Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial eligibility'
Page 92 of 496
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/18/26
Commerce Finance and Policy
Transcript Highlights:
- <00:21:30.720>
be clinical trainees will no longer be clinical trainees will no longer be eligible - c> for<00:21:31.520>
the <00:21:31.679>same <00:21:31.840>reimbursement eligible - for the same reimbursement eligible for the same reimbursement under<00:21:32.640>
its <00:21: - would interfere with litigation that the state of Minnesota's engaged in and trying to let that judicial
- <01:36:17.520>
judicial to um to to let that judicious judicial to um to to let that judicious
Keywords:
common interest community, CIC, homeowners association, HOA, condominium, planned community, cooperative, unit owner, association board, declarant, declarant control, special declarant rights, assessment lien, foreclosure, late fees, fines, attorney fees, resale disclosure, annual report, maintenance plan
MN
Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety - 03/18/26
Judiciary and Public Safety
Transcript Highlights:
- It targets the funds to the kids most in need, uh, kids who are eligible for legal status, and these
- It targets the funds to the kids most in need, uh, kids who are eligible for legal status, and these
- Judicial Branch reception is going on as we speak.
- I don't see any. 3958, Chair Latz, 3958. note to the judicial branch that Senator note to the judicial
- Homeline serves are not income eligible Homeline serves are not income eligible to<01:38:23.560>
WV
West Virginia 2026 Regular Session
WV Senate Banking and Insurance Committee in Session Mar 11th, 2026 at 02:34 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- administrative bodies to one, it allowed for additional funding to help form that independent body in the judicial
- Medicare supplement policy to individuals who are 65 years of age or older on the date their Medicaid eligibility
- ends, who are entitled to Medicare, and who lost eligibility for medical assistance under Medicaid,
- including full or partial dual eligibility.
- The guaranteed issue period will begin on the date Medicaid eligibility ends and continue for 63 days
Summary:
The Senate Banking and Insurance Committee met with a quorum present and approved the March 4, 2026 minutes by voice vote. The committee first considered House Bill 55, which updates and modernizes workers’ compensation statutes to reflect the privatized system, remove obsolete provisions, and adjust the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review from five members to three. The Insurance Commissioner testified that the bill is part of the cleanup from privatization and would give the governor more flexibility in appointments. After adopting a strike-and-insert amendment and a title amendment, the committee reported HB 55 to the full Senate with a recommendation that it do pass.
The committee then took up House Bill 5463, which would reduce BRIM’s required liability coverage for county boards of education from $1.25 million to $1 million per occurrence and eliminate the separate $5 million excess coverage requirement. BRIM’s director testified that the excess market was difficult to access and costly, but several senators raised concerns that lowering coverage could reduce protection for victims and school-related claims. After a divided vote, the motion to report the bill failed, and HB 5463 was not passed by the committee.
Next, the committee considered House Bill 4869, creating guaranteed issue rights for Medicare supplement policies, including annual birthday replacement rights and a special right for certain Medicaid recipients losing eligibility. Counsel said the bill would prohibit underwriting barriers during the guaranteed issue periods and require an annual report on premium trends. With no amendments offered, the committee reported HB 4869 to the full Senate with a recommendation that it do pass.
Finally, the committee considered House Bill 5462 on mine subsidence insurance. The bill would allow the mine subsidence fund to offset payments by amounts received from other sources and limit lawsuits over claims reported to BRIM. Members debated a proposed strike-and-insert amendment that would have softened the litigation limits and added notice and remedy provisions, but the amendment was rejected. The committee then reported HB 5462 to the full Senate with a recommendation that it do pass, and the meeting adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Department and the Houston Police Department drop programs by allowing all currently employed and eligible
- least 18% of the functions that the judge performs or 18% of the total hours for the judge works are judicial
- To be eligible to retire, while this change affected all members, the new requirement had a particular
- Eligible restaurant owners may deduct. $5 from the state sales and use tax liability for every 100 Texas
- House Bill 3159 is the same subject and is eligible for consideration at this time.
Bills:
HB104
Keywords:
property tax, ad valorem tax, tax rate election, voter-approval tax rate, no-new-revenue tax rate, de minimis rate, local government, special district, tax increase, tax notice, public hearing, tax code, Health and Safety Code, Texas property taxes, taxing unit, election threshold, two-thirds vote, majority vote, budget approval
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Appropriations Committee May 14th, 2025
Appropriations
Transcript Highlights:
- motion do pass applies to bills that also enjoy unanimous support in this committee. that are not eligible
- But under current law, families can lose access to subsidized care due to gaps in eligibility rules.
- This bill will clarify child care eligibility rules to better support families when they are taking family
- Importantly, the language does not limit the ability of a plaintiff to seek judicial review of all or
- residential mixed income developments on commercially zoned lots near campus universities and creates the eligibility
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Judiciary Committee Mar 25th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- as an essential tool in the judicial system to ensure that family reunification services are available
- He was never criminally charged for his admitted sexual abuse of me, and he remains eligible to work
- However, the current judicial procedures allow jurisdictions to delay compliance with court orders by
- That is the way our judicial system is set up. Everybody has the right to at least one appeal.
- There's no judicial discretion here is making me uncomfortable.
Summary:
The committee heard several bills, with the most detailed discussion focused on AB 316, AB 251, AB 474, AB 1201, AB 464, and AB 614. AB 316 would prevent AI developers or deployers from arguing in civil cases that an AI system’s alleged autonomy absolves them of responsibility. Supporters framed it as a narrow guardrail to protect families, especially children, from harms like dangerous chatbots and deepfakes; opponents, including TechNet and the Chamber of Progress, raised concerns about possible strict-liability implications. The bill was moved out of committee to Privacy and Consumer Protection.
AB 251 would let judges lower the burden of proof in elder abuse cases when a skilled nursing facility or RCFE intentionally destroys evidence. Supporters said the measure is needed because elder abuse victims are often unable to testify and records are vulnerable to spoliation, while opponents argued existing sanctions are sufficient and warned of more litigation. The bill passed, with committee members emphasizing the vulnerability of elder abuse victims. AB 474 sought to expand nonprofit home-sharing programs, including tax incentives for low-income homeowners and changes to housing law and lodger rules. Supporters said it would help older adults and low-income Californians avoid homelessness, but several members and the California Apartment Association raised concerns about removing lodger-law protections for homeowners; the author committed to keep working on the issue. The bill passed to Human Services.
AB 1201 would give courts discretion to provide family reunification services to parents with certain violent felony convictions, rather than applying an automatic bypass. Supporters from Starting Over Inc. described personal experiences with permanent family separation and argued the bill would give parents a fair chance when the conviction is unrelated to child safety. Some members supported the measure but questioned whether domestic violence histories should be treated differently; the author said the bill still allows courts to deny services when reunification would endanger a child. The bill passed to Human Services. AB 464 addressed sexual abuse and retaliation in state prisons by extending reporting time after release, adding 90-day monitoring after reports, barring rehiring of confirmed abusers, and strengthening reporting and anti-retaliation rules. Survivors testified about abuse, retaliation, and failures in CDCR’s response; the bill passed to Appropriations.
AB 614 would standardize the Government Claims Act filing deadline at one year for all claims. The author and supporters argued the current six-month deadline for injury and wrongful death claims is too short for victims to learn the process, find counsel, and gather evidence, while businesses often get a full year. A civil rights attorney and a family member of a deceased jail detainee testified in support, describing how the current deadline can block meritorious claims. The bill was presented for committee consideration as the hearing continued.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Floor Session Jun 2nd, 2025
California House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- It also creates eligibility for affordable units that use this process for students, faculty, and staff
- These clarifications ensure that eligible voters in county jails receive their voter information guides
- AB 352 will enhance protection for judicial officers.
- AB 378 seeks to extend eligibility for participation.
- I rise today to present AB 1314, which ensures that all foster youth eligible for transitional housing
IN
HI
Transcript Highlights:
- for listing might um be exempt eligible for listing might um be exempt and<01:03:45.720>
everything - foreclosures, but non-judicial foreclosures are actually really difficult to keep an eye on.
- We have to physically monitor newspapers to try and find out about these non-judicial foreclosures, as
- foreclosures, but non-judicial foreclosures are actually really difficult to keep an eye on.
- So it might be helpful as the conversation continues to exempt CDFIs from the definition of eligible
Summary:
The Committee on Housing held a public hearing on January 31 and heard testimony on a series of housing and building-code bills. The first major item, HB 1 relating to building codes, drew sharply divided testimony. Supporters, including BIA Hawaii, Grassroot Institute, Dr. Horton, and several builders and trade groups, argued the current code-adoption process is slow, fragmented, and costly, and that reform would help housing production. Opponents, including Sierra Club Hawaii, AIA Hawaii, ICC, and labor representative Kiko Bosi, said the bill would weaken public safety, reduce statewide consistency, and could leave tenants and first responders at greater risk. No vote was taken during the hearing, and members asked questions about the effect of a governor’s emergency proclamation suspending the Building Code Council and about county authority over code amendments.
The committee then heard HB 745 and HB 1321, both also relating to building codes. Grassroot Institute supported both measures, saying the system is broken and needs streamlining, while BIA Hawaii and others emphasized the cost burden of repeated code updates. Opponents, especially Bosi and ICC, argued that the bills would undermine the State Building Code Council’s role, create confusion, and prioritize cost over safety; Bosi also said labor should be included in any code discussions. Members questioned whether counties can remove state code provisions and whether the state code already supersedes county codes, and one member noted the need for clarity and consistent enforcement rather than a wholesale overhaul.
Later, the committee heard HB 284 on housing, HB 761 on county permitting and inspection, and HB 738 on historic preservation. HB 284 drew support from several housing and real estate groups, while DLNR opposed it. On HB 761, HHFDC supported the bill, DLNR warned that the proposed changes could jeopardize Hawaii’s participation in the National Flood Insurance Program, DAGS said it would likely need to duplicate county permitting staff, and the Department of Planning and Permitting opposed it; Grassroot Institute and NAIOP supported it. For HB 738, HHFDC, DLNR, Grassroot Institute, Hawaii YIMBY, NAIOP, and others supported the measure, with Grassroot and NAIOP suggesting clarifications so expedited review would also cover mixed-use projects and better define the scope of work. The transcript does not show any final votes or committee action on these bills during the hearing.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Appropriations Committee May 23rd, 2025
Appropriations
Transcript Highlights:
- Do pass out with to provide eligibility for part-time students taking at least nine units.
- AB1094 Baynes parole eligibility, do pass as amended to make an effective After 14 years with Republicans
- AB 1035 Mark Gonzales California College Promise Eligibility Expansion, holding committee.
- Do pass as amended to strike the judicial training provision. and recast the evidence a court must consider
NH
Transcript Highlights:
- This is a bill that broadens the criminal venue for prosecution in the county or judicial district where
- offense occurred in situations where all of the elements of the offense do not occur in one county or judicial
- The goal of this legislation is not to undermine the judicial process or decrease safety, but to ensure
- The goal of this legislation is not to undermine the judicial process or decrease safety, but to ensure
- The goal of this legislation is not to undermine the judicial process or decrease safety, but to ensure
FL
Transcript Highlights:
- The bill requires Commerce to identify an individual's eligibility by making sure the individual is who
- Manage that onslaught of claims, but also because the eligibility requirements were so narrow in Florida
- So we have narrow criteria to be eligible, which means if you are a big worker and the business is not
- MEMBERS, QUADRIPLEGICS UNDER CURRENT FLORIDA LAW ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE GRANTED A HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION FOR
- In closing, I want to say a huge thank you to my State Attorney for the 20th Judicial Circuit, Amira
Bills:
SB 2, HB 2, HB 2000, HB 2196, HB 213, HB 222, HB 645, HB 1458, HB 1022, HB 141, HB 502, HB 643, HB 3093, HB 1700, HB 117, SB 503, SB 2, HB 120, HB 20, HB 150, HB 6, HB 100, HB 210, HB 215, HB 1393, HB 1151, HB 1268, HB 142, HB 451, HB 124, HB 2, HB 2000, HB 2196, HB 213, HB 222, HB 645, HB 1458, HB 1022, HB 141, HB 502, HB 643, HB 3093, HB 1700, HB 117
Keywords:
public education, teacher compensation, certification, funding, school finance, educator rights, education funding, charter schools, staff compensation, state aid, retention allotment, child grooming, sex offender registration, criminal justice, reportable conviction, law enforcement, virtual education, hybrid learning, school funding, average daily attendance
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
Senate - Tax, Business and Transportation Jan 29th, 2026 at 02:36 pm
Senate Tax, Business & Transportation
Transcript Highlights:
- And so there is a case pending in the first judicial district. I think Mr.
- enables the tracking of patients, providers, and their loved ones, all without the safeguard of a judicial
- And we heard loud and clear from law enforcement that that requirement of a judicial order is not workable
- So that legislator, if they met their criteria, would be eligible for the tax credit.
- So if you are eligible for retirement and you retire, the first $30,000 is tax-free of your retirement
Keywords:
tax credits, municipality, county property, industrial revenue bonds, economic development, qualified expenditures, solar energy, tax credit, renewable energy, photovoltaic, solar thermal, New Mexico, economic incentive, energy independence, SB40, Driver Privacy and Safety Act, automated license plate reader, ALPR, license plate reader, vehicle surveillance
NM
New Mexico 2026 Regular Session
Senate - Health and Public Affairs Jan 28th, 2026 at 03:08 pm
Senate Health & Public Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- The First Judicial District Attorney, Mary Carmack Altweiss, supports this legislation.
- He said the district attorney's office and the judicial system do not deal with criminals and habitual
- Unfortunately, I don't believe SB 17 will survive judicial review, and that's according to Justice Scalia
- somehow that the person that has filled out the paperwork passed a background check is then not eligible
- So there could be some places, sir, that may not be able to be eligible for gun shows anymore based on
Keywords:
Medicaid, healthcare, medical education, salaries, graduate education, clinician pay, health sciences, education funding, faculty salary, University of New Mexico, healthcare funding, general fund, state budget, New Mexico legislation, gun control, firearm safety, dealer regulation, illegal trade, background checks, 996
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on the Judiciary Jun 21st, 2026 at 01:00 pm
Joint Committee on the Judiciary
Transcript Highlights:
- Rather than process these cases through a judicial juvenile court, they will go through a youth court
- It is necessary to focus our judicial efforts to crack down on those who supply these substances rather
- Rather, it empowers the judicial system to identify and hold accountable mid- to high-level dealers who
- When forfeiture is used to go after well-valued property, it impacts disbanded to people and grace judicial
- Next, we strongly support people and grace judicial resources.
Summary:
The hearing covered a wide range of Judiciary Committee bills, with much of the testimony focused on criminal justice, public safety, and civil asset forfeiture reform. Several lawmakers and advocates supported bills to increase penalties or create new offenses related to assaults on sports officials, assaults on transit workers, reckless discharge of firearms, fires and explosives, pill press machines, and drug-induced homicide. Testifiers described rising harassment and violence against youth sports officials and transit workers, as well as the fentanyl overdose crisis and the need for stronger tools to prosecute dealers whose conduct leads to death. Supporters of the sports-official and transit-worker bills emphasized declining referee availability and repeated assaults on commuter rail and MBTA workers. District attorneys also backed bills on reckless firearm discharge and fires/explosives, saying current law does not adequately address dangerous conduct that endangers bystanders.
The committee also heard testimony on several proposals related to youth diversion and prison mitigation. Supporters of the youth court justice fund bill said youth courts are peer-led diversion programs with strong compliance and low recidivism, and argued for a stable funding source rather than annual earmarks. A representative from Bridgewater supported a prison mitigation fund for municipalities that host state prisons, saying the costs of public safety and emergency services are not fully covered. On gun policy, testimony split between supporters of a bill to ban in-state manufacture of assault-style rifles for civilian sale and opponents or skeptics of other firearm-related measures, including a bill on collateralizing firearms and a bill to increase penalties for drug trafficking combined with illegal firearm offenses.
A major portion of the hearing was devoted to civil asset forfeiture reform. Advocates from the ACLU, CPCS, the Boston Bar Association, the Institute for Justice, and others supported bills to increase the burden of proof, improve transparency and reporting, require counsel, and limit or eliminate the current practice of directing forfeiture proceeds to law enforcement. They argued the current system creates perverse incentives, lacks adequate due process, and is insufficiently transparent. District Attorney Paul Tucker defended current forfeiture practices, saying his office has reporting and oversight, uses the funds for investigations and community programs, and warned that reducing forfeiture revenue would hinder crime fighting. No votes or final committee actions were taken during the hearing; the chairs repeatedly thanked witnesses and indicated the bills would remain under consideration.
NM
New Mexico 2025 Regular Session
IC - Legislative Health and Human Services Jul 22nd, 2025
Legislative Health & Human Services Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- Those regions are designated, as you know, by judicial district. They've made that determination.
- We took our list of providers and overlaid them onto judicial districts to see what our list Of providers
- not the entire state, but in our association, there is an overlay of where we fit and cover the judicial
- So there's going to be Some work has to be done to assign providers to judicial districts where they
- I understand, Madam Chair, I've been very judicious with my time previously, so I just wanted to make
CO
Colorado 2026 Regular Session
Colorado House 2026 Legislative Day 086 Part 2 Apr 10th, 2026
Colorado House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Eligibility determinations and client services contracts for special eligibility determinations.
- Eligibility determination. Eligibility overflow processing. Return mail processing.
- <05:19:35.600>
vendor for centralized eligibility vendor for centralized eligibility vendor - >
overflow <05:19:54.798>processing I 8 eligibility overflow processing I 8 eligibility - <05:42:10.160>
8397,7319 for eligibility 8397,7319 for eligibility 8397,7319 attend.<05:42
OK
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm concerned that this bill prevents landowners from seeking full judicial recourse for the loss of
- law judge, and then ultimately, the three statewide elected Corporation Commissioners serve in a judicial
- water and wastewater infrastructure program that includes the development of competitive loans for eligible
Keywords:
SB1191, Oklahoma Energy Initiative Act, Oklahoma Low Carbon Energy Initiative Board, low carbon energy, clean energy, energy policy, renewable energy, board repeal, statutory repeal, administrative board, energy committee, natural resources, Oklahoma statutes, 17 O.S. 802.3, groundwater, indemnity fund, well drilling, pollution prevention, regulatory compliance, SB1319
AZ
Transcript Highlights:
- If that is a dilapidated building or a building in poor condition, unsafe, it is also not eligible.
- These are more judicial. It's not like us or council deciding on an issue.
- These are more judicial. It's not like us or council deciding on an issue.
- This does not remove judicial discretion.
- For the record, my name is Leanna Garcia, and I represent the Arizona Judicial Council.
NH
New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session
House Ways and Means (02/05/2025)
Transcript Highlights:
- decision they would of Quasi judicial decision they would end<01:02:42.119>
up <01:02:42.279>< - The BTLA takes on a quasi-judicial role similar to a superior court, makes rulings on how statutes are
- The BTLA takes on a quasi-judicial role similar to a superior court, makes rulings on how statutes are
- up to them they take on a quasi judicial role<01:10:01.600>
similar <01:10:01.920>to <01 - That five years of abandonment, 10 years if they never built, that would come up eligible to come up
Summary:
The committee first held a public hearing and then an executive session on HB 650, a housekeeping-style bill from the Joint Committee on Dedicated Funds. Testimony explained that the bill would remove references to two already-repealed dedicated funds, split the state parks dedicated fund so Cannon Mountain winter activities would be tracked separately from the rest of the parks system, and place a $1 million cap on the robotics education fund so excess money would revert to the general fund. Supporters said the changes were mainly administrative but would improve accounting and avoid timing issues; committee members asked about a typographical error in the bill text and whether the measure was more than housekeeping. The committee later voted 16-0 to recommend HB 650 ought to pass, and then placed it on the consent calendar.
The committee also opened a public hearing on HB 585, which would revise the property tax exemption for religious organizations. Representative John Janigian, the sponsor, said the bill was intended to help small churches and other religious groups that own parsonages or worship buildings but no longer have a resident pastor, allowing them to rent space or use property for church purposes without losing the exemption so long as the money is used for church operations, maintenance, or outreach. He described his Salem church’s parsonage being taxed after it was no longer occupied by a pastor, and said the bill would prevent similar burdens on small congregations. Former Representative Betty Gay testified in support, describing prior assessor actions in Salem that taxed church land and buildings very aggressively, while a Municipal Association representative testified in opposition. Committee members raised questions about how terms such as “regularly recognized and constituted denomination” would be defined, whether the bill could be applied consistently to larger denominations with multiple parishes, and whether legislative research should review past treatment of similar cases.