Video & Transcript Research : 'ballot language'

Page 8 of 500
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • General the power of the courts and fine cities up to $50,000 per day just for putting an item on a ballot
  • Show me, show me the language. Absolutely, yeah.
  • the criminal implications on a, on a woman who's seeking or who has had an abortion, show me the language
  • You've, you've, you've correctly identified the operative language of, of the, of who the bill is targeting
  • If we need to tighten language, Representative Turner, to, um, to, to address any concerns you might
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Income derived from DPRIT will be deposited into the General Revenue Fund and will be on the ballot in
  • Dementia is defined as... ...a progressive loss of cognitive functions such as memory, language, or problem-solving
  • We support the inclusion of Parkinson's and other related neurodegenerative disorders in the language
Bills: SB5, SJR3, SB 5, SJR 3
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • and we're going to make those changes, whether it's through this bill, a safety net being the new language
  • Representative Frank also included language... ...in HB 913 that requires each state hospital to have
AL

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

Alabama House State Government Committee Jan 21st, 2026

State Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • simply in this bill, we're adding in the Alabama State Port Authority in addition to the existing language
  • <00:09:02.480> to<00:09:02.640> the<00:09:02.880> existing<00:09:03.360> language
  • <00:09:03.760> where addition to the existing language where addition to the existing language
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Community Affairs Feb 3rd, 2026

Community Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • When DEI language is removed entirely, access becomes inconsistent.
  • For these reasons, we oppose this bill and the removal of DEI language because erasing the language erases
  • When DE and I language is removed entirely, access becomes inconsistent.
  • Removing the language does not remove and participation depends on recognition.
  • For these reasons, we oppose this bill and the removal of D.E. and I language because erasing the language
Summary: The committee heard several housing, local government, utility, and transparency bills. SB 1342 on transportation infrastructure and land development regulations, by Sen. Rouson, was presented as a housing-affordability measure modeled on the Live Local Act for transit corridors. After adopting an amendment that removed the bill’s compelling-governmental-interest language in enforcement provisions, the committee heard testimony from local-government and housing interests both supporting and opposing the bill’s zoning preemption approach. The bill was reported favorably. The committee also reported favorably CS/SB 1614, by Sen. Leek, which was amended to remove stormwater and code-enforcement spending provisions and to tighten restrictions on local governments seeking state appropriations after audits or without required affirmations. SB 1548, the next Live Local Act iteration by Sen. Claddie Ude, was also reported favorably; it expands where Live Local projects may be located and adds fair-housing protections. SB 968 on home backup power systems, by Sen. McLean, was reported favorably after testimony from builders and energy-related stakeholders, with the sponsor noting he was still working on amendments to refine permit provisions. The committee then approved CS/SB 698, by Sen. Martin, which allows building permits for single-family homes to be issued before septic permits are finalized if application has been made, while still requiring septic approval before occupancy. Builders testified that septic permit delays were causing lengthy project delays and contract cancellations. The committee also reported favorably SB 1320, by Sen. Martin, requiring county tax-increase referenda to include a Department of Financial Services spending analysis if available; the sponsor said the goal was to give voters more standardized fiscal information, while opponents argued existing law already provides similar transparency. SB 484, by Sen. Avila, on data centers, was reported favorably after an amendment adding a knowledge requirement to the foreign-country-of-concern service prohibition; the bill addresses local planning authority, nondisclosure agreements, utility tariff requirements, and water-use limits for large data centers. The committee also reported favorably SB 1118, by Sen. Avila, creating a one-year public-records exemption for data-center location and proprietary information, with testimony split between economic-development supporters and transparency concerns. Finally, the committee took up SB 706, by Sen. Mayfield, preempting naming of major commercial service airports to the state and designating Palm Beach International Airport as Donald J. Trump International Airport subject to federal and trademark conditions; it was reported favorably after questions about local input and airport naming. The committee then heard extensive public testimony on SB 1134, by Sen. Yarbrough, which would prohibit counties and municipalities from funding, promoting, or taking official actions related to DEI and would create penalties and a private right of action for residents. The sponsor argued the bill was aimed at preventing taxpayer-funded DEI programs and cited examples from Jacksonville and other jurisdictions; opponents said the bill was vague, overbroad, and would chill local programs, public education, and civil-rights-related activities. The transcript ends during continued public testimony on SB 1134, with no final committee action shown in the excerpt.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Commerce Finance and Policy Committee 3/3/26

Commerce Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • our—I am hopeful that the bill jackets will be arriving imminently, but we have shared our draft language
  • We have worked with them very closely on the language throughout the process.
  • :18:16.640> the worked with them very closely on the worked with them very closely on the language
  • <00:18:18.640> We language throughout the process. We language throughout the process.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • happens later in the school year. and split the writing test off from the rest of the reading and language
  • This is a language model that, I don't know, the technology goes back about 15 years.
  • We're required to have assessments to assess the reading and language arts standards of the State Board
  • written assessments and overall assessments is there is none because if you're taking a reading language
  • Language arts exams in the state of Texas are from grades three through ten, and that includes a writing
Bills: HB8
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • So that's really a... ...straight clean-up of language. And that's in our testimony already.
  • I know that a colleague of mine has given you some language to try to address that as well.
  • The bill separates out the writing component of the English language arts or reading language arts assessment
  • The proposed language of HB 8 provides some positive changes.
  • The language indicates the need to form councils filled with educators to provide feedback.
Bills: HB8
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Aug 21st, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • later in the school year, uh, and split the writing test, um, off from the rest of the reading and language
  • This is a language model that, as I understand it, the technology goes back about 15 years. a, um, a,
  • We're required to have assessments that assess the reading and language arts standards of the State Board
  • written assessments and overall assessments is there is none, because if you're taking a reading language
  • That being said, there's about 3.2 million reading language arts— Exams in the state of Texas, from grades
Bills: HB8
Summary: The House Committee on Public Education met to hear House Bill 8, which would replace STAAR with a new assessment and accountability system beginning in the 2027-28 school year. The chair described the bill as reducing testing time, limiting benchmark tests, adding beginning-, middle-, and end-of-year assessments, requiring faster score turnaround, involving Texas teachers in test development, and tightening accountability timelines and transparency rules. Members also discussed provisions on A-F ratings, cut scores, CCMR, local accountability plans, and TEA reporting requirements. Committee members and invited witnesses split sharply on the bill’s approach. Supporters, including the chair, TEA Commissioner Mike Morath, and Ed Trust’s Nicholas Munyon Penny, argued the bill would reduce high-stakes pressure, provide quicker and more actionable data, limit over-testing, and better align assessments to Texas standards while preserving criterion-referenced accountability. They said the new system would help teachers and parents intervene sooner and would improve transparency, including parent access to student responses and automatic rescoring in some writing cases. Opponents, including Rep. Hinojosa and student witness Ella Moran, argued the bill still increases testing and replaces one high-stakes test with multiple TEA-created tests. Moran testified that STAAR creates anxiety, disrupts instruction, and does not reflect real learning, while Hinojosa said the House had previously passed a better bill based on a nationally norm-referenced model and criticized the new proposal as a concession to the Senate. Questions also focused on AI scoring of writing, rescoring rates, and whether the bill’s new accountability rules would be reliable and fair. The committee did not take a final vote during the portion provided, but the chair said a vote on HB 8 would be called after public testimony later in the day.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Leg Committee Meeting - 2025-04-09

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • are three programs being funded: grants to Minnesota Tribal Nations to preserve Dakota and Ojibwe languages
  • I think next we can go to the policy language for nonpartisan. Very good. Thank you, Co-Chair Vang.
  • Collectively, we share a common concern about the language in Article 3 that would serve to prevent our
  • to have the vision to pass this, you know, 15-16 years ago or whatever to do it and put it on the ballot
  • There are a lot of people who go there to learn a second language, or kids who cannot afford some of
Bills: HF2563
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation Education Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Finance and Taxation Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • We had the four buckets that the members were interested in, those being poverty, English language learners
  • , to the Poverty, English language learners to the financing.
  • And I want some language in there saying that is the time that people be considered.
  • So, you'll find that with the EL component, the English language learners, and the gifted, there is a
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama House Health Committee Apr 9th, 2025

Health

Transcript Highlights:
  • We're adjusting the language for one of those.
  • Two other states, and we’ve offered that language, and I don’t have a full response.
  • Have done it, and we would take that language. But we don’t have that amendment.
  • What does that language mean? Enforcement of what?
  • Uh, we kind of got notified that the agreed language we had on this may not work.
Bills: HB445, HB477, SB274, HB441
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Legacy Finance Committee 4/9/25

Legacy Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • I think next we can go to the policy language for nonpartisan staff. Very good.
  • Um, but the funds allocated to them through the proposed language would be better used through existing
  • The proposed language would be better used through existing local partnerships throughout the state.
  • But when you look at the constitutional language, something happened along the way.
  • But when you look at the constitutional language, something happened along the way.
Bills: HF2563
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 2ND REVISED Apr 21st, 2026 at 10:00 am

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It doesn't hurt to throw that language in there.
  • Not in this language. Follow up, excuse me. I'm sorry.
  • With this language, and I know we talked about that a little bit last week.
  • So I would just understand that this may be the language as is causes some angst.
  • that you see before you is where the final language will look like.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Education 2ND REVISED Apr 21st, 2026

Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • It doesn't hurt to throw that language in there.
  • Not in this language. Follow up. Excuse me, I'm sorry. It's what is required now.
  • The language is still permissive.
  • that you see before you is where the final language will look like.
  • that you see before you is where the final language will look like.
Summary: The Senate Education Committee first considered a series of executive nominations, including Brian Bobeck to the State Board of Education, Jonathan Daniels to the Oklahoma Board of Private Vocational Schools, Cody Swanee to OETA, Randy Squires to the Western Oklahoma State College Board of Regents, Dwight Spencer to the Carl Albert State College Board of Regents, V. Lee to the Oklahoma Arts Council, Adisha Chapman to the Murray State College Board of Regents, Trevor Pemberton to the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, Jennifer Carlson and Melissa Yvonne to the Commission for Educational Quality and Accountability, Kevin Gross to the Tulsa Community College Board of Regents, and Barbara Myers to the Oklahoma Arts Council. Most nominees briefly described their backgrounds and reasons for serving, and the committee approved each nomination, with votes ranging from 8-1 to 10-0, sending them on to the full Senate or floor as applicable. The committee then took up several education bills. House Bill 1937, dealing with the Communications with Students Act, was amended to require corroborated evidence before immediate suspension and to narrow the definition of student; it passed 9-0. House Bill 2153, which would subject OSSAA meetings and hearings to the Open Meetings Act and repeal the statutory one-year sit-out rule for transfers, drew questions about recruitment and FERPA but passed 7-3. House Bill 3674, requiring school resource officer training on sexual assault and violence, annual continuing education, mandatory reporting, and closure of contractor loopholes, passed 9-0. House Bill 3885, setting a graduated discipline framework for third through fifth graders, prompted debate over classroom safety and student rights and passed 9-1. House Bill 3671, allowing a receiving district to accept a transferring teacher’s career status, passed 10-0. House Bill 3261, assigning employee numbers to school support staff such as coaches and bus drivers for tracking across districts, passed 10-0. Several other bills generated more extensive discussion. House Bill 2978, which would impose annual library audits, public online catalogs, a formal challenge process, and funding penalties for noncompliance, faced repeated questions about how it differed from existing policy and who could challenge materials; it failed 4-5. House Bill 3021, revising graduation requirements and preserving flexibility for applied math/science and local course approval while removing some language requirements, passed 8-2. House Bill 3029, requiring the Department of Education to develop a four-year plan, passed 9-1. House Bill 4274, expanding school choice options for military-dependent students living on base, passed 10-0. The committee also began consideration of House Bill 3076, which would clarify alternative teacher certification provider definitions and OEQA oversight, but the transcript cuts off before a final vote is shown.