Video & Transcript Research : 'front pay'

Page 90 of 500
AR

Arkansas 2026 Regular Session

JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE Mar 4th, 2026

JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE

Transcript Highlights:
  • paying 75% of the share.
  • So the amount of administrative expenses that we pay for SNAP go from 50-50 share to we're paying 75%
  • So I don't have the list in front of me.
  • pay.
  • Pay. Has the increase in pay helped in recruiting any at all? Yes, sir. It definitely has helped.
Summary: The committee first adopted revised JBC rules, which staff said were updated to reflect legislation passed in the 2025 session. It then heard a presentation from DFA Secretary Jim Hudson on the governor’s proposed balanced budget for FY27, with no action taken. Hudson said the budget reflects three priorities: limiting state-government growth, continuing investments in education, and advancing income-tax cuts. He highlighted increases for education funding through EFAs, pay-plan costs for Corrections, DPS, and the Attorney General, higher education productivity funding, drug task forces, a Corrections medical contract, the governor’s 1033 initiative, SNAP error-rate reduction efforts, and an additional $100 million set aside for Medicaid sustainability. Committee members questioned the size of the tax cuts, the balance requirement, public education funding, Medicaid trust-fund levels, EFA funding, and the expected impact of new SNAP cost-sharing rules. The Division of Higher Education then presented its productivity-based funding recommendations. Officials said institutions were 2.61% more productive overall, with funding changes driven by a statutory formula that rewards degree production, underserved populations, and high-demand fields. Members asked about declines at UA Little Rock, the formula’s multipliers, the role of the Arkansas Access Act and a new return-on-investment metric, and how two-year colleges are adjusted for size. The committee also reviewed special items and approved two letters: one authorizing 17 net personnel changes across nine institutions, and another adding special language for North Arkansas College’s entry into the University of Arkansas system. The committee then adopted the Higher Education Coordinating Board’s recommendations for all institutions. A lengthy portion of the meeting focused on the University of Arkansas system, especially Fayetteville’s athletics funding and the broader impact of the House/NIL settlement. Chancellor Charles Robinson and system officials explained that the board had waived a longstanding campus transfer and directed the university to provide an additional $6 million to athletics, with some costs likely to be passed through to students but partially offset by existing budget growth. Members debated whether the university should prioritize academics or athletics, how the transfer originated, and whether the athletic changes would affect affordability. The committee also discussed the 1890 extension program at UAPB and the Division of Agriculture’s land-grant funding. UAPB officials said the state match is intended to be one-to-one, that the current recommendation aligns appropriation with actual spending, and that a $2 million set-aside remains available if needed. The Division of Agriculture later clarified that its Smith-Lever extension and Hatch research funds are part of the UA system’s separate budget and that the state matched about $6.2 million in federal extension funding last year. The committee then moved to the Department of Corrections. It approved G1, transferring 51 positions to the secretary’s office to activate a recidivism program, with an estimated cost of about $4 million. Staff then began walking through the department’s FY27 budget, noting an increase of about $8 million for administration and shared services, including a $170,000 sex-offender assessment appropriation moved under Act 723 of 2025 and roughly $6 million more for medical contracts. Questions on the Corrections budget had just begun when the transcript ended.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Transportation Finance and Policy Committee 3/17/26 - Part 1

Transportation Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • members here uh would want to pay members here uh would want to pay attention.<00:01:59.520>
  • Uh, we have this bill back in front of us because it wasn't technically in front of the committee before
  • So there are some competing pressures along that front.
  • So there are some competing pressures along that front.
  • There are some competing pressures along that front.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Taxes Committee 4/16/26

Taxes

Transcript Highlights:
  • real estate tax. 55% of our property don't pay real estate taxes.
  • Happy to answer any questions. tax is the right way to pay for this big tax is the right way to pay for
  • I hope you're getting paid mileage. front of us today, but are but have been front of us today, but are
  • That's to pay for one kind of facility.
  • what's happening in front of us today. what's happening in front of us today.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 3/25/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • The program pays for itself as higher rents subsidize the entire housing stock.
  • The program pays for itself as higher rents subsidize the entire housing stock.
  • The program pays for itself as higher rents subsidize the entire housing stock.
  • The program pays for itself as higher rents subsidize the entire housing stock.
  • I'm not sure that opportunity comes in front of you regularly.
KY

Kentucky 2026 Regular Session

Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary (2-19-26)

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:11:44.959> their creditors or get out of paying their creditors or get out of paying their
  • So worst case scenario, the family does not pay on the trust.
  • Uh, because if they don't pay you, my experience has been that if you don't pay your mortgage within
  • So worst case scenario, the family does not pay on the trust.
  • Uh, because if they don't pay you, my experience has been that if you don't pay your mortgage within
Keywords: 958, all
Summary: The Senate Judiciary Committee met with a quorum and took up Senate Bill 50, sponsored by Chair Storm and President Stivers, a broad probate and trust measure. Stivers and attorney Barry explained that the bill updates Kentucky probate and intestacy procedures to better fit electronic filing and modern family structures, adjusts inheritance tax classifications to reflect longer lifespans and more complex family relationships, and adopts newer trust tools used in other states, including electronic wills and directed trusts. They also described a domestic asset protection trust provision, saying it is intended to level the playing field with other states and is not meant to help people evade existing creditors; they noted one non-uniform section may have fiscal impact and could warrant referral to Appropriations and Revenue. Members asked about the asset protection trust language, especially whether it could shield assets after a lawsuit is pending or threatened. Barry said the bill would not allow transfers to defeat existing or threatened claims and that the protection only applies where there are no such claims at the time of transfer. Senators also discussed whether the trust could be used for spendthrift-style family planning, with Barry noting trusts can already be drafted for that purpose and that the bill is not aimed at that issue. Senator Thomas requested more detail on the inheritance tax changes, and Stivers explained that the bill would move more beneficiaries into the no-tax category because estates now often pass to older children, grandchildren, and step-relatives, creating unexpected tax liability. He and others said the changes were meant to reflect modern family patterns and longer life expectancy, and Thomas said he was not opposed to the tax changes but wanted the public to understand them. Tim Shank of the Kentucky Bankers Association testified that the bankers were not opposing the bill overall but had concerns about the domestic asset protection trust section, particularly its treatment of existing mortgages and creditor claims. He said the bill’s notice and claim-extinguishment provisions could create unintended consequences for mortgage holders, and he urged changes to protect existing debt. In response, Senator Thomas questioned whether a lender that takes no action for the bill’s six-month-to-two-year claim period should lose its claim, but Shank replied that federal mortgage rules and payment status could complicate that assumption. The discussion ended with acknowledgment that the mortgage issue was likely unintended and would need further review.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Joint Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources, May 27, 2026 - PM

Travel, Recreation, Wildlife & Cultural Resources

Transcript Highlights:
  • <00:51:32.000> for, pays for, pays for, you<00:51:34.240> know,<00:51:34.480> the
  • Good thoughts on that front.
  • then we will pay for that adjustment. then we will pay for that adjustment.
  • Uh this would be a bill that front.
  • pay for it, not the sportsman. pay for it, not the sportsman.
Keywords: 916, all
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Finance Division II (01/29/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • <03:44:36.399> very enhanced training but we they pay very enhanced training but we they pay
  • knowing requirement of having a front knowing requirement of having a front license<04:49:07.958
  • <04:51:31.400> for about the T Pike toll Revenue pays for about the T Pike toll Revenue pays
  • and you can either pay by plate or pay by E-ZPass.
  • <04:58:04.718> off that goes toward um paying off that goes toward um paying off i93<04:58
Keywords: 928, house, all
Summary: The Division 2 Finance Committee heard an overview and budget presentation from New Hampshire Fish and Game, led by new Executive Director Stephanie Simi and Business Division Chief Kathy Leonti. The agency described its mission to conserve and manage fish, wildlife, and marine resources, and emphasized growing pressures from disease, climate impacts, habitat change, and increased public demand. Simi said the department is largely funded by hunting and fishing license revenue and federal grants, is reviewing staffing and internal processes, and faces critical needs including permanent funding for environmental review staff, infrastructure and IT modernization, and possible service reductions if additional support is not found. Members asked about specific program and policy issues, including chronic wasting disease in deer, hemorrhagic disease in rabbits and hares, moose population decline, and a proposed bait-disease bill. The department said it is actively monitoring diseases and did not see a need for the bait bill at this time. Legislators also discussed the Hike Safe program, which the department said has grown from an expected $100,000 annually to more than $300,000, and a possible boating version of that program, which the department said remains under consideration but would involve complex logistics and multiple agencies. Questions were also raised about rescue costs, out-of-state hikers, and whether boat registrations could be used as a revenue source; Fish and Game said boat registration is handled by the Department of Safety, though the department receives $5 per registered boat for the public boat access program. The budget discussion focused on revenue projections, use of unrestricted Fish and Game funds, and dependence on federal reimbursements. Leonti said the department met the governor’s general fund target but not the Fish and Game fund target without using surplus unrestricted funds, leaving only about $100,000 in the fund by the end of the biennium. She said the budget uses more than $18 million in Fish and Game funds annually against about $14 million in unrestricted revenue, and that five of 193 full-time positions remain unfunded. The department warned that if federal grants were halted, it could cost about $5 million over five months and force the Fish and Game fund to cover the gap. Committee members also requested that future presentations be sent electronically in advance, and the department agreed to do so.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select Jul 31st, 2025

Disaster Preparedness & Flooding, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • I see, so- Even though we pay for the gauges, we do not- So you pay for the gauges, but you don't get
  • I generally don't pay attention.
  • , that they have to pay back.
  • We have an RV in front of our lakefront.
  • We didn't pay attention. And here's what happened.
Keywords: 997, house, all
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • So, I mean, we pay out... are expected to pay out about $16 billion between DI and paid family benefits
  • State workers money twice, both by them paying taxes and then again when we have to pay $85 a month to
  • So everyone else who's going to be forced back to office and pay for parking will be paying the full
  • I don't have it in front of me.
  • Beginning with the July 2025 pay period.
Keywords: 988, house, all
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Joint Appropriations Committee, June 22, 2026 - PM

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • It suggests in that staff comment to pay close attention to what the purpose these funds can be used
  • It suggests in that staff comment to pay close attention to what the purpose these funds can be used
  • If we start ending up on the front page of a paper and we’re not able to provide clean drinking water
  • And those are they have in front of them.
  • With only 7,500 people within the community and their municipal boundaries to pay for it.
Keywords: 916, all
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • So it's actually direct medical care, just like paying for an x-ray or anything else by cash.
  • It's only about 3% of our cases that go in front of a civil court.
  • And then the front, the customer facing...
  • Some facilities do, so insurance doesn't pay for it.
  • The money goes to your CMO, a doctor; the doctor then pays the IB taxes.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Budget Committee Jun 15th, 2026

Transcript Highlights:
  • They have not shied away from the task in front of them.
  • And yet the proposal in front of us today has multiple... ...tax increases.
  • What California pays us does not reflect the true cost of care. Everything...
  • What California pays us does not reflect the true cost of care.
  • But adding slots alone is not enough without increased provider pay.
Summary: The Assembly Budget Committee met to consider the 2026 Budget Act, which leaders said was the negotiated compromise with the Senate and was expected to move to the floor that evening. Opening remarks emphasized that the plan balances the budget over two years, reduces the structural deficit, and builds reserves, while also protecting core services in the face of federal cuts. Jason Sisney outlined the legislative budget framework and the likely floor bills, including AB 109, SB 110, SB 122, and SB 125. Department of Finance representative Eric Khali said the administration appreciated the two-year balanced approach and supported the modification in SB 122, while noting the package uses additional revenues and new spending to soften or reject some proposed cuts. Most of the discussion focused on major spending areas. Members and subcommittee chairs highlighted protections and additions for health care and human services, including rejecting the proposed Medi-Cal asset limit change, delaying premium increases, restoring clinic and dental funding, supporting distressed hospitals and county indigent care, and expanding county eligibility staffing to handle H.R. 1-related workload. Education members described record or expanded support for TK-12 schools, child care, special education, community colleges, teacher recruitment, and higher education, including a change to extend Cal Grant eligibility to age 30 for some community college students. Housing and homelessness funding was increased for HAP, multifamily housing, and the low-income housing tax credit, while public safety members pointed to investments in victims’ services, restorative justice, and prison closure savings. Several members also raised concerns or priorities tied to the budget deal. Some praised the package as a moral document that protects vulnerable Californians, immigrant communities, LGBTQ residents, seniors, and people with disabilities. Others noted unresolved issues, including the MCO tax’s impact on districts, the need for more support for local journalism, arts, biotech R&D incentives, transit and GGRF-related concerns, and the need for continued work on Prop. 98 and long-term fiscal resilience. The vice chair cautioned that despite the current progress, the state remains vulnerable to revenue volatility and warned that the budget should build more resilience against a possible downturn. No formal vote was taken in the portion provided, but the committee was preparing the budget package for floor action and final negotiations.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • I think we're going to do a few questions up front.
  • , because we're paying.
  • We're the ones that are paying.
  • Everyone has to pay a part. And I think I shared that yesterday. Everyone has to pay a part.
  • And so they're just willing to pay the fine.
Keywords: 987, senate, all
Summary: The joint Senate hearing of the Natural Resources and Water Committee and the Emergency Management Committee focused on wildfire resilience, with members discussing the SB 254 report on enhancing California’s response to natural catastrophes. Opening remarks emphasized the scale of wildfire damage, the need for prevention and preparedness, and concerns about the affordability and insurability crisis. Senators repeatedly contrasted the relatively small share of funding going to community hardening with the much larger amounts spent on utility wildfire mitigation and landscape-scale projects, and several members raised concerns about CEQA delays, one-time funding, and the need for more sustainable, ongoing financing. The Legislative Analyst’s Office presented an overview showing about $4.7 billion in state wildfire resilience appropriations from 2018-19 through 2025-26, with funding shifting from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund to the General Fund and then to Proposition 4. LAO noted that only about $65 million had been specifically targeted to community hardening, while most funding went to forest health, fuels, research, and related programs. LAO also said one-time funding will decline in coming years and that future GGRF support is uncertain, though General Fund use is not legally precluded. Members asked about maintenance costs, polluter-pays ideas, and whether performance metrics should focus more on property and community risk reduction than acres treated. Cal Fire’s State Fire Marshal described the state’s community wildfire preparedness strategy, centered on home hardening, defensible space, and neighborhood-scale mitigation. He said roughly 4 million homes are in the wildland-urban interface, most built before modern fire-resistant standards, and argued that the state must move from response to prevention. He said Cal Fire is incorporating the SB 254 recommendations into its updated action plan, has streamlined some fuel-reduction projects under a recent executive proclamation, and is shifting some grant funding toward maintenance of existing treatments. Cal OES described the AB 38 pilot and FEMA hazard mitigation work, saying the pilot helped build tools and standards for home hardening but that federal approval delays remain a major barrier; the agency reported 155 hardened properties, 19 under construction, and 370 assessed and waiting. The Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force said it has coordinated more than $6 billion in state and federal investments, is moving toward regional block grants and better data-driven prioritization, and is developing separate community and landscape strategies. The hearing ended with discussion of modeling, data gaps, utility coordination, contractor capacity, and possible legislative or budget changes to better align funding and metrics with community safety outcomes.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • I know I'm not standing there in front of you.
  • And so in the loser-pay, I'm just curious about your definition of loser pay.
  • A health plan does pay for that claim, but they pay it off of a usual and customary amount.
  • We pay more because the patient was paying more before. Now we pay more.
  • But loser pay does that.
CA
Transcript Highlights:
  • economic climate that will provide opportunity, continue to inspire entrepreneurship, create good-paying
  • There's a deck in front of you and I promise I won't go into detail on all of the slides, but I want
  • Not to pay people to do what they would have done anyway. So I'll give a couple of examples.
  • Right now, their annual annual is to pay to the state of California is $2,800 a year.
  • Any comparison, whether anybody, any other industry pays for it, for that type of service, they pay $100
Keywords: 988, house, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

February 5, 2025 - 12:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • The competitive nature of the pay is another factor.
  • If you're paying attention to the website, I see a large number of arrests.
  • And I said it yesterday in front of one of the committees.
  • Paying costs of supervision, not changing residence, is directed to the probation office, paying costs
  • officers like you pay other law enforcement officers.
Summary: The Criminal Justice Subcommittee heard an informational presentation from the Florida Department of Corrections on how the prison and community supervision systems operate after sentencing. Assistant Deputy Secretary Hope Gartman described the reception process for new inmates, including intake, medical and mental health screening, classification, custody and housing levels, gain time, and the department’s academic, vocational, substance abuse, chaplaincy, visitation, and communication programs. She emphasized that reentry begins on day one and that program placement is driven by risk and needs assessments, with facilities matched to inmates’ medical, mental health, and security requirements. Members also asked about family contact, visitor applications, inmate welfare trust funds, tablet access, private prison placement, staffing shortages, overtime, contraband interdiction, and waiting lists for programs; several follow-up materials were requested for distribution to all members. Mr. Winkler then outlined community corrections, explaining the different supervision types under Florida law, including probation, drug offender probation, community control, sex offender supervision, conditional release, and addiction recovery supervision. He described the department’s monitoring tools, such as office and field visits, warrantless searches, alternative sanctioning for technical violations, telephone reporting for low-risk offenders, employment assistance, and mobile probation and reentry units. He said the department’s supervision success rate is about 62%, with more than 91% of successful completers not returning to custody within three years. Members questioned officer workloads, the use of radios and GPS check-ins, the rollout of uniforms and firearms, how violations are handled, and whether all circuits participate in alternative sanctioning; Winkler said the program is statewide and that the department is seeking funding for radios. During public comment, Florida Cares Charity urged the committee to consider evidence on deterrence, parole, and recidivism, arguing that community supervision is less costly than incarceration and can be effective. James Beardy of the Florida PBA emphasized the dangers faced by correctional and probation officers, including long shifts, field searches, and working alone, and argued for higher pay and better support comparable to other law enforcement. The meeting concluded with the chair thanking the presenters and public speakers, and the subcommittee adjourned without taking any legislative votes or formal actions.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Health Policy Jan 14th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • So we pay them start being for serving for on the board.
  • As Chair Burton Burton mentioned, it says there is a lot of material in front of you.
  • Those costs are not included in rate development, so we're not paying for them twice.
  • Do you have a separate drg that you pay?
  • Hospitals are your plans are required to pay hospitals versus prenatal.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
UT

Utah 2025 Regular Session

Economic Development and Workforce Services Interim Committee - November 19, 2025

Economic Development and Workforce Services Interim Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's not just about what we do in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, or even the Wasatch Front.
  • Having growth help pay for growth is a really critical item.
  • We never get in front of our communities.
  • We have about nine front-facing divisions across the department.
  • Then you have to pay those back as well as replenish your own state's funds.
Keywords: 985, all
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

Rules Apr 1st, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • to me that what we're doing that this bill is requiring out of state beneficiaries, the higher and pay
  • My door is always open to my front. Thank you.
  • Economy 340 billion with a B billion dollars. >> Every year, Florida drivers pay an average of 37% more
  • We're paying 45% more. Then the national average.
  • Senator Burton, again, I don't have a parent practice act in front of me. This bill is no language.
Keywords: 999, senate, all
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 4/15/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • They wanted to start work only after I paid $25,000 up front.
  • I had to pay all over again and am hoping to be reimbursed.
  • I had to pay all over again and am hoping to be reimbursed.
  • I had to pay all over again and hoping to be reimbursed.
  • And yes, they will have to pay a public appraiser.