Transcript Highlights:

• to a real producer solution, we are all about on-farm testing.
• So you need a great diversity when you're testing.
• You know, we're not intending to have our own test spaces. We leverage other test spaces.
• You know, we're not intending to have our own test spaces. We leverage other test spaces.
• Test spaces. We leverage other test spaces.

Summary: The committee met in Fargo and approved the minutes from the March 31 meeting before hearing a series of informational presentations focused on North Dakota agriculture, water, and research. NDSU President David Cook opened with remarks about NDSU’s land-grant mission, emphasizing statewide service through research, teaching, and extension, and highlighting examples such as the Lilac Agriculture startup and the university’s role in applying research to real-world problems. He said he intends to spend time listening across the state to better understand local needs. The committee then received a detailed presentation on a state irrigation and drainage study from Tom Bodine on behalf of Agriculture Commissioner Doug Goehring. The study projected significant potential for expanded irrigation acreage, especially in counties such as McLean, Williams, Sargent, Burleigh, Mountrail, McKenzie, McIntosh, Dunn, and Bottineau, and estimated major economic gains from irrigation, including higher farm returns and support for value-added agriculture. Members discussed water permits, surface water versus aquifers, infrastructure, drought resilience, and the role of legal drains in improving productivity and generating economic activity. The presenters also noted that the full report is available online. Dr. Greg Lardy followed with NDSU’s required interim report, outlining the university’s agricultural research and extension system, including the State Board of Agricultural Research and Education, seven research-extension centers, and the economic importance of agriculture to the state. He highlighted recent research impacts such as new crop varieties, potato breeding successes, virtual fencing, AI-assisted weed control, weather-network tools, and 4-H programming. He also described NDSU’s budget priorities: restoring the governor’s proposed 10% cuts, additional operating support, and deferred maintenance funding. Committee members asked about the new agricultural field lab, storage sheds, and NDSU’s partnership with Grand Farm. The committee also heard from the North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute and a professor presenting water-related research, including data center cooling, water reuse, smart irrigation, and a feasibility study on co-locating data centers with greenhouse and aquaculture production. Members asked about water use, ownership, and whether the concepts were operational or still speculative. Finally, North Dakota AgTech presented its NSF-funded innovation engine work, describing startup commercialization, on-farm trials, workforce development, and partnerships with NDSU, UND, tribal colleges, and other land-grant institutions. No formal votes were taken beyond approval of the prior meeting minutes.

Transcript Highlights:

• WE ALSO HAVE SOME OF THE LOWEST TEST SCORES IN THE COUNTRY.
• IN THE 68 DECISION IT WAS BEFORE THE MILLER TEST.
• THE MILLER TEST IS NOT CHALLENGE THIS IS NOT SIMPLY SAYING WE IGNORE THE MILLER TEST.
• SOME PEOPLE WILL TALK ABOUT THE MILLER TEST TODAY. THE MILLER TEST GOES INTO PRETTY GOOD DETAIL.
• OTHER REPUBLICAN-LED STATES HAVE TESTED BILL SIMILAR TO THIS.

Transcript Highlights:

• Testing is important versus actually getting a vaccine. Correct. So, testing and detection.
• So early detection through pap smears and other. testing methods is the most effective way. to prevent
• That did not mean that we, We went around the testing of safety.
• We'll go ahead and go into the test. money. First up will be Mr. Stephen Bain. Thank you very much.
• testing of critical infrastructure, controllers for grid, oil and gas. water, things like that.

Bills: HB 1105, HB1527, HB1787, HB1972, HB2081, HB3296, HB3976, HB4071, HB4234, HB4438, HB4701, HB5092, HB5150, HB5180, HB5265, HB5333, HJR203

Keywords: tuition exemption, paramedics, higher education, laboratory fees, emergency medical services, peace officers, criminal justice, law enforcement, degree programs, public institutions, HB 1787, HPV, human papillomavirus, college health, university health, student health, public health education, prevention program, screening, early detection

Transcript Highlights:

• their heads around what is a Bitcoin. what is a digital asset, what is a stable coin, what is a Howie test
• Love to hear your views on the Howey test.
• If the probability test applies, fundraising transactions involving digital assets would continue to
• When we talk about the path forward here in the United States, the jurisdictional lines, the tests.
• We run these assets through rigorous due diligence tests, cybersecurity tests, legal tests, and Make

Keywords: Digital Assets, Bitcoin, Stablecoins, Legislation, Bipartisan, Consumer Protection, Regulatory Framework, Financial Innovation, Testimony

Summary: The inaugural meeting of the Digital Assets Subcommittee brought a wave of excitement and anticipation regarding the future of digital assets, including Bitcoin and stablecoins. Chair Lummis expressed gratitude towards Senator Scott for establishing the subcommittee, indicating a commitment to promote responsible innovation while safeguarding consumers. Members discussed the necessity for a bipartisan legislative framework to regulate digital asset markets effectively while outlining the potential benefits such legislation could have on enhancing financial inclusion and streamlining payments. The meeting featured expert testimonies from key figures in the digital asset industry, highlighting the importance of creating clear regulatory guidance for digital assets to foster innovation without compromising consumer protections.

Transcript Highlights:

• As a teacher, I can tell you I've overseen testing at my school: state testing, NAEP testing, all these
• testings are done online.
• They'd have to scroll down through two pages of screen to figure out answers on testing.
• And they always wonder why I always do paper tests.
• We have one of eight Federal Aviation Administration test sites for unmanned aerial systems, which is

Bills: SB194, SB200, SB203, SB204, SJR3

Keywords: appropriation, higher education, sports facilities, community college, Luna Community College, KANW, educational radio, rural news, public education, funding, education, documentary, historical figure, Padre Antonio Jose Martinez, cultural heritage, research funding, federal funding, New Mexico, University of New Mexico, New Mexico State University

Transcript Highlights:

• c> professional comprehensive test and professional comprehensive test and professional lensure<00
• Um the test prep is dislocated workers.
• Those tests are expensive. Sometimes you have to take several of them.
• Those those tests are expensive. those. Those those tests are expensive.
• the process of um, taking these tests the process of um, taking these tests and<00:37:20.640>

Keywords: 1187, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• a parolee or an asylee that knows English, but is here in the country, they could pass an English test
• One, Senator Freeman's language, I think, to make them take the knowledge test in English is great.
• One, they added something related to the core transfer library, making sure that the tests that high
• schoolers take, such as AP tests, are counted in our core transfer library.
• They added language with, say, if you pass an AP test, you could do it.

Keywords: 964, all

Transcript Highlights:

• urine testing they conduct to treat for possible drug overdose or poisoning.
• It requires follow-up testing if test results are positive.
• Committee Substitute for House Bill 1195, a bill to be entitled an act relating to fentanyl testing.
• Committee substitute for House Bill 1195, a bill to be entitled an act relating to fentanyl testing.
• It's tested twice a week.

Summary: The Senate opened with a prayer, the Pledge of Allegiance, doctor and guest introductions, and then moved to the special order calendar. Early bills passed included measures on the Florida Trust Code (SB 806/HB 1173), school district reporting requirements and educator misconduct reporting (SB 1374), debt collection email communications (SB 232), service of process updates (SB 576/HB 157), public lodging and food service establishments (SB 606), lien waivers and releases (SB 658), Crime Stoppers public records exemptions (SB 710), health care licensure and foreign-country business interests (SB 768, amended), diabetes management in schools (SB 772/HB 597), platting procedures (SB 784), fentanyl testing in hospitals (SB 1346/HB 1195), third-party reservation platforms (SB 940), electronic landlord-tenant notices (SB 1164/HB 615), leaving the scene of a crash restitution (SB 1378/HB 479), background screening for athletic coaches (SB 1546), surrendered infants and infant safety devices (SB 1690/HB 791), and affordable housing/Live Local Act changes (SB 1730, amended). Several other bills were temporarily postponed, including measures on trespass, higher education, transportation services, the UCC, altered sexual depictions, firearms during emergencies, Brownfields, false reporting, health care billing, motor vehicles, utility services, and others. Most of the debate centered on a few controversial bills. Senators debated the fentanyl testing bill in support of faster detection and life-saving treatment, and the surrendered infants bill drew opposition over safety, anonymity, and liability concerns, though supporters argued baby boxes provide a monitored safe surrender option. The affordable housing bill received an amendment and broad support as a continuation of the Live Local Act, with changes to zoning, parking, height, and litigation procedures. The day’s most contentious measure was the agriculture/consumer services package (SB 700), where senators argued over the bill’s fluoride-related preemption; opponents criticized the policy and process, while the sponsor emphasized broader agriculture, consumer protection, and FFA-related provisions. That bill passed 27-9. Votes on the other major bills were largely bipartisan and often unanimous or near-unanimous, with several bills passing 35-37 yeas and few or no nays. The Senate also adopted a motion to immediately certify all bills passed that day to the House. The session concluded with announcements recognizing visitors, including Taiwan representatives, and remarks about a lantern-lighting observance tied to the 250th anniversary of Paul Revere’s ride, followed by adjournment until the next scheduled meeting.

Transcript Highlights:

• are tested.
• They got through the FDA, uh, check line, but only because they weren't tested.
• Because so little of it's actually tested, a lot of it could be contaminated.
• Get testing to be better in the European Union, 50% of all shrimp are tested of the shipments that are
• In the US, and you know if they're only testing 0.1 to 1%, the chances are it's going to get in.

Transcript Highlights:

• , and we started that test in the state of Oregon.
• and we started this program as a test and we started that<00:45:08.160> test<00:45:08.480>
• 6% the THC of the 21st century tested 6% the THC of the 21st century tested last<03:55:35.399>
• And for roadside tests, we only have a roadside test for alcohol, and that was not even invented till
• we only have a um and for roadside tests we only have a roadside<04:01:29.880> test<04:01:30.040

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The committee held a public hearing on House Bill 451, which would create a postconsumer paint stewardship program in New Hampshire. Prime sponsor Representative Karen Ebel described the bill as a bipartisan, broadly supported model based on PaintCare programs used in other states. She said consumers and businesses could drop off leftover paint at participating retailers or municipal household hazardous waste sites, with the paint then collected and recycled by the stewardship organization. She emphasized that the program is intended to reduce landfill disposal, improper dumping, and contamination of groundwater and soil, while also helping municipalities save on hazardous waste handling costs. Members asked several questions about how the program would work and how it would be funded. Ebel explained that the program would be financed by a small fee charged at the point of sale on paint products, not a general sales tax, and that retailers could either list it separately or roll it into the price. She said the fee would cover the Department of Environmental Services’ administrative costs, which were described as minimal, and that the program’s structure was developed with DES and industry input. Questions also addressed whether cans would be recycled and how collected paint would be processed; Ebel said the ACA and PaintCare representatives could provide more detail, but that the paint and containers would be handled through recycling or other approved disposal methods rather than landfilled. Representative Judy Aron, a co-sponsor and chair of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, testified in support, saying the bill had been developed over several years with stakeholders and would keep toxic paint out of landfills while saving municipalities and taxpayers money. Representative Peter Bixby, the ranking member of Environment and Agriculture, also supported the bill, saying his committee had heard it many times and that it had strong bipartisan enthusiasm. No vote was taken during the hearing.

Transcript Highlights:

• You know, we talked about how fourth graders test, eighth graders test, 11th graders test.
• 15 states that test every kid. 15 states that test every kid.
• This bill was<04:32:28.560> a<04:32:28.720> test, was a test, was a test, not<04:32:30.560
• Remember last test. It's just a test.
• That was a test. It was a two-year test. That was a test. It was a two-year test.

Keywords: 916, all

Transcript Highlights:

• He said that challenge, the challenge of doing the hard things, is what tests the best of our energies
• Because ACT changed some methodology, the science test was pulled out as a required score.
• And in language, it said four test scores.
• So all students, we take these test scores from that July 1 through June 30.
• If they've taken multiple tests during that time period, those scores are going to be superscored so

Keywords: 908, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Just for your information, we will close signing up for test public testimony for the next two bills
• Graham decision. in which the Supreme Court used the lemon test to strike down conditions.
• Eliminating the Lemon test and instead looking more appropriately to America's history and tradition
• Coercion is the new test that replaced the lemon test. that Senator King talked about.
• But suffice it. it to say the big takeaway was that the lemon test was thrown out and if you want to

Bills: SB 10, SB 11

Keywords: human trafficking, trafficking victim, compelling prostitution, affirmative defense, criminal defense, coercion, force fraud or coercion, sexual exploitation, victim protection, Penal Code, Texas criminal law, prosecution, party liability, affirmative defense statute, survivor rights, 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Test, test. Okay, here we go. Thank you, the four of you, for being here, along with our staff.
• Zero in on just biomarker testing, for example.
• This area has been growing rapidly with companies developing proprietary tests at high cost.
• In calendar year 24, the cost for... ...proprietary tests at high cost.
• In calendar year 24, the cost for biomarker testing was $12.2 million.

Keywords: 1182, all

Summary: The caucus reviewed a long list of House bills that had returned from the Senate with amendments, with members repeatedly noting that sponsors intended to concur on most items. Topics included public health and vaccination rules (HB 2086, HB 2248), state investment in gold and silver (HB 2140), property records and voter-registration privacy (HB 2327), municipal and county regulation of business property and development fees (HB 2460, HB 2946, HB 2999), legislative subpoenas (HB 2745), cold plunge regulation (HB 2439), nursing-facility complaint timelines and licensed health aide rules (HB 2195, HB 2189), court-ordered treatment review (HB 2923), Access/Medicaid reimbursement and prior authorization for diagnostic services (HB 2932), inmate mental health study committee language (HB 2673), prenatal development instruction in schools (HB 2830), public records requests by legislators (HB 4056), parents’ rights and social transitioning in schools (HB 2249), school district financial compliance and facilities contracting (HB 2481, HB 2482), Native American language proficiency for graduation (HB 2895), advanced math auto-enrollment (HB 2423), special education and military-family procedures (HB 2621), AI rules for state agencies (HB 2592), eviction record sealing (HB 2244), tax filing penalties (HB 2016), shade structures in HOAs (HB 2342), homelessness-related community restitution (HB 2028), medical records timelines (HB 2557), PFAS firefighting foam restrictions (HB 2641), family-court expert testimony and prisoner transition services (HB 2662, HB 2440), address confidentiality protections (HB 2594), guardianship notice attestation (HB 2661), utilities for high-load customers (HB 2756), and nuclear-ready community planning (HB 2456). The committee also briefly moved to Caucus Calendar 19 for additional bills on mobile food vendors, school board training, out-of-state travel and meeting transparency, and a medical-intervention nondiscrimination bill. Several bills drew substantive discussion or criticism. Members debated HB 2932 at length, with staff explaining that Access said the bill would have a high fiscal impact because it would require reimbursement for non-contracted lab services and eliminate prior authorization for a broad range of diagnostic services, potentially increasing costs substantially. HB 2249 also prompted concern from members who argued it could force teachers to out students and create civil liability for using preferred pronouns or failing to notify parents about social transitioning. HB 2830 was criticized as requiring prenatal-development instruction while barring discussion of sexual activity or reproduction. HB 2028, which allows community restitution instead of a $20 probation assessment for people who are indigent and experiencing homelessness, was questioned as potentially punitive. HB 2481 was discussed as a way to help, rather than punish, small rural school districts struggling with financial-record compliance. The caucus also noted that several of the measures were sponsored by Democrats, which was highlighted as notable during the meeting. No formal votes were taken in the transcript. The caucus chair repeatedly asked for questions, and in most cases there were none, after which the sponsor was understood to intend concurrence with the Senate amendments. The meeting ended with adjournment after the caucus moved through the remaining calendar items.

Transcript Highlights:

• DESIGNATING AND SUPPORTING A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR FLORIDA'S DEVELOPMENTAL RESEARCH SCHOOLS TO DESIGN, TEST
• TO DESIGN AND TEST SOLUTIONS THAT WILL HELP INFORM AND IMPROVE FLORIDA K-12 SCHOOLS IN PARTNERSHIP WITH
• STUDENT SCHOOLS WITH A LOW STUDENT MOBILITY RATE, ENGAGE IN LONGITUDINAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING
• YEAR AFTER YEAR WE WORK WITH OUR UNIVERSITY PARTNERS TO DESIGN AND TEST INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS TO FLORIDA'S
• SHARE WITH YOU THAT HEALTHY LIVES HAS CREATED JOHN BOEHNER PROVIDED PK YOUNG TO DESIGN, BUILD AND TEST

Keywords: 999, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• notable learning gains compared to the similar non-community schools, with an improvement in math test
• level in additional learning, and also showing larger than expected gains in English language arts test
• You see dramatic gains in both math and English language arts test scores for the community schools in
• Mayor, focusing on your LPI study, you know, you talk about how the greatest test score gains were at
• And that also, again, we're talking about testing. People focus on so much data and testing.

Summary: The joint informational and oversight hearing focused on community schools in California, with members emphasizing that the purpose was to examine effectiveness, implementation, and sustainability rather than the Governor’s budget proposal. The California Department of Education described the California Community Schools Partnership Program, created in 2021 and funded with more than $4 billion, including planning, implementation, extension, and county coordination grants. Officials said nearly 2,500 schools are participating and highlighted the statewide technical assistance structure, including the State Transformational Assistance Center, eight regional centers, county offices, and CDE support. Researchers from the Learning Policy Institute and UCLA presented early findings and implementation data. LPI reported reductions in chronic absenteeism and suspensions, along with gains in math and English language arts, with especially large benefits for Black students and other historically underserved groups. UCLA described the Annual Progress Report as a statewide improvement tool showing growth in capacity-building, shared decision-making, whole-child supports, and continuous improvement. Members asked about how the reports measure outcomes, how to interpret outliers, and how to distinguish community schools effects from other concurrent initiatives; presenters said matched comparison methods and deeper case-study work are being used, with additional statewide findings expected in June. Panelists from Oakland Unified, LAUSD/UTLA, San Diego Unified, and advocacy organizations described key elements of success: integrated student supports, strong family and student engagement, collaborative leadership, community partnerships, and school-site decision-making. They gave examples such as wellness centers, dual enrollment, student senates, parent leadership, and community campaigns that built trust and increased participation. Members also raised concerns about sustainability, implementation fidelity, and whether community schools improve participation in LCAP processes. Presenters said major barriers include unclear early guidance, the need for a mindset shift away from top-down models, and uncertainty about long-term funding for coordinators and other staff. The panel’s recommendations centered on stable ongoing funding, stronger technical assistance, shared governance, and embedding community schools practices into district and county systems.

Transcript Highlights:

• , okay, the licensed social worker test is too high a bar?
• <00:10:57.279> okay worker uh professional test okay worker uh professional test okay licensed
• So my other question was whether there's some other test that might be a better fit for the position,
• whether it's an academic test or practical skills test, that would actually just be more relevant to
• academic test or practical skills test academic test or practical skills test uh<00:22:09.919>

Keywords: 928, house, all

Summary: The subcommittee heard House Bill 2712, which would remove the exam requirement for licensure as a Licensed Social Work Associate (LSWA). Members expressed concern that the exam requirement was only added in 2021 and has not been in place long enough to evaluate, but they also questioned whether licensure should be granted without a meaningful measure of competency. Testimony was split: supporters argued the exam is a barrier for applicants without formal social work education, while opponents said licensure should still require some standard of competency, especially because the title carries public expectations and insurance reimbursement implications. Karina Bonia, speaking for NASW New Hampshire, said there is very limited data because only one person in New Hampshire currently holds an LSWA. She explained that LSWA applicants may have degrees outside social work, unlike licensed social workers, and that the current exam is the same national social work exam used for higher levels of licensure. She argued that this creates a significant barrier for LSWA applicants and noted that LSWA holders are already required to complete 30 hours of training and substantial supervised hours. Members asked for data on pass/fail rates and whether a different exam or practical skills test would be more appropriate. Committee members and OPLC representatives discussed whether the current statute and board rules already provide enough authority for the board to set other criteria, and whether the exam requirement is tied to the social work compact. OPLC indicated that the current rule requires passage of a national proctored exam approved by the board, but that no national exam exists specifically for this level, and that the board may need legislative authority to develop different criteria. The discussion ended with interest in obtaining the existing rule language and possibly revisiting the issue through amendment or future legislation rather than immediately removing the exam requirement.

Transcript Highlights:

• So come in and we'll give her a strep test and a flu test.” We tested her for both of them.
• So we did another test, and she tested positive.
• They had tested her. She had tested positive for strep.
• That's a $4 test, not a $50 to $100 test.
• That's a $4 test, not a $50 to $100 test.

Keywords: 1185, senate, all

Transcript Highlights:

• Can you talk about why testing is important versus, uh, actually getting a vaccine? Correct.
• So, um, testing and detection has regularly been found to be the number one way to, um, To prevent the
• If you remember Operation Warp Speed, that did not mean that we did, we, we went around the testing of
• That came out of that work was um the testing for COVID, how, how that was led.
• We're gonna test up, set up test beds at Reese Technology Center and EM effects on critical infrastructure

Transcript Highlights:

• Just run the tests. Are you willing to do that?
• Did he launch a stress test when inflation reached 40-year highs? No.
• I, for one, think CCAR and stress testing are broken.
• So, CCAR and stress tests.
• At the appropriateness of the way the stress tests have been implemented.

Keywords: legislation, housing affordability, financial regulation, public testimony, accountability, oversight

Summary: The meeting involved significant discussions around key legislative proposals, primarily focusing on various bills such as HB2 and SB5. The committee examined the implications of these bills on issues like housing affordability and financial regulation. Notable members engaged in debates, providing differing perspectives on the potential economic impacts of the proposed bills. The meeting witnessed public testimony, which included a call for accountability in government actions and oversight of current financial policies. Members echoed concerns about following through on commitments to address critical issues affecting everyday Americans.