Video & Transcript : 'DFPS budget' :
Page 88 of 500
AL
Alabama 2026 Regular Session
Alabama House Ways and Means Education Committee Apr 7th, 2026
Ways and Means Education
Transcript Highlights:
- They just moved to the budget.
- </c> It's a language change in the budget. It's a language change in the budget.
- That's all in the budget.
- It's been a great budget.
- </c><00:11:28.640><c> Um</c> budget." So, that's kind of a first. Um budget."
Keywords:
land bank, land bank authority, local land bank authority, Alabama Land Bank Authority, tax delinquent property, tax sale, tax lien, redemption period, quiet title, blight remediation, vacant property, foreclosure, ad valorem tax, property tax exemption, intergovernmental agreement, county government, municipal government, redevelopment, brownfields, floodplain management
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- We're not a budget-setting committee.
- branch budget.
- We're not a budget setting committee.
- We understand the budget limitations and the need to balance your budget, and even though this isn't
- We understand the budget limitations and the need to balance your budget, and even though this isn't
Summary:
The House Revenue and Taxation Committee heard House Bill 559, an Internal Revenue Code conformity bill presented by Rep. Jeff Ehlers. Ehlers said the measure would conform Idaho to most of the federal 2025 tax changes, provide tax cuts for Idaho individuals, and allow full expensing of new research and experimentation costs going forward while continuing amortization of prior years’ costs. He defended the fiscal note as reasonable at about $155 million in FY 2026 and $175 million in FY 2027, saying larger estimates included bonus depreciation, which Idaho is not conforming to. He also argued the bill fit within the state’s overall budget picture and was not a budget bill. Committee members questioned the treatment of R&E expenses, the timing of deductions, and the impact on the current budget year and possible cuts.
Public testimony was sharply divided. Supporters, including the Idaho Freedom Foundation, the Idaho Society of CPAs, the Associated Taxpayers of Idaho, and several business representatives, urged quick conformity for filing simplicity and tax certainty, though some said the bill should conform more fully, especially on business provisions. Mark Wynn and others argued the bill would still impose costs on innovative businesses by changing treatment of R&D-related deductions and credits. Opponents, including the Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy, NAMI Idaho, the League of Women Voters, disability advocates, seniors, clergy, parents, and individual taxpayers, warned the bill would reduce state revenue, threaten Medicaid, education, and other services, and shift costs to local governments and families. Several said the fiscal note was incomplete or unreliable because it did not fully account for all corporate and other tax provisions.
The chair limited testimony as time ran short, reducing remaining public testimony to one minute each so more people could speak. After public testimony, Rep. Ehlers closed by reiterating that the bill was about tax conformity, not budget cuts, and said the business-side changes were a timing issue rather than a denial of benefits. No committee vote or final action on the bill was taken in the portion of the hearing provided.
ID
Idaho 2026 Regular Session
Agenda Mar 2nd, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- I am a budget and policy analyst with the Legislative Services Office.
- You have before you the requested budget for the health education programs.
- Beginning with the FY 2027 JFAC program maintenance budget...
- And that may need to be done when we do the K-12 budget.
- Beginning with FY 2027 JFAC program maintenance budget, add 1.4.
Summary:
The committee took up a series of FY 2027 budget items, beginning with health education programs. Members approved additional general fund support and FTPs for psychiatry residents, a Burley family medicine resident, a family medicine OB fellowship, additional family medicine residents, child psychiatry residents at the University of Utah, and a veterinary education FTP adjustment. They then approved language to shift fellowship funding to the rural health transformation program if available, with debate focused on whether that money should instead be reserved for broader rural health needs; the language ultimately passed despite objections.
The Office of the State Board of Education budget was approved with funding for Canvas LMS renewal, transfer of risk managers to institutions, and a federal post-secondary education grant. In the colleges and universities budget, a substitute motion to add general fund support and restore a rescission failed, but the original motion passed, providing dedicated funds for endowment adjustments and restoring the FY 2027 rescission. Community colleges were then considered, and a motion to reduce the Canvas LMS item and leave the rescission unfilled failed; the original motion restoring the rescission passed. The committee also approved a one-time Career Ready Students Fund appropriation for secondary CTE programs, then later approved a separate one-time Career Ready Students Fund increase for Idaho Division of Career Technical Education secondary programs after rejecting a general fund substitute.
The Department of Administration budget drew the most debate. Members discussed utilities transfers, new procurement staff for Medicaid managed care contracting, training and administrative support transfers, inflationary utilities costs, IT hardware, and a vacancy adjustment correction. The committee rejected the motion, largely over concerns about the Medicaid procurement staffing request. It then approved the Permanent Building Fund budget, including state match for a Bonneville County National Guard Readiness Center design and replacement items for public works projects, along with standard language and reporting language by unanimous consent. Finally, the State Lottery budget was approved for $25,800 in replacement items for design equipment. The committee adjourned after announcing the next meeting schedule.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee Feb 4th, 2026
Budget and Fiscal Review
Transcript Highlights:
- Today, we will hear an early action bill, Assembly Bill 106, a budget bill junior amending the 2025 Budget
- amends the 2025 Budget Act, as was stated.
- Budget year.
- Now, a budget is a statement.
- And in the current budget and the proposal for the upcoming budget, a goose egg well describes the amount
Summary:
The Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee heard AB 106, an early-action budget bill providing $90 million one-time General Fund to support reproductive health providers affected by the federal H.R. 1 prohibition on Medicaid funding. Department of Finance staff explained that the money would be administered as grants through the Department of Health Care Access and Information because affected providers can no longer bill Medi-Cal during the federal restriction, which lasts through July 4, 2026. Members also discussed why the amount increased from an earlier $60 million estimate, with Finance saying the figure was updated based on additional claims data and provider information.
The committee debate focused heavily on the policy implications of the funding. Supporters argued the bill is an emergency response to a targeted federal attack on Planned Parenthood and related family planning services, emphasizing that the funding would backfill non-abortion services such as cancer screenings, contraception, STI testing, mammograms, and prenatal care. Opponents questioned the use of General Fund dollars, the grant structure versus loans for other distressed providers, the Public Records Act exemption, and the bill’s priority compared with rural hospitals, developmental services, public safety, and other budget needs. Finance clarified that the federal funds at issue do not pay for abortion services and that the grant program would be open to eligible providers meeting criteria set by the department.
Public testimony was overwhelmingly in support from Planned Parenthood affiliates, Essential Access Health, Western Center on Law and Poverty, the California Medical Association, family physicians, OBGYN groups, and others, while some commenters used the opportunity to raise unrelated budget concerns such as Medi-Cal dental cuts, IHSS, and CalHome funding. After discussion, the committee approved AB 106 on a 12-4 vote and reported it out. The chair also noted that a later hearing would examine broader H.R. 1 impacts in more detail.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- Today we're here on HCR 25, which is a balanced budget amendment.
- I represent Balance Budget Now.
- balancing your checkbook, for instance, and balancing your budget.
- And so the reality is the budget isn't balanced.
- I wish that they would balance the budget.
Summary:
The committee first approved the minutes from January 29 and 30. It then took up HCR 25, a resolution calling for an Article V convention effort aimed at a balanced budget amendment. The sponsor and supporters argued that federal debt and annual deficits are unsustainable, that the resolution is intended to pressure Congress rather than actually convene a runaway convention, and that any amendment would still require ratification by 38 states. Supporters also said the proposal includes safeguards and a 10-year phase-in to avoid sudden tax hikes or program cuts.
Public testimony was split. Supporters included former officials, business leaders, and a student, who emphasized fiscal responsibility, intergenerational debt, and the need for states to act when Congress will not. Opponents, including the Idaho GOP chair and other speakers, warned that the resolution’s language explicitly contemplates a constitutional convention, that delegate selection and agenda limits are uncertain, and that a convention could exceed its intended scope. Several members questioned whether threatening a convention was appropriate or authentic, and whether a balanced budget amendment would force harmful cuts or tax increases.
After debate, Representative Boyle moved to hold HCR 25 in committee, but that substitute motion failed 9-4. The committee then voted on the original motion to send HCR 25 to the floor with a due pass recommendation, and that motion passed 9-4. The committee then adjourned.
FL
Florida 2026 Regular Session
Appropriations Committee on Pre-K - 12 Education Jan 14th, 2026
Appropriations Committee on Pre-K - 12 Education
Transcript Highlights:
- We are diving deep into budget policy.
- This is the governor's full $117.4 billion budget proposal.
- The Floridian First budget also includes increased funding in key areas of our FEFP budget.
- The Floridian First budget also includes increases in key areas of our FEFP budget: an increase of $100
- If you listen to the governor's budget presentation, If you listen to the governor's budget presentation
Summary:
The Senate Appropriations Committee on Pre-K-12 Education met to hear the governor’s fiscal year 2026-27 budget recommendations for education from the Office of Policy and Budget and the Department of Education. Shelby Salmons and Commissioner Stasi Kamoutsis outlined the governor’s proposed $117.4 billion state budget, including about $32.5 billion for education, with major emphasis on public schools and early learning. The presentation highlighted a $30.6 billion K-12 budget, a $486 million VPK program, continued funding for VPK Summer Bridge, TEACH, HIPPY, and Help Me Grow, as well as increases for teacher pay, base student allocation, mental health, school safety, civics education, and school hardening initiatives. The commissioner also cited a 92.2% statewide graduation rate and Florida’s national rankings in education and education freedom.
Senators used the question period to raise concerns about counselor staffing, mental health services, school closures, school choice oversight, the Guardian Program, data reporting, and school capacity. Senator Jones asked about counselor ratios, school closures in historically Black communities, and whether school choice schools are properly monitored for safety and instructional quality. Senator Osgood argued that mental health funding should support more clinical services on campuses, not just academic counselors, and Senator Bradley asked whether the centralized data repository includes scholarship students. Senator Gates praised the civics and debate funding and asked for more detail on the Guardian Program’s performance; the commissioner said 53 of 67 districts participate and described it as a successful safety option with sheriffs approving training. Senators Simon and Osgood also pressed for better use of the FISH report and more accurate space data to understand school capacity and right-sizing.
During public testimony, Pinellas County School Board member Laura Hine said her district is an A-rated district with no D or F schools, but spends far more on safety and mental health than it receives in state categorical funding. She said Florida’s mental health staffing ratio is about one counselor per 2,203 students, compared with a recommended one per 1,106, and urged the committee to consider funding full-day VPK statewide, estimating it would cost about $375 million. Committee members followed up on her comments about local flexibility and whether districts can shift funds to meet needs. The meeting ended after members thanked DOE and executive branch staff for the presentation, and the committee adjourned without taking any substantive vote on legislation.
MA
Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint Committee on Ways and Means Jun 21st, 2026 at 11:00 am
Joint Committee on Ways and Means
Transcript Highlights:
- I know that this budget reflects a decrease in funding to the soldiers' homes and the House 1 budget.
- We have to balance a budget.
- Specific budget items that speak to our budget. thousand four hundred individuals specific budget items
- Governor Healey’s fiscal year 2026 budget proposes a budget of $93.7 million, a $6.8 million increase
- Turning to MCB's fiscal year 26 budget, the budget includes $250,000 to create three new social work
Summary:
The hearing opened with remarks from Senate Chair Robyn Kennedy and House Chair Chynah Tyler, who emphasized that the fiscal year 2026 hearing was focused on the Health and Human Services budget, asked members to keep questions budget-related, and noted that no public testimony would be taken. They also highlighted the choice of Doherty Memorial High School as the venue to showcase Worcester’s investment in career and technical education. Committee members then introduced themselves before the first panel, the Executive Office of Veterans Services and the state veterans homes, began testimony.
Secretary John Santiago said the governor’s FY26 proposal would support implementation of the HERO Act, which he said is now about 95% implemented, including higher disabled veteran annuities, expanded behavioral health benefits, and other service expansions. He described efforts to reduce veteran homelessness, including nearly $20 million in ARPA-funded housing and outreach initiatives, and said the agency has delivered more than 100,000 supportive services to nearly 8,500 veterans. Leaders from the Chelsea and Holyoke veterans homes reported on staffing, quality measures, electronic medical records, and major construction projects at both facilities, including a new Chelsea campus and the new Holyoke home. Members asked about funding transfers, geographic equity in access to the homes, outreach to women veterans and veterans of color, suicide prevention, Gold Star family support, and the impact of federal uncertainty; Santiago said the homes are now licensed and certified, that the current budget is sufficient, and that the agency is expanding engagement and data collection.
The second panel, the Office of the Veteran Advocate, testified that its FY26 request is about $3.3 million, up from the current $2 million, to cover staffing, a larger office, and higher technology costs. Veteran Advocate Bob Notch said the office is a new independent oversight agency created in 2022 to examine systems, coordinate with local veteran service officers, and investigate fatalities or serious harm involving veterans in state care. He said the office’s work depends on research, data, and collaboration with other agencies, and that current funding is only enough for minimum operations. In response to questions, Notch and Deputy Commissioner David O’Callaghan discussed the difficulty of tracking veteran suicides, the need for better data across agencies, and the office’s role as an oversight body rather than a direct service provider. No votes or formal actions were taken during the hearing.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 4 on Climate Crisis, Resources, Energy, and Transportation Apr 22nd, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- In addition to ongoing budget cuts and just their proposed budget for this year, at the top line is about
- Not in the budget as it stands.
- I think at our peak, because of a budget that was a multi-year budget a few years ago, there was a total
- They instructed Finance to look at all of the budget items, and so we looked at all of the budget items
- I don't want to leave budget...
MO
Transcript Highlights:
- I think budget planning is producing a spreadsheet that they'll distribute, and the budget director will
- , assuming that they're approved in the FY 27 budget, to get those additional staff in DESE's budget,
- Our DOC budget chair, budget person, director. Thank you.
- And so I will mention that our budget this year is less than our budget last year. It is. It is.
- The lottery's FY27 budget begins on page 241 of your budget book.
LA
Louisiana 2026 Regular Session
JLCB Jan 23rd, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- Colleen Gill with the Office of Planning and Budget.
- and the non-discretionary adjusted standstill budget.
- the non-discretionary adjusted standstill budget.
- It's a total increase of 2.8% to LDH's budget.
- But the budget number is significant, correct?
Summary:
The committee first took up the fiscal status statement, certification of the state surplus, and the five-year baseline budget. Officials from the Office of Planning and Budget and the Division of Administration said the January fiscal status statement had no changes, and the commissioner certified a surplus of $577,073,871. They also reviewed the baseline outlook, noting projected imbalances in later years driven by declining revenue, including the redirection of motor vehicle sales tax, and rising costs such as inflation and Medicaid-related expenses. The fiscal status statement was approved without objection.
The governor’s executive budget was then presented as a third consecutive standstill budget, with administration officials emphasizing efficiency savings, no reduction in services, and no reduction in state workforce. They said the budget relies on prior savings efforts and incorporates agency-level cuts and reorganization, while also addressing higher costs in corrections, DCFS, and health care. Major items highlighted included funding for LA GATOR, the high-impact jobs program, DCFS modernization, corrections population and overtime needs, nursing home and managed care adjustments at LDH, and additional support for the MJ Foster Scholarship Program. Members asked about the impact of inflation, the use of federal versus state funds, the future of voucher and GATOR funding, and whether more support should go to DCFS and the Hero Fund.
The committee also received the calculation of the FY27 expenditure limit, set at $20.1 billion, and the annual comprehensive financial report for FY2025, which received a clean audit opinion. Members approved a BA-7 increasing federal funds for an executive office transportation grant, approved additions to the Act 751 higher education deferred maintenance project list and a Baton Rouge Community College project combination, and approved contract amendments for CPRA with Coastal Estuary Services and Access Sciences. The committee also corrected a legislative intent item naming the New Orleans Recreational Development Foundation. Finally, the judiciary presented a weighted caseload study for district and appellate courts, explaining it as an updated tool to assess judicial workload and potential judgeship needs; members discussed its limits, the role of specialty courts and commissioners, and the need for further legislative-judicial collaboration before any changes are made.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 3 on Education Finance Apr 29th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- How much was budgeted? Let's start with that. 2024-25. How much was budgeted for this program?
- Beginning in the budget year, the Governor’s budget revises the funding methodology in an effort to:
- lower than what was estimated at the Budget Act.
- Are you speaking to the governor's budget? Yes.
- Those deferrals were adopted in the 2025-26 budget and continue to create out-year budget pressure for
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- I will current House budget resolution.
- ><c> resolution</c> move the current budget resolution move the current budget resolution 06.<00:02:17.840
- </c><00:02:50.560><c> resolution</c> If you're looking at budget resolution If you're looking at budget
- </c><00:09:53.200><c> that</c> matter is, folks, we have a budget that matter is, folks, we have a budget
- </c><00:12:51.520><c> bill,</c> the Human Services budget bill, the Human Services budget bill, uh<00
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Committee Feb 17th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- budget acts.
- 25 budget acts.
- , the 2025 Budget Act, ...
- Section 91, which was included in the current-year budget, the 2025 Budget Act, required the Department
- So for the benefit of my colleagues on Budget that are not part of Budget Sub 4, the key topic that we
Summary:
The Assembly Budget Committee held an informational hearing on two early-action budget bills. AB 107 would make mostly technical corrections to prior budget acts, including extending deadlines, fixing fiscal language, moving $20 million for California travel and tourism promotion from Visit California to GoBiz, and making changes related to Proposition 4 climate bond funding. A key provision would exempt development of program guidelines and selection criteria for certain 2025 climate bond appropriations from the Administrative Procedure Act, which supporters said would speed implementation of wildfire prevention and other projects. Members raised concerns about oversight, competitive bidding, and whether vendors and safeguards were sufficient, while public commenters from water, climate, and conservation groups strongly supported the APA exemption and urged similar treatment for future allocations.
AB 117 would authorize up to $590 million in short-term loans for four Bay Area transit agencies: BART, Muni, Caltrain, and AC Transit. Finance explained that the loan would be administered through MTC using Bay Area TIRCP funds that have been awarded but not yet allocated, making the structure cost-neutral to the state. The loan would run 12 years, with the first two years interest-only, and repayment would be secured through state transit assistance funds if needed. Several members questioned whether the proposal amounted to a bailout, whether it was fair to prioritize the Bay Area, and whether the structure adequately protected other projects, especially BART to Silicon Valley Phase 2; Finance and committee staff said safeguards and monitoring provisions were included and that no state funds were at risk.
Public testimony was largely supportive of both bills. Transit agencies and local officials said the loan would provide bridge financing as ridership remains below pre-pandemic levels, while allowing service improvements and major events to continue. San Jose representatives and some members asked for possible cleanup language to better protect large regional capital projects. The chair said the committee anticipated hearing the bills on the floor later in the week, and the hearing was adjourned after public comment.
WA
Washington 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Floor Session Mar 12th, 2026 at 07:00 pm
Washington Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Many of these comments I made on final passage of the Senate supplemental operating budget, and the budget
- It does take $880 million from the budget stabilization account to help the budget balance, which is
- I'm rising in strong support of this budget.
- When we look at the four-year budget and the six-year budget, to look at these kinds of deficits, they
- This is not the most challenging budget of the last 35. this is not the most challenging budget of the
Keywords:
returning bills to house of origin, sine die, end of session, legislative procedure, Rules Committee, third reading, unfinished business, pending bills, joint resolutions, concurrent resolutions, joint memorials, special session, bill numbering, legislative records, House of Representatives, Senate, Washington Legislature, session adjournment, procedural resolution, 904
ND
North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session
Senate Appropriations - Human Resources Division Apr 9th, 2025 at 09:30 am
Appropriations - Human Resources Division
Transcript Highlights:
- side of this budget.
- I'm fine doing this in the OMB budget. I'm fine doing this in the OMB budget.
- in balance so that you're not having one budget 30% and one budget 10%.
- 30% and one budget 10%.
- No, but I mean half of our budget. Oh, more than half of the budget is federal funds.
Bills:
SB2399
Keywords:
mental health, psychiatric treatment, reimbursement, medical assistance, legislative report, 908, all
Summary:
The Senate Appropriations HR Division met to work through amendments and budget items in House Bill 2012/HB 1004, focusing first on long-term care, disability services, and behavioral health. Members discussed competing approaches to a four-plex for medically complex individuals, a value-based care payment withhold for nursing facilities, accreditation requirements for providers, a study of developmental disability services, and funding for Family Voices and Ann Carlson-related services. Several amendments were accepted or set aside after discussion, including a study amendment for disability services and a Family Voices grant amendment that was adjusted to remove “one-time” language so it could continue as an ongoing grant. The committee also agreed to keep or defer some items for conference committee, including the youth crisis stabilization pilot and other long-term care proposals.
A major discussion centered on the state hospital project. Members debated whether the $330 million project should remain in the DHS budget or be moved to the OMB budget for construction management. After discussion of costs, alternates, and the role of a steering committee and BND loan language, the committee agreed to remove the state hospital funding and related loan language from the DHS budget while leaving the steering committee language in place. The committee also considered a proposed Altru grant for additional beds and settled on a smaller planning-focused approach, with a $1 million grant and a line of credit concept to be refined later.
The committee then turned to behavioral health items, including QRTP funding, nursing home behavioral health training, and a youth crisis stabilization pilot. Members generally supported keeping the QRTP funding level, but were divided on the nursing home behavioral health training and the crisis stabilization pilot, with some preferring to leave those issues for conference committee. The division also reviewed the HHS block grant and underfunding structure, with Donna Ackland explaining salary, vacancy, and flexibility calculations; the committee discussed adjusting the underfund and revenue assumptions but did not finalize every number before moving on.
Finally, the committee took up House Bill 1577 on wastewater treatment grants. Senator Davison moved to hoghouse the bill into a study-focused version using the proposed amendment language, and the motion passed. The committee then moved HB 1577 as amended with a do pass recommendation; the roll call passed with Senators Cleary, Davison, Dever, and Mathern voting yes, and Senator Magrum not recorded as voting. The meeting adjourned with plans to return later in the day to continue budget work.
KY
Kentucky 2026 Regular Session
House Standing Committee on Appropriations and Revenue (2-25-26) - Upon Adjournment of the House
Appropriations & Revenue
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> first want to recognize our budget first want to recognize our budget review<00:02:37.680><c> subchairs
- </c> and and move the budget process along. and and move the budget process along.
- </c> I'm going to take note there are multiple budget units where we have removed budget language in
- ’s budget or the cabinet request.
- Uh you can't budget to in our budgets.
ID
Transcript Highlights:
- If that was to go away, I'm assuming this wouldn't be over the whole budget then.
- Just, if we started doing individual budgets again, what would happen, I guess?
- I don't think anybody in here takes that attitude towards budgeting.
- We have struggled with what a maintenance budget is among JFAC committee.
- We have struggled with what a maintenance budget is among J-FAC committee.
Summary:
The Senate Finance Committee heard presentation of Senate Bill 1252, the “ROGUE Act” (Restraint of Government-Uncontrolled Expansion), by Senator Dan Foreman. The bill would limit annual increases in the maintenance budgets of state entities to the average CPI-U increase for the western U.S., while allowing exceptions for exigent circumstances, federally mandated costs, and operational needs. Foreman said the measure was intended as a statement of intent and a budgeting target, not a hard cap, and said it had been coordinated with JFAC leadership and LSO staff.
Committee members raised several concerns, including whether the bill would affect employee compensation, whether it could interfere with JFAC’s appropriations authority, how exemptions would be determined, and whether CPI is a reliable measure of inflation. Members also questioned the lack of a clear definition of “maintenance budget” and whether the bill adequately accounts for population growth and past recession-related budget cuts. Foreman responded that the bill was meant to preserve flexibility for JFAC and would not prevent necessary increases when operational needs require them.
Overall, the committee expressed interest in the concept but said the proposal was not yet ready to move forward because of unresolved issues around the definition of maintenance budgets and the practical effect of the cap. No vote was taken, and the meeting adjourned after discussion.
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 6 on Public Safety Mar 2nd, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- The first is that it limits budget transparency.
- to pay its bills—as well as how is it planning to make room in its budget in the budget year to free
- make room in its budget in the budget year to free up money, as well as what the programmatic implications
- It's the budget process.
- Sarah Larson, director division of Watch budget proposals.
MN
Transcript Highlights:
- </c> budget resolution labeled BUD S02. budget resolution labeled BUD S02.
- </c> budget resolution. budget resolution.
- </c> aside from the uh finance budget bills. aside from the uh finance budget bills.
- </c> Bud Res 2, the House budget resolution. Bud Res 2, the House budget resolution.
- The budget resolution is Thank you. The budget resolution is passed. passed. passed.
Bills:
HF601
Keywords:
agriculture, depredation compensation, livestock, crop damage, elk, wolves, wildlife management, 1183, house
CA
California 2025-2026 Regular Session
Assembly Budget Subcommittee No. 5 on State Administration May 19th, 2026
Transcript Highlights:
- The budget change proposal reflected in the Governor's budget provided additional resources for the CWDB
- However, at the Governor's Budget, we were looking in the budget window and the projected fund balance
- So you're budgeting for extra time, so you don't have to come back to this budget. Correct.
- from the 2023 Budget Act.
- from the 2023 Budget Act.