Transcript Highlights:

• This adjustment increases an advanced deposit wagering regulatory fee from 1% to 2%.
• This adjustment increases an advanced deposit wagering regulatory fee from 1% to 2%.
• This adjustment increases an advanced deposit wagering regulatory fee from 1% to 2%.
• <00:31:28.159> fee advanced deposit wagering regulatory fee advanced deposit wagering regulatory
• On line 147, you'll also see the second half of the advanced deposit wagering regulatory fee increase

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• And that increases the regulatory risk here in New Hampshire.
• regulatory risk here in New Hampshire. regulatory risk here in New Hampshire.
• <01:00:00.160> risk, changes, that creates regulatory risk, changes, that creates regulatory
• Applicants know predictable framework.
• a way of dealing with all the regulatory a way of dealing with all the regulatory issues<02:51:49.439

Keywords: 1191, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Madam Chair, do we allow any other scope of practice to be specified by various regulatory agencies?
• Madam Chair, do we allow any other scope of practice to be specified by various regulatory agencies?
• Addis, do we allow any other scope of practice to be specified by various regulatory agencies? Dr.
• We're waiting for sub-regulatory guidance from CMS, and we may not get that until this summer.
• Is there not a chance to make changes to our regulatory framework here in Arizona and then potentially

Bills: HB2190, HB2202, HB2233, HB2251, HB2252, HB2396, HB2437, HB2689, HB2796

Keywords: physician assistants, licensure compact, medical services, multistate practice, patient care access, healthcare workforce, military families, adverse actions, dementia care, telementoring, healthcare education, rural communities, grant funding, HB 2233, rural health transformation, rural health transformation program, AHCCCS, Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, Joint Legislative Budget Committee, JLBC

Transcript Highlights:

• President, members, this morning we'll hear invited testimony on health regulatory agencies in Article
• On the council to coordinate and share their administrative and regulatory efforts.
• Um, this is a regulatory and enforcement action response related to.
• TSBBP oversees a robust regulatory framework with 117 FTEs managing the licensing and regulation of over
• Representative from our regulatory agency in charge statutorily.

Transcript Highlights:

• This is a group that would be looking at the entire criteria. entire scope, and also viewing the framework
• President, Senator, again, it goes back to the framework that is established, the negotiations, and how
• it's put together with a plan that will come forth. the framework that is established, the negotiations
• You know, what we can see within the framework. Mr.
• That will be part of the process as it forms and as it's designed, and also with seeing the framework

Transcript Highlights:

• So along with the regulatory framework, is there any, was there any conversation on taxing these products

Keywords: 1182, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Notarization Act, SB 696, a Chapter 291 statute of 2023, Portantino, which established for the first time a framework
• Rather, it reduces uncertainty and potentially costs by ensuring regulatory consistency.

Summary: The Assembly Appropriations Committee met on April 8, 2026, with a quorum established and 59 bills listed for consideration. The committee first approved two consent calendars: several bills were sent to the Assembly floor on a due-pass basis, and a smaller set was approved due-pass but not eligible for the floor consent calendar. The proposed suspense calendar was then deemed approved without individual debate on those measures. The committee heard several bills in regular order. AB 1977, sponsored by the Secretary of State, would clean up and clarify the Online Notarization Act to support implementation by 2030; it drew no opposition and was approved. AB 2011 would codify existing federal mental health parity standards into state law; supporters said it would preserve enforcement authority, while health plans opposed it as premature given federal uncertainty and possible premium impacts; the bill was placed on the B roll call. AB 1673 would give county fish and game commissions more flexibility to use certain revenues for wildlife conflict prevention, and it advanced on an A roll call. AB 2233 would allow unused authorized ABA therapy hours for children with autism to be made up within the authorization period; supporters emphasized access and continuity of care, while insurers warned of higher costs and reduced utilization safeguards; it advanced on an A roll call. AB 1660, as amended, would give courts more flexibility in cases involving financial institutions and public guardians/conservators, with supporters saying it could save counties time and money; it was approved due-pass as amended. During general public comment, speakers voiced support for AB 2081 and AB 1667, and opposition to AB 1777. After public comment and final vote recording for absent members, the committee adjourned.

Transcript Highlights:

• A regulatory environment that really benefits them, it would balance that out. You are recognized.
• It establishes regulatory standards for payments to entities including MGAs, attorneys, and reciprocal
• boards and educational standards would pose a some cases serious public safety risks, increase regulatory
• I learned firsthand the number of consumer protections in these regulatory statutes and how they need
• The framework is simple: when a person is convicted, a judge may order the offender to abstain from drugs

Bills: HB 118, HB 388, HB 114, HB 205, HB 2789, HB 2791, HB 499, HB 2960, HB 3163, HB 3135, HB 2427, HB 1618, HB 1672, HB 1722, HB 1338, HB 787, HB 2618, HB 879, HB 1126, HB 4134, HB 3513, HB 718, HB 1536, HB 1445, HB 1640, HB 1893, HB 1734, HB 3229, HB 3306, HB 1276, HB 3272, HB 3276, HB 3516, HB 4145, HB 1585, HB 4810, HB 2989, HB 2558, HB 3014, HB 2742, HB 1695, HB 29, HB 125, HB 145, HB 171, HB 255, HB 50, HB 363, HB 116, HB 491, HB 1495, HB 368, HB 1285, HB 1905, HB 2002, HB 917, HB 2723, HB 2067, HB 1238, HB 745, HB 1188, HB 1606, HB 2003, HB 2147, HB 2355, HB 2546, HB 2495, HB 2818, HB 2249, HB 3228, HB 3240, HB 1507, HB 658, HB 1748, HB 1851, HB 1922, HB 2798, HB 107, HB 1587, HB 3684, HB 118, HB 388, HB 114, HB 205, HB 2789, HB 2791, HB 499, HB 2960, HB 3163, HB 3135, HB 2427, HB 1618, HB 1672, HB 1722, HB 1338, HB 787, HB 2618, HB 879, HB 1126, HB 4134, HB 3513, HB 718, HB 1536, HB 1445, HB 1640, HB 1893, HB 1734, HB 3229, HB 3306, HB 1276, HB 3272, HB 3276, HB 3516, HB 4145, HB 1585, HB 4810, HB 2989, HB 2558, HB 3014, HB 2742, HB 1695, HB 609, HB 630, HB 420, HB 767, HB 1708, HB 1404, HB 2457, HB 140, HB 227, HB 913, HB 2198, HB 2763, HB 1261, HB 1135, HB 1318, HB 2358, HB 2765, HB 2735, HB 3307, HB 1242, HB 2842, HB 333, HB 201, HB 694, HB 2415, HB 155, HB 272, HB 405, HB 519, HB 1136, HB 1275, HB 1437, HB 1532, HB 1675, HB 1868, HB 1888, HB 1990, HB 2286, HB 2523, HB 3129, HB 3251, HB 3354, HB 3479, HB 3803, HB 3804, HB 3805, HB 3806, HB 3887, HB 4163, HB 4238, HB 1240, HB 1842, HB 2029, HB 2622, HB 3255, HB 654, HB 4643, HB 4945, HB 3611, HB 3724, HB 3623, HB 3810, HB 4127, HCR 78, HCR 12, SB 767

Keywords: HB 388, HB388, coordination of benefits, COB questionnaire, health benefit plan, health insurance, insurance commissioner, Texas Department of Insurance, uniform form, primary payer, secondary payer, multiple coverage, dual coverage, Medicaid, CHIP, managed care, HMO, small employer health plan, school district health coverage, self-funded plan

Bills: HB 118, HB388, HB 114, HB205, HB2789, HB2791, HB499, HB2960, HB3163, HB3135, HB2427, HB1618, HB1672, HB1722, HB1338, HB787, HB2618, HB879, HB 1126, HB4134, HB3513, HB718, HB1536, HB1445, HB1640, HB1893, HB1734, HB3229, HB3306, HB 1276, HB3272, HB3276, HB3516, HB4145, HB1585, HB4810, HB2989, HB2558, HB3014, HB2742, HB1695, HB29, HB 125, HB145, HB171, HB255, HB50, HB363, HB 116, HB491, HB1495, HB368, HB 1285, HB1905, HB2002, HB917, HB2723, HB2067, HB 1238, HB745, HB 1188, HB1606, HB2003, HB2147, HB2355, HB2546, HB2495, HB2818, HB2249, HB3228, HB3240, HB1507, HB658, HB1748, HB1851, HB1922, HB2798, HB 107, HB1587, HB3684, HB 118, HB388, HB 114, HB205, HB2789, HB2791, HB499, HB2960, HB3163, HB3135, HB2427, HB1618, HB1672, HB1722, HB1338, HB787, HB2618, HB879, HB 1126, HB4134, HB3513, HB718, HB1536, HB1445, HB1640, HB1893, HB1734, HB3229, HB3306, HB 1276, HB3272, HB3276, HB3516, HB4145, HB1585, HB4810, HB2989, HB2558, HB3014, HB2742, HB1695, HB609, HB630, HB420, HB767, HB1708, HB1404, HB2457, HB140, HB227, HB913, HB2198, HB2763, HB 1261, HB 1135, HB1318, HB2358, HB2765, HB2735, HB3307, HB 1242, HB2842, HB333, HB201, HB694, HB2415, HB155, HB272, HB405, HB519, HB 1136, HB 1275, HB1437, HB1532, HB1675, HB1868, HB1888, HB1990, HB2286, HB2523, HB3129, HB3251, HB3354, HB3479, HB3803, HB3804, HB3805, HB3806, HB3887, HB4163, HB4238, HB 1240, HB1842, HB2029, HB2622, HB3255, HB654, HB4643, HB4945, HB3611, HB3724, HB3623, HB3810, HB4127, HCR78, HCR12, SB767

Keywords: HB 388, HB388, coordination of benefits, COB questionnaire, health benefit plan, health insurance, insurance commissioner, Texas Department of Insurance, uniform form, primary payer, secondary payer, multiple coverage, dual coverage, Medicaid, CHIP, managed care, HMO, small employer health plan, school district health coverage, self-funded plan

Transcript Highlights:

• the longstanding inequities in youth sports by establishing a blue ribbon commission to develop a framework
• It seems like when you create this kind of regulatory structure, not everybody benefits from that, and
• AB 549 develops a framework for interagency coordination.
• AB 549 develops a framework for interagency coordination to ensure that these international sporting
• AB 549 provides the framework we need to take proactive, coordinated action, aligning state agencies,

Summary: The committee heard AB 749, which would create a blue ribbon commission to study equitable access to youth sports and recommend a statewide framework, including coaching standards, PE modernization, and funding models to reduce barriers for families. The author and supporters, including youth sports advocates, educators, coaches, and former athletes, argued that sports improve health, school engagement, and long-term opportunity, while noting racial and income disparities in participation. One member raised concerns that a new commission could add cost and regulatory burdens, but the bill was framed as a study measure rather than immediate regulation. The committee also took up AB 549, aimed at coordinating state and local security planning for major upcoming sporting events such as the FIFA World Cup, Super Bowl, and Olympic and Paralympic Games. Supporters said the bill would improve interagency coordination, protect visitors and communities, and help prevent human trafficking and discrimination during mega-events. Members discussed the need to avoid over-policing and to center community values, but the bill advanced on a due pass recommendation to Appropriations. AB 1291 addressed ticket purchasing for concerts, sports, and other live events by requiring electronic proof of purchase and allowing it to be used for entry if a ticket cannot be accessed through no fault of the buyer. Supporters said the measure would give consumers more certainty and help address problems in a monopolized ticketing market, while opponents from venues, sports teams, and entertainment groups warned it could undermine anti-scalping tools, create security problems, and burden venues with duplicate or fraudulent proofs of purchase. The committee approved the bill on a due pass as amended basis to Privacy and Consumer Protection, with the roll held open for absent members. The consent calendar item, AB 644, was also approved.

Transcript Highlights:

• So, without addressing the framework of other agencies and rulemaking authorities under this bill, we
• I would also ask you to be careful about unintentionally importing public school regulatory frameworks
• <02:03:15.040> frameworks<02:03:16.080> into<02:03:16.480> homeschool regulatory
• frameworks into homeschool regulatory frameworks into homeschool law.<02:03:17.760> Homeschooling
• A less encumbered statutory framework supports that flexibility.

Keywords: 1189, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• The Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act modernizes the framework of professional boxing to meet
• <03:35:19.520> of Act modernizes the framework of Act modernizes the framework of professional
• Instead, it creates a framework for disciplined decision-making while retaining full congressional and
• Instead, it creates<03:58:10.640> a<03:58:10.880> framework<03:58:11.199> for<03
• :58:11.439> disciplined creates a framework for disciplined creates a framework for disciplined

Keywords: U.S. House of Representatives Floor Proceedings on Tuesday, March 24, 2026, 1012, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Minnesota launched a nation-leading regulatory framework and empowered many Minnesota businesses to pioneer
• Minnesota launched a nation-leading regulatory framework and empowered many Minnesota businesses to pioneer
• Minnesota launched a nation-leading regulatory framework and empowered many Minnesota businesses to pioneer
• Minnesota launched a nation-leading regulatory framework and empowered many Minnesota businesses to pioneer
• the way to becoming among the most successful THC beverage brewers in the nation. regulatory framework

Keywords: 1183, house

Transcript Highlights:

• education and beyond, these historical sites play a pivotal role in Texas's identity and economic framework
• The Pension Review Board provides oversight of Texas public retirement systems, but it is not regulatory
• This framework not only protects our volunteers but also acknowledges their service to the community.
• This framework not only acknowledges the sacrifices of these individuals but also promotes their ongoing
• Senator: We include regulatory experts in our review process, as well as business people who have taken

Bills: SB1, SB 1

Keywords: appropriations, budget, state funding, education, healthcare, infrastructure, campground safety, youth camp regulations, flood safety, emergency evacuation, health and safety standards, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Members, this amendment keeps the current exemption framework in place.
• <01:11:46.800> in the current exemption framework in the current exemption framework in place
• The amendment would expand OHE's regulatory authority into these areas that haven't been regulated as
• under OHE's regulatory authority.
• without full discussion about framework without full discussion about what<01:25:21.679> happens<

Bills: HF4362, HF4252, HF4440

Keywords: firearms, guns, gun rights, gun control, campus safety, public college, university, postsecondary institution, higher education, visitor carry, concealed carry, open carry, campus policy, Minnesota Statutes 624.714, petty misdemeanor, parking lot carry, firearm possession, public safety, college campus, student carry

Transcript Highlights:

• Codifying the MRVP builds a permanent framework for tenant-based and project-based vouchers, which are
• Codifying the MRVP builds a permanent framework for tenant-based and project-based vouchers, which are
• To meet these challenges of a strict regulatory or statutory timeline and real estate speculation, there
• This bill establishes a framework for home sharing, which is at least just kind of laid out as an arrangement
• area of expertise here as to exactly some of the nuances of it, but I think that, you know, the framework

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The Joint Committee on Housing held a hybrid hearing on a broad slate of housing and homelessness bills. Chairs Rich Haggerty and Julian Cyr opened by noting the committee’s focus on EOHLC programs such as RAFT, MRVP, and HomeBASE, and several members and advocates emphasized the urgency of the state’s homelessness crisis, including rising family homelessness and the need for earlier intervention, more stable subsidies, and stronger long-term housing tools. A major theme was homelessness prevention and rehousing. Multiple witnesses supported bills to codify and strengthen RAFT and HomeBASE, arguing that assistance should be available earlier in a crisis rather than only after a notice to quit or imminent loss of housing. Testimony from legal services, homelessness coalitions, social workers, municipal housing staff, and tenant advocates said the programs help families avoid eviction and shelter, but need more flexibility, higher benefit caps, and permanent statutory protection. Several speakers also urged support for codifying the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program (MRVP), describing it as a critical long-term subsidy for low-income households and older adults, and warning that codification would protect the program from future budget or policy changes. The committee also heard testimony on housing stability for older adults, affordable homes for people with disabilities, supportive housing, housing cooperatives, home sharing, local preference, and reentry housing for returning citizens. Advocates for older adults described a Somerville bridge subsidy pilot that helped stabilize seniors while they waited for permanent housing, and urged statewide expansion. Supporters of supportive housing called for an interagency board to streamline funding and development, while cooperative housing proponents backed creation of a Massachusetts Center for Housing Cooperatives and a dedicated funding reserve. A bill to secure housing for returning citizens drew support from reentry providers and Senator Adam Gomez, who said stable housing is essential to successful reintegration. No votes were taken during the hearing; witnesses generally asked the committee to report the bills favorably, and some members asked follow-up questions on data and program details.

Transcript Highlights:

• We're using this to build the framework and capacity to ensure that we're well positioned to meet our
• about, the Resilient Lands Initiative, will really help us sort of build out that organizational framework
• The initiative will really help us sort of build out that organizational framework across the state to
• So what the 2024 law did was change the legal framework under which those orders existed and said that
• I do think we put in a legislative framework that, you know, helped David meet Goliath in a way that,

Keywords: 995, all

Summary: The committee held a hearing on natural and working lands, carbon sequestration, and related provisions in Governor Healey’s $3 billion Mass Ready Act. EEA officials described the bill’s investments in flooding, land protection, tree planting, wetlands restoration, biodiversity, dams, seawalls, and coastal resilience, along with permitting reforms intended to speed ecological restoration projects. They also outlined current programs on resilient lands, healthy soils, forest climate solutions, forest reserves, and urban tree planting, and said the administration expects natural and working lands to offset up to 7 million metric tons of residual emissions by 2050, while acknowledging that additional strategies will be needed to close the gap to the state’s 10-million-ton offset target. Committee members pressed EEA on the cost of reaching the 30% conservation-by-2030 goal, the loss of a federal USDA grant of about $22 million, the adequacy of current sequestration estimates, and whether the state should consider regional approaches or statutory changes. EEA said current state conservation spending has been about $35 million to $40 million annually, that the Mass Ready Act is intended to help double the pace of conservation, and that federal funding remains uncertain. Senators also raised concerns about PILOT payments for state-owned land, the management of state forests, and the proposed Chapter 91 general license for restoration projects. EEA said the bill’s forest reserve language is meant to create a more durable designation process while still allowing limited active management. Advocates from The Nature Conservancy and Mass Audubon supported stronger investment in land conservation and restoration, saying natural and working lands are a cost-effective climate strategy that also provides biodiversity, water quality, and public health benefits. They urged passage of legislation to increase funding, improve PILOT equity, and strengthen land-use planning and mitigation requirements. They also backed removing Chapter 91 licensing requirements for ecological restoration, arguing that the current process adds cost and delay. In a later panel, a forest scientist and an urban forestry advocate emphasized the carbon and cooling benefits of mature trees, called for greater protection of older forests, and supported bills to expand municipal reforestation and modernize public shade tree law. No votes were taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• As you can imagine, when they're using 1,600 pages of regulatory documents to help guide their contract
• So our first one is for an improved planning framework and support.
• whole proposed solution is intended to try and arm school districts with better resources and a framework
• And give them a better framework for that planning effort beyond just the study and survey process, then
• Like the planning framework to help support proving the need, the ED-spec prototype can support that.

Summary: The Capital Budget Committee heard presentations from the Department of Commerce, the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), and a consultant on the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) study. Commerce officials described their agency’s role in housing, energy, local government, broadband, and other capital programs, and reported on a $5 million pilot under Senate Bill 5200 that used trusted community messengers and technical assistance to help historically excluded organizations prepare for capital funding. They said 18 organizations received direct support and 79 smaller projects were also funded, but emphasized that statutory match rules, reimbursement-based payments, site-control requirements, insurance and audit costs, and extensive contracting rules remain major barriers. Commerce outlined efforts to expand outreach, digital modernization, internal contracting improvements, tribal MOUs, and innovation centers, and members asked about small business support, housing program placement, and outreach to Eastern Washington and communities of color. RCO described its grant programs for recreation, conservation, education, and salmon/orca recovery, and reviewed equity work done before and after a 2021-23 proviso. The agency had already created a small-communities carve-out in youth athletic facilities, piloted stipends for advisory committee members, and reduced match requirements where allowed. Under the proviso, RCO completed an equity review and a planning program that funded 54 projects across 34 counties, with many applicants being new or long-absent grantees. Staff said the review led to changes in scoring criteria, clearer application guidance, more objective data measures, expanded technical assistance, and targeted community engagement. Members asked about application burden, project sizes, outreach, and how the agency is broadening participation and representation on advisory committees. The final presentation summarized a planning study on SCAP, which examined rising construction costs, fragmented grant programs, local funding barriers, and uneven district capacity. The report recommended nine major changes, including stronger planning support, a new minor-modernization category, a mechanism to use unused funds more quickly, an education-specification prototype, a SCAP enhancement program for low-capacity districts, acceptance of non-SCAP funds, phased modernization, streamlined D-form and reimbursement processes, and revisions to the SCAP formula to better account for grade-band differences, enrollment projections, and regional cost factors. Additional recommendations included ongoing monitoring and evaluation, facilities-impact reviews, matching SCAP increases to construction-cost inflation, earlier locking of funding estimates, flexible program spaces, and updated statewide building-condition assessments. No votes were taken during the meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• state and conservation and energy to look at producing policies that we could pursue legal and regulatory
• So when you talk about the property framework, are you talking about the mineral rights and pore space
• I mean, what are you talking about when you say property framework?
• I think one of the things I would just, responding to this set of amendments and the kind of framework
• And I think when you look at, I understand what Clint was saying about giving a predictable framework

Keywords: 965, house, all

Transcript Highlights:

• AB 2705 seeks to establish a uniform framework in the excess proceeds claim process to ensure consumers
• AB 2705 seeks to establish a uniform framework in the excess proceeds claim process to ensure consumers
• AB 2705 would protect consumers by establishing those uniform frameworks for agreements to locate, recover
• This is really a framework that provides a tested and balanced process that protects consumers while
• AB 2705 mirrors the State Controller's unclaimed property framework under civil code of procedure with

Keywords: 988, house, all