Transcript Highlights:

• And lastly, the registration framework is also really well designed, too.
• Finally, this bill mandates dog breeder registration.
• exposure to extreme temperatures, trigger criminal penalties and placement on a public animal abuser database
• We all want children to be safe online, but safety should not require building a statewide identity verification

Bills: S0198, S0422, S1236, S1356, S1456, S1722

Keywords: virtual currency, kiosks, money services business, regulation, financial services, consumer protection, cryptocurrency, registration, ADS-B, automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast, aviation, airports, airport fees, landing fees, departure fees, touch-and-go landing, general aviation, pilot privacy, airspace radius, aircraft tracking

Summary: The committee first postponed SB 1456, then heard SB 1236, which would condition state economic development incentives on employers using secret-ballot union elections and prohibit neutrality agreements. The sponsor argued the bill protects workers from coercion and applies only to companies receiving taxpayer-funded incentives; opponents said it was government interference, likely to hurt contractors, apprenticeships, and business growth, and raised concerns about federal preemption and Attorney General enforcement. After debate, the committee reported SB 1236 favorably on a recorded vote. The committee then considered CS/SB 198, a measure to regulate cryptocurrency kiosks by requiring operator registration, fraud warnings, transaction limits, blockchain analytics, receipts, and refund protections for certain first-time transactions tied to fraud. Supporters from the banking industry, AARP, and others said the bill would help stop scams that are targeting seniors and vulnerable adults; one industry witness supported the bill but suggested narrowing the limits for existing users and shortening the new-customer period. The committee reported the bill favorably. Next, the committee took up CS/SB 1356 on dog breeding, pet sales, and breeder registration. The sponsor said the bill is intended to curb puppy mills, improve animal welfare, and add consumer protections, while an amendment removed state oversight of local animal shelters. Pet store representatives supported much of the bill but objected to the three-day waiting period for financed purchases, expanded reimbursement, and unfair trade practice penalties; others argued the bill would add red tape and litigation. The committee adopted the amendment and then reported the bill favorably. The committee also heard SB 1722 on app stores and minors, which would require age verification, parental consent for minors, app-content disclosures, and enforcement by the Department of Legal Affairs. Supporters said the bill would help parents protect children online; opponents warned it could force collection of sensitive personal data, create privacy and constitutional problems, and duplicate existing parental tools. Members debated the balance between child safety and privacy, and the committee reported the bill favorably. Finally, the committee heard CS/SB 422 on ADS-B aviation data, which would bar use of ADS-B information to calculate certain landing or access fees; an amendment added departures to the restriction. Pilots supported the bill as a safety and privacy measure, while airport representatives opposed it as undermining airport finances and shifting costs. The amendment was adopted, and the hearing on the bill began with testimony from both sides.

Transcript Highlights:

• Senate Bill 5234 deals with snowmobile registration fees.
• Senate Bill 5234 deals with snowmobile registration fees.
• The annual registration for a vintage snowmobile is $12.
• Three times the voters said, we don't want to pay any more than $30.
• Three times the voters said, we don't want to pay any more than $30.

Bills: SB5234, SB6110, SB6176

Keywords: snowmobile, snowmobile registration, vehicle registration fees, registration fee, Department of Licensing, DOL, recreational vehicles, winter recreation, vintage snowmobile, parks and recreation, vehicle license fee, RCW 46.17, fee schedule, renewal fee, initial fee, Washington state, electric-assisted bicycles, electric motorcycles, transportation regulation, safety standards

Summary: The Senate Transportation Committee held a work session on impaired driving, beginning with data from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission showing that about half of traffic fatalities involve an impaired driver, with alcohol the most common substance involved. Mark McKinney presented crash trends, age-group patterns, the link between impairment and speeding, racial disparities in impaired-driving fatalities, and survey results showing support for lowering Washington’s per se BAC limit from 0.08 to 0.05 increased from 54% to 71% after respondents received information. He and later panelists said a lower limit would deter drinking and driving, encourage planning ahead, and align with international research showing fewer alcohol-related fatalities and serious injuries without major effects on arrests or the hospitality industry. The committee also heard personal and agency testimony supporting the 0.05 proposal. Joshua Jackman described severe injuries from a 2007 drunk-driving crash and said the bill could help prevent similar tragedies. AAA Washington, the State Patrol chief, and the Transportation Secretary all supported the measure, emphasizing safety, deterrence, and the costs of impaired driving to road workers, work zones, and state finances. Committee members asked about enforcement, blood testing, and how the law would affect drivers and passengers; witnesses said enforcement practices would remain based on observed impairment and that the bill was aimed at prevention rather than increasing arrests. The committee then held public hearings on three bills. SB 5234 would raise snowmobile registration fees from $50 to $75 and vintage snowmobile fees from $12 to $18 to support snow park operations; State Parks and snowmobile groups supported it, while one club representative opposed the fee increase and urged broader program reform. SB 6110 would clarify the distinction between e-bikes and higher-powered e-motos and direct a workgroup to recommend a statutory framework for e-motos; students, cities, trail groups, and recreation advocates supported clearer definitions for safety and enforcement, while some local officials asked for an immediate e-moto definition and civil infraction authority. SB 6176 would allow enforcement of expired vehicle registrations for parked, unoccupied vehicles on public right-of-way and certain parking facilities; the sponsor said it would help recover unpaid tab revenue, and the hearing began with opposition testimony from a tax watchdog group before the transcript ended.

Transcript Highlights:

• voter voted.
• So the voter won't even, it would be seamless. The voter would not even know.
• has 400 voters.
• The voter won't even basically know it's the same voter experience.
• Okay, so this is another thing that bothers me then: no-party registrants or voters could select our

Bills: HB398, HB906, HB1201, SB41, SB47, SB106, SB210, SB218, SB220, SB248, SB289, SB397

Keywords: travel expenses, reimbursement, state officials, US General Services Administration, disaster management, nominating petitions, unaffiliated voters, party primaries, political participation, elections, public meeting minutes, transparency, government accountability, publication deadlines, open meetings, boards and commissions, public records, contact information, email addresses, phone numbers

Transcript Highlights:

• That is not a timeline that impacts voters.
• registration file, there's a window of time where that voter can come in and cure, make good on that
• registration, and election administration.
• This puts it to the voters.
• can speed up election results without compromising voter access.

Bills: SB1285, SB1289, SB1326, SB1328, SB1329, SB1330, SB1392, SB1402, SB1425, SCR1013, SCR1014

Keywords: sentencing, correctional facilities, multiple sentences, death penalty, aggravating circumstances, juvenile offenses, class 2 felony, foreign donations, election administration, certification, Arizona Revised Statutes, transparency, public disclosure, victims' rights, attorney fees, government accountability, right to counsel, legal representation, parents' rights, family law

Transcript Highlights:

• House Bill 2806 requires verification of citizenship or lawful presence for voter registration, driver
• Voter registration data, ID applications, health care information—all fed into federal systems.
• It requires a SAVE system, a federal database never designed to determine citizenship, to verify voters
• My question, ma'am, was: were the voters removed from the voter registration rolls?" Mr.
• Does the ACLU believe that non-citizens should be qualified registrants, i.e., qualified voters in the

Bills: HB2006, HB2165, HB2245, HB2348, HB2806, HB2901, HB2902, HCR2016

Keywords: sample ballots, elections, primary election, general election, mailing deadline, ballot mailing, county election officials, board of supervisors, secretary of state, early voting list, election administration, voter information, postal service, USPS processing center, city elections, town elections, special district elections, Arizona election law, ballot proofing, party chair

Transcript Highlights:

• We think this helps create some statewide standards so that everybody is pulling their weight to make

Bills: HB2266, HB2489

Keywords: housing, supportive housing, transitional housing, emergency shelters, homelessness prevention, public space, local governance, life-sustaining activities, statewide standards, regulation, 904, all

Summary: The Housing Committee met in executive session on two bills. On Substitute House Bill 2266, the committee reviewed a proposed substitute for the step housing bill and several amendments. The substitute would set different siting rules for transitional housing, permanent supportive housing, emergency shelters, and emergency housing; allow some local prohibitions in critical areas and certain resource lands; streamline local variance approvals; require local governments to update regulations within two years or at the next comprehensive plan update; and grandfather existing step housing. Members discussed amendments addressing school and daycare setbacks, form-based codes, operational safety requirements, timing of checklist items, local reporting/auditing requirements, and preemption of conflicting local rules. Several amendments were adopted, including the form-based code, timing/clarity, and preemption amendments, while others were rejected. The bill then passed out of committee on a 10-7 vote with a do pass recommendation. The committee then took up Substitute House Bill 2489, which would prohibit local governments from enforcing laws that criminalize or penalize life-sustaining activities on public property unless adequate alternative shelter space is available. The proposed substitute clarified that the bill would not limit state criminal laws, added exceptions for imminent risk, obstruction, and disability access issues, allowed local policies for documenting shelter availability and outreach, expanded the definition of adequate shelter space to include regional interlocal agreements, and narrowed the definition of life-sustaining activities. Amendments were considered on park facilities where children are likely to be present, weapons screening and possession in shelters, and portable mats or beds in drop-in shelters; the park-facility and weapons amendments were withdrawn or rejected, while the portable mat/bed amendment was adopted. After debate over public safety, homelessness, and local control, the committee approved the bill on a 9-8 vote with a do pass recommendation and adjourned for the week.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is definitely an important bill that helps tackle our statewide challenge and protect those most
• The Shelters Not Penalties Act is about creating statewide standards, and it's about putting people first
• Floor with clear, consistent statewide standards on public property for those who have no other place
• It sets a clear statewide standard where today there is confusion and displacement.
• As was mentioned earlier, this bill will require officers statewide to make impossible individualized

Bills: HB2266, HB2489

Keywords: housing, supportive housing, transitional housing, emergency shelters, homelessness prevention, public space, local governance, life-sustaining activities, statewide standards, regulation, 904, all

Summary: The House Housing Committee heard a work session on federal Continuum of Care funding and state shelter siting rules before moving to public hearings on House Bills 2266 and 2489. Ted Kelleher of the Department of Commerce said HUD’s late and restrictive 2025 Continuum of Care notice threatened roughly $120 million a year in Washington for existing permanent supportive housing and shelter operations, but a multistate lawsuit led by the Washington Attorney General has forced HUD to begin renewing funding. Dave Anderson of Commerce then reviewed state step-housing implementation, explaining the legal framework for siting shelters and supportive housing, the model ordinance and guidance Commerce developed, and ongoing plan reviews and hearings board cases involving local compliance. House Bill 2266 would require cities and counties to allow step housing in all nonindustrial zones, limit local standards and permitting to those applied to comparable residential uses, require administrative rather than discretionary design review, remove an exception for existing buildings, and restrict conditions on affordable housing program participation. The bill sponsor and supporters from Plymouth Housing, Disability Rights Washington, King County, Catholic Community Services, and the Attorney General’s Office said local barriers, inconsistent zoning, and discretionary approvals delay or block needed housing and can violate civil rights laws. City officials and the Association of Washington Cities opposed the bill as drafted, arguing it goes too far by limiting operational agreements, spacing rules, and local safety tools, and by treating different housing types too uniformly; several asked for amendments to preserve local authority over operations and community protections. The committee then heard House Bill 2489, the “Shelters Not Penalties Act,” which would bar local governments from enforcing public-space laws against life-sustaining activities unless adequate alternative shelter space is available. The bill defines adequate shelter broadly, including accessibility, no-cost access, accommodation for disabilities, pets, partners, family members, and possessions, and it creates a defense and private right of action against enforcement. Supporters including the ACLU of Washington, Interfaith Works, and the bill sponsor argued that anti-camping enforcement displaces people without solving homelessness, wastes public resources, and should be tied to real shelter availability. Early questions focused on how the bill would apply to parks and other public property, what counts as adequate shelter, and whether bad-faith camping would be affected; testimony continued with additional supporters as the hearing proceeded.

Transcript Highlights:

• Are the statewide officials?
• But you also have a database that is searchable and is crawled so that...
• We do also, as he mentioned, have a statewide database called LouisianaPublicNotice.com.
• Our statewide website, is that? LouisianaPublicNotice.com.
• database called LouisianaPublicNotice.com.

Bills: HB248, HB249, HB997, HB1052, HB1193, SB1, SB161, SB218, SB220, SB289, SB435

Keywords: Compensation Commission, elected officials, salary evaluation, government accountability, Louisiana legislature, compensation, independent commission, salary adjustment, consumer price index, official journal, public notices, government transparency, local government, municipal website, school board notices, parish council, police jury, special districts, levee district, drainage district

Transcript Highlights:

• Speaker, the drafters of Amendment 7 to the state Constitution and the voters of the state of Washington
• procedure by which that measure, if no action were taken by the Legislature, would go before the voters
• The voters for their approval or rejection.
• However, Amendment 7 to the state Constitution, which was adopted by the voters in 1911, providing the

Bills: HB1160, HB1289, HB1339, HB1604, HB1798, HB1002, HB1065, HB1155, HB1269, HB1916, HB2120, HB2123, HB2158, HB2178, HB2264, HB2309, HB2411, HJM4004

Keywords: design review, local government, land use, zoning, project permits, housing density, middle housing, affordable housing, parking minimums, single-family zoning, infill development, growth management, comprehensive plan, permit streamlining, objective development regulations, architectural review, administrative review, transit-oriented development, accessory dwelling units, ADU

Summary: The House convened with a quorum, opened with the Pledge of Allegiance, a National Anthem performance, and a prayer offered by Washington Army National Guard Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Cole. The chamber then adopted House Resolution 4675, honoring the Washington National Guard for its service in emergencies, search and rescue, disaster response, and military readiness. Members spoke in support, highlighting the Guard’s history, its role in recent flood and landslide responses, and the sacrifices of service members and their families. The resolution passed by voice vote, and Guard leadership and members present in the galleries were recognized. The House also recognized Congressman Dan Newhouse in a point of personal privilege, with remarks praising his service in state and federal office and his ties to agriculture. The chamber then moved to the Fourth Order of Business and debated a motion to suspend House rules to send two initiatives to the Education Committee for prompt public hearings. Supporters argued the Constitution requires precedence for initiatives and that the House should hear them promptly; opponents argued the Constitution allows the Legislature to take no action and that the motion was unnecessary. The motion to suspend the rules failed on a recorded vote, 38 yeas and 57 nays, with three excused. Next, members debated the routine motion to refer the bills, memorials, measures, and resolutions on the introduction sheet to committee. Some members again argued the two initiatives should be given priority and public hearings before other business, while others supported normal referral of the day’s measures. The motion passed on a recorded vote, 57 yeas and 38 nays, with three excused. Committee reports were then accepted and referred as designated, and the House adjourned until Thursday, January 29 at 10:30 a.m.

Transcript Highlights:

• to their ballot, but it explicitly states to not release the voters' information.
• These databases... ...change as voters move, and this makes vote history data degrade as time passes.
• We also require daily reconciliation of ballots to voters during early voting, as some counties only
• So the idea is to allow a way for that voter to make corrections so that their vote does count.
• ballots and provide those voters a corrective action form.

Bills: SB1065, SB2117, SB2217, SB2363, SB2533, SB2742, SB2743, SB2881, SB2964, SB3013, SB3014

Keywords: SB 1065, handgun carry, license holder, concealed carry, open carry, government contracts, governmental entity, property lease, state agencies, local government, higher education, university, Texas Government Code, Penal Code 30.06, Penal Code 30.07, Penal Code 46.03, Second Amendment, gun rights, firearms, civil penalty

Transcript Highlights:

• So back when I was Director of Voter Registration and in the code it required you to put together a list
• , but it says do not release the voters.
• These databases change as voters move, and that makes vote history data degrade as time passes.
• It's a clerical problem, but a real voter sent that in, so the idea is to allow a way for that voter.
• This gave voters the chance to address simple.

Bills: SB1065, SB2117, SB2217, SB2363, SB2533, SB2742, SB2743, SB2881, SB2964, SB3013, SB3014

Keywords: SB 1065, handgun carry, license holder, concealed carry, open carry, government contracts, governmental entity, property lease, state agencies, local government, higher education, university, Texas Government Code, Penal Code 30.06, Penal Code 30.07, Penal Code 46.03, Second Amendment, gun rights, firearms, civil penalty

Transcript Highlights:

• It would have statewide effect, which is the really good side of it. Thank you.
• So back when I was director of voter registration, in the code, it required you...
• So all these cases where you had clear voter fraud going on were never, never seen.
• Her signature was so distinct and large that it had covered the entire registration card.
• But I consider that to be a successful prosecution of voter fraud.

Bills: SB1065, SB2117, SB2217, SB2363, SB2533, SB2742, SB2743, SB2881, SB2964, SB3013, SB3014

Keywords: SB 1065, handgun carry, license holder, concealed carry, open carry, government contracts, governmental entity, property lease, state agencies, local government, higher education, university, Texas Government Code, Penal Code 30.06, Penal Code 30.07, Penal Code 46.03, Second Amendment, gun rights, firearms, civil penalty

Summary: The Senate State Affairs Committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 1065, which would require government property contracts to prohibit contractors from barring licensed handgun holders from carrying firearms on leased or owned public property, with civil penalties and attorney general enforcement for violations. Senator Hall and invited witnesses from the Texas State Rifle Association, NRA, and Texas Gun Rights argued the bill would close a loophole exposed by the State Fair of Texas gun ban and protect law-abiding Texans’ self-defense rights. Opponents, including Moms Demand Action/Everytown, said the bill would undermine event organizers’ ability to set site-specific safety rules and could increase liability and insurance costs. Public testimony was then closed and the bill was left pending. The committee next took up Senate Bill 2742, which would create civil penalties for independent school districts and officials who use public resources for electioneering, waive immunity defenses, and expand attorney general enforcement. Senator Hagan-Bood said current law bans the conduct but lacks meaningful penalties, making injunctions the only remedy. No public testimony was heard, and the bill was left pending. Finally, the committee heard Senate Bill 2743, also by Senator Hagan-Bood, which would allow a court to disqualify local prosecutors who refuse to prosecute election offenses and appoint the attorney general to handle the case, with a committee substitute adjusting the removal process through an adjacent-county judge. Opponents from the Texas Civil Rights Project argued the bill would undermine prosecutorial discretion and was vague and open to abuse, while a Harris County election official described past instances where alleged voter fraud cases were not pursued. After testimony, public comment was closed and SB 2743 was left pending.

Transcript Highlights:

• their address is... just not publicly released because I know the Secretary of State has a list of voters

Bills: HB12, HB149, HB12, HB149, SB229, SB1361, SB1749, SB1897, SB2113, SB2566, SB2677, SB1652, SB2327, SB2344, SB2696

Keywords: election law, attorney general, prosecution, criminal offenses, law enforcement, jurisdiction, voter fraud, local prosecuting attorney, public safety, communication, governor approval, interoperability, political subdivision, radio systems, artificial intelligence, regulation, biometric data, ethical AI, consumer protection, AI governance

Transcript Highlights:

• Registration. Those two are recognized to provide testimony. I have blue tabs. Welcome.
• Actually, we've already closed registration, so we are going to close public testimony and leave Senate
• related to being aware that a broker is being compensated, and related to transactions under the registration

Bills: HB12, HB149, SB229, SB1361, SB1749, SB1897, SB2113, SB2566, SB2677, SB1652, SB2327, SB2344, SB2696, HB12, HB149

Keywords: artificial intelligence, regulation, biometric data, ethical AI, consumer protection, AI governance, automobile sales, finance, retail seller, motor vehicle purchase, motor vehicle sales, pricing restrictions, third-party financing, education, funding, student assessment, accountability, standards, motor vehicle, financing

Transcript Highlights:

• . uniformity and risk-unequal treatment of voters.
• Including outreach to people and voters with limited English proficiency and voters with disabilities
• Second, if a voter registration application is received within a certain time period, a county auditor
• UOCAVA voters.
• Ranked choice voting undermines voter confidence.

Bills: HB2210, HB2123, HB2206, HB2281, HB2411

Keywords: local representation, fair elections, government accountability, voter rights, transparency, foreign nationals, elections, Washington state, voter participation, government oversight, voting rights, uniform standards, overseas voting, civilian voting, state legislation, tribal relations, government, state policy, sovereignty, federalism

Summary: The committee began with member introductions and then heard House Bill 2123 on foreign national participation in elections. Staff explained that current law requires certifications from candidates, political committees, and political advertising sponsors that foreign nationals were not involved in financing or decision-making. The proposed substitute would raise the threshold for when those certifications are required, and an amendment would raise it further, effectively limiting the requirement mostly to ballot measure activity. Prime sponsor Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon said the existing paperwork burden makes campaigns harder without solving much, and that the bill would reduce unnecessary requirements while preserving protections where federal law does not already bar foreign money, especially in ballot measures. The committee then took up House Bill 2210 on ranked choice voting for local elections. Staff described the bill as allowing local governments to adopt ranked choice voting, changing the top-two primary structure to a top-five process for participating jurisdictions, and setting rules for ballot design, tabulation, and voter education. Rep. Lisa Gregerson framed the bill as a temporary tool to protect fair elections amid federal uncertainty and possible Voting Rights Act changes. Supporters, including Fair Vote Washington, Washington Bus, Sightline Institute, and several advocates, argued ranked choice voting could improve representation, expand voter choice, and help communities of color, young voters, military and overseas voters, and underrepresented groups. Opponents, including Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, several county auditors, and other witnesses, said the system is confusing, costly, and may increase ballot errors or lower turnout, especially for language-minority and disabled voters. The hearing on HB 2210 was paused partway through to move to other bills. House Bill 2411, on expanding the state shared leave program, would allow state employees to use donated leave if they are victims of hate crimes or if they or a family member are affected by immigration enforcement actions. Rep. Osman Salahuddin said the bill fills a gap exposed by a recent ICE detention case involving a state employee and would help workers remain employed during traumatic disruptions. OFM, the Office of Equity, and the Washington Federation of State Employees supported the bill, saying it is a low-cost way to help coworkers support one another. Some witnesses questioned whether the bill would apply to people without legal status, while others argued that state employment already requires legal documentation. Online and in-person opponents criticized the bill as unnecessary or as benefiting undocumented people. The committee also heard House Bill 2281, which would strengthen government-to-government consultation with tribes and add protections for tribal traditional cultural places. Staff said the bill would require timely notice, meaningful consultation, and a higher legal standard before state agencies could burden tribal cultural practices, with a possible superior court claim if the standard is violated. Vice Chair Rep. Chris Stearns said the bill is meant to protect Native identity and sacred sites from destruction and to use a strict-scrutiny-like standard when state actions burden tribal religious practices. Tribal and faith-based supporters backed the bill as a needed safeguard for sacred places and sovereignty, while industry groups warned it could create broad veto power, permitting uncertainty, and significant costs. The hearing on HB 2281 was then closed. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2206, which adopts the Uniform Military and Overseas Voters Act to expand and standardize voting access for military and overseas voters in state and local elections. Staff said the bill would broaden the definition of overseas voters and improve ballot access and enforcement. Secretary of State Steve Hobbs strongly supported the measure, and a witness who had lived overseas as a child described herself as one of the small number of people affected and asked for clearer review of UOCAVA status. An opponent argued the bill would allow never-residents to vote in Washington and cited North Carolina court decisions rejecting similar provisions. A Verified Voting representative supported a committee amendment to remove stray electronic portal language. The hearing on HB 2206 was still underway at the end of the transcript.

Transcript Highlights:

• The next obligation is under federal law to do the search at the Defense, uh, Manpower Database Center
• committee, a lot of agencies and organizations that are wanting veterans to, Um Register on different voter
• , uh, not voter banks, but different websites in order to.

Bills: HB101

Keywords: voter approval, local tax, disaster declaration, tax rate increases, community funding

Bills: HB506, HB480, HB105, HB403, HB513, SB341

Keywords: emergency vehicles, off-road vehicles, public safety, liability, regulations, foreign nationals, voter identification, driver licenses, immigration documentation, Alabama election law, law enforcement, retirement benefits, Alabama Peace Officers, agency-issued badge, agency-issued pistol, criminal enterprise, database, data privacy, criminal justice, background check

Transcript Highlights:

• If you require assistance with registration or the testimony process, please consult with, uh, my committee
• Their ownership requires registration with the ATF, creating a threshold of responsible regulation of
• This law would actually not do anything to change any federal law that still requires federal registration
• We're not changing laws as to background checks or age or or registration.
• I'm the director of public policy at the Texas Council on Family Violence, the statewide coalition of

Bills: HB259

Keywords: redistricting, Independent Citizen Redistricting Commission, Texas Legislature, elections, district boundaries, voter representation

Transcript Highlights:

• Polling shows that Arizona voters support this measure by over 6 to 1. Mr.
• This would go to the voters.
• The other thing I find utterly disingenuous, these are both referrals to the voter.
• They give the voter a choice on which thing that they would like to...
• They give the voter a choice on which thing that they would like to proceed with. So, Mr.

Bills: HCR2048

Keywords: elective officers, salary regulation, compensation, Arizona Constitution, voter approval, legislative commission, 1182, all

Bills: HB139

Keywords: ad valorem tax, tax rates, voter-approval, taxing unit, property tax, local government