Transcript Highlights:

• Some of the work we do around testing, we think about piloting and testing all the time.
• So we tested this pilot. We are seeing huge results.
• I said, “Okay, test it out. Tell me what you've learned,” right?
• To test potentially? Well, I would have to hear what that workflow is.
• We’d have to test and learn for sure. But thanks, Marilyn, it’s a good point.

Keywords: 962, all

Summary: The MAPOC Women and Children’s Health Subcommittee heard a presentation from Kate Parker Riley, executive director of the Connecticut Dental Health Partnership, on the Husky Dental Program and efforts to improve oral health during pregnancy. She reviewed the structure of Connecticut’s Medicaid dental benefit, the ASO model, provider network, utilization trends, and member barriers to care. She noted that children’s dental measures remain above the national median, but adult utilization is lower and the dental provider network has been shrinking, with longer wait times in rural areas. A major focus was the state’s goal to raise the rate of oral evaluation during pregnancy from about 17.5% to 25% by 2030. Riley described planned outreach to OB/GYN practices using a draft “snapshot” report showing each practice’s pregnancy oral-health rate compared with the state average, along with education materials based on ACOG and AAP guidance. Committee members and guests discussed barriers such as lack of provider training, workflow burden, access to dentists who will see pregnant patients, and the need for stronger referral bridges. Suggestions included adding simple oral-health screening questions in OB settings, using human support to make appointments, and exploring co-located dental hygienists or other embedded models. Riley also highlighted partnerships with DSS, DCF, Head Start, WIC, Read to Grow, YMCA programs, refugee resettlement agencies, and school-based and hospital partners, as well as data-sharing and navigation efforts. She said pregnant members newly identified through HUSKY will now receive outreach and navigation support. DSS dental director Carolyn MacArthur introduced herself and said she supports the initiative, noting the literature linking untreated maternal dental disease to poor child oral-health outcomes. No votes were taken; the meeting ended with thanks and a preview of upcoming July presentations on integrated behavioral health and home visitation programs.

Transcript Highlights:

• Right now, Texas law permits officers to administer these tests without consistent training or testing
• particular type of testing.
• Most of the criminal tests are on.
• or receive the test?
• You have time to pass the test.

Bills: SB 36, HB 1065, HB2929, HB2956, HB3009, HB3420, HB3626, HB3649, HB4956, HB4993, HB5293, HB5308, HB5528, HCR118, SB36, HB4023

Keywords: transportation, regional authorities, mobility, infrastructure, sales tax, employee classification, private security, misclassification, workforce regulations, Texas Workforce Commission, autism, peace officers, training program, law enforcement, intervention, communication, developmental disability, family violence, central database, criminal offense

Transcript Highlights:

• It's based on a simple lab test called a PSA blood test, which allows for early detection.
• Two Texas studies recently found that an increase in PSA testing on the count...
• the test.
• So you get a PSA test, and it's a PSA test which has a problem with false positives.
• You have to go for a follow-up test, and the follow-up test is very invasive.

Bills: HB712, HB722, HB946, HB1687, HB1809, HB1899, HB2528, HB2583, HB2741, HB2750, HB3021, HB3150, HB3265, HB3658, HB3812, HB3960, HB4392, HB4432

Keywords: prostate cancer, health benefit plans, insurance coverage, cost sharing, preventive health care, auto insurance, total loss evaluation, disclosure, insurance materials, vehicle appraisal, HB 946, Texas Insurance Code, automobile insurance claims, oral release, written release, settlement agreement, claim release, property damage, bodily injury, psychological injury

Transcript Highlights:

• which created the right for sexual assault survivors to opt out of having their sexual assault kits tested
• Tested as well as for the crime labs as well.
• or not tested as may be the case, but to make sure that there's efficiencies with the transfer of the
• seconds. of the efficiencies that have been developed over the years and making sure that kits get tested
• or not tested as may be the case, but to make sure that there's efficiencies with the transfer of the

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on September 10, 2025, with one bill on the agenda: SB 733 by Senator Rahab. The author described the measure as a cleanup bill that clarifies implementation of SB 464, which gave sexual assault survivors the right to opt out of testing their sexual assault kits. The bill was presented as providing clearer procedures for practitioners and investigating agencies, especially when a survivor is undecided about whether to have a kit tested. The California Department of Justice testified in a neutral position and said it was available to answer technical questions. The California Association of Crime Lab Directors also took a neutral position, thanking the author and committee staff for amendments that preserved efficiencies in the transfer and handling of kits while clarifying whether kits should be tested. No opposition was voiced. The committee then moved the bill, and SB 733 was passed out of committee on a roll call vote with an A recommendation. The meeting then adjourned after no further public comment or additional business.

Transcript Highlights:

• and the written test in West Virginia.
• And vice versa, the West Virginians will not have to take a written test and a skills test in Ireland
• So the West Virginians will not have to take a written test and a skills test in Ireland if they are
• And in Ireland, there's about 14 drivers' tests for our folks.
• But as soon as they establish a residence and they're working in Ireland, they have to take 14 tests.

Keywords: 994, senate, all

Summary: The Senate Transportation and Infrastructure Committee met, approved the March 9, 2026 minutes, and then took up the engrossed committee substitute for House Bill 4577 relating to driver's licenses. Counsel explained that the bill would authorize the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to enter reciprocal agreements with Ireland and Japan to recognize each other’s driver’s licenses, provided the foreign licensing standards are at least as stringent as West Virginia’s. The bill also requires drivers using recognized foreign licenses to carry insurance and comply with state financial responsibility laws, clarifies that foreign license holders are not eligible to register to vote through the DMV, and allows the commissioner to set related fees and adopt rules. A strike-and-insert amendment and a title amendment were adopted. The committee heard from DMV counsel Adam Hawley and the bill’s House sponsor, Delegate Mike Hornby. Hawley said the measure would allow citizens of the listed countries to avoid retaking written and skills tests when transferring licenses, and noted West Virginia already has similar arrangements with Taiwan, South Korea, and Germany. Hornby said the bill was intended to support economic development and trade ties, especially with Ireland, where American workers and companies face licensing hurdles; he said Ireland had requested state-level reciprocity and that Japan was added because of West Virginia’s existing trade relationship there. Several senators expressed support, describing the bill as a symbolic and practical step toward foreign investment and job creation. After discussion, the committee voted to report the engrossed committee substitute for House Bill 4577, as amended, with a recommendation that it do pass. The title amendment was then adopted, and the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• We are removing the ACT test score as one of the qualifications from what I recall.
• And so for students that did the ACT as their accountability test, they could use the subscores from
• that specific test to meet one of the additional indicators in that workforce-ready pathway.
• I understand we're not requiring students to take that test, but many still can. They can elect to.
• because after this year seniors graduate, no student will have had the ACT as their accountability test

Bills: HB1404

Keywords: HB 1404, North Dakota scholarship, scholarship eligibility, student aid, high school graduation, college readiness, career readiness, career and technical education, CTE, dual credit, advanced placement, AP exam, International Baccalaureate, IB exam, ACT, SAT, WorkKeys, ASVAB, JROTC, Civil Air Patrol

Summary: The Senate Education Committee met with six members present and first took up House Bill 1404, which would update North Dakota scholarship eligibility language by allowing the NDA Plus assessment to be used in place of ACT scores in certain pathways. The Department of Public Instruction explained that the bill does not eliminate the ACT entirely, but removes outdated references tied to ACT accountability testing that will no longer apply after this year’s seniors graduate. Members discussed how the change affects public and nonpublic schools, then voted 6-0 to give HB 1404 a do pass recommendation. The committee then returned to House Bill 1363, a bill dealing with school emergency response planning and automatic external defibrillators. Members adopted an amendment clarifying that the requirements apply to school-owned facilities and grounds, replacing language about school events and venues, and revising the planning language for school-based events not held on school-owned property. The committee also debated whether the bill should be mandatory or permissive; a motion to change “shall” to “may” failed, with members noting the bill’s liability protections. The committee then voted 5-1 to pass HB 1363 as amended, with Senator Gerhardt carrying the bill. Before recessing, the chair noted that House Bill 1533 would be taken up later in the day after additional information from DPI was received.

Transcript Highlights:

• an expert for that independent testing. an expert for that independent testing.
• We don't have access to those tests to test you for those drugs."
• <04:29:30.000> And tests to test you for those drugs."
• And tests to test you for those drugs."
• test for the<04:46:26.560> DNA.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We heard last week also HB 401, relative to animal testing funded by New Hampshire state funds.
• The idea that if there is any animal testing, they need to sort of alert the House or the Senate.
• more about what sort of animal testing more about what sort of animal testing is<00:57:35.680>
• for hb401 relative to animal testing for hb401 relative to animal testing funded<02:53:32.359>
• <02:56:22.160> funded hb401 relative to animal testing funded hb401 relative to animal testing

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The meeting covered two main items. First, the solid waste subcommittee reviewed draft language for HB 707, focusing on landfill siting and permitting standards. Members and the Department of Environmental Services discussed replacing repeated references to “aquifer” with “drinking water well,” clarifying that aquifer is a broad term, and considering whether a statutory definition was needed. They also debated the bill’s setback and time-of-travel provisions, including the 10^-5 standard, a 1,500-foot distance, and whether the bill should rely more on performance-based criteria than prescriptive distances. Another major topic was permit denial language tied to applicants with significant histories of repeated serious violations or landfill-related litigation; the department said it already has related authority in current rules, but noted some wording was still too vague and could be tightened. No vote was taken, and the chair closed the hearing with plans to continue work later. The second item was a work session on HB 424, which would direct the Department of Agriculture, Markets and Food to create forms for businesses to request information about service animals and establish a study committee on fraudulent or untrained service animals. Several members said the problem raised by the bill was real but expressed concern that the legislature may be limited by the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. Others argued that a study committee would likely not produce a workable solution and might conflict with leadership’s direction to avoid unnecessary study committees. Members discussed whether the bill should be retained, amended, or instead replaced with a letter or resolution to the federal delegation. The committee appeared to lean toward ITL and possibly pursuing a letter to federal officials, but no final vote is reflected in the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• So you can see where then the tests wouldn't really indicate anything.
• So you can see where then the tests wouldn't really indicate anything.
• Um, what happens with the tests, the standardized tests, is that especially at my school, parents in
• So you can see where then the tests wouldn't really indicate anything.
• So you can see where then the tests wouldn't really indicate anything.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• I was going to um get a pregnancy test I was going to um get a pregnancy test that<00:15:25.759>
• <00:15:36.040> pregnancy<00:15:36.920> test an over-the-counter pregnancy test an over-the-counter
• <00:16:12.120> was time um and the pregnancy test was time um and the pregnancy test was negative
• <00:16:43.800> was me that the my pregnancy test was me that the my pregnancy test was negative
• increases access to Affordable testing increases access to Affordable testing treatment<00:31:25.440

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• Testing, testing. Test. Hello. Yeah, it's a volume. Test. Testing. Check. Sound check.
• Testing, testing. Sound check. No. I think so. Check 1, 2.

Transcript Highlights:

• For infants born to mothers who test For infants born to mothers who test negative,<01:53:44.639
• It depends on what kind of test the pregnant mother gets and when they get the test.
• If a pregnant mother is recently infected and then tested in that time frame and they test negative,
• <02:14:33.280> the depends on like what kind of test the depends on like what kind of test
• > or tested or the test results are lost or tested or the test results are lost or not<02:49:00.960

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• ranges to test out.
• And if we want to... ...aerospace defense contractors looking for test ranges to test out.
• We have done flight tests out of Spaceport.
• We want to continue to do flight tests out of Spaceport.
• How do we—what's blocking us from doing more testing? You said you wanted to do more testing.

Keywords: 996, all

Transcript Highlights:

• into our standard water supply testing.
• Through testing, blood testing, or whatever? There is. It's imperfect, but you can test.
• And we test about 60% of municipal water supplies across the state, and this PFAS testing will be incorporating
• What are we testing for in the water?
• So, we test for pathogens, other contaminants, we test and now we'll be testing for those per and polyfluoroalkyl

Keywords: 1184, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 620 FN, relative to refusal of consent to testing to determine alcohol concentration and
• Thank you, Senator. refusal to testing to determine alcohol refusal to testing to determine alcohol concentration
• <00:42:49.160> SRY opposed to the use of the SRY test SRY opposed to the use of the SRY test
• :52.320> sex<00:42:52.720> in test to determine biological sex in test to determine biological
• He argues that the test women's sports.

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• We've added more testing sites, and we're initiating a new hotspot investigation program.
• We are tested by the Coast Guard. We are tested by the Coast Guard. Commission.
• We are tested by the Coast Guard. We are tested by the state pilot commission.
• We are tested by the Coast Guard. We are tested by the Coast Guard. commission.
• We are tested by the Coast Guard. We are tested by the state pilot commission.

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee hearing covered several bills related to environmental, natural resources, and maritime issues. Representative Markey testified in support of H. 1000, which would create a commission to study financing wastewater infrastructure, especially in southeastern Massachusetts and the South Shore, citing combined sewer overflows and impacts on aquaculture. Members agreed the core challenge is finding long-term financing for wastewater solutions. The committee also heard testimony on H. 902 to establish an Office of Outdoor Recreation, with supporters describing its role in expanding access, supporting underrepresented communities, and helping grow the outdoor economy. Related testimony also supported H. 986, which would codify the Division of Ecological Restoration and the Office of Fishing and Boating Access within the Department of Fish and Game, with witnesses emphasizing habitat restoration, flood reduction, public access, and boating/fishing opportunities. A major portion of the hearing focused on H. 901/S. 597, “An Act Providing Nature for All,” which would dedicate existing sporting goods sales tax revenue to a new conservation fund. Supporters from Mass Audubon, Environmental League of Massachusetts, Appalachian Mountain Club, Trust for Public Land, Massachusetts Rivers Alliance, and conservation groups argued the bill would provide a sustainable revenue stream for land conservation, parks, trails, wetlands, water protection, and climate resilience, while also advancing environmental justice and outdoor recreation. They said the state needs roughly $300 million more per year to meet land conservation goals and that the bill could generate about $100 million annually without raising taxes. Committee members asked about balancing conservation with housing and development, and witnesses said the goals are compatible and that the bill includes safeguards. Witnesses also noted similar funding models in other states. The hearing also included H. 1053, a bill to create a Merrimack River Collaborative. Regional planning and watershed advocates said the river faces bacterial contamination, heavy metals, combined sewer overflows, and other pollution, and that a formal collaborative would help coordinate municipalities, state agencies, and nonprofits across the watershed and possibly across state lines. Another bill, H. 4109, would relocate harbor lines in New Bedford Harbor to allow reconstruction of deteriorating bulkheads at a waterfront industrial site; the New Bedford Port Authority, engineers, and the property owner said the change is needed for permitting and would support port modernization and jobs. Finally, the committee heard extensive testimony on S. 641 regarding marine pilotage in New Bedford. Supporters argued the bill would remove a District 3 pilotage restriction and improve port flexibility and offshore wind operations, while opponents warned it would undermine the state’s compulsory pilotage system, weaken safety, and allow ship owners to shop for pilots. No votes or final actions were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• and the blue line is boys' test scores.
• So what happened to districts test scores between 22 and 24.
• So this is the average test scores in 2022.
• that affected test scores.
• In terms of its impact on on the test scores that dr.

Keywords: 988, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• It would also have one standardized test.
• has only one, and they get to pick what lane they want to go in and testing.
• But not only that, on the testing.
• The private schools had to have a report in on what they tested. Many of them didn't test.
• Many of them did not test their students.

Summary: The committee first considered House Resolution 1016, which would have allowed introduction of a bill by Representative Richmond addressing disclosure and restrictions for certain real-estate arrangements where buyers purchase interests in entities rather than direct ownership of property. Richmond said the measure was aimed at transparency, consumer protection, and preventing private tribunals or discriminatory practices, while several members questioned whether it would affect homeowners associations, hunting clubs, arbitration clauses, or duplicate existing law. After discussion, the committee voted down the resolution. House Resolution 1006, sponsored by Representative Schultz, proposed increasing the Homestead Tax Credit by $75, from $600 to $675, using a fund created by Amendment 79 and supported by sales tax revenue. Schultz argued the fund could support the increase now and that families needed relief amid high prices. The committee approved the resolution. The committee then heard House Resolution 1007, presented by Senator King and Representative Eaton, which sought to change how turnback funds are distributed to counties, with a focus on giving counties more predictable annual funding for roads, jails, water, sewer, public safety, and other infrastructure. Members raised concerns about taking $150 million off the top of sales tax revenue and about whether the bill should be handled through budget language instead; the resolution failed. House Resolution 1008, by Representative Wooten and Senator King, would have amended the LEARNS education program to reduce costs, limit or change eligibility, and add performance-based requirements and reporting for certain school-choice funding. Supporters said the program was financially unsustainable and needed accountability, while opponents argued the proposal would create larger problems and that the issue should be handled in the regular session. The resolution failed after a point of order prevented reading a supporting letter into the record. Finally, House Resolution 1009 and House Resolution 1013, both tied to Senator Bryant’s proposals on local control over crypto mines and data centers, were discussed together with testimony about water use, energy demand, and local opposition; both failed. House Resolution 1015, which would have amended the IDEA economic-development bill to remove eminent domain authority and address board accountability, also failed after members said more concerns remained to be worked out.

Transcript Highlights:

• But you know, there's computer systems to test it.
• It's a great question because those tests were implemented by the state department.
• We don't oversee the Praxis tests, so using that same language.
• Require things like so that the Praxis, of course, is a nationally known test set.
• Tests where they have to go into a testing center.

Keywords: 914, all

Transcript Highlights:

• So number one in this bill that we're bringing up is it puts the net income test at the front of the
• Second, it aligns the SNAP program with the asset testing that we do in many of our other programs.
• And this net income test, they do do it.
• And the counties do asset testing for numerous other programs.
• And this net income test, they do do it.

Keywords: 919, house, all

Summary: Representative Nolan West and Representative Pam Oldenorf introduced and defended a bill aimed at tightening Minnesota SNAP eligibility rules. They said the measure would move the net income test to the front of the application process, add asset testing similar to other state programs, and exclude vehicles over $100,000. They argued these changes would reduce overpayments, improve “good governance,” and help the state avoid future financial penalties tied to SNAP error rates. Oldenorf said Minnesota’s SNAP error rate has risen from about 4% in 2013 to about 9% now, and warned that if it stays above 6% the state could owe about $86 million in 2027. She cited a GAO report saying broad-based categorical eligibility is a major driver of payment errors, and pointed to examples she described as fraud or improper enrollment, including a millionaire receiving benefits and a recent Minneapolis SNAP fraud conviction. West and Oldenorf said the bill would not significantly increase county workloads, because counties already do similar eligibility and asset checks in other programs. In response to questions, the sponsors said they had not yet formally consulted many stakeholders because the bill had just been drafted, but they expected bipartisan support and said they had reached out to counties for input. They also said counties would retain some administrative costs, but the bill should not add major new burdens. The discussion then shifted to a separate topic when West raised concerns about access to Hennepin County voter rolls and alleged irregularities in voter data; he said he had obtained some county records and believed the Secretary of State was improperly limiting access, though no bill action or vote was taken on that issue in this transcript.