers and ranchers. The bill would create protections for beginning farmers and ranchers, require 15 days’ notice before surveyors enter property, extend the response period in eminent domain cases from 10 days to 60 days, bar eminent domain for wind and solar facilities, require land restoration and maintenance after construction, increase compensation to 125% of fair market value in certain cases, add tax-liability compensation, change treatment of heritage and blight-related compensation, and allow attorney’s fees when a landowner wins a higher award than the condemning authority offered. Members raised concerns about the bill’s scope, its effect on energy development, and several drafting and implementation issues, including surveyor access, maintenance standards, and whether the bill could create conflicts with existing attorney-fee provisions. The sponsor said he was open to changes and noted that an HCS would address some drafting errors and feedback. Testimony in support came from the Missouri Farm Bureau, Missouri Cattlemen’s Association, a landowner/banker, and attorney Brent Hayden, who argued that landowners are often pressured into quick, low offers and should be treated as partners rather than obstacles. Supporters said the bill would improve transparency, due process, compensation, and restoration standards, and that it would not stop infrastructure development. Hayden described current eminent domain practice as giving landowners little leverage over route selection or restoration and said the bill would create needed discipline for condemning authorities. Several supporters also defended the wind-and-solar restriction as a response to the amount of land those projects can require and to concerns about using eminent domain for generation projects. Opposition came from the Missouri Energy Development Association, municipal utilities, and MoDOT. Opponents said they agreed some reforms may be reasonable but warned the bill, as written, could increase costs, delay projects, and create litigation risk that would ultimately be passed on to customers and taxpayers. MoDOT said the fiscal impact could be substantial, potentially doubling annual right-of-way spending. Utility representatives also cautioned that the bill could conflict with existing attorney-fee rules and should be aligned with compromise language from other legislation. The hearing ended without a vote or committee action, with the sponsor and witnesses indicating further negotiations and possible revisions were expected.

Transcript Highlights:

• . is already a core part of those generally accepted appraisal practices.
• There is also a practical consideration or two.
• I'm a property tax attorney, I've been practicing...
• I've been practicing in this area for more than 30 years.
• It is a good best practices bill.

Bills: HB1952 , HB3258 , HB3524 , HB3851 , HB4478 , HB4613 , HB4703 , HB4742 , HB4744 , HB4809 , HB4864

Committee: House S/C on Property Tax Appraisals

Keywords: county appraisal district, board of directors, governance, taxing units, public representation, penalty, property report, taxation, timely filing, chief appraiser, appraisal district, ad valorem tax, property appraisal, tax protests, unequal appraisal, property rights, property tax, public employees, protest leave, appraisal review board

Transcript Highlights:

• So how does this work in practice?
• rules that I can assure you all lawyers take very seriously because it impacts their ability to practice
• I think that's practical and it's compassionate. I want to do...
• I think that's practical and it's compassionate.
• Madam President, Senate Bill 2129 is the Veterinary Practices Act for our state.

Summary: The Senate opened with prayer, the Pledge, a quorum call, and approval of journal corrections. It then handled several House messages, appointing conference committees on Senate Bills 2004 and 2006 and House Bills 1018, 1019, and 1363, and re-referring House Bill 1216 to Appropriations. The chamber also adopted amendments to House Bill 1601, which would have expanded special assistant attorney general authority for certain offices, but the bill failed on final passage after strong opposition centered on preserving the Attorney General’s control and avoiding a solution in search of a problem. A major portion of the day focused on education funding. House Bill 1369 was amended to raise per-pupil aid from 2% and 2% to 3% and 3% and to increase the school construction loan transfer from $75 million to $100 million; supporters said this would help local schools and military base projects, while opponents raised questions about special education placement language and state coordination. The bill passed 44-3. House Bill 1013, the DPI budget, was also amended extensively to adjust staffing, funding sources, grants, meal assistance, teacher training, and other education programs; it passed 45-2. House Bill 2234, dealing with Choice Ready grants, was amended to shift funding away from general funds and toward federal or other sources, but then failed on final passage after the sponsor urged a red vote. The Senate also approved House Bill 1482, restricting bond and indebtedness elections for counties, cities, school districts, and park districts to primary or general election days, and House Bill 1332, creating a value-added agriculture facility incentive program with an emergency clause. House Bill 1010, the Insurance Department budget, passed unanimously after amendments reflecting the merger of the Securities Department into Insurance and adding staff and fee changes, while House Bill 1011, the separate Securities Department budget, failed because its funding was already included in HB 1010. House Bill 1584, a major pharmacy benefit manager reform bill, passed with an enforcement fund and new licensing/enforcement structure despite debate over ERISA and market transparency. In other action, the Senate concurred in House amendments and passed Senate Bills 2226, 2230, 2069, 2082, 2387, 2385, and 2186, with SB 2186 on parenting time interference and a child custody task force passing 27-20 after debate over whether the issue should be left to the courts. Senate Bill 2234, on Choice Ready grants, and Senate Bill 2243, on driver’s license points and traffic penalties, both failed after concurrence motions were adopted but final passage votes were overwhelmingly negative. The chamber also advanced Senate Bill 2291 to conference committee consideration near the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• There was an ask from TASA to just limit it to that school district, which turns out to be practically
• There's a lot of specialty stuff here, but it's just from practical experience.
• So that's all I'm... just from practical experience, it happens all the time. That's the problem.
• I'm saying just from practical experience. I understand what the intent is, okay?
• As the author, I'm willing to accept this compromise, and it's a best practice of many medical schools

Committees: Senate Education , Senate Education K-16

Transcript Highlights:

• At same types of innovative practices.
• </c><01:39:17.360><c> So</c> that um they do best practices. So that um they do best practices.
• </c> make sure that pedagogical practices make sure that pedagogical practices that<02:19:40.960><c>
• It is a very powerful practice.
• I also do is a very powerful practice.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> as um people who discuss best practices as um people who discuss best practices from<01:00:46.960
• </c> this is not only updating best practices this is not only updating best practices but<01:19:28.639
• This measure delivers on these community-level sexual violence prevention best practices.
• area of practice in that same<01:41:32.080><c> area</c><01:41:32.360><c> of</c><01:41:32.560><c> practice
• </c><02:25:22.479><c> to</c> read it is a discriminatory practice to read it is a discriminatory practice

Committee: House Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs

Summary: The House Committee on Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs heard Senate Bill 1322, SD2, HD1, a comprehensive measure revising Hawaii’s mental health code. The bill would clarify emergency transportation, examination, and hospitalization procedures for people who may be mentally ill or suffering from substance abuse and deemed imminently dangerous, expand notice requirements, allow certain information-sharing for assisted community treatment petitions, and add liability protections for emergency responders and providers. The Department of the Attorney General supported the bill as a collaborative update to the law, while the Department of Health asked for a copy of provider-generated emergency transport documentation within five days for data and planning purposes. Testimony was sharply divided. Queen’s Health System, Hawaiʻi Pacific Health, HHSC, and the Institute for Human Services supported the measure or parts of it but requested amendments, including clarifying whether a second psychiatric exam is required, restoring a 72-hour rather than 48-hour stabilization window, and adjusting where patients are taken when an MEO cannot be reached. The ACLU of Hawaiʻi strongly opposed the bill, arguing it weakens due process and civil liberties, especially around involuntary commitment, assisted community treatment, emergency transport by police, and reduced procedural safeguards; it urged the committee to hold the bill and consider an interim working group. Louie E.K. of the Hawaiʻi Disability Rights Center also opposed the bill, focusing on immunity from negligence, the use of police for transport, and the reduction of a three-provider review to one in state-hospital treatment orders. Other testimony included support from an individual who said the bill could improve mental health care delivery amid provider shortages, and a comment from Hawaiʻi Health and Harm Reduction Center warning that the substance use portion of the bill lacks evidence of effectiveness and could be misused. In response to committee questions, the Attorney General’s office said the measure was developed with input from multiple stakeholders, including state agencies, hospitals, the ACLU, HHSC, and IHS, and that it aims to make assisted community treatment more accessible and effective by streamlining the legal process and improving consequences for noncompliance. No vote or final action was taken during the portion of the meeting provided.

Transcript Highlights:

• So large requests are contemplated and allowed under the Data Practices Act.
• Does, which is to create a statewide data infrastructure to study pre-trial practices here.
• I've represented both in my practice.
• I've represented both in my practice.
• I've represented both in my practice.

Bills: HF2233 , HF1999 , HF1995 , HF1614 , HF2781 , HF1775 , HF1316 , HF2127 , HF2521 , HF689 , HF2380 , HF1273

Committee: House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Keywords: Uniform Special Deposits Act, special deposit, banking law, financial institutions, escrow, escrow account, trust account, security deposit, beneficiary, depositor, creditor process, garnishment, attachment, levy, setoff, recoupment, financial market infrastructure, retirement benefits, compensation, earnest money

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><00:52:16.240><c> because</c> And your bill is not practical because And your bill is not practical
• </c> Not because we disagree with restorative practices. We love restorative practices.
• </c> using restorative practices. using restorative practices.
• We love with restorative practices.
• </c><01:14:16.000><c> We</c> historical restorative practices. We historical restorative practices.

Transcript Highlights:

• The Data Practices Act limits what information about an employee is public.
• The Data Practices Act designates all final discipline as public data.
• </c><00:04:44.960><c> not</c> intended to improve their practice not intended to improve their practice
• </c><00:05:03.360><c> Act</c> accessible the data Practices Act accessible the data Practices Act designates
• So we're simply trying to get some funding to come in alignment with current law and practice.

Committee: House Education Policy

Transcript Highlights:

• The four bills before the committee today aim to put these principles into practice.
• A common practice in... ...ability to contamination is increased.
• They're getting another permit to practically double the size of that.
• How could this agency be okay with these devastating practices?
• How could this agency be okay with these devastating practices?

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources

Summary: The hearing covered a broad set of environmental and water-related bills, with much of the testimony focused on blue economy and circular economy proposals, drought management, drinking water safety, flood resilience, and water infrastructure funding. Supporters of bills such as H. 987 and H. 988 described grant programs for blue economy workforce development, research, small businesses, and public education about a circular economy. Other speakers backed measures on coastal erosion research, recreational boating dredging, cranberry water-right transfers, sand mining oversight, and a voucher program for home water filtration in PFAS-impacted communities. Several elected officials and advocates also urged passage of bills to require private well testing, improve school drinking water safety, and address sand mining pollution and PFAS contamination. Water supply and drought issues drew extensive testimony. Senator Eldridge and others supported legislation to let the state, through DEP and the drought management task force, impose regional water-use restrictions during droughts and make the task force permanent in statute. Advocates from watershed groups, farms, and environmental organizations said the current town-by-town approach is inconsistent and ineffective, and they described drought impacts on rivers, farms, private wells, and wildfire risk. A related bill on private wells was supported as a way to help homeowners test and remediate contaminated wells, especially in rural areas without public water. The committee also heard testimony on a bill to allow the Lynnfield Water District to join the MWRA, with local officials saying the move would help address PFAS and other contamination and improve supply reliability. Another major panel supported a water infrastructure funding bill, arguing that aging drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater systems need major new investment, including support for PFAS treatment, sewer rate relief, biosolids research, and regional interconnections. Members asked about costs, funding sources, and the relationship to existing revolving loan funds; witnesses said the bill would need to be paired with future bond funding and new revenue ideas. No votes were taken during the hearing, and the chairs repeatedly invited written testimony and noted the large number of speakers.

Transcript Highlights:

• Practices, it also laid the groundwork for a water right system that continues to exclude tribes to this
• But ultimately, as has been mentioned even by opposition, a lot of these agencies already have practice
• The tribes also care about sustainability and job prevention, and in some cases have the best practices
• AB 2254 offers a practical, tailored solution. AB 2254 offers a practical, tailored solution.
• That's why the bill requires the development of best practices, is to figure out what those best practices

Committees: House Water, Parks and Wildlife , House Water, Parks, and Wildlife

Transcript Highlights:

• Um, page six, uh, standardized practice.
• </c> creates a plan, trains and practices. creates a plan, trains and practices.
• </c><01:16:14.640><c> It</c> practice annually is not burdensome.
• It practice annually is not burdensome.
• It is<01:16:15.040><c> practical</c><01:16:15.600><c> evidence-based</c> is practical evidence-based

Bills: HB0076 , HB0102 , HB0115

Committee: House Education

Transcript Highlights:

• In 1948, we added the regulation of LPNs, and in 1995 we added advanced practice registered nurses.
• setting standards for maintaining competence, and disciplining nurses for violations of the Nurse Practice
• LPNs are required to pass a standard national licensure exam in order to be licensed, and advanced practice
• Advanced practice registered nurses receive a master's degree or a doctorate degree, and we currently
• have 8,000 actively licensed advanced practice nurses in Arkansas.

Committee: All ALC-OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE

Summary: The Occupational Licensing Review Subcommittee met to review two occupational licensing reports: the Arkansas State Board of Nursing and the State Board of Registration for Professional Soil Classifiers. For nursing, board officials described the board’s history, scope, and licensure categories, noting it regulates about 72,000 nurses and oversees RNs, LPNs, advanced practice nurses, medication assistants, and a new dialysis patient care technician registry. Members asked about workforce shortages, complaint types, and the board’s finances; the board said Arkansas has enough licensed nurses overall but has vacancy issues in some areas, complaints commonly involve criminal backgrounds, fraud, misrepresentation, drug abuse, and misappropriation, and the average case length is 191 days though some cases remain open much longer while awaiting criminal adjudication. Officials also said they are working on efficiency improvements and have added help positions with Department of Health support. The report was accepted without objection. The committee then reviewed the soil classifier program, now housed under the Natural Resources Commission after the former board was abolished in 2023. Agriculture Department officials explained that soil classifiers are a small, specialized profession requiring a four-year degree with coursework in biological, earth, and soil sciences, and that the state currently has 29 registered soil classifiers. Members asked whether that number is sufficient, what the work involves, and how the program’s finances are used. Officials said the profession is mainly used for septic system design, wetland determinations, nutrient management, and other soil-related work, and that current staffing appears adequate. They also noted the program has about $20,000 in reserves, above the statutory three-year balance, and discussed possible uses such as training, curriculum upgrades, and expanded administrative funding. The report was also accepted without objection, and the meeting adjourned with the next meeting scheduled for February 19 at 1:30 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• In 1948, we added the regulation of LPNs, and in 1995 we added advanced practice registered nurses.
• setting standards for maintaining competence, and disciplining nurses for violations of the Nurse Practice
• LPNs are required to pass a standard national licensure exam in order to be licensed, and advanced practice
• Advanced practice registered nurses receive a master's degree or a doctorate degree, and we currently
• have 8,000 actively licensed advanced practice nurses in Arkansas.

Committee: All ALC-OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE

Summary: The Occupational Licensing Review Subcommittee met to review reports from the Arkansas State Board of Nursing and the State Board of Registration for Professional Soil Classifiers. Nursing officials described the board’s history and scope, saying it now regulates about 72,000 nurses across multiple license types, including RNs, LPNs, advanced practice nurses, medication assistants, and a new dialysis patient care technician registry. Members asked about workforce shortages, complaint trends, and the board’s finances. The board said Arkansas has enough licensed nurses overall but still has vacancy problems in certain areas, and that common complaints involve criminal backgrounds, fraud or misrepresentation, misappropriation, drug abuse, and other criminal issues. Officials also said the board receives about 2,200 complaints a year, has worked to improve case processing, and is trying to make its reporting more accurate; the average case length was said to be 191 days, though some cases remain open longer while criminal matters are pending. Questions were also raised about using surplus funds for outreach and support, including efforts to encourage nursing careers in rural areas, with officials noting some collaboration with nursing associations and the Arkansas Center for Nursing. The committee then heard from the Department of Agriculture on professional soil classifiers. Officials explained that the occupation was created in 1975 and is now administered by the Natural Resources Commission after the former board was abolished in 2023. They said soil classifiers are a small, specialized group of professionals who need a four-year degree plus coursework in biological, earth, and soil sciences, and that they typically work on septic system design, wetland determinations, nutrient management, and other soil-related projects. The department said there are currently 29 licensed soil classifiers in Arkansas and that this appears to be sufficient for current demand. Members asked about the profession’s role, educational requirements, and the difference between soil classifiers and other septic-related professionals. Officials also discussed the program’s finances, noting a reserve balance above the three-year target and saying some funds have covered administrative and cybersecurity costs, with possible future uses including training, curriculum updates, and expanded administrative support. Both reports were accepted without objection, and the meeting adjourned with the next meeting announced for February 19 at 1:30 p.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• To retain and to keep practicing their professions within our state.
• But I'll also add that this bill does require that there be internships that are practiced, and I think
• in the program that I'm in, the students that we graduate are very likely to stay in state and to practice
• Four of the other items are things that are currently practiced by the ERB.
• This is clarifying language in current practice, which is why it has no appropriation attached to it.

Committee: House House Education

Transcript Highlights:

• Further, third-party suppliers' problematic practices are put on display at local grocery stores in our
• So marketing practices, that is basically how you have sales.
• Are you aware how many Chapter 93A unfair and deceptive business practice lawsuits have been brought
• These companies routinely deploy unethical practices.
• It seems that that appears to be a targeted practice, very specific in its purpose.

Committee: Joint Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy

Summary: The committee heard testimony on several energy-related bills, with the main focus on H. 3534/S. 2255, which would ban or sharply restrict residential third-party electric suppliers, and on related reform proposals. Supporters included the Attorney General’s office, municipal and regional planning officials, environmental justice groups, consumer advocates, and city officials from Boston and Chelsea. They argued that the residential competitive supply market has produced higher bills, deceptive sales tactics, auto-renewals into higher rates, and disproportionate harm to low-income residents, seniors, communities of color, and people with limited English. Witnesses cited AG reports estimating hundreds of millions of dollars in overcharges over time, described door-to-door and storefront marketing abuses, and said municipal aggregation programs have saved residents money while offering more stable rates. Several supporters said the Legislature should either ban residential competitive supply or adopt strong guardrails such as ending automatic renewals, banning incentive-based commissions, and capping rates relative to basic service. Opponents or industry representatives from the Retail Energy Advancement League, Vistra, and Constellation argued that the market can provide savings, longer-term price stability, and value-added products such as renewable options and time-of-use offerings. They said Massachusetts has already improved consumer protections through DPU proceedings, that complaints are relatively few compared with the size of the market, and that a ban would eliminate consumer choice. They also defended direct sales and commissions as normal features of a retail market, while saying they would support additional protections, licensing, bonding, and stronger oversight of bad actors. Committee members pressed both sides on whether the market truly saves money, whether automatic renewals should be banned, and whether the AG’s proposed reforms would be enough. The committee also heard testimony on H. 3972, a bill to extend utility shutoff protections during extreme heat, with Rep. Mindy Domb arguing that Massachusetts should treat extreme heat like extreme cold and protect customers facing financial hardship. Rep. Barrett also testified for H. 3450, a municipal broadband/right-of-way bill, arguing that communities need easier and cheaper access to utility poles and public rights of way to build municipal broadband. In addition, Senate Majority Leader Creem testified for S. 2239, which would bar utilities from recovering ratepayer funds for lobbying, promotions, trade association dues, and similar expenses. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c><02:09:52.400><c> the</c> administrators shall practice the administrators shall practice the principles
• </c><02:09:57.360><c> the</c> there we had previously practice the there we had previously practice the
• </c> teachers that are supposed to practice teachers that are supposed to practice these<02:10:49.840
• So there it's a you shall also practice.
• I just will practice its principles.

Summary: The conference committee first met on HB 1260, a bill requested by municipal clerks to allow certain divorce-related records to be kept confidential. House members argued the Senate amendment would reverse the presumption of openness established in the Keene Sentinel case and raise constitutional issues under the state constitution’s privacy and open-government provisions. Senate members responded that the 2018 privacy amendment, the limited scope of the proposal, and modern internet risks justified the change, but the House maintained the issue needed a full hearing in a separate bill. The committee ultimately voted unanimously for the Senate to recede and adopt the House version, preserving the underlying bill without the Senate amendment, and both sides said they would revisit the topic in a future session. The committee then took up HB 1574, which extends free and reduced-price breakfast and lunch programs and provides funding for SNAP administrative costs. The main dispute was the Senate’s addition of $4.4 million for SNAP administration, which DHHS said was needed because federal law would shift more administrative costs to the state and could increase the state’s SNAP error rate, potentially triggering much larger future penalties. DHHS officials reported the current error rate was 7.57% for federal fiscal year 2024, below the national average, and estimated that if the rate rose above 8%, the state could owe about 10% of SNAP benefits, or roughly $12 million for a partial year and nearly $16 million for a full year. Some House members supported the added funding as a preventive measure, while others objected that the underlying bill was modest and the amendment resembled a previously rejected proposal. The discussion ended with the committee moving toward the House position and the bill’s future depending on the chamber’s vote on the Senate amendment.

Transcript Highlights:

• </c> Being a physician, living and practicing Being a physician, living and practicing in<00:04:09.320
• Um, so, again, the Home Run is pipeline to practice.
• Um, so, again, the Home Run is pipeline to practice.
• ,</c> initiative, uh physicians, practices, initiative, uh physicians, practices, clinics,<00:51:56.280
• </c> involve those there as the practices involve those there as the practices want<00:52:08.840><c>

Bills: HB20 , HB276 , HB644 , HB812 , HB816 , HB916 , HB1131 , HB1247 , HB1518 , HB1525 , HB1537 , HB1541 , HB1546 , HB1553 , HB1562 , HB1565 , HB1566 , HB1576 , HB1577 , HB1591 , HB1605 , HB1612 , HB1613 , HB1614 , HB1618 , HB1620 , HB1650 , HB1656 , HB1658 , HB1661 , HB1664 , HB1668 , HB1676 , HB1707 , HB1711 , HB1713 , HB1715 , HB1718 , HB1727 , HB1749 , HB1756 , HB1774 , HB1776 , HB1801 , HB1802 , HB1805 , HB1813 , HB1815 , HB1831 , HB1838 , HB1853 , HB1854 , HB1859 , HB1863 , HB1871 , HB1872 , HB1918 , HB1920 , HB1952 , HB1965 , HB1966 , HB1967 , HB1969 , HB1972 , HB1973 , HB1974 , HB1975 , HB1980 , HB1985 , HB2005 , HB2023 , HB2031 , HB2033 , HB2062 , HB2113 , HB2114 , HB2116 , HB2138 , HB2139 , HB2156 , HB2158 , HB2159 , HB2171 , HB2208 , HB2268 , HB2270 , HB2272 , HB2273 , HB2276 , HB2289 , HB2310 , HB2315 , HB2335 , HB2338 , HB2339 , HB2340 , HB2343 , HB2361 , HB2384 , HB2387 , SB2338 , SB2431 , SB2438 , SB2593 , SB2907 , SB2671 , SB2321 , SB3084 , SB2401 , SB3033 , SB2972 , SB3032 , SB2806 , SB3014 , SB2108 , SB2981 , SB2973 , SB2423 , SB2078 , SB2322 , SB2397 , SB2896 , SB2088 , SB2347 , SB2408 , SB2970 , SB2851 , SB2713 , SB2697 , SB2312 , SB2192 , SB2363 , SB2530 , SB3028 , SB2024 , SB3007 , SB2599 , SB2596 , SB2662 , SB2930 , SB3334 , SB2378 , SB3019 , SB3231 , SB2240 , SB2372 , SB2175 , SB2046 , SB2298 , SB2922 , SB2835 , SB3263 , SB2174 , SB2128 , SB2006 , SB2489 , SB3134 , SB2982 , SB2425 , SB2849 , SB2797 , SB2795 , SB2575 , SB2521 , SB2765 , SB2386 , SB2852 , SB2022 , SB2117 , SB2277 , SB2387 , SB2688 , SB2885 , SB3132 , SB3219 , SB2169 , SB2591 , SB2090 , SB2983 , SB888 , SB3249 , SB2611 , SB2429 , SB2463 , SB3154 , SB3131 , SB3152 , SB3315 , SB2448 , SB2054 , SB2140 , SB2520 , SB2377 , SB2986 , SB2010 , SB2189 , SB2026 , SB3010 , SB2818 , SB2002