Video & Transcript Research : 'court filing fees'

Page 8 of 500
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

House of Representatives Apr 15th, 2026

Louisiana House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, if you remember, we've been transitioning courts to more electronic filing.
  • Since 1994, the filing fee has not been raised in East Baton Rouge Parish for the Juvenile Court.
  • fees and court costs to be deposited into the judicial expense fund for the Fourth JDC.
  • This bill is a local bill filed for the judges of the 19th Judicial District Court.
  • These fees in this bill were approved by the Judicial Council and increase the transcript fees for court
HI

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

HSH Public Hearing - Thu Feb 12, 2026 @ 10:30 AM HST

Human Services & Homelessness

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, your testimony says, "As Hawaiʻi family courts really rarely impose fines, fees, or court costs against
  • court cases. >> Those fees would be for traffic offenses, right?
  • :57:22.480><c> or</c> really rarely impose fines, fees, or really rarely impose fines, fees, or court
  • So in most family court instances, minors won't be assessed fees currently.
  • So in most family court instances, minors won't be assessed fees currently.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on HB 1877, which would expand the membership of the Hawaii State LGBTQ+ Commission and add a youth seat. The commission’s vice chair supported the bill, saying the commission started with eight members, has growing interest, and would benefit from an odd-numbered board and youth representation. Members asked about quorum, and the commission said it has generally met monthly with only one quorum issue in the past 18–19 months and would work with legislative leaders to have appointments ready if the bill passes. Written testimony included support from Kokopac and one individual in opposition. The committee then took up HB 2006, which would create a cash assistance program for pregnant women and mothers of babies. The Department of Human Services explained current TANF rules, including eligibility requirements, child support cooperation, and work-program participation, and said the state has recently raised benefit levels to the maximum allowed, with a family of three or four receiving a little over $900 per month. Supporters from the Hawaii Public Health Institute, Hawaii Children’s Action Network Speaks, and others argued the bill could reduce child poverty and improve maternal and child health, citing evidence from Michigan’s Rx Kids program and the temporary federal child tax credit expansion. A mother and Oahu Youth Action Board member testified from personal experience about the need for direct support during pregnancy. The committee also noted support from several organizations and about 26 individuals. The committee next heard HB 2167, which would direct the Office of Youth Services to run a pilot program providing financial assistance to homeless youth. The Office of the Public Defender, youth advocates, and several organizations supported the measure, saying even small amounts of help can prevent homelessness and help youth transition safely to adulthood. The Office of Youth Services said it supports the intent of the bill but requested clarification, and committee members discussed whether the program should be run directly or through contracted community agencies, how to set performance metrics, and how to structure the RFP and contract process. The chair indicated the committee wanted to work with the vice chair and OYS offline to refine the bill before moving forward. The committee then began discussion of HB 2224, relating to Medicaid pharmacy benefit management, with testimony generally supporting giving DHS flexibility to negotiate with PBMs.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 3/11/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • This bill, House File 1917, deals with the public data law.
  • What House File 1083 does is provides protections for domestic...
  • </c> the bill is before us um house file the bill is before us um house file 1083<00:26:34.360><c> and
  • </c> in 2022 a Minnesota Supreme Court in 2022 a Minnesota Supreme Court decision<00:31:52.960><c> found
  • I won't ever go into the court process.
Bills: HF1917, HF1083, HF367
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Feb 27th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And Attorney General Paxton has filed over 100 lawsuits challenging this federal overreach.
  • The founders did not intend our Supreme Court to be our supreme ruler, and we, the people of Texas, through
  • clear that the Attorney General has the authority to defend a district or county attorney in federal court
  • That bill passed both houses in a bipartisan measure, and it is on appeal in a federal court today.
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Jan 14th, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • earlier than 31 days following the statewide general election or the expiration of the time period for filing
  • earlier than 31 days following the statewide general election or the expiration of the time period for filing
  • earlier than 31 days following the statewide general election or the expiration of the time period for filing
Bills: HB66, HB79, HB95, HB145, HB66, HB79, HB95, HB145
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House Ways and Means General Fund Committee Jan 14th, 2026

Ways and Means General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • earlier than 31 days following the statewide general election or the expiration of the time period for filing
  • earlier than 31 days following the statewide general election or the expiration of the time period for filing
Bills: HB66, HB79, HB95, HB145, HB66, HB79, HB95, HB145
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part I) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Courts take pages and pages just to talk about.
  • I know that they filed a response with the court, and I believe the court issued a response.
  • I think there had been a response filed.
  • You're telling the court, because this is going to court, that you made.
  • Court that that will be proven to be true in court.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part II) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • For filing, if so, which ones?
  • It is a bill that I filed.
  • How did the Supreme Court... well, 2003, the Supreme Court decision... Came down in 2006.
  • I know we just asked for all the court documents. Court filings on the El Paso case.
  • It was a pretty big file. It was a digital file they transmitted.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session (Part III) Aug 22nd, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • Supreme Court ruled in Allen v.
  • in federal court through 2020.
  • We're in court right now with a 2021 map. Senator Huffman was the chair of the committee.
  • But here we are, and we will see how the courts come down on this.
  • Mid-decade redistricting absent a court order departs from that constitutional design.
Bills: SB 2, SB 5, SB 9, SB 7, SB 17, SB 4, HB4, HB1, HB3, HB20, HB22, SB9, SB7, SB17, SB4, HB4, SB2, SB5
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 28th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • And so they would still technically file with the filing authority that they're supposed to be filing
  • court.
  • They learn how to file applications without government agencies and with the court.
  • Immigration court is often a little less daunting than other courts while still being a formal court
  • Court.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • costs, attorney's fees, and an inappropriate, in in it. actual damages, court costs, attorney's fees
  • Just simply having to go into court, pay the legal fees to go into court, and say, 'This doesn't pass
  • The party filing the motion automatically recovers attorneys' fees if successful.
  • But by removing mandatory fees, or by making fee shifting mandatory if someone files what a trial judge
  • It would be no additional court costs or filing fees.
Summary: The committee heard House Bill 4961, which would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision. The author said the bill is intended to create incentives to maintain insurance and to address what he described as an unfair system for insured drivers. Texans for Lawsuit Reform and Texas Eagle Forum testified in support, while the Texas Trial Lawyers Association opposed it, warning the bill could also affect pedestrians, passengers, children, and others who did not choose whether a vehicle was insured. The bill author clarified that passengers would be included in the bill’s coverage. No vote was taken and the bill was left pending. House Bill 5570 would extend a legislative attorney CLE exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate to boards or commissions. The author said the measure is meant to ease time burdens and encourage service, and a witness supported it as a modest incentive for public service. A committee member noted a discrepancy in the number of affected attorneys, and the author agreed to verify the correct figure. The bill was left pending. The committee also heard House Bill 2969, which would restrict the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech based on sincerely held beliefs. The author and several witnesses from Texas Values, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Cecilia Wood argued the bill protects lawyers of faith from an ABA model rule they described as a speech code. No one testified against the bill, and it was left pending. House Bill 4260, which would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction, drew opposition from the County Judges and Commissioners Association, which argued existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would burden rural officials. The author said the bill was prompted by concerns about judges using their office to pressure others. The bill was left pending. House Bill 5134 would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect actual damages and would allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill is aimed at preventing harassment and fishing expeditions, especially in family-law disputes. Questions focused on how the standard would work and how it differs from current law; the author said the main change is fee-shifting and a clearer legislative directive. The bill was left pending. House Bill 3095, a committee substitute version of a similar uninsured-motorist bill, would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages and limit economic recovery, with several exceptions. Trial lawyers argued it was unconstitutional because it capped economic damages and could unfairly affect innocent drivers, pedestrians, and older people who no longer drive. The author acknowledged constitutional concerns and said the bill would need further work; the committee withdrew the substitute and left the bill pending. Finally, House Bill 4388 would require all judges, including county judges who perform administrative duties, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct. Supporters said some elected judges avoid accountability by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents argued the bill is too rigid and unnecessary because existing remedies already exist. House Bill 3964 would limit public nuisance claims to their historical role and bar such claims against lawful conduct, conduct already covered by other remedies, and products. The author and supporters said the bill is meant to prevent courts from using public nuisance to make policy, while opponents argued it would eliminate useful remedies and could affect local actions against environmental or product-related harms. The author said the bill would not affect statutory nuisance claims, private nuisance claims, or other causes of action, and would be amended to clarify some provisions. The bill was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025 at 10:04 am

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • costs, attorney's fees, and an inappropriate, in in it. actual damages, court costs, attorney's fees
  • The party filing the motion automatically recovers attorney's fees if successful.
  • But by removing mandatory fees or by making fee shifting mandatory if someone files what a trial judge
  • It would be no additional court costs or filing fees.
  • It would be no additional court costs or filing fees.
Summary: The committee heard testimony on several bills affecting civil practice, judicial conduct, and attorney regulation. HB 4961 and the similar HB 3095 would bar uninsured motorists from recovering non-economic damages after a collision, with HB 3095 also addressing certain exceptions and limiting economic damages in some cases. Supporters said the measures would encourage insurance coverage and fairness for insured drivers, while opponents argued they would unfairly punish injured people who were not responsible for the lack of insurance, including pedestrians, passengers, children, and others. HB 3095 drew constitutional concerns from witnesses, and the committee later withdrew the committee substitute and left the bill pending; HB 4961 was also left pending after questions about its scope, including passengers. HB 5570 would expand a continuing legal education exemption to attorneys appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate who serve on boards or commissions. The author and witness said the bill would free up time for public service while still requiring ethics training. A committee member raised a discrepancy in the number of attorneys covered, and the bill was left pending. HB 2969 would prohibit the State Bar from adopting rules or penalties that unreasonably burden attorneys’ religious exercise or free speech, especially in relation to sincerely held religious beliefs. Supporters framed it as a protection for lawyers of faith against an ABA-style speech code, while no one testified in opposition; the bill was left pending. HB 4260 would prohibit county judges and county commissioners from practicing law in courts over which they have jurisdiction. The author described it as an ethics measure to avoid conflicts of interest, but county officials and the County Judges and Commissioners Association opposed it, saying existing ethics rules already address conflicts and that the bill would impose hardships, especially in rural counties. The bill was left pending. HB 4388 would require all judges, including those who serve only in administrative roles, to remain subject to the Code of Judicial Conduct; supporters said some judges avoid discipline by relinquishing judicial functions, while opponents said the bill was unnecessary and could burden county judges who serve as administrators. It was also left pending. The committee also heard HB 5134, which would limit Rule 202 pre-suit depositions to people who have suffered or reasonably expect to suffer actual damages and allow attorney’s fees against abusive petitioners. The author said the bill would curb harassment and fishing expeditions, but members questioned how the standard would work in practice; the bill was left pending. Finally, HB 3964 would narrow common-law public nuisance claims by barring suits over lawful conduct, conduct already addressed by other remedies, and products, while preserving other causes of action. Supporters said the bill would prevent regulation through litigation and protect legislative authority; opponents said it would eliminate important remedies and that no Texas abuse had been shown. The author indicated he would revise the bill, and it was left pending.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence Apr 23rd, 2025

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Transcript Highlights:
  • For the first time, we will be paying a filing fee to the court when we file an application for receivership
  • We have to file the application, and then we request a hearing. ...from the court.
  • That was one of the arrangements we discussed; it was in exchange for the filing fee.
  • They have 10 days to file that with the court, and the court will set that hearing immediately.
  • Last year, we had almost 1,500 filed in my court.
LA

Louisiana 2026 Regular Session

Appropriations Apr 21st, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • of Court, Felicia Feist with St.
  • John Clerk of Court, Maria Ross Tucker. Maria Ross Tucker, St. John Clerk of Court. Aaron A.
  • Baer, Assumption Clerk of Court. Randy Desotale with Evangeline Clerk of Court.
  • ; Jenny Lawrence, Bossier Parish Clerk of Court; and David Dart, East Feliciana Clerk of Court.
  • Transaction fee, storage fees are typically less than 0.125%.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development May 7th, 2025

Trade, Workforce & Economic Development

Transcript Highlights:
  • It's an annual fee, and it's about $475. Okay, gotcha.
  • , increasing the amount of certain fees.
  • Associations... are adding various additional charges disguised as inspection fees, processing fees,
  • rush fees, document assembly fees, document preparation fees, or other creative labels to effectively
  • Attorney's fees should they lose.
NV
Transcript Highlights:
  • living document that governs what we have to provide in the state in order to be in compliance with the court
  • It included the Department of Indigent Defense Services, the governor's office, and the court so that
  • struck out 'license to practice law in the State of Nevada pursuant to the rules of the Nevada Supreme Court
  • Three of them were appointed by members of the legislature, one by the Supreme Court of Nevada.
  • There are four that are submitted by the Nevada Association of Counties..." "...Court of Nevada.