Video & Transcript Research : 'absentee voting'

Page 8 of 500
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Judiciary Committee Meeting - 2025-04-02

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • All right, not seeing any, so let's vote then on adoption of the A4 amendment.
  • finally that error could be corrected, ballots reprinted, and then reprinted ballots got out to absentee
  • voters and people wanting to vote in person.
  • The envelopes, which are containers containing the voted ballots, need to stay sealed except by court
  • All in favor, please vote. Say aye. Any opposed?
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Judiciary Finance and Civil Law Committee 4/2/25

Judiciary Finance and Civil Law

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, let's vote then on...
  • <00:32:43.600> then<00:32:43.919> on So, let's vote then on adoption of the A4.
  • voters or people wanting to vote in person.
  • voters or people wanting to absentee voters or people wanting to vote<00:43:02.480> in<00:43:
  • Um so our uh remedy vote in person.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any objection to doing a roll call vote? Let's do one real quick, Senator... vote.
  • It's not a bill that prevents anyone from voting.
  • Votes were flipped from one candidate to another.
  • Back in 2022, I requested my absentee ballot.
  • I was a poll watcher, and I took my absentee ballot and went and made... ...absentee ballot and went
Bills: SB245, SB246, HB30, HB30
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/3/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • with that person's absentee vote.
  • As you all know, when a voter registers to vote, before they even can apply for an absentee ballot, when
  • they're registering to vote, which was about 95% of absentee ballots that were cast, their record is
  • absentee vote person's absentee vote and<01:01:27.680> it's<01:01:27.960> pretty<01:01
  • vote um which was about 95% of absentee vote um which was about 95% of absentee ballots<01:03:41.480
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Government Oversight Feb 26th, 2026 at 10:30 am

Government Oversight

Transcript Highlights:
  • Any members wishing to vote or change their vote, declare the vote. 'Ayes' and 'nays'.
  • Anybody who wishes to vote or change their vote, seeing none, will the clerk declare the vote.
  • or change their vote.
  • Robert Strom, any members wishing to vote or change their vote?
  • Robert, any members wishing to vote or change their vote?
TX

Texas 89th 2nd C.S.

Public Education Apr 29th, 2025

Public Education

Transcript Highlights:
  • They want to vote. Thank you. All right, thank you very much.
  • We do not elect them to ignore us and take away our vote.
  • Not every issue can or should be sent back for public vote.
  • So when people tell me that they want to vote, I tell them you have the option to vote.
  • They have to send that out to a vote, and that vote is with a certain set of circumstances.
Bills: HB4, HB54, SB 10, SB 24
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • That's Senator Bettencourt's bill about accepting an early voting ballot voted by mail.
  • Eligible to vote.
  • They're not citizens; they can't register to vote, they can't vote.
  • So what's being added is the specific explicit language that the early vote site—the early vote clerk's
  • We're talking about early voting ballot storage.
AZ

Arizona 2026 Regular Session

01/21/2026 - House Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Federalism, Military Affairs & Elections

Transcript Highlights:
  • I'll explain my vote. Aye. Chairman Gillette. I'll explain my vote. Mr.
  • I am voting on the bill, and I vote aye on this bill.
  • methods they've been voting with for... ...to the voting methods that they've been voting with for,
  • on Tuesday and vote.
  • Go vote in person.
Summary: The committee met to hear several measures, beginning with HCM 2001 and HCM 2002, both memorials urging Congress to review and potentially designate the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as foreign terrorist organizations. Supporters argued the groups have documented ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal of undermining Western civilization, citing the Holy Land Foundation case, FBI concerns, and testimony from national-security advocates. Opponents, including CAIR representatives, Muslim community members, and civil-rights advocates, said the memorials relied on guilt by association, would stigmatize Muslims, and lacked a factual or legal basis; they emphasized CAIR’s civil-rights work and warned of First Amendment concerns and community harm. After extensive debate and questions about the relationship between national and Arizona CAIR entities, the committee approved HCM 2001 and HCM 2002 on 4-3 votes, with members on both sides explaining their votes at length. Supporters framed the measures as simple requests to Congress based on existing federal findings, while opponents called them political theater and discriminatory. The committee then recessed briefly. When the committee returned, it heard HB 2009, which would prohibit committees primarily organized to influence constitutional amendments from accepting foreign national contributions and require donor verification and disclosure of out-of-state funding. The sponsor said the bill is meant to help voters understand outside influence on Arizona constitutional initiatives and suggested it could be broadened to all ballot measures. The bill passed 4-3. The committee then took up HCR 2001, a proposed constitutional amendment on elections that would limit voting to U.S. citizens, ban foreign contributions to candidate and ballot measure campaigns, require government-issued ID, and adjust early voting and mail-ballot rules. A late amendment clarified that the citizenship requirement applies to primary, general, and municipal elections, set early voting to end the Friday before an election, and refined mail-ballot rules while preserving federal overseas military voting requirements. The sponsor argued the measure would make Arizona elections more secure and efficient, while critics said it would create barriers and longer lines. The transcript cuts off during sponsor questioning on the amendment and ballot-access provisions.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Judiciary Committee Apr 2nd, 2025

Judiciary

Transcript Highlights:
  • You know, we've introduced several laws, legislations about that, but it keeps getting voted down.
  • X and the mayor says this is how we're going to do this and the city council votes unanimously.
  • I'm going to know vote for the bill.
  • I'm going to vote for the bill, but I do still say that there needs to be something in that bill that
  • And basically, uh, what this bill is, is the restoration of voting rights of individuals that have been
MN

Minnesota 2025 1st Special Session

House Elections Finance and Government Operations Committee 3/10/25

Elections Finance and Government Operations

Transcript Highlights:
  • State to post the temporary voting State to post the temporary voting locations<00:23:54.840>
  • where these opportunities for uh voting where these opportunities for uh voting are<00:24:01.919
  • the what 46 days or or so of voting the what 46 days or or so of voting start<00:25:10.679> U
  • early and absentee voting uh so that's early and absentee voting uh so that's the<00:25:50.240><
  • <00:29:02.480> for to vote for to vote for it<00:29:05.080> um<00:29:05.240> to<
Bills: HF1345, HF71, HF993, HF1943
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • We had an option as a... local government to approve it when 81% of the population voted for it.
  • You know, it's just—and the good news is since 20 years... ...though that 81% vote has gone to 86, 83
  • And of course, staying in their home is number one, and they are the largest voting bloc as well.
  • Those numbers stay very high as well because consistently folks vote when they're that age or so.
  • As Charles and others have indicated, we voted for, Texans have voted.
Bills: SB4, SJR2, SB 4, SJR 2
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • Supporting the bill, we'll vote for the bill.
  • This is how I'm going to vote and the teacher that there's an inference that I expect you to vote the
  • A vote for this bill is a vote of conscience and it is a vote towards your legacy on how you viewed each
  • They have to be approved by y'all. by two-thirds vote, so you have both parties voting for these constitutional
  • I ask you to vote in favor of this bill and push it to the full Senate for a full vote and eventual passage
FL

Florida 2026 Regular Session

Criminal Justice Jan 26th, 2026

Criminal Justice

Transcript Highlights:
  • By your vote, SB 442 is reported favorably.
  • rights restored and to register to vote.
  • By your vote, SB 132 is reported favorably. By your vote, SB 132 is reported favorably.
  • I think I need two-thirds of the vote, and I'm in a prevailing party to vote pursuant to Senate rules
  • We need a vote of two-thirds in favor. There's no vote until next week. Oh, okay.
Summary: The committee took up a series of criminal justice and public safety bills. SB 646, allowing the use of drug testing tools such as fentanyl test strips and reagent kits to detect dangerous adulterants, was presented as a harm-reduction measure and reported favorably after supportive testimony from advocates and criminal defense groups. SB 442, extending the return period for warrants involving digital evidence from 45 days to one year, also passed unanimously amid testimony from prosecutors and law enforcement about encryption, backlogs, and large volumes of child exploitation evidence. SB 418, creating autism-related law enforcement training and a Blue Envelope Program for traffic stops and other encounters, was reported favorably with support from police, disability advocates, and families. SB 132, creating a public database to help people determine eligibility for restoration of voting rights, and SB 748, requiring notice of voting-rights restoration information on sentencing score sheets, both passed with broad support from voting-rights and criminal defense advocates. The committee also approved SB 1734, recognizing juvenile probation and detention officers as officers under Florida law and extending related training and benefits, and SB 1660, designating June as Responsible Firearm Safety Awareness Month. SB 1742, which repealed the existing “unnatural and lascivious acts” statute and created a new offense for indecent exposure of sexual organs to a minor, was amended with a delete-all amendment and then reported favorably. SB 1750, a major overhaul of career offender registration requirements, was later reconsidered after a bill-number mix-up and then reported favorably as SB 1332, with FDLE and sheriff’s association support. The most contentious measure was SB 1326, which would eliminate the traditional insanity defense and replace it with a lack-of-culpable-mental-state defense, require malingering assessments in competency evaluations, and limit downward departures based on mental illness. Criminal defense attorneys and disability advocates argued it lacked a treatment component, raised scientific and cost concerns, and could worsen public safety by sending mentally ill defendants to prison without adequate care. Supporters, including the sponsor and the Attorney General’s office, argued it would close gaps and better protect the public. After extensive debate, the bill was reported favorably on a divided vote, with several members voting no. At the end of the meeting, members recorded additional votes on some bills, and Senator Pizzo moved for reconsideration of SB 1326 for a future meeting.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 24th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • Each vote was 15 to 16 or 16 to 15.
  • Last year when delegates voted on the individual planks, 51% of those in attendance voted against the
  • When that vote was adjusted to a voting strength percentage, the plank barely passed and had the lowest
  • Are you going to vote for something that says, oh, I don't know, we're going to outlaw poultry?
  • And then going further, if Texas is not on board, it's doubtful the other states will pull enough votes
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part II) Apr 24th, 2025

State Affairs

Summary: The Senate Committee on State Affairs was called to order and a roll call showed most members present, with one absent. The chair explained that the committee had arranged witnesses for a later meeting but had received responses from some parties declining to testify, prompting Senator Bettencourt to offer a written motion for subpoenas. The motion authorized the committee chair, under Senate Rule 11.20, to issue subpoenas to BlackRock, State Street, or other financial services companies affecting Texas public pension investments, along with their subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, employees, agents, or representatives. The subpoenas would require testimony and production of records concerning investment practices, the impact on Texas public pension funds, and any investments intended to further political or social causes. Members discussed the importance of obtaining testimony and the limited but necessary use of subpoena power. The committee then voted, with 10 ayes, no nays, and one absent, to adopt the motion. With no further business, the committee recessed until the call of the chair, planning to return after the local calendar.
TX

Texas 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part III) Apr 24th, 2025

State Affairs

Transcript Highlights:
  • They vote. They vote.
  • And the votes, there's the perception that the votes have gotten better, the proxy votes have gotten
  • Let's talk about recent votes, some examples of harmful shareholder votes by BlackRock recently.
  • And the votes, there's the perception that the votes have gotten better, the proxy votes have gotten
  • Let's talk about recent votes, some examples of harmful shareholder votes by BlackRock recently.
Summary: The committee heard Senate Bill 945, 946, 2044, 2819, 2403, 2337, and 312, with all bills left pending after testimony. SB 945 would restrict insurance companies from denying or limiting coverage based on oil and gas activity or ESG-related goals, and supporters argued it would protect Texas energy producers from politically motivated shareholder activism and insurance discrimination. SB 946 would bar creditors from using social credit, ESG, DEI, or religious/political affiliation as a basis for denying or limiting credit; witnesses said it would prevent viewpoint-based financial discrimination and protect access to capital for Texas businesses. SB 2337 would require proxy advisory firms to disclose when recommendations are based on non-financial factors or when they give conflicting advice to different clients; supporters said the measure would increase transparency and curb ESG-driven influence over shareholder voting. SB 312 would direct public retirement systems to focus on financial returns rather than social or political objectives, with the author saying the bill responds to activist pressure on pensions and would reinforce fiduciary duty. The committee also took up election and ethics measures. SB 2044 would strengthen electioneering restrictions for publicly funded education institutions and personnel, prohibiting use of official resources to promote political agendas; testimony focused on alleged school district electioneering in bond and tax elections. SB 2819 would prohibit county elections administrators from holding certain officer positions appointed by elected officials, addressing potential conflicts of interest. SB 2403, the Texas Ethics Commission sunset bill, would restructure complaint handling with a three-tier violation system, risk-based complaint prioritization, longer response times, bipartisan preliminary review panels, and expanded hearing options; members discussed amendments aimed at dismissing minor complaints, clarifying categories, and adjusting lobbying and penalty provisions, but the amendments were withdrawn during committee consideration. Across the ESG and finance bills, invited witnesses from the American Energy Institute, Heartland Impact, Consumers Research, ADF Action, Texas Civil Justice League, and related groups generally supported the measures, arguing that banks, insurers, proxy advisors, and asset managers have used ESG or reputational-risk standards to discriminate against energy, agriculture, firearms, and religious organizations. No opposition testimony was presented in the excerpt, and the committee closed public testimony on each bill and left them pending.