Video & Transcript Research : 'judicial overreach'

Page 8 of 243
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Mar 20th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • what you still have is the Court of Criminal Appeals, the experts in criminal law within the Texas judicial
  • I'm the Judicial District Attorney for the 106th Judicial District, which covers four counties in rural
  • that constitutional provision dates from 1891, which was the year that the current structure of our judicial
  • lead to confusion and cause delays and that it would perhaps allow the Supreme Court justices to overreach
  • And I don't think that you see the Supreme Court overreaching at all.
Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs met and heard several bills related to legislative process and court jurisdiction. Senate Bill 1386, by Senator Huffman, would change compelled legislative testimony from blanket transactional immunity to testimonial immunity, allowing compelled statements or documents to be used against a witness in criminal prosecution only if not derived from the compelled testimony, while preserving protection against perjury and false statements and retaining the right to counsel. No public witnesses testified, and the bill was left pending. The committee then heard Senate Bill 1470, by Chairman Hughes, which would require DPS to share existing data on cross-state driver’s license cancellations with the Secretary of State for voter-roll maintenance. Hughes said the bill does not create new data collection and is intended to improve list maintenance. A DPS resource witness was present, there was no substantive opposition, and the bill was left pending. Senate Bill 1210, also by Hughes, would address conflicts between the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals on constitutional questions by making the Supreme Court the final arbiter in limited circumstances. Chris Hilton supported the bill, but Allen Place, Jack Rohde, and Philip Furlow opposed it, arguing it was unconstitutional, unnecessary, and could create practical problems in criminal post-conviction litigation. The bill was left pending after testimony. The committee also heard Senate Bill 311, which would conform the Government Code to the Texas Constitution by clarifying the Supreme Court’s original writ authority against lower courts and officials other than the governor. Justice Evan Young and Chris Hilton supported the bill as a clarification of existing authority, while no one testified against it; the bill was left pending. The committee then recessed to allow the chamber to rearrange for the Senate session.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice Feb 18th, 2026

Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • This provides uniform standards statewide by limiting judicial discretion for post-conviction releases
  • The clerk of the court is identified in current law as an integral part of a Chapter 45 judicial sale
  • As the judicial sale administrator, the clerk ensures statutory safeguards are maintained throughout
  • significant as condo owners face rising assessments and liens, and it notes that despite pointed judicial
  • significant as condo owners face rising assessments and liens, and it notes that despite pointed judicial
Summary: The Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice met to consider several criminal justice and court-related bills, along with the committee’s proposed $7.9 billion budget. The committee first heard and approved CS/SB 600 on bail bonds, as amended to adjust solicitation, cash bond return, forfeiture remission timing, and clerk procedures; CS/SB 436 on felony battery, which expands qualifying prior offenses and was amended to correct a drafting issue; CS/SB 928, “Missy’s Law,” requiring immediate remand to custody after conviction for dangerous crimes; SB 1332 on career offender registration, adding in-person reporting, more detailed registration requirements, and stronger penalties for noncompliance; and CS/SB 682 on violent criminal offenses, a domestic violence measure adopted via a substitute amendment that adds stricter penalties, electronic monitoring, injunction protections, and related procedures. All of those bills were reported favorably. The committee also approved SB 1072 creating an anti-Semitism task force in the Attorney General’s Office. The bill drew extensive public testimony both for and against, with supporters emphasizing rising anti-Semitic incidents and the need for statewide review, and opponents raising concerns about free speech, the definition of anti-Semitism, and possible conflation of criticism of Israel with hate speech. Senators also discussed the bill’s scope and the IHRA definition before it was reported favorably. In addition, CS/SB 532 on clerks of court was amended to clarify foreclosure sale procedures and funding predictability for clerks, then reported favorably. CS/SB 644 on attorney’s fees, suit money, and costs was also approved after amendments that aligned family-law fee provisions and codified standards for fee awards in dissolution and paternity cases; the sponsor said the bill was intended to curb vexatious litigation and improve consistency across districts. After the bill actions, the chair summarized the criminal and civil justice budget, describing it as a disciplined proposal that addresses corrections deficits and future inmate growth while funding core public safety needs. The committee then heard substantial public testimony on prison conditions, staffing, pay, heat, infrastructure, and the possibility of reducing prison populations or adding air conditioning in facilities. The chair announced that SB 1632 and its conforming bill SB 1634 would be temporarily postponed to the following week, and the record was supplemented with the names of many people who had registered to speak for or against those bills. The meeting concluded after members were invited to record votes and the committee adjourned.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • and members, Senate Bill 1574 relates to a Centers of Excellence program developed by the Texas Judicial
  • Members, the Centers of Excellence program is an initiative by the Texas Judicial Council to identify
  • Now, in my eighth year of judicial service, I preside over criminal misdemeanors, family law programs
  • In 2019, the Texas Judicial Council recognized Webb County Court of Law II as a Judicial Center of Excellence
  • I know that last year at the Annual Judicial Conference we had Judge D.C.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Senate Legislative Session Apr 14th, 2026 at 01:30 pm

Oklahoma Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members Senate Bill 1174 rejects the judicial pay increases in the final report of the Board on Judicial
  • It says the Board of Judicial Compensation shall be six members.
  • They look at the national judicial salaries as well as regional and federal judges.
  • This year, the judicial and public safety agencies took a total 6.2 million dollar cut and so because
  • The Judicial Board on Judicial Compensation makes recommendations and we either accept or reject those
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 26th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Various matters of judicial administration are always in this bill.
  • On the floor, a couple more local changes were made to the 501st Judicial District in Fort Minn County
  • It contains my Senate Bill 1575, which implements vital recommendations of the Texas Judicial Council
  • Or are other candidates for judicial office subject to the same restrictions?
  • I hear that they are through judicial canon.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • committee substitute adds current and former employees and commissioners of the State Commission on Judicial
  • I am the general counsel for the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
  • I serve on the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, and I too want to express my appreciation to Senator
  • So that provision allows court staff, or clerk staff, or Judicial Conduct Commission staff to use their
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/18/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • is available in a Judicial is available in a Judicial foreclosure<00:14:36.600> um<00:14:
  • by action judicial by action judicial foreclosure<00:16:19.519> um<00:16:20.279> up
  • Association and the Minnesota judicial Association and the Minnesota judicial branch<01:18:19.400>
  • work say that one more time judicial work say that one more time judicial officers<01:21:13.920>
  • official is no longer a judicial official is no longer a Judicial<01:26:43.880> official<01:26
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Study by Judicial Watch found that 33 Texas counties had registration rates. exceeding 100% of eligible
  • pretty much got all of my points done, so I'm going to go jump to the end here. brands, bureaucratic overreach
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • you still have is the Court of Criminal Appeals, the expert... in criminal law within the Texas judicial
  • My name is Philip Mack Furlow, I'm the Judicial District Attorney. for the 106th Judicial District, which
  • that constitutional provision dates from 1891, which was the year that the current structure of our judicial
  • lead to confusion. and cause delays, and that it would perhaps allow the Supreme Court justices to overreach
  • District Courts, the Courts of Appeals already, and I don't think that you see the Supreme Court. overreaching