Video & Transcript Research : 'bonds'

Page 8 of 248
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Justice Feb 2nd, 2026

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • Members, Senate Bill 600 makes changes to Florida's bail bond and pretrial release laws and policies
  • written authorization from the bail agent, bail bond agency, or the surety.
  • written authorization from the bail agent, bail bond agency, or the surety.
  • But at the same time, that's why bond agencies exist and why, you know, I understand.
  • But at the same time, that's why bond agencies exist and why, you know, I understand.
Summary: The committee took up several criminal justice bills, beginning with SB 760 on violations of pretrial release conditions. A strike-all amendment narrowed the bill to make willful violation of a no-contact order a first-degree misdemeanor, authorize warrantless arrest on probable cause, and require detention until first appearance in certain cases. The amendment and the bill, as amended, were both adopted and reported favorably. The committee then heard SB 1536 on digital voyeurism, which would extend the expectation of privacy to backyards in the surveillance statute; it was reported favorably after brief questions and support from a Florida Smart Justice Alliance witness. Members next considered SB 1012 on inmate services. The bill would expand use of contractor-operated institutions inmate welfare trust funds for reintegration and facility upgrades, and would require reimbursement for inmate emergency and specialty medical services at Medicaid rates, with telehealth and autonomous APRNs included as options. Safety Net Hospital Alliance of Florida opposed the bill as written, warning that tying Medicaid participation to treatment of inmates could reduce reimbursement and discourage provider participation, while the Department of Corrections and Florida Smart Justice Alliance supported it. Senators discussed costs, aging inmates, and possible future changes, and the bill was reported favorably. The committee also passed CS for SB 600 on bail bond and pretrial release laws after adopting a strike-all that aligned it with the House companion and made technical changes to solicitation, training, and bond reinstatement rules. Public testimony raised concerns about who should receive returned bond money and how clerks would process payments, but the sponsor said the bill would continue to be refined. Later, the committee reconsidered and favorably reported SB 1750 on criminal sexual conduct, which increases penalties and mandatory minimums for serious sex crimes, especially those involving children. It also reconsidered and favorably reported SB 1544 on complaints against law enforcement and correctional officers, a bill requiring complainants to provide sworn complaints to officers before interrogation unless corroborating evidence is present; police chiefs and sexual violence advocates opposed parts of the bill, while supporters argued it would protect officers from unfounded complaints. Finally, SB 1488 on booking officer duties regarding minor children of arrested persons was reported favorably, and SB 1326 on prosecution of defamation was taken up for reconsideration with a delete-all amendment that narrowed the insanity defense, limited mitigation for severe mental illness in serious cases, and extended detention periods for incompetent defendants; opposition testimony from defense, public defender, and mental health advocates warned it would worsen treatment and increase costs.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - House Ways & Means

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • , and political subdivision bond elections in general.
  • change in making sure that the information provided to taxpayers on truth and taxation notices and bond
  • Just looking through this, I do have some concerns also, seeing that it updates the language for bonds
  • The bonds are payable without limits to the rate or amount. I have some issues with that.
  • Representative Luna-Nájera. have some concerns also seeing that updates the language for bonds the bonds
Summary: The committee began with member, staff, and page introductions, then heard reminders about public testimony limits. It first considered House Bill 2016, which would eliminate late-filing penalties when a tax return shows zero tax due. The sponsor argued the bill would prevent unnecessary fines on small businesses and individuals with no liability, while staff noted any fiscal impact would likely be minimal. The bill passed on an 8-1 vote, with one member opposing it on the grounds that current waiver procedures already exist and the change could weaken compliance incentives. The committee then took up House Bill 2104, which would bar county assessors from reclassifying agricultural property for four years after an owner prevails on appeal, unless there is a change in use, ownership, or parcel configuration. The sponsor and agricultural groups said the measure would reduce repetitive annual appeals and provide stability for ranchers and farmers, especially in urbanizing areas and in places affected by fallowing. County assessors opposed the bill, arguing that their offices are better qualified than the State Board of Equalization, that the bill could allow inaccurate classifications to persist, and that it relies too heavily on owners to report changes. After extensive testimony from the Maricopa County Assessor and the State Board of Equalization executive director, the committee approved the bill 5-4. Next, House Bill 2105 was heard. It would require advance notice of certain property inspections and provide inspection reports to property owners. The sponsor said the goal was to give owners a chance to be present for inspections and to receive the reasons for any denial of agricultural status. Assessors opposed the bill as an unfunded mandate and said they already communicate with owners through mail, door hangers, and other methods, but that a standardized report form does not currently exist. Supporters from the farm and ranch community said the bill would improve transparency and help avoid disputes. The committee passed the bill 5-4. Finally, the committee heard House Bill 2289, which updates truth-in-taxation and election pamphlet language to reflect higher residential property values, including a new $400,000 example. The sponsor and the Arizona Tax Research Association said the changes would make taxpayer notices more accurate and noted the bill was similar to one that had previously advanced, but without a provision that contributed to a veto. No vote was taken on this bill in the portion provided.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Their revenue bonds, and if the revenues decrease, then they've got a problem.
  • In the city to pay off the bond.
  • stipulates if you have investor capital for future development, that it will be based on future revenue bonds
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs Apr 7th, 2025

Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • But for those areas that do have damages, because services would be interrupted, their revenue bonds.
  • are rate payers out of the city, what does it cost the remaining members in the city to pay off the bond
  • What does it cost the remaining members in the city to pay off the bond?
  • clear that if you have investor capital for future development that will be based on future revenue bonds
Summary: The Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs heard several water-related bills, with testimony focused on drinking water quality, groundwater contamination notice, flood infrastructure funding, water rights conservation, and utility service areas. SB 1662 would limit TCEQ’s advance notice to public water systems to no more than 24 hours before testing after a consumer complaint, to reduce the chance of temporary treatment affecting results. SB 1663 would allow TCEQ to notify private well owners, groundwater conservation districts, and nearby residents by direct means about known groundwater contamination, rather than relying mainly on first-class mail and annual reporting. SB 2124 would move the deadline for publishing the Texas Groundwater Protection Committee’s annual report from April 1 to June 1. Witnesses on the first two bills described long-running water quality problems and delayed notice in their communities and supported the measures. No opposition was recorded, and each bill was left pending for a later vote. The committee also heard SB 1967, which would expand eligibility for Flood Infrastructure Fund financing to multipurpose projects that both reduce flooding and create water supply. Senator Hinojosa and Hidalgo County representatives described the Delta Reclamation Project as a shovel-ready example that would capture flood and drainage water, treat it, and produce new potable supply while also providing detention and flood mitigation. A Sierra Club witness also supported the bill, saying such projects could help manage floodwaters and reduce polluted discharges to bays and estuaries. The bill was left pending. A lengthy and divided discussion followed on SB 1413, which would expand the streamlined expedited release process for landowners seeking removal from a water or sewer CCN in additional counties. Senator Nichols said the bill was a property-rights measure aimed at legacy monopolies and bad actors who use CCNs to hold landowners hostage, while supporters described cases where developers could not get timely service, including fire flow, or were asked to fund infrastructure without reasonable recoupment. Opponents from rural water corporations and utility associations argued the bill would undermine investment in water infrastructure, strand debt, and weaken the return on planned expansion. PUC and TCEQ resource witnesses explained that compensation is handled case by case through appraisal and can include stranded costs, planning, design, construction, and some legal fees, but members noted the statute is unclear and discussed possible committee substitute language. Public testimony was closed with the bill left pending. Later, SB 1624 would allow the Texas Water Trust within the Texas Water Bank to hold donated water rights for conservation purposes and protect them from use-it-or-lose-it cancellation, and SB 863 would address Edwards Aquifer utilities that straddle the aquifer boundary by allowing them to continue using Edwards water within their certificated areas under specified conditions. Both bills were laid out, received no public opposition in the hearing, and were left pending.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Housing Committee Meeting - 2025-04-01

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • The bill will expand the use of housing infrastructure bonds for adaptive reuse for the development of
  • Chair and committee members, why I'm bringing it forth is that when we go on our bonding tours across
  • Who's going to be the ultimate owner of the building, and does it matter with bonding money?
  • Investment Committee, I can describe that HIBs do not have the public ownership requirement as in GEO bonds
  • This is a request for $44.6 million in housing infrastructure bonds for the public portion of development
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Housing Finance and Policy Committee 4/1/25

Housing Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Chair and committee members, why I'm bringing it forth is, you know, when we go on our bonding tours
  • Who's going to be the ultimate owner of the building, and does it matter with bonding money?
  • with bonding with bonding money<00:20:20.559> Cher<00:20:20.840> Le<00:20:21.400><
  • This is a request for $44.6 million in housing infrastructure bonds for the public portion of housing
  • bonds for the public<00:21:51.320> portion<00:21:51.919> of<00:21:52.559> housing
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cap Committee Meeting - 2025-04-30

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you so much for this opportunity to present our request for $34.8 million in bonding funds for
  • bonding committees.
  • In state bonding locally since 2021, we've locally bonded $3.4 million through debt levies and. operating
  • Funds, trail funds, anything else since there are so many projects out there for bonding?
  • As Chief Raines and I talked about, I would love to be on the bonding committee.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Capital Investment Committee 4/30/25

Capital Investment

Transcript Highlights:
  • Paul Colleg's bonding funds for the St.
  • bonding committees.
  • > both<00:32:02.880> bonding received visits from both bonding received visits from both
  • <01:01:44.160> Uh Um and um so why state bonding? Uh Um and um so why state bonding?
  • can do it with bonding fund here. can do it with bonding fund here.
NM

New Mexico 2026 Regular Session

Senate Chamber Feb 19th, 2026 at 08:53 am

New Mexico Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • The payments on their bond are six million dollars a year.
  • And I think the documents that I have sent you show that their bond payments are six million dollars
  • It further shows the connection and the bond that we have here in the state of New Mexico.
Bills: SB273, SB37, SB100
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Ways & Means May 19th, 2025

Ways & Means

Transcript Highlights:
  • Taxpayers have raised concerns that taxing units re-propose bond propositions and tax rate increases
  • issue. alleviate these concerns by requiring 60% of a taxing unit's governing body to approve any GEO bond
  • proposition and requiring 75% of a taxing unit's governing body to propose a GEO bond election or M&
  • taxpayers from excessive taxation by installing common sense safeguards around the tax rate setting and bond
  • Whenever the municipality is going to go out and issue bonds for that TIRS, historically, they've been
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services May 5th, 2025

Pensions, Investments & Financial Services

Transcript Highlights:
  • House Bill 1342 prompts Texas to maximize the use of its limited bond capacity.
  • So when you get into bonds related to housing, currently... ...there are time limits.
  • Who issues the bonds?
  • Because if you don't perform within the 180 days, you lose that bond allocation.
  • in general obligation bonds.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Senate Session Feb 19th, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • On those criminal cases where we do not allow a personal bond, they still can set up a bond to get out
  • a hundred dollar bond was appropriate then they can certainly set that.
  • They can set a dollar bond I suppose or they may choose to set a $50,000 dollar bond because they're
  • And he was let out of bond, low bond, so he got out of the low bond and guess what?
  • Is the money going back to the whoever or whatever entity posted the bond?