Video & Transcript Research : 'developer fees'

Page 8 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Criminal Jurisprudence Apr 1st, 2025

Criminal Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • So the legislature mandated the task force to develop statewide best practices of response and care for
  • We're certainly going to work to develop the best policy we can to help people who experienced something
  • sexual acts or exploitation, and neuroscientific research confirms that a child's brain is not fully developed
  • And So I, I don't know how, who's gonna develop, I guess I can ask uh the bill's author, just like teaching
Bills: HB47
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development Mar 19th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • The Committee on Trade Workforce and Economic Development will come will now come to all the clerk will
  • and in the development of the product.
  • We're developing a workforce.
  • We're happy to work with your offices on developing.
  • The Committee of Trade Workforce and Economic Development is now adjourned.
Bills: HB 186
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Intergovernmental Affairs Aug 22nd, 2025

Intergovernmental Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Divisions charge developers impact fees for new developments to cover costs associated with additional
  • And if we give their development fees that are intended to pay for their new development, we give them
  • But hasn't the developer already paid that cost in the impact fee?
  • And so those impact fees, if the developer then negotiates to get those impact fees paid, there's still
  • If the... developer gets the impact fees back, then that cost is now spread out among...
Bills: HB26, HB73, SB 14, HB46
HI
Transcript Highlights:
  • effect fee entirely? effect fee entirely?
  • <00:23:26.080> a housing developer to plan and develop a housing developer to plan and develop
  • . development. development.
  • <01:22:54.719> to go out and develop or ask a developer to go out and develop or ask a developer
  • impact fees. impact fees.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1604, which would create an agricultural workforce housing group within the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity to address shortages of farmworker housing. The department said it supported the bill’s intent but emphasized that the group’s early work should focus on gathering data and surveying farm operators to assess actual demand, to avoid “mission creep.” Testimony from the City and County of Honolulu Office of Economic Revitalization, Hawaii Farmers Union, Hawaii Farm Bureau, Housing Hawaii’s Future, and the Maui Chamber of Commerce was in support, with one witness suggesting a housing advocacy nonprofit be added to the working group for balance. The committee then discussed HB 1713 on school impact fees, which would clarify exemptions for certain affordable housing projects and exempt new residential developments of fewer than 100 units. The Attorney General’s office said the bill should define “low to moderate income households” because that term is not defined in chapter 302A. HHFDC, the School Facilities Authority, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, and others supported the measure, arguing it would reduce administrative burden and remove barriers to housing. Members questioned whether the bill should instead repeal the school impact fee entirely; supporters said they also favored full repeal but viewed this bill as a more feasible step. The School Facilities Authority also explained that about $28 million in school impact fees had been collected across four districts and none had yet been spent, and discussed how recent nexus requirements limit how the funds can be used. HB 1722, relating to residential condominiums, drew extensive testimony and questioning. HCDA supported the bill and explained that it amends the 99-year leasehold pilot program created by Act 97 of 2023 by reducing owner-occupancy restrictions from 100% of units to 60%, allowing some rental or subleasing flexibility for the owner-occupied units, and permitting up to 40% of units to be sold to qualified residents after being on the market for more than 60 days. HCDA said the original restrictions, combined with rising construction costs, higher interest rates, and competition from nearby projects, made the pilot project difficult to market and finance; it said the changes are needed to make the project feasible and competitive. Supporters including AP Hawaii, Kila LLC, and project representatives said the amendments would help make the demonstration project in Kakaʻako viable. Some members raised concerns that the changes could weaken long-term affordability and questioned why certain ownership language was being deleted if rentals would still be restricted. No votes or final committee actions were taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
AL
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

House - Judiciary Feb 16th, 2026 at 11:18 pm

House Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • The first item on the agenda is Senate Bill 38: fees on registered pet food. ...registered pet food.
  • food brand, and then that goes into the fee and is distributed.
  • So there's a fee on—pardon me, Madam Chair, Representative—there's a fee on registering the pet food.
  • Is there an actual tax on anything over this, or is it just the fee to register the food?
  • Madam Chair, Madam Chair, and Representative, yes, it's just the fee.
Bills: SB38, SB17, SB41, SB264
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Effective allocation, workforce development, supply chain, research and development, or other areas.
  • and researched and workforce developed also.
  • Energy-proving grounds serve as a way to accelerate their development and actually de-risk these developments
  • It brings a chilling effect to commercial development by expanding criminal liability for developer owners
  • But it's directed simply at the developer owner.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • And, you know, this process, even in the hearing, you continue to develop things and improve the bill
  • Chairman and members, Senate Bill 1015 relates to excess contributions and fees allocated to statutory
  • It would clarify the exact court fees pursuant to the local government code which the comptroller uses
  • But in any event, that's... ...where we are on this bill, and we strongly support it so we can develop
  • If the bill is implemented, then whatever hourly rate or flat fee the county pays for those.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate - Conservation Jan 27th, 2026 at 09:00 am

Senate Conservation

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, again, that's how the fees are collected. It's done...
  • It's a $100 fee, as I understand it.
  • Basically, it's a registration fee charged to manufacturers.
  • The animal feed annual fee that companies have to pay, that's the basic fee for whatever product that
  • The animal feed annual fee that companies have to pay, that's the basic fee for whatever product that
Bills: SB38, SB46, SB18
AL
Transcript Highlights:
  • Good afternoon, Chairman W and members of the House Economic Development Tourism Committee.
  • Thanks... ...Development Tourism Committee. Thanks for having us here today.
Bills: HB521
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

WLA Public Hearing 02-04-2026

Water, Land, Culture and the Arts

Transcript Highlights:
  • Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development. >> Good<00:09:50.560> afternoon.
  • does it makes the two recording fees does it makes the two recording fees equal<00:32:58.720>
  • how mandatory recording fees are spent. how mandatory recording fees are spent.
  • Agra Business Development Corporation Agra Business Development Corporation EDCO. EDCO. EDCO.
  • <01:26:14.719> Um relating to administrative fees. Um relating to administrative fees.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 2603, which would designate the Hawaii Symphony Orchestra as the state orchestra of Hawaii. Testimony was uniformly supportive from the Attorney General’s office, the State Foundation on Culture and the Arts, Retail Merchants of Hawaii, Hawaii Youth Symphony, the Hawaii Symphony Orchestra, the Hawaiian Steel Guitar Association, and others. Supporters emphasized the bill’s value to arts education, cultural vitality, and the visitor economy. The chair noted there were also many written testimonies submitted, and the bill was left without questions or action in the excerpt. The committee then took up Senate Bill 2083, which would create a state-owned historic properties preservation plan working group within DNR. The State Historic Preservation Division supported the bill and said it would help create a statewide database and better planning for state-owned historic properties, while noting its current review work is reactive and project-by-project. The committee asked about duplication and existing consultation processes; SHPD said it already reviews state projects under existing law and has in-house architectural staff. The measure was then set aside after brief discussion, with no vote shown in the excerpt. Next was Senate Bill 2341, which would authorize phased review of certain private-property projects and change SHPD’s review deadlines. SHPD and the Office of Planning and Sustainable Development supported the bill, saying it could encourage more proactive, programmatic review and that the current average review time for simple projects is about 56 days. Several opponents, including Sierra Club of Hawaii, Bianca Isaki, Malama Kane Lua, and Tara Roas, argued phased review would delay projects, create conflict, and weaken historic preservation protections, especially for iwi kūpuna and burial sites. Committee members raised concerns about whether the bill conflicted with prior court decisions and asked SHPD for its view; SHPD said it was not a legal question for them and suggested a programmatic alternative. The bill was not voted on in the excerpt. Finally, the committee began hearing Senate Bill 2306 on administrative fees for the Bureau of Conveyances. HGEA opposed the measure, focusing on a provision allowing the special fund to be used for qualified contractors, while the Bureau of Conveyances supported the bill as a fee correction that would equalize recording fees between systems. The bureau said specialized technical work sometimes requires outside contracting and that it could consider a contract period; the chair and members discussed the HGEA concern and asked whether the issue could be addressed. No final action was shown in the excerpt.
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Commerce and Tourism Jan 13th, 2026

Commerce and Tourism

Transcript Highlights:
  • We require clear disclosure to consumers before any fee is charged.
  • To your point, these fees can already be charged, but then the accusation could be made that the fees
  • There’s that fee that they can charge, which we would say is reasonable.
  • Who determines whether an allowable fee is reasonably related to?
  • Who’s making money off of the fee believes is reasonable.
Summary: The Commerce and Tourism Committee met with a quorum and considered several bills, most of them receiving favorable reports. SB 386, relating to farm equipment repair rights, was briefly explained by the sponsor as a lemon-law style measure for farm equipment; it passed without questions or debate. SB 528, aimed at strengthening Florida’s manufacturing sector by expanding Department of Commerce responsibilities, codifying the chief manufacturing officer role, creating a workforce development grant program, and requiring reporting, drew support from several appearance forms and was reported favorably. SB 806, a broader right-to-repair bill covering portable wireless devices and agricultural equipment, drew the most discussion: dealership and industry representatives opposed it, arguing existing manufacturer agreements already provide access to repair information and that the bill could force manufacturers into competition with dealers, while supporters framed it as pro-consumer and pro-repair access; it was still reported favorably. SB 696 on trademark registration modernization and SB 930 creating a Florida Retirement Savings Task Force were both explained as administrative/policy measures and passed without opposition. SB 874, which creates a professional licensure reciprocity path for out-of-state surveyors and mappers to address workforce shortages, also passed favorably. The committee then took up SB 826 on gift certificates, which the sponsor said is intended to target bank-branded “reward cards” that function like gift cards but expire, while not affecting loyalty programs. The Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association expressed concern about unintended consequences and asked to work on tighter definitions, but the bill was reported favorably after the sponsor said clarifying language would be added later. The committee also heard SB 838, as amended, on electronic payments for retail installment contracts; the sponsor said it would clarify that reasonable convenience fees for optional electronic payments are permissible, require disclosure, and preserve a fee-free option. Members raised concerns about what counts as a “reasonable” fee and whether the bill could authorize junk fees, but the committee substitute was reported favorably. Several votes were taken by roll call, with the bills above reported favorably and SB 898 temporarily postponed at the sponsor’s request. Members later asked to be recorded as voting affirmatively on bills they had missed. The meeting concluded after the final vote on SB 838 and a motion to adjourn.