Video & Transcript : 'online pricing' :

Page 89 of 500
MO

Missouri 2026 Regular Session

Special Committee on Property Tax Reform Feb 5th, 2026

Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Transcript Highlights:
  • Representative Price: [not recorded in transcript]. Chair Taylor: No.
  • Price. Taylor? Now. Vinsquoy? Aye. Warwick? Williams? Yes. Substitute, do pass. Substitute do pass.
  • Price? Taylor? No. Van Schoiack? Aye. Warwick? Williams? Aye.
  • Price? Taylor? Yes. Van Schoiack? Warwick? Williams? Yes.
  • Price? Taylor? No. Van Schoiack? Warwick? Williams? Warwick? Williams? Aye.
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Finance Feb 4th, 2026 at 04:00 pm

Finance

Transcript Highlights:
  • Second, the farm equipment must have been acquired by an eligible farmer at a sales price of $10,000
  • The equipment must have been acquired by an eligible farmer at a sales price of $10,000 or more.
  • So this is just a way to help give them some relief, help them stay afloat until our commodity prices
  • These equipment items often have a sale price of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  • They'll be followed by online testimony from Lori Lane, Jeff Pack, and Tim Eamon. Can we start?
Committee: House Finance
OK
Transcript Highlights:
  • The blue line you see there is what normally we translate to inflation which is a consumer price index
  • That's online.
  • That's not price-based, but it's not just competitively bid when we do construction projects.
  • I think some of it was almost like a market correction where prices were probably too low.
  • Thank goodness that fuel prices have come down because that helps our economy a whole lot.
AL

Alabama 2025 Regular Session

Alabama Senate Finance and Taxation General Fund Committee Feb 19th, 2025

Finance and Taxation General Fund

Transcript Highlights:
  • Senator Gavan, Senator Jones, Senator Kelly, Senator Livingston, Senator Or, Senator Price, Senator Shellnut
  • Senator Elliott, Senator Gavan, Senator Jones, Senator Kelly, Senator Livingston, Senator Or, Senator Price
  • Senator Price, Senator Shut, Senator Stewart, Senator Stuts, Senator Weaver.
  • Yeah, people may be able to go online and do it or whatever, but a lot of people don't know that you
  • Senator Gavan, Senator Jones, Senator Kelly, Senator Livingston, Senator Price, Senator Stewart.
Bills: SB163 , SB173 , SB155 , HB93 , SB163 , SB173 , SB155 , HB93
TX

Texas 89th Regular

Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 28th, 2025

Congressional Redistricting, Select

Transcript Highlights:
  • There's an audio and video stream online.
  • Someone has to pay the price.
  • Finally, Price Warren.
  • Is Price Warwick here? Okay, um, I'll show you register to testify as...
  • My name is Price Warwick III.
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Science, Technology and Energy (04/07/2025)

Science, Technology and Energy

Transcript Highlights:
  • </c><04:23:43.760><c> And</c> online last fall. And online last fall.
  • None opposed.<05:29:57.160><c> Online.
  • Online. I'll do Pardon. I'll do opposed. Online. I'll do Pardon.
  • </c><05:30:33.040><c> Bill</c> online.
  • Senate Bill online.
NM

New Mexico 2025 Regular Session

IC - Legislative Finance Nov 20th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • So, our newest historic site is online.
  • So it is three months of online training and then a month. Three months—I should ask John Taylor.
  • And so the curriculum is a two-week online for the learning modules, and then it's a three-day in-field
  • pricing because they're going to do 28 homes at once.
  • I'll start talking about the fair price. Thank you very much, Vice Chair.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Thank you for joining us, including thank you for members joining online, and... ...for joining us, including
  • thank you for members joining online and for those in person, along with the legislative auditor, Eric
  • Most of the community and cultural awareness training is available online, on demand.
  • And also, Commerce does house an online box for those state, those 59 community action plans.
  • Maybe our staff can make sure that it's available online, the report and link.
Summary: The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee subcommittee held a hybrid hearing to receive three State Auditor’s Office performance audits. The first audit examined implementation of the Law Enforcement Training and Community Safety Act. Auditors said the Criminal Justice Training Commission had developed most required training, but six community/cultural topics were still unfinished, the patrol tactics curriculum was incomplete in one area, and the agency lacked a systematic project management approach. They reported that most officers had not completed the 40 required hours, with low participation in patrol tactics training, weak communication, limited data to track compliance, and ineffective incentives or consequences. Committee members questioned staffing, liability, and enforcement, and the Commission said it generally agreed with the findings and had begun implementing recommendations, including improving training development and communication. The second audit reviewed Washington’s digital equity planning. Auditors concluded the state lacked a comprehensive, unified digital equity strategy, a designated lead, and reliable funding. They said the existing PEAR/Impact Plan, BEAD five-year plan, and NTIA-approved digital equity plan each addressed parts of the issue but none provided a full statewide framework with clear authority across agencies. The Department of Commerce’s Broadband Office and the Office of Equity said they agreed with the findings and were open to working with the legislature and the Digital Equity Forum on a more structured approach. A public witness described local and regional digital equity planning efforts and emphasized the importance of coordination and community-based work. The third audit focused on Commerce’s management of the Digital Navigator Program. Auditors said Commerce did not consistently use a competitive process, did not adequately vet grantees and subgrantees, wrote contracts that lacked clear deliverables and monitoring requirements, failed to enforce reporting, and paid $10.7 million without sufficient documentation to verify reimbursement eligibility. They said agency staff had raised concerns that were ignored and that some payments and contract expansions occurred despite warnings. Commerce officials said new leadership had already begun major contract-management reforms, including centralized oversight, risk assessments, clearer documentation standards, and staff training, and they said they would pursue recapture where appropriate. Committee members expressed strong concern about accountability, and the hearing ended after public testimony and committee discussion.
OK

Oklahoma 2026 Regular Session

Oklahoma Education Commission Feb 26th, 2026 at 01:00 pm

Oklahoma Education Commission

Transcript Highlights:
  • Anyone online? Well, I think harder.
  • It's all online, right? Fourteenish hours online, and you get a stamp of accomplishment.
  • He can take stuff online through microcredentials, which means it's available 24/7, right?
  • So I think the price would be reduced if we could get everyone.
  • You guys online? Are you OK on the 2nd of April?
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee Apr 13th, 2026

Energy, Utilities and Communications

Transcript Highlights:
  • They're just looking at different resources, where they are, what the pricing is, and whatnot.
  • So it's currently working as it is, but with new technologies coming online, it's a way DWR can establish
  • for other, let's say, city council, school board meetings, they don't have to do meeting postings online
  • for other, let's say, city council, school board meetings, they don't have to do meeting postings online
  • we believe SB 1196 is common-sense legislation that will ensure that we can get low-cost housing online
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Senate Floor Session-Day 21, March 6, 2026-AM

Wyoming Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • I said, “I guess,” because she was not tickled with the workmanship or the price of previous gavels.
  • not tickled with the workmanship<00:14:11.920><c> or</c><00:14:12.160><c> the</c><00:14:12.399><c> price
  • </c> workmanship or the price workmanship or the price of<00:14:14.320><c> previous</c><00:14:15.199>
  • Do we want every single manhole, um, every single pipeline that data published online or is there some
  • or is there some data published online or is there some uh<00:30:39.039><c> security</c><00:30:39.520
NH

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

House Ways and Means (05/20/2025)

Transcript Highlights:
  • Prices get higher, the tax goes up until you hit that breaking point where the prices are so high that
  • So to your point, if nothing changes other than prices and those prices hit the bottom line of businesses
  • I was just doing a quick check online.
  • We have new properties coming online.
  • </c><04:41:03.200><c> and</c> housing market uh pricing and housing market uh pricing and availability
Summary: The committee heard testimony on Senate Bill 110, as amended by the Senate, which would establish fees for alteration-of-terrain applications and direct the Department of Environmental Services to adopt rules for a permit-by-notification process for certain projects. Trisha Milo introduced the bill for Senator Lang and noted that the department had worked on the amended language. Matt Mayberry of the New Hampshire Homebuilders Association said the industry strongly supported the bill, describing it as a public-private partnership that would speed review for developers without affecting local control, with builders paying the costs rather than taxpayers. Members focused heavily on how the bill’s fee structure and permit thresholds would work, especially for projects near shoreland, wetlands, and protected water bodies. Representative Opel raised concerns about whether the bill reduced review of habitat and shoreland impacts or shifted costs unfairly; Philip Trobridge of DES explained that the bill does not eliminate those reviews and that shoreland projects still receive greater scrutiny. He said the bill creates different tiers, with the permit-by-notification process applying to certain projects between 100,000 and 150,000 square feet that are not in protected shoreland, while larger or shoreland-affected projects remain under the standard review process. He also said the proposed fees were based on sustaining the program, covering added habitat and species review responsibilities, and keeping reviews efficient. Trobridge said the new fee structure would generate about $1.2 million in additional revenue and help fund additional staff and related program costs. He stated that the department had worked with the regulated community and believed the fees were fair and reasonable, though he acknowledged the bill’s wording was confusing and that the threshold could be revisited later if the new process works well. Members also discussed how the state process interacts with local approvals, and Trobridge said both state and local approvals are required before a project can begin. No vote or final action was taken in the portion of the meeting provided.
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Energy Finance and Policy Committee 2/24/26

Energy Finance and Policy

Transcript Highlights:
  • Recently implemented market reforms to align market price signals with demand.
  • They can hedge against pricing control.
  • First of two are online, and so we'll ask Mr.
  • One, I don't think you could just go online and actually purchase these.
  • go online and actually purchase<01:45:14.719><c> these.
Bills: HF2986 , HF3555
MN

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Committee on Environment, Climate and Legacy - 03/11/25

Environment, Climate, and Legacy

Transcript Highlights:
  • I also just wanted to highlight that one in four of those visitors enter through a reduced-price program
  • a</c> those visitors enter through um a those visitors enter through um a reduced<00:04:29.880><c> price
  • ><c> um</c><00:04:31.520><c> or</c><00:04:31.919><c> free</c><00:04:32.360><c> program</c> reduced price
  • program um or free program reduced price program um or free program um<00:04:33.199><c> in</c><00:04
  • lunch if if redu free and reduced price lunch if if it<00:57:54.240><c> weren't</c><00:57:54.480><c>
WA

Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session

House Consumer Protection & Business Jan 30th, 2026 at 08:00 am

Consumer Protection & Business

Transcript Highlights:
  • Kratum products may not be ordered or purchased by mail or online; delivering, shipping, or transporting
  • Beginning January 1, 2027, the LCB must make and maintain a publicly available online directory that
  • An excise tax of 11% of the retail sales price of kratum products is established.
  • The tax of 11% of the retail sales price of kratum products is established.
  • However, that limit should be adjusted as inflation and salaries and prices go up.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Kratom products may not be ordered or purchased by mail or online; delivering, shipping, or transporting
  • Beginning January 1, 2027, the LCB must make and maintain a publicly available online directory that
  • An excise tax of 11% of the retail sales price of kratom products is established. It is...
  • An excise tax of 11% of the retail sales price of kratom products is established.
  • However, that limit should be adjusted as inflation and salaries and prices go up.
Summary: The Consumer Protection and Business Committee held a public hearing on House Bill 2291, the Kratom Consumer Protection Act, and then moved into executive session on several bills. Staff explained that HB 2291 would license kratom retailers and processors, set age 21 purchase limits, require labeling, child-resistant packaging, independent testing, an LCB-approved product directory, and an 11% excise tax, while banning certain synthetic or adulterated kratom products and restricting online/mail sales and public consumption. The prime sponsor said the bill was intended to regulate natural kratom while banning the synthetic or chemically altered forms, and several witnesses supported stronger youth protections and product standards. Others opposed the bill’s licensing fee, statewide preemption of local bans, or the regulatory approach, while some testified that natural kratom helps with pain or recovery. The hearing on HB 2291 was then closed without action. In executive session, the committee took action on multiple bills. HB 2439, dealing with cigarette, vapor product, and tobacco product policy, was amended and reported out with a do pass recommendation; the adopted amendments limited Consumer Protection Act enforcement to the Attorney General, adjusted coupon language, and restored state preemption over local retail regulation. HB 1078 on pet insurance, HB 1701 on shared liquor-license premises, HB 2207 on bonded beer warehousing, and HB 2501 on real estate oil-tank disclosure were all reported out with do pass recommendations, with HB 1701’s substitute removing a Public Records Act exemption and HB 2207’s substitute aligning beer warehousing more closely with spirits warehouse rules. HB 2361, which raises the maximum small loan amount, was amended to make inflation adjustments biennial and to change publication requirements, then passed out of committee. The committee also approved HB 1932, which would authorize cannabis consumption events in regulated environments. The substitute bill would create a cannabis consumption event organizer license, allow limited adult-use events subject to local approval, and establish permit and budtender training requirements; members discussed the bill as a way to provide lawful consumption spaces while others objected to expanding cannabis access. In the final votes, HB 2439 passed 12-3, HB 1078 passed unanimously, HB 1701 passed 14-1, HB 2207 passed 14-1, HB 2501 passed unanimously, HB 2361 passed 13-2, and HB 1932 passed 11-4, all with do pass recommendations.
CA

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee Apr 8th, 2025

Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials

Transcript Highlights:
  • These costs will inevitably be passed on to consumers through higher prices with rising tariffs supply
  • And so, this year for me, I'm really concerned with passing on prices right now.
  • We just got to kind of keep the prices down. Thank you. Other questions or comments from members?
  • What about the cannabis prices? That's a good question.
  • But I will get you data on the price differential. I don't believe it's substantial. Thank you.
FL

Florida 2025 Regular Session

April 7, 2025 - 12:30 PM

Transcript Highlights:
  • For more complex requirements or procurements, negotiations allow us to refine scope, terms, and pricing
  • For more complex requirements or procurements, negotiations allow us to refine scope, terms, and pricing
  • We accomplish our mission in many ways, from providing a suite of online e-procurement tools to assist
  • climb, the price goes down.
  • climb, the price goes down.
Summary: The subcommittee heard a panel on Florida’s IT procurement process from the Florida Digital Service, the Department of Management Services, and the Department of Financial Services. Witnesses walked through the procurement lifecycle, including planning, market research, solicitation, evaluation, award, implementation, and closeout, and emphasized the role of budget timing, contract managers, and subject matter experts. DMS described the state’s enterprise contracting system, noting more than 1,100 active vendor agreements, over 800 involving IT services, and the statutory requirement to request 25 quotes for certain IT purchases. DFS demonstrated the Florida Accountability Contract Tracking System (FACS), explaining how agencies upload contract and payment data and how the public can search contracts and related documents online. Members focused on accountability, transparency, and whether the state is getting the best products and vendors. Questions addressed how contracts are vetted, how technical evaluations are performed, how financial consequences are used for missed deliverables, how public records and confidential information are handled, and how the state screens vendors for foreign-concern or bad-actor issues. Witnesses said agencies rely on technical experts for evaluations, that contract terms should include measurable deliverables and meaningful financial consequences, and that agencies—not procurement staff—generally manage performance, though Florida Digital Service oversees large IT projects of $10 million or more. The committee then shifted to broader policy discussion, including Senate Bill 7026 and proposals to reorganize state IT governance. Several members argued for stronger centralization under a state CIO or similar enterprise authority, while others cautioned against abrupt restructuring and stressed the need for a transition plan. Members also raised concerns about workforce retention, consulting services, recurring project overruns, and the need for better planning and periodic monitoring. No votes were taken; the meeting ended with the chair thanking members and staff and adjourning the subcommittee.
WY

Wyoming 2026 Regular Session

Joint Appropriations Committee, January 9, 2026

Appropriations

Transcript Highlights:
  • Um, so we have a $55 Wyoming oil price forecast.
  • </c> decreases in production but the price decreases in production but the price remains<00:23:25.679
  • </c><02:42:18.560><c> uh</c> contract, a guaranteed maximum price uh contract, a guaranteed maximum price
  • Is she online?
  • I was listening online last work well.
WA
Transcript Highlights:
  • Participants in the room must use their microphone when speaking so that folks in Zoom and online can
  • We'll head online now to... I don't see any other questions. Thank you, Vice Chair Nance.
  • We'll head online now to Dr.
  • And then we'll head online next for Tanisha Ross to kick us off online after Mr. Moran.
  • We'll head online now to Tanisha Ross, followed by Jeremiah Nelson. Tidisha can't hear you yet.
Summary: The committee held its first meeting and heard four bills. HB 2286 would create an alternative route to social worker licensure by removing the exam requirement for advanced social workers and allowing enhanced supervision with supervisor attestation in place of the exam for independent clinical social workers. The sponsor and several social workers testified that the exam is a poor measure of clinical competence and can be a barrier to licensure, while opponents warned that removing the exam could affect public protection and Washington’s participation in the social work compact. Members asked follow-up questions about the compact, the exam format, and accreditation requirements, but no action was taken. HB 2363 would allow music therapy license applicants to practice under supervision for up to six months while waiting for exam verification. The sponsor described it as a technical fix to the new licensure system, and testimony from music therapists, educators, and a patient supported the bill as a way to avoid delays in hiring newly trained therapists while maintaining supervision and patient safety. The bill drew strong support in written testimony and no opposition in the hearing. HB 2324 would change tuition waiver rules for children of eligible veterans and National Guard members by giving eligible children eight years from the date of a parent’s disability determination to use the waiver when that determination occurs after the child turns 18. The sponsor said the bill is meant to align state law with federal dependency education benefits and prevent families from losing access because disability determinations can take years. The committee asked for clarification on how the new timing would work, and the hearing closed without a vote. HB 2098 would eliminate the cap on the advanced computing surcharge, expand Washington College Grant eligibility up to 100% of state median family income, and reduce resident undergraduate tuition by 10% for three years starting in 2027-28. Supporters, including students, labor, and advocacy groups, said the bill would improve affordability and access to higher education by asking large tech companies to pay more. Opponents from business and university groups argued the surcharge would be economically harmful, that the state already has substantial WEA funding, and that the bill would reduce tuition revenue without adequately backfilling institutional budgets. The committee heard extensive testimony and members raised questions about the surcharge cap, WEA spending, and the compacted funding structure, but no final action was taken.